Connecting Indigenous and Scientific Ecological Knowledge in the Madidi National Park, Bolivia †
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. Species Availability Influences Plant Use
1.2. Biodiversity Shapes Forest Use
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Floristic Inventory
2.2. Ethnobotanical Data Collection
2.3. Data Analysis
2.3.1. Species Availability Influences Plant Use
2.3.2. Biodiversity Shapes Forest Use
3. Results
3.1. Species Availability Influences Plant Use
3.2. Biodiversity Shapes Forest Use
4. Discussion
4.1. Species Availability Influences Plant Use
4.2. Biodiversity Shapes Forest Use
5. Conclusions
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
References
- Levis, C.; Costa, F.R.C.; Bongers, F.; Peña-Claros, M.; Tamanaha, E.K.; Figueiredo, F.O.G.; Salomão, R.P.; Castilho, C.V.; Zartman, C.E.; Vasquez, R.; Andrade, A.; et al. Persistent Effects of Pre-Columbian Plant Domestication on Amazonian Forest Composition. Science 2017, 355, 925–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Soldati, G.T.; de Medeiros, P.M.; Duque-Brasil, R.; Coelho, F.M.G.; Albuquerque, U.P. How Do People Select Plants for Use? Matching the Ecological Apparency Hypothesis with Optimal Foraging Theory. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2017, 19, 2143–2161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salick, J.; Biun, A.; Martin, G.; Apin, L.; Beaman, R. Whence Useful Plants? A Direct Relationship between Biodiversity and Useful Plants among the Dusun of Mt. Kinabalu. Biodivers. Conserv. 1999, 8, 797–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Albuquerque, U.P.; de Lucena, R.F.P. Can Apparency Affect the Use of Plants by Local People in Tropical Forests? Interciencia 2005, 30, 506–511. [Google Scholar]
- Lawrence, A.; Phillips, O.L.; Ismodes, R.; Lopez, M.; Rose, S.A.M.; Wood, D.; Jose, A. Local Values for Harvested Forest Plants in Madre de Dios, Peru: Towards a More Contextualised Interpretation of Quantitative Ethnobotanical Data. Biodivers. Conserv. 2005, 14, 45–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Phillips, O.; Gentry, A.H. The Useful Plants of Tambopata, Peru: II. Additional Hypothesis Testing in Quantitative Ethnobotany. Econ. Bot. 1993, 47, 33–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Byg, A.; Vormisto, J.; Balslev, H. Using the Useful: Characteristics of Used Palms in South-Eastern Ecuador. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2006, 8, 495–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ribeiro, J.P.O.; Carvalho, T.K.N.; Ribeiro, J.E.S.; Sousa, R.F.; Lima, J.R.F.; Alves, C.A.B.; Jardim, J.G.; Lucena, R.F.P. Can Ecological Apparency Explain the Use of Plant Species in the Semi-Arid Depression of Northeastern Brazil. Acta Bot. Brasilica 2014, 28, 476–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Lucena, R.F.P.; de Lima Araújo, E.; de Albuquerque, U.P. Does the Local Availability of Woody Caatinga Plants (Northeastern Brazil) Explain Their Use Value? Econ. Bot. 2007, 61, 347–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Lucena, R.F.P.; de Medeiros, P.M.; de Araújo, E.L.; Alves, A.G.C.; de Albuquerque, U.P. The Ecological Apparency Hypothesis and the Importance of Useful Plants in Rural Communities from Northeastern Brazil: An Assessment Based on Use Value. J. Environ. Manag. 2012, 96, 106–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Torre-Cuadros, M.D.L.A.; Islebe, G.A. Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Use of Vegetation in Southeastern Mexico: A Case Study from Solferino, Quintana Roo. Biodivers. Conserv. 2003, 12, 2455–2476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Galeano, G. Forest Use at the Pacific Coast of Choco, Colombia: A Quantitative Approach. Econ. Bot. 2000, 54, 358–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ayantunde, A.A.; Hiernaux, P.; Briejer, M.; Udo, H.; Tabo, R. Uses of Local Plant Species by Agropastoralists in South-Western Niger. Ethnobot. Res. Appl. 2009, 7, 53–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thomas, E.; Vandebroek, I.; van Damme, P. Valuation of Forests and Plant Species in Indigenous Territory and National Park Isiboro-Sécure, Bolivia. Econ. Bot. 2009, 63, 229–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferraz, J.S.F.; Albuquerque, U.P.D.; Meunier, I.M.J. Valor de Uso e Estrutura Da Vegetação Lenhosa Às Margens Do Riacho Do Navio, Floresta, PE, Brasil. Acta Bot. Brasilica 2006, 20, 125–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lucena, R.F.P.D.; Sousa, R.F.D.; Guerra, N.M.; Ribeiro, J.E.D.S.; Leite, A.P.; Abreu, D.B.D.O.; Carvalho, T.K.N.; Trovão, D.M.D.B.M.; Bel, C.A.; Nunes, E.N. The Ecological Apparency Hypothesis and Dry Tropical Forests: An Ethnobotanical Assessment. Etnoecológica 2014, 10, 70–86. [Google Scholar]
- Lucena, R.F.P.; Leite, A.P.; Pedrosa, K.M.; Lucena, C.M.; Vasconcelos-Neto, C.F.A.; Ribeiro, J.P.O. O Uso de Especies Vegetais No Vale Do Pianco Pode Ser Explicado Por Sua Disponibilidade Local? Rev. Biol. Farmácia 2012, Esp, 55–71. [Google Scholar]
- Phillips, O.; Gentry, A.H. The Useful Plants of Tambopata, Peru: I. Statistical Hypotheses Tests with a New Quantitative Technique. Econ. Bot. 1993, 47, 15–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- da Ribeiro, J.E.S.; Carvalho, T.K.N.; de Ribeiro, J.P.O.; Guerra, N.M.; da Silva, N.; Pedrosa, K.M.; Alves, C.A.B.; de Sousa Júnior, S.P.; Souto, J.S.; Nunes, A.T.; et al. Ecological Apparency Hypothesis and Availability of Useful Plants: Testing Different Use Values. Ethnobot. Res. Appl. 2014, 12, 415–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guèze, M.; Luz, A.C.; Paneque-Gálvez, J.; Macía, M.J.; Orta-Martínez, M.; Pino, J.; Reyes-García, V. Are Ecologically Important Tree Species the Most Useful? A Case Study from Indigenous People in the Bolivian Amazon. Economic Bot. 2014, 68, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thomas, E.; Vandebroek, I.; Van Damme, P.; Goetghebeur, P.; Douterlungne, D.; Sanca, S.; Arrazola, S. The Relation between Accessibility, Diversity and Indigenous Valuation of Vegetation in the Bolivian Andes. J. Arid Environ. 2009, 73, 854–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saqib, Z.; Naseem Malik, R.; Shinwari, M.I.; Shinwari, Z.K. Species Richness, Ethnobotanical Species Richness and Human Settlements along a Himalayan Altitudinal Gradient: Prioritizing Plant Conservation in Palas Valley, Pakistan. Pakistan J. Bot. 2011, 43, 129–133. [Google Scholar]
- Anderson, M.J.; Crist, T.O.; Chase, J.M.; Vellend, M.; Inouye, B.D.; Freestone, A.L.; Sanders, N.J.; Cornell, H.V.; Comita, L.S.; Davies, K.F.; et al. Navigating the Multiple Meanings of β Diversity: A Roadmap for the Practicing Ecologist. Ecol. Lett. 2011, 14, 19–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Macía, M.J. Woody Plants Diversity, Floristic Composition and Land Use History in the Amazonian Rain Forests of Madidi. Biodivers. Conserv. 2008, 2671–2690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arellano, G.; Cala, V.; Fuentes, A.; Cayola, L.; Jørgensen, P.M.; Macía, M.J. A Standard Protocal for Woody Plant Inventories and Soil Characterisation Using Temporary 0.1-Ha Plots in Tropical Forests. J. Trop. For. Sci. 2016, 28, 508–516. [Google Scholar]
- Macía, M.J.; Armesilla, P.J.; Cámara-Leret, R.; Paniagua-Zambrana, N.; Villalba, S.; Balslev, H.; Pardo-de-Santayana, M. Palm Uses in Northwestern South America: A Quantitative Review. Bot. Rev. 2011, 77, 462–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cook, F.E.M. Economic Botany Data Collection Standard. Prepared for the International Working Group on Taxonomic Databases for Plant Sciences (TDWG); Royal Botanic Gardens (Kew): London, UK, 1995. [Google Scholar]
- Rossato, S.C.; De LeitãO-Filho, H.F.; Begossi, A. Ethnobotany of Caiçaras of the Atlantic Forest Coast (Brazil). Econ. Bot. 1999, 53, 387–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tardío, J.; Pardo-De-Santayana, M. Cultural Importance Indices: A Comparative Analysis Based on the Useful Wild Plants of Southern Cantabria (Northern Spain). Econ. Bot. 2008, 62, 24–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fisher, R.A.; Corbet, S.A.; Williams, C.B. The Relation between the Number of Species and the Number of Individuals in a Random Sample of an Animal Population. J. Anim. Ecol. 1943, 12, 42–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Phillips, O.; Gentry, A.H.; Wilkin, P.; Gálvez-Durand, B.C. Quantitative Ethnobotany and Amazonian Conservation. Conserv. Biol. 1994, 8, 225–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cámara-Leret, R.; Paniagua-Zambrana, N.; Svenning, J.-C.; Balslev, H.; Macía, M.J. Geospatial Patterns in Traditional Knowledge Serve in Assessing Intellectual Property Rights and Benefit-Sharing in Northwest South America. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2014, 158, 58–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Burnham, K.P.; Anderson, D.R. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach, 2nd ed.; Springer-Verlag: New York, NY, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Albuquerque, U.P.D. Implications of Ethnobotanical Studies on Bioprospecting Strategies of New Drugs in Semi-Arid Regions. Open Complement. Med. J. 2010, 2, 21–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Patrick, R. Biodiversity: Why Is It Important? In Biodiversity II: Understanding and Protecting our Biological Resources; Joseph Henry Press: Washington, DC, USA, 1997; pp. 15–24. [Google Scholar]
Alternative Models (UVp as a Function of Biodiversity) | AIC |
---|---|
UVp~ Fisher α | 20.47 |
UVp~ Fisher α * Forest Type | 18.46 |
UVp~ Fisher α + Forest Type | 17.35 |
UVp~ Fisher α * Forest Type + Fisher α2 * Forest Type | 17.94 |
UVp~ Fisher α * Forest Type + Fisher α2 | 15.96 |
UVp~ Fisher Alpha + Fisher Alpha 2 + Forest Type | 14.36 |
Category | S | rs |
---|---|---|
Total | 436 | 0.60 |
Construction | 240 | 0.48 |
Fuel | 194 | 0.44 |
Tools | 130 | 0.30 |
Food | 138 | 0.28 |
Medicinal | 118 | 0.27 |
Cultural | 85 | 0.25 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Aledo, J.G.d.; Bongers, F.; Cayuela, L.; Macía, M.J. Connecting Indigenous and Scientific Ecological Knowledge in the Madidi National Park, Bolivia. Environ. Sci. Proc. 2021, 3, 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECF2020-07963
Aledo JGd, Bongers F, Cayuela L, Macía MJ. Connecting Indigenous and Scientific Ecological Knowledge in the Madidi National Park, Bolivia. Environmental Sciences Proceedings. 2021; 3(1):63. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECF2020-07963
Chicago/Turabian StyleAledo, Julia G. de, Frans Bongers, Luis Cayuela, and Manuel J. Macía. 2021. "Connecting Indigenous and Scientific Ecological Knowledge in the Madidi National Park, Bolivia" Environmental Sciences Proceedings 3, no. 1: 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECF2020-07963
APA StyleAledo, J. G. d., Bongers, F., Cayuela, L., & Macía, M. J. (2021). Connecting Indigenous and Scientific Ecological Knowledge in the Madidi National Park, Bolivia. Environmental Sciences Proceedings, 3(1), 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECF2020-07963