After curing jute fiber-reinforced composites with varying silica nanoparticle contents (3%, 6%, and 9%), we conducted crucial mechanical tests. Tensile tests measured breaking points, revealing the impact of silica on strength. Flexural tests assessed bending forces and silica’s effect on flexibility. Impact tests gauged energy absorption in sudden impacts. The Brinell test assessed composite rigidity, and a wear test machine quantified material loss for wear resistance, crucial for practical use.
3.3. Impact Test
The impact test aimed to evaluate the impact resistance of the prepared composites [
9,
10]. It involved dropping a pendulum onto the composite’s surface and measuring the energy absorbed during the impact, reflecting the material’s ability to withstand sudden shocks or impacts.
Table 4 displays the composite number, silica content percentage, and impact strength in kilojoules per square meter (kJ/m
2). The material containing 9% silica nanoparticles exhibited the highest impact resistance at 42.8 kJ/m
2. In comparison, composites with 3% and 6% silica nanoparticles displayed impact strengths of 35.7 kJ/m
2 and 38.9 kJ/m
2, respectively. These results highlight the effectiveness of adding reinforcing composites in improving the impact resistance of jute fiber-reinforced composites.
3.4. Hardness Test Result
The Brinell hardness test was conducted to evaluate the hardness of the prepared composites [
11]. This test entails pressing a hardened steel ball into the composite’s surface and measuring the diameter of the resulting indentation, indicating the material’s resistance to deformation or penetration by a hard object.
Table 5 presents the composite number, silica content percentage, and Brinell hardness value in HB units. The composite containing 9% silica nanoparticles exhibited the highest Brinell hardness value at 72.5 HB. In comparison, composites with 3% and 6% silica nanoparticles displayed Brinell hardness values of 65.6 HB and 67.5 HB, respectively. These results underscore the effectiveness of reinforcing composites in enhancing the hardness of the prepared materials.
In
Figure 2, we observe the experimental results depicting the impact of increasing silica content on the tribological properties of jute-reinforced composites. As the silica nanoparticle percentage rises, a notable improvement in tribological properties becomes evident. The consistent increase in responses with higher silica content affirms its effectiveness in enhancing the material’s mechanical characteristics. Additionally, both impact strength and hardness of the composites significantly improve with silica nanoparticle reinforcement, reflecting enhanced impact resistance and deformation resistance. These findings hold great relevance for industrial applications requiring high-performance materials.
3.5. Wear Test Result
The wear test involved standardizing the prepared composites to 10 mm diameter and 70 mm length [
12]. Experiments followed the Taguchi design, a statistical method for optimizing performance by minimizing variability and enhancing output quality. This approach, applied to the composite materials with EN 31 alloy as the base material, improved wear resistance and identified optimal wear parameters. The study assessed various input responses, including composition (C), load (L), disc rotational speed (Sr), and sliding distance (Ds), to evaluate wear (Sw) and coefficient of friction (CoF). The results from the L9 experiments array are summarized in
Table 6. Through Taguchi analysis, researchers determined the optimal parameter combination for minimizing Sw and CoF. The study revealed that the most effective combination includes C = 9%, L = 20 N, Sr = 150 RPM, and Ds = 90 m, resulting in the lowest responses (
Figure 3). This indicates excellent wear resistance in the composite material, rendering it suitable for applications where friction and wear are critical considerations.
A linear regression analysis was performed using MINITAB statistical tool to obtain a scientific equation for the responses. Equation (1) shows the equation for the specific wear rate (Sw), while Equation (2) illustrates the equation for the coefficient of friction (COF).
Following the determination of the optimal combination, an experiment was conducted, with results closely matching the predicted values obtained from regression analysis (
Table 7). This confirms the reliability of the regression model in forecasting composite material behavior under different conditions. These findings demonstrate that composition, load, rotational speed, and sliding distance have a substantial impact on composite material responses. Optimizing these factors can enhance performance and prolong the composite material’s service life.
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis was conducted to study the surface morphology and wear mechanism of the material. The SEM image in
Figure 4 provides insights into the wear patterns of the composites. At a 3% silica composition, severe wear is evident with prominent pits and grooves. This is attributed to the decreasing stiffness and increased particle size of silica at higher compositions, making the composite more prone to wear. Conversely, at a 9% silica composition, the wear track is less severe, with less prominent pits and grooves. This results from the increased stiffness and smaller particle size of silica, making the composite more wear resistant. Artificial neural network (ANN), a machine learning technique, is employed to forecast composite responses. The process involves data collection for input and output variables, with data separated into training and testing sets.
The neural network structure is established, comprising three layers: the first layer with four neurons (matching the input variables), the second layer with eight neurons, and the third layer with two neurons (matching the output variables). The activation functions used are hyperbolic tangents for the first and second layers and a linear tangent for the third layer. The network is trained with the training dataset, utilizing the backpropagation method to optimize weights and biases. Training continues until the difference between predicted and actual outputs is minimized.
Performance is assessed with the testing dataset, where network predictions are compared to actual outputs for accuracy. The optimized network is then used to forecast output variables for new input data, resulting in a 100% prediction accuracy, as shown in
Figure 5.