In-Silico Studies toward the Improvement of the Antibacterial Activity of Pristinamycin IIB †
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Discussion
3. Conclusions
Acknowledgments
References
- Mast, Y.; Wohlleben, W. Streptogramins-Two are better than one! Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2014, 304, 44–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fass, R.J. In vitro activity of RP 59500, a semisynthetic injectable pristinamycin, against Staphylococci, Streptococci, and Enterococci. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1991, 35, 553–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Moellering, R.C. Discovering new antimicrobial agents. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2011, 37, 2–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mezghani Maalej, S.; Malbruny, B.; Leclercq, R.; Hammami, A. Emergence of Staphylococcus aureus strains resistant to pristinamycin in Sfax (Tunisia). Pathol. Biol. 2012, 60, e71–e74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Thal, L.A.; Zervos, M.J. Occurrence and epidemiology of resistance to virginiamycin and streptogramins. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 1999, 43, 171–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Van de Waterbeemd, H.; Gifford, E. ADMET in silico modelling: Towards prediction paradise? Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2003, 2, 192–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Daina, A.; Michielin, O.; Zoete, V. SwissADME: A free web tool to evaluate pharmacokinetics, drug-likeness and medicinal chemistry friendliness of small molecules. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 42717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Brenk, R.; Schipani, A.; James, D.; Krasowski, A.; Gilbert, I.H.; Frearson, J.; Wyatt, P.G. Lessons learnt from assembling screening libraries for drug discovery for neglected diseases. ChemMedChem 2008, 3, 435–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Teague, S.J.; Davis, A.M.; Leeson, P.D.; Oprea, T. The design of leadlike combinatorial libraries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 3743–3748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Pristinamycin IIB | Analogue 1 | Analogue 2 | |
---|---|---|---|
Physicochemical roperties | |||
Formula | C28H37N3O7 | C28H35F2N3O7 | C28H33F2N5O6 |
Molecular weight | 527.61 g/mol | 563.59 g/mol | 573.59 g/mol |
No. heavy atoms | 38 | 40 | 41 |
No. arom. heavy atoms | 5 | 5 | 11 |
Fraction Csp | 0.54 | 0.54 | 0.50 |
No. rotatable bonds | 1 | 1 | 1 |
No. H-bond acceptors | 8 | 10 | 10 |
No. H-bond donors | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Molar Refractivity | 148.14 | 148.28 | 149.66 |
TPSA | 139.04 Å2 | 139.04 Å2 | 143.72 Å2 |
Lipophilicity | |||
Consensus Log Po/w | 1.91 | 2.36 | 1.78 |
Water Solubility | |||
Log S (ESOL) | −4.64 | −5.32 | −5.29 |
Solubility | 1.22 × 10−2 mg/mL; 2.31 × 10−5 mol/L | 2.70 × 10−3 mg/mL; 4.79 × 10−6 mol/L | 2.97 × 10−3 mg/mL; 5.17 × 10−6 mol/L |
Class | Moderately soluble | Moderately soluble | Moderately soluble |
Log S (Ali) | −4.93 | −5.70 | −5.46 |
Solubility | 6.19 × 10−3 mg/mL; 1.17 × 10−5 mol/L | 1.13 × 10−3 mg/mL; 2.00 × 10−6 mol/L | 1.97 × 10−3 mg/mL; 3.43 × 10−6 mol/L |
Class | Moderately soluble | Moderately soluble | Moderately soluble |
Log S (SILICOS-IT) | −4.19 | −4.70 | −5.21 |
Solubility | 3.38 × 10−2 mg/mL; 6.40 × 10−5 mol/L | 1.13 × 10−2 mg/mL; 2.01 × 10−5 mol/L | 3.50 × 10−3 mg/mL; 6.11 × 10−6 mol/L |
Class | Moderately soluble | Moderately soluble | Moderately soluble |
Pharmacokinetics | |||
GI absorption | High | Low | Low |
BBB permeant | No | No | No |
P-gp substrate | Yes | Yes | Yes |
CYP1A2 inhibitor | No | No | No |
CYP2C19 inhibito | No | No | No |
CYP2C9 inhibitor | No | No | No |
CYP2D6 inhibitor | No | No | No |
CYP3A4 inhibitor | No | Yes | No |
Drug-likeness | |||
Lipinski | Yes | Yes | No |
Ghose | No | No | No |
Veber | Yes | Yes | No |
Egan | No | No | No |
Muegge | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Bioavailability Score | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.17 |
Medicinal Chemistry | |||
PAINS | 0 alert | 0 alert | 0 alert |
Brenk | 0 alert | 0 alert | 0 alert |
Lead-likeness | No; 1 violation: MW > 350 | No; 1 violation: MW > 350 | No; 1 violation: MW > 350 |
Synthetic accessibility | 6.92 | 6.97 | 6.88 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Chebieb, A.; Ziani-Cherif, C.; Bellifa, K. In-Silico Studies toward the Improvement of the Antibacterial Activity of Pristinamycin IIB. Chem. Proc. 2022, 8, 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecsoc-25-11703
Chebieb A, Ziani-Cherif C, Bellifa K. In-Silico Studies toward the Improvement of the Antibacterial Activity of Pristinamycin IIB. Chemistry Proceedings. 2022; 8(1):13. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecsoc-25-11703
Chicago/Turabian StyleChebieb, Assia, Chewki Ziani-Cherif, and Khadidja Bellifa. 2022. "In-Silico Studies toward the Improvement of the Antibacterial Activity of Pristinamycin IIB" Chemistry Proceedings 8, no. 1: 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/ecsoc-25-11703