Next Article in Journal
Cyber–Physical System for Traffic Sign Detection and Recognition
Previous Article in Journal
Enhancing Insider Malware Detection Accuracy with Machine Learning Algorithms
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Homogeneous vs. Heterogeneous Photo-Fenton Processes in the Treatment of Winery Wastewater †

1
Centro de Química de Vila Real (CQVR), Departamento de Química, Universidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (UTAD), Quinta de Prados, 5001-801 Vila Real, Portugal
2
Centro de Química de Vila Real (CQVR), Departamento de Agronomia, Universidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (UTAD), Quinta de Prados, 5001-801 Vila Real, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 4th International Electronic Conference on Applied Sciences, 27 October–10 November 2023; Available online: https://asec2023.sciforum.net/.
Eng. Proc. 2023, 56(1), 288; https://doi.org/10.3390/ASEC2023-15405
Published: 27 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 4th International Electronic Conference on Applied Sciences)

Abstract

:
The winery industry generates large volumes of wastewater which can be toxic if released to the environment without proper treatment. The aim of this work was to treat two winery wastewaters (from red and white wine production) using Fenton-based processes. With the application of the best operational conditions, namely, pH = 3.0, [ferrocene] = [FeSO4•7H2O] = 0.50 g/L, [H2O2] = 155 mM, temperature = 298 K, and radiation UV (254 nm), to the treatment of a red WW, a chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal of 98.9 and 84.5% for the homogeneous and heterogeneous photo-Fenton processes, respectively, was achieved. The same conditions were applied in the treatment of a white WW and a 98.9 and 84.5% COD removal was achieved. Based on the results, it can be deduced that homogeneous and heterogeneous Fenton-based processes are effective in organic carbon removal, UV-C radiation is essential in hydroxyl radical ( HO ) generation, and the multiple addition of H2O2 reduces HO scavenging. Finally, it is concluded that both the homogeneous and heterogeneous photo-Fenton processes are effective for red and white WW treatment.

1. Introduction

The demand for high volumes of wine by consumers leads to the poor management of winery wastewater (WW) by viticulture and winemaking industries. WW is produced from the rinsing and steaming of grapes, and the washing of barrels and other equipment used in winemaking; if released into the environment, it can cause oxygen depletion in watercourses and oxygen imbalance in soil, while the polyphenolics present phytotoxic and antibacterial properties [1,2,3]. Due to the high organic carbon present in WW and the low biodegradability characterizing these types of wastewaters, advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) can be applied as an efficient treatment. In AOPs, hydroxyl radicals ( HO ), with an oxidation potential = 2.8 eV, are generated via a number of processes, that can react with the pollutants (rate constant: 109 M−1 S−1), breaking molecular bonds to obtain smaller molecular fragments and oxidizing them to simpler intermediates and possibly to CO2 and H2O [4]. Among the AOPs, homogeneous Fenton-based processes were observed to be efficient in the treatment of WW [5]. Some drawbacks were associated with homogeneous Fenton processes such as (1) the application of low pH to prevent metal precipitation; moreover, (2) the homogeneous catalyst has to be removed from the treated wastewater; and (3) the resulting wastewater must be neutralized to meet the legal discharge limits imposed (pH 6.0–9.0) [6]. Heterogeneous Fenton processes can overcome these issues, as demonstrated by recent studies. Moreover, the recycling of the catalyst can be achieved, leading to a decrease in treatment costs [7,8]. Starting from these considerations, and with the aim to compare efficiency in this work, the application of ferrocene, a catalyst able to release ferrous ions in aqueous solutions, was tested.

2. Material and methods

2.1. Reagents

Ferrocene (Fc), iron(II) sulfate heptahydrate (FeSO4•7H2O), H2O2 (30% w/w), NaOH and H2SO4 (95%) were supplied by José Manuel Gomes dos Santos, Portugal. Deionized water was used to prepare the respective solutions.

2.2. Analytical Determinations

The red and white WW were collected from a Portuguese winery production unity located in the Douro region (northeastern Portugal), placed in small containers, and cooled at −40 °C until use. Different physical-chemical parameters were determined in order to characterize the WW, including turbidity, total suspended solids (TSS), chemical oxygen demand (COD), biological oxygen demand (BOD5), and total polyphenols (TPh). The main wastewater characteristics are shown in Table 1.

2.3. Experimental Procedure

The photocatalytic experiments were performed in a batch cylindrical photoreactor (500 mL) equipped with a UV-C low pressure mercury vapor lamp (TNN 15/32)—working power = 15 W (795.8 W m−2) and λmax = 254 nm (Heraeus, Hanau, Germany). For homogeneous catalysis, FeSO4 was employed (catalyst dissolved in water), and for heterogeneous catalysis, ferrocene (Fc) was used. Fc is an Fe2+ inducer, that does not dissolve in water. Initially, red WW was treated by testing the application of (1) H2O2, Fc, and FeSO4 alone, (2) FeSO4 + H2O2 and Fc + H2O2, (3) UV-C, UV-C + H2O2, and (4) FeSO4 + H2O2 + UV-C and Fc + H2O2 + UV-C (the H2O2 was tested in single and multiple addition modes). The percentage of turbidity, TSS, TPh, COD, and BOD5 (Xi) removed through was calculated according to Equation (1) [9,10], as follows:
X i = C i C f C i   ×   100
where Ci and Cf are the initial and final concentrations, respectively. Experiments were performed in triplicate and average values were compared using Tukey’s test, with OriginLab 2022, version 9.9 software (Northampton, MA, USA).

3. Results and Discussions

Fenton-Based Process Optimization
The WW was observed to have a low biodegradability (Table 1), thus a chemical process is the best alternative treatment. In this work, several Fenton-based processes were tested in red WW, to study their efficiency in COD removal. The oxidation processes were initially optimized (data not shown) by the variation of the pH (3.0–7.0), H2O2 concentration (78–233 mM), and catalyst concentration (0.25–1.0 g/L), and the best operational conditions were selected: pH = 3.0, [FC] = [FeSO4] = 0.50 g/L, [H2O2] = 155 mM, temperature = 298 K, and radiation UV (254 nm) (Figure 1). As shown in Figure 2a, the ferrous sulfate and Fc were added alone to the WW. The iron is usually applied in coagulation–flocculation–decantation (CFD) [11], and it requires fast and slow mixing steps for floc production. However, due to continuous agitation, the flocs were shattered and as a result, low COD was removed. The Fc is a porous material, and some COD was absorbed by this material, reaching 8.9% COD removal. The H2O2 has an oxidation potential of 1.77 V; however, alone it is unable to generate hydroxyl radicals ( HO ), and thus only 1.2% COD removal was observed.
In Figure 2b, the homogeneous vs. heterogeneous Fenton processes are shown. The results showed a COD removal of 10.7 and <0.5%, respectively. When the H2O2 consumption was analyzed, a consumption of 1.9 and 55.0 mM, respectively, was observed. The homogeneous Fenton process has the ferrous iron available, while the ferrocene has a slow release; thus, the higher efficiency of the homogeneous Fenton process is explained. Considering that ferrocene is a porous material, part of the H2O2 applied could have been absorbed into the catalyst.
To increase the COD removal, UV-C radiation can be applied. Figure 2c shows the application of UV-C and UV-C + H2O2. The results showed a COD removal of 2.3 and 15.3%, respectively. These results are due to the higher production of HO radicals by the degradation of H2O2 by the radiation. UV-C alone is not capable of generating HO radicals; thus, very little COD was removed. These results were in agreement with the work of Tan et al. [12], who observed no removal of RB5 with the application of UV radiation and an increase in RB5 removal with the application of H2O2 + UV.
As a final step, the UV-C + H2O2 + catalyst was combined in homogeneous and heterogeneous photo-Fenton processes (Figure 2d). To understand the effect of the oxidant agent, the H2O2 was applied in single and multiple addition during the reaction. The results showed that with single addition, COD removal reached 76.6 and 24.2%, respectively, for the homogeneous and heterogeneous photo-Fenton processes. With the application of multiple addition, COD removal reached 98.9 and 84.5%, respectively. It is clear that the application of H2O2 in multiple addition allows the H2O2 to be in the solution for a longer time and at the same time avoids radical scavenging due to the excess of H2O2. In the work of Rodríguez-Chueca et al. [13], it was observed that the addition of H2O2 in multiple dosage increased the efficiency of the photo-Fenton process in COD removal from WW. The best operational conditions were applied to white WW (Figure 3), and results showed a COD removal of 98.9 and 84.5%, respectively. A similar adaptation was performed by Jorge et al. [14,15], with results showing the high organic carbon removal and low energy consumption of the UV systems.
In Figure 4, it is shown that the homogeneous and heterogeneous photo-Fenton processes have a high efficiency in turbidity and TSS removal in both red and white WW. The homogeneous photo-Fenton process showed a significant removal of TPh, COD, and BOD5 compared to the heterogeneous photo-Fenton process, most likely due to the rapid availability of iron. In the work of Jorge et al. [16], it was observed that the application of a photo-Fenton process increased the removal of turbidity, TSS, TPh, COD, and BOD5, similar to the results of this work. The biodegradability was analyzed, with results showing 0.50, 0.85, 0.79, and 0.54, respectively, for the homogeneous photo-Fenton (red and white WW) and heterogeneous photo-Fenton (red and white WW) processes, and thus it can be perceived that both processes enhance the biodegradability of the WW.

4. Conclusions

The COD of WW can be efficiently degraded using homogeneous and heterogeneous photo-Fenton processes. Based on the results, it is concluded that UV-C radiation is essential to achieve the 150 mg O2/L COD, corresponding to the Portuguese legislation. It is also concluded that the application of H2O2 in multiple addition enhances the degradation of COD and reduces the scavenging effect. Finally, it is concluded that ferrocene is a suitable catalyst with similar capacity to ferrous sulfate, able to remove significant percentages of turbidity, TSS, TPh, COD, and BOD5, and increase the biodegradability of wastewater.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.J., S.S., A.P. and A.R.T.; methodology, N.J.; software, N.J.; validation, N.J., A.R.T., S.S., A.P., M.S.L. and J.A.P.; formal analysis, N.J.; investigation, N.J.; resources, N.J.; data curation, N.J.; writing—original draft preparation, N.J.; writing—review and editing, N.J., M.S.L. and J.A.P.; visualization, N.J., M.S.L. and J.A.P.; supervision, M.S.L. and J.A.P.; project administration, M.S.L. and J.A.P.; funding acquisition, M.S.L. and J.A.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors are grateful for the financial support of the Project AgriFood XXI NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000041 and Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) to CQVR (UIDB/00616/2020). Ana R. Teixeira also thanks the FCT for the financial support provided through the doctoral scholarship UI/BD/150847/2020. This work was also financially supported by the project “Vine and Wine Portugal—Driving Sustainable Growth Through Smart Innovation” with reference number C644866286-011, co-financed by the Recovery and Resilience Plan (RRP) and NextGeneration EU Funds.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ngwenya, N.; Gaszynski, C.; Ikumi, D. A Review of Winery Wastewater Treatment: A Focus on UASB Biotechnology Optimisation and Recovery Strategies. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 108172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Davididou, K.; Frontistis, Z. Advanced Oxidation Processes for the Treatment of Winery Wastewater: A Review and Future Perspectives. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2021, 96, 2436–2450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jorge, N.; Santos, C.; Teixeira, A.R.; Marchão, L.; Tavares, P.B.; Lucas, M.S.; Peres, J.A. Treatment of Agro-Industrial Wastewaters by Coagulation-Flocculation-Decantation and Advanced Oxidation Processes—A Literature Review. Eng. Proc. 2022, 19, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bello, M.M.; Raman, A.A.A.; Asghar, A. A Review on Approaches for Addressing the Limitations of Fenton Oxidation for Recalcitrant Wastewater Treatment. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2019, 126, 119–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lucas, M.S.; Mosteo, R.; Maldonado, M.I.; Malato, S.; Peres, J.A. Solar Photochemical Treatment of Winery Wastewater in a CPC Reactor. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 11242–11248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Guimarães, V.; Teixeira, A.R.; Lucas, M.S.; Silva, A.M.T.; Peres, J.A. Pillared Interlayered Natural Clays as Heterogeneous Photocatalysts for H2O2-Assisted Treatment of a Winery Wastewater. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2019, 228, 115768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Jorge, N.; Teixeira, A.R.; Lucas, M.S.; Peres, J.A. Combination of Adsorption in Natural Clays and Photo-Catalytic Processes for Winery Wastewater Treatment. In Advances in Geoethics and Groundwater Management: Theory and Practice for a Sustainable Development; Abrunhosa, M., Chambel, A., Peppoloni, S., Chaminé, H.I., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 291–294. ISBN 978-3-030-59320-9. [Google Scholar]
  8. Cheng, A.; He, Y.; Liu, X.; He, C. Honeycomb-like biochar framework coupled with Fe3O4/FeS nanoparticles as efficient heterogeneous Fenton catalyst for phenol degradation. J. Environ. Sci. 2024, 136, 390–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Jorge, N.; Teixeira, A.R.; Lucas, M.S.; Peres, J.A. Agro-Industrial Wastewater Treatment with Acacia dealbata Coagulation/Flocculation and Photo-Fenton-Based Processes. Recycling 2022, 7, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rahmah, A.U.; Harimurti, S.; Murugesan, T. Experimental investigation on the effect of wastewater matrix on oxytetracycline mineralization using UV/H2O2 system. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 14, 1225–1233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Amaral-Silva, N.; Martins, R.C.; Paiva, C.; Castro-Silva, S.; Quinta-Ferreira, R.M. A New Winery Wastewater Treatment Approach during Vintage Periods Integrating Ferric Coagulation, Fenton Reaction and Activated Sludge. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2016, 4, 2207–2215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tan, W.; Ai, J.; Fan, Y.; Liu, X.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, H.; Huang, Y.H. Enhanced Mineralization of Reactive Black 5 by Waste Iron Oxide via Photo-Fenton Process. Res. Chem. Intermed. 2020, 46, 4423–4431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rodríguez-Chueca, J.; Amor, C.; Silva, T.; Dionysiou, D.D.; Li, G.; Lucas, M.S.; Peres, J.A. Treatment of Winery Wastewater by Sulphate Radicals: HSO5-/Transition Metal/UV-A LEDs. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 310, 473–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Jorge, N.; Teixeira, A.R.; Lucas, M.S.; Peres, J.A. Enhancement of EDDS-Photo-Fenton Process with Plant-Based Coagulants for Winery Wastewater Management. Environ. Res. 2023, 229, 116021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Jorge, N.; Teixeira, A.R.; Lucas, M.S.; Peres, J.A. Combined Organic Coagulants and Photocatalytic Processes for Winery Wastewater Treatment. J. Environ. Manag. 2023, 326, 116819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Johnson, M.B.; Mehrvar, M. Treatment of Actual Winery Wastewater by Fenton-like Process: Optimization to Improve Organic Removal, Reduce Inorganic Sludge Production and Enhance Co-Treatment at Municipal Wastewater Treatment Facilities. Water 2021, 14, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic mechanism suggested for ferrocene releasing/absorption of ferrous iron in the photo-Fenton process.
Figure 1. Schematic mechanism suggested for ferrocene releasing/absorption of ferrous iron in the photo-Fenton process.
Engproc 56 00288 g001
Figure 2. Effect of (a) H2O2, FeSO4 and Fc, (b) FeSO4 + H2O2 and Fc + H2O2, (c) UV-C, UV-C + H2O2, and (d) FeSO4 + H2O2 + UV-C and Fc + H2O2 + UV-C on COD removal and H2O2 consumption. S.A.—single addition of H2O2; M.A.—multiple addition of H2O2.
Figure 2. Effect of (a) H2O2, FeSO4 and Fc, (b) FeSO4 + H2O2 and Fc + H2O2, (c) UV-C, UV-C + H2O2, and (d) FeSO4 + H2O2 + UV-C and Fc + H2O2 + UV-C on COD removal and H2O2 consumption. S.A.—single addition of H2O2; M.A.—multiple addition of H2O2.
Engproc 56 00288 g002
Figure 3. Application of the homogeneous and heterogeneous photo-Fenton processes to (a) red WW, and (b) white WW.
Figure 3. Application of the homogeneous and heterogeneous photo-Fenton processes to (a) red WW, and (b) white WW.
Engproc 56 00288 g003
Figure 4. Effect of the homogeneous and heterogeneous photo-Fenton processes on turbidity, TSS, TPh, COD, and BOD5 removal. Means in bars with different letters represent significant differences (p < 0.05) within turbidity, TSS, TPh, COD, and BOD5 by comparing the treatment processes.
Figure 4. Effect of the homogeneous and heterogeneous photo-Fenton processes on turbidity, TSS, TPh, COD, and BOD5 removal. Means in bars with different letters represent significant differences (p < 0.05) within turbidity, TSS, TPh, COD, and BOD5 by comparing the treatment processes.
Engproc 56 00288 g004
Table 1. Winery wastewater characterization.
Table 1. Winery wastewater characterization.
ParametersRed WWWhite WW
pH4.53.9
Biochemical oxygen demand—BOD5 (mg O2/L)267298
Chemical oxygen demand—COD (mg O2/L)970964
Biodegradability—BOD5/COD0.290.30
Turbidity (NTU)307107
Total suspended solids (mg/L)742247
Electrical conductivity (μS/cm)488.0
Total polyphenols (mg gallic acid/L)26.87.3
Iron (mg/L)0.050.05
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jorge, N.; Teixeira, A.R.; Silva, S.; Pirra, A.; Peres, J.A.; Lucas, M.S. Homogeneous vs. Heterogeneous Photo-Fenton Processes in the Treatment of Winery Wastewater. Eng. Proc. 2023, 56, 288. https://doi.org/10.3390/ASEC2023-15405

AMA Style

Jorge N, Teixeira AR, Silva S, Pirra A, Peres JA, Lucas MS. Homogeneous vs. Heterogeneous Photo-Fenton Processes in the Treatment of Winery Wastewater. Engineering Proceedings. 2023; 56(1):288. https://doi.org/10.3390/ASEC2023-15405

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jorge, Nuno, Ana R. Teixeira, Sérgio Silva, António Pirra, José A. Peres, and Marco S. Lucas. 2023. "Homogeneous vs. Heterogeneous Photo-Fenton Processes in the Treatment of Winery Wastewater" Engineering Proceedings 56, no. 1: 288. https://doi.org/10.3390/ASEC2023-15405

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop