Next Article in Journal
ERBB2 Mutation Testing in NSCLC: A Pan-European Real-World Evaluation of the Oncomine Precision Assay
Previous Article in Journal
The Current Landscape of Molecular Pathology for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pediatric High-Grade Glioma
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Mechanism of Sepsis

by
Hideaki Yamamoto
1,
Muhammad Usman
2,
Aristides Koutrouvelis
3 and
Satoshi Yamamoto
3,*
1
Division of Biological Science, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
2
School of Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555, USA
3
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Mol. Pathol. 2025, 6(3), 18; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmp6030018
Submission received: 5 June 2025 / Revised: 22 July 2025 / Accepted: 22 July 2025 / Published: 7 August 2025

Abstract

Sepsis is a complex and life-threatening syndrome arising from a dysregulated immune response to infection that can lead to severe organ dysfunction and increased mortality. This multifactorial condition is marked by intricate interactions between immune, inflammatory, and coagulation pathways, which together contribute to systemic effects and multiorgan damage. The aberrant immune activation seen in sepsis includes profound leukocyte activation, endothelial dysfunction, imbalanced coagulation leading to disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), and the production of both pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory mediators. These events culminate in pathological alterations that extend beyond the initial site of infection, adversely impacting distant tissues and organs. Early recognition and timely intervention are crucial to mitigate the progression of sepsis and its associated complications. This review aims to explore the underlying biological mechanisms, including host–pathogen interactions, immune dysregulation, and the cascade of systemic and organ-specific effects that define sepsis. By delving into the pathophysiological processes, we intend to provide insights into the determinants of multiorgan failure and inform strategies for therapeutic intervention. Understanding these mechanisms is pivotal for advancing clinical outcomes and reducing mortality rates associated with this critical condition.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Sepsis is characterized as a critical condition involving organ failure resultant from an aberrant host response to infectious agents, highlighting its clinical significance in critical care settings [1]. Understanding the mechanisms of sepsis is crucial for improving patient outcomes and guiding the development of targeted therapeutic strategies. Successful management of sepsis hinges on a comprehensive grasp of its underlying biological processes and the complex interactions between host responses and infectious agents. Furthermore, the early recognition and prompt treatment of sepsis are crucial, as delays can lead to severe complications, including multiple organ failure and increased mortality rates [2].
The typical physiological reaction of the host to microbial infection constitutes a multifaceted mechanism that both localizes and regulates bacterial infiltration, concurrently commencing the restoration of damaged tissue [3]. In the context of sepsis, the aberrant immune response of the host is characterized as a pathological disturbance and/or modification of the homeostatic balance of immune-mediated resistance, disease tolerance, and the mechanisms of resolution that transpire simultaneously [2]. The aberrant immune response precipitates a profound activation of leukocytes, platelets, and the endothelium, accompanied by an overactivation of coagulation pathways that when coupled with impaired anticoagulant and fibrinolytic mechanisms, may result in disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), which is linked to multiorgan dysfunction and elevated mortality rates [4]. This entails the stimulation of both circulating and resident phagocytic cells, in addition to the production of proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory mediators. Sepsis occurs when the host’s response to an infectious agent becomes systemic, thereby affecting healthy tissues located distantly from the original site of injury or infection. Comprehending these intricate interactions is essential for the development of strategies aimed at mitigating excessive immune activation, thrombin production, and endothelial impairment, which may ultimately enhance the survival of individuals facing infectious challenges, as they underscore the critical role of the immune–inflammatory system in the pathogenesis of multiorgan dysfunction syndrome associated with sepsis [2].
In this review, we endeavor to furnish an exhaustive examination of the pathophysiological processes and the determinants of multiple organ system failure in the context of sepsis.

2. From Infection to Sepsis Leading to Organ Dysfunction

2.1. Inflammatory and Immune Response

2.1.1. Pathogen Recognition and Immune Activation

Pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), including Toll-like receptors (TLRs) and NOD-like receptors (NLRs), initiate immune signaling upon recognizing microbial components. TLR4, in particular, detects lipopolysaccharides (LPSs) from Gram-negative bacteria, while NOD1/2 responds to bacterial peptidoglycans. These interactions trigger intracellular cascades—especially via NF-κB and MAPK—that drive cytokine expression, inflammation, and downstream immune activation (Figure 1). PRRs—including TLRs, NLRs, CLRs, and RLRs—serve as molecular sentinels, detecting pathogen- and danger-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs and DAMPs) to initiate immune responses. In sepsis, TLR4 and NOD1/2 are particularly critical: they detect microbial products like lipopolysaccharides and peptidoglycans, triggering NF-κB and MAPK signaling cascades [5]. Non-PRRs, such as RAGE, TREM-1, and GPCRs, further amplify the inflammatory response. Alarmins, like HMGB1 and mitochondrial DNA, act as DAMPs that reinforce host responses, linking cellular injury to immune activation. Although their roles in sepsis are less well defined, they represent emerging modulators of host–pathogen signaling. The body’s natural defense system depends on these specific receptors, which are crucial for recognizing PAMPs and DAMPs to trigger immune responses. CLRs and RLRs also contribute to pathogen recognition and the subsequent immune response, although their roles in sepsis are less well-characterized compared with TLRs and NLRs [5]. PAMPs may be recognized by non-PRRs, which comprise receptors for advanced glycation end products (RAGEs), triggering receptors expressed on myeloid cells (TREMs), and G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) [6]. Furthermore, PRRs possess the ability to detect endogenous danger signals, referred to as alarmins or DAMPs, which are released during inflammatory insults [7]. DAMPs consist of nuclear, cytoplasmic, or mitochondrial structures that assume novel functions upon their release into the extracellular milieu. Notable examples of DAMPs include high mobility group box-1 protein (HMGB1), S100 proteins, heat shock proteins, and mitochondrial DNA, along with metabolic molecules, such as adenosine triphosphate [8]. The triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells (TREM-1) and the myeloid DAP12-associating lectin (MDL-1) receptors, which are expressed on host immune cells, possess the ability to identify and interact with microbial constituents [9]. Once pathogen recognition initiates innate immune signaling, neutrophils are rapidly mobilized to the site of infection, where they serve as a frontline defense against microbial invasion.

2.1.2. Neutrophils and NETs: A Double-Edged Sword in Host Defense

Neutrophils and T cells exhibit distinct activation patterns in sepsis, with pathways related to inflammatory signaling and responses to pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) being prominent [10]. Various cellular components may be liberated during the course of infection, potentially affecting the host’s immunological response. Microparticles derived from circulating and vascular cells also contribute to the detrimental outcomes associated with sepsis-induced intravascular inflammation [11]. Neutrophils function as phagocytic entities that provide a defense against pathogenic organisms. The defensive mechanisms employed encompass the phagocytosis and subsequent destruction of the invading microorganisms, the secretion of antimicrobial peptides, and the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) [12]. Neutrophils combat pathogens not only through phagocytosis but also by generating NETs—webs of chromatin and granule-derived peptides extruded into the extracellular space. While these structures aid in microbial clearance, they also promote vascular injury, inflammation, and procoagulant activity. In sepsis, persistent NET formation is linked to endothelial damage, platelet activation, and propagation of disseminated intravascular coagulation via factor XII activation and impaired DNase I activity. During the formation of NETs, neutrophils undergo decondensation of their nuclear chromatin and DNA within the cytoplasmic milieu, which is subsequently amalgamated with granule-derived antimicrobial peptides. Research indicates a significant involvement of NETs in the pathophysiology of disseminated intravascular coagulation and intravascular thrombosis [13]. While NETs represent one effector arm of neutrophil function, the broader orchestration of the immune response is governed by tightly regulated intracellular signaling pathways.

2.1.3. Cellular Mechanisms in Inflammatory Signaling Pathways

The pathogen recognition triggers a cascade of signaling events leading to the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines [14]. Once activated, NF-kB translocates from the cytoplasm to the nucleus, where it binds to specific transcriptional sites, thereby facilitating the expression of a myriad of genes that contribute to the host’s inflammatory response, including pro-inflammatory cytokines (such as tumor necrosis factor alpha [TNFα] and interleukin-1 [IL-1]) and chemokines (including intercellular adhesion molecule-1 [ICAM-1] and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 [VCAM-1]), as well as nitric oxide [15]. Transport proteins are involved in the movement of molecules across cell membranes and within the bloodstream, playing a role in the distribution of inflammatory mediators.

2.1.4. Endothelial Activation and Leukocyte Migration

The cytokine signals induced by PRR activation do not remain localized—instead, they act systemically to activate endothelial cells, guiding the trafficking of immune cells from circulation into affected tissues. Polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs) undergo activation and subsequently express adhesion molecules that promote their aggregation and margination to the vascular endothelium. The endothelial cells express various TLRs, which are activated upon contact with circulating pathogens during bacteremia or viremia. TLRs, such as TLR2, TLR3, TLR4, and TLR7, are involved in recognizing bacterial and viral components, leading to the activation of inflammatory pathways. The activation of TLRs on endothelial cells results in the production of inflammatory mediators and modulation of vascular permeability, which are critical in the body’s response to infection [16]. This process is augmented by the endothelium’s expression of adhesive molecules that serve to attract leukocytes. The PMNs then navigate through a sequence of events (rolling, adhesion, diapedesis, and chemotaxis) to reach the site of injury. The release of mediators by PMNs at the infection locus accounts for the classical manifestations of local inflammation: warmth and erythema resulting from local vasodilation and hyperemia, as well as edema characterized by an elevated protein content, are consequences of increased microvascular permeability [17].

2.1.5. Cross-Talk and Integration

This intricate process is meticulously governed by a complex interplay of proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory mediators that are secreted by macrophages, which have been stimulated and activated due to bacterial invasion of the tissue. Notable proinflammatory cytokines encompass TNF-alpha and IL-1, both of which exhibit a remarkable spectrum of biological activities. The secretion of TNF-alpha is self-perpetuating, whereas non-TNF cytokines and mediators elevate the concentrations of other mediators [18]. The proinflammatory milieu facilitates the mobilization of supplementary polymorphonuclear leukocytes and macrophages [19]. Cytokines that reduce the synthesis of TNF-alpha and IL-1 are classified as anti-inflammatory cytokines. These anti-inflammatory mediators exert suppressive effects on the immune system by inhibiting the production of cytokines by mononuclear cells and monocyte-dependent T helper cells. Nonetheless, the ramifications of these mediators may not exhibit a consistent anti-inflammatory response across all contexts [20]. The equilibrium between proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory mediators governs the inflammatory processes, which include adherence, chemotaxis, phagocytosis of invading microbes, bacterial eradication, and the phagocytosis of debris from damaged tissue [21]. In addition, the coagulation and fibrinolytic systems are also closely linked to inflammation, with proteins—namely, thrombo-fibrinolytic balance proteins—from these systems participating in the regulation of blood clotting and breakdown [22]. Should the mediators achieve a state of equilibrium and the initial infectious challenge is successfully mitigated, homeostasis will be reinstated. The final result will be the restoration and recuperation of the tissue. This restoration process is essential for recovery, as it involves not only the removal of pathogens but also the resolution of inflammation and tissue repair mechanisms [23].

2.2. Development into Sepsis

When the host immune response fails to confine the infection locally, the escalating signals result in systemic immune activation—a tipping point that defines the onset of sepsis (Figure 2).

2.2.1. Transition from Localized Infection to Systemic Response

The transition from a localized infection to a systemic response is a complex process involving the host’s immune system and the infectious agents. This transition is marked by the inability of the host to contain the infection locally, leading to the dissemination of pathogens or their products into the bloodstream, which triggers a systemic inflammatory response. This systemic response can result in conditions such as sepsis, systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) [24]. The transition is influenced by various factors, including the nature of the pathogen, the host’s immune response, and the presence of any underlying conditions. The following sections detail the mechanisms and factors involved in this transition.

2.2.2. Proinflammatory Cytokines

TLR activation triggers intracellular signaling cascades that lead to the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines. Proinflammatory cytokines play a crucial role in the immune and inflammatory pathways in sepsis, acting as both mediators of the immune response and contributors to the pathophysiology of the condition. The role of these cytokines, featuring interleukins (IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-18), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and interferons, is crucial in stimulating the immune response of the host when faced with pathogenic threats [25]. However, their excessive production can lead to a harmful inflammatory response, contributing to tissue damage, organ failure, and increased mortality in septic patients. This dual role makes them both potential therapeutic targets and biomarkers for sepsis. Proinflammatory cytokines additionally facilitate the eradication of pathogens through the activation of immune cells and the enhancement of inflammatory responses [25]. IL-6 and TNF-α are particularly important in the early stages of sepsis, as they activate phospholipase A2, leading to the release of polyunsaturated fatty acids and subsequent production of eicosanoids, which modulate inflammation. In the context of sepsis, the overactivation of TLRs can lead to a cytokine storm, which is characterized by excessive and uncontrolled release of cytokines, contributing to systemic inflammation and shock [26]. Central to early sepsis is the cytokine storm—a surge in proinflammatory mediators, such as TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β. These cytokines recruit immune cells, disrupt the vascular integrity, and amplify inflammation through pathways like NF-κB, MAPK, and cGAS-STING. In particular, IL-6 is central to the cytokine storm, a severe immune response that can lead to sepsis and shock. It interacts with various signaling pathways, including the JAK/STAT pathway, to modulate immune responses and inflammation [27]. It acts on hepatocytes to induce the production of acute phase proteins (APPs), including C-reactive protein (CRP) and serum amyloid A (SAA), which increase significantly during inflammation [28]. Beyond its role as an inflammation marker, CRP forms a protective film on the endothelium, preventing microbial PAMPs from directly contacting endothelial cells [29]. While initially protective, their sustained activation leads to tissue damage, metabolic dysregulation, and organ dysfunction [30].

2.2.3. Complement System Activation

The complement system is integral to the pathophysiology of sepsis, a critical and frequently lethal disorder defined by an excessive immune reaction to infectious agents. Activation of the complement system in sepsis involves a complex interplay of pathways that contribute to both protective and detrimental effects. The complement system, comprised of more than 30 distinct proteins, is initiated via three primary pathways: classical, lectin, and alternative. These pathways converge to form the central component C3, which is cleaved into C3a and C3b, leading to further downstream effects, including the formation of the membrane attack complex (MAC) and the release of anaphylatoxins like C5a. These processes are integral to the immune response but can also exacerbate inflammation and tissue damage in sepsis.
The classical pathway is commonly initiated by the binding of antibodies to pathogenic entities, resulting in the proteolytic cleavage of C4 and C2, thereby facilitating the assembly of the C3 convertase. In sepsis, this pathway can be activated by bacterial products, even in the absence of antibodies [31]. The interaction of mannose-binding lectin (MBL) with the surfaces of pathogens starts the lectin pathway, which encompasses MBL-associated serine proteases (MASPs) that drive the proteolytic cleavage of C4 and C2 [32]. An alternative pathway is continuously active at low levels and can be rapidly amplified in the presence of pathogens. It is frequently engaged prior to the initiation of the classical pathway in instances of septic shock, thereby facilitating the elimination of endotoxins [33]. Beyond initiating microbial clearance, persistent complement activation contributes to immune exhaustion and tissue injury—paving the way for systemic immunosuppression. An imbalance between proteolytic enzymes and their inhibitors can lead to uncontrolled proteolysis, contributing to inflammatory diseases.

2.2.4. From Immune Hyperactivation to Exhaustion: Apoptosis and Immune Collapse

The immune dysregulation in sepsis involves an initial hyper-inflammatory response followed by a prolonged immunosuppressive phase, which is exacerbated by the apoptosis of immune cells. IL-7 is critical for the development and survival of B and T lymphocytes. It acts as a growth and anti-apoptotic factor for these cells, and its absence can lead to lymphopenia, as seen in conditions like sepsis [34]. In lymphopenic conditions, IL-7 levels typically rise to stimulate lymphocyte proliferation, but in sepsis, the inflammatory environment inhibits IL-7 production, exacerbating lymphopenia. IL-7 also has a novel role in stimulating myelopoiesis. The proinflammatory state in sepsis can shift the balance towards myelopoiesis, compensating for the lack of lymphocyte production due to the IL-7 deficiency [35]. This dual-phase response is central to the pathophysiology of sepsis and contributes to the increased susceptibility to secondary infections and organ dysfunction.
The hyper-inflammatory phase is the initial response to sepsis that involves a systemic inflammatory response triggered by pathogen invasion. This phase is marked by the activation of both innate and adaptive immune systems, leading to the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines and immune cell activation [36]. Following the hyper-inflammatory phase, the immune system enters the immunosuppressive phase, which is characterized by T cell exhaustion, reduced expression of HLA-DR on monocytes, and increased regulatory T cell activity. This phase is associated with increased susceptibility to secondary infections and poor clinical outcomes. T cell dysregulation is a hallmark of sepsis, involving apoptosis, anergy, and metabolic reprogramming. These changes contribute to the impaired adaptive immune response and are linked to increased morbidity and mortality in sepsis patients [37].
It affects various immune cells, including neutrophils, macrophages, T lymphocytes, and dendritic cells, leading to immune cell depletion and impaired immune function [38]. The apoptosis of immune cells is a significant contributor to the immunosuppressive state in sepsis. It results in the loss of key cells necessary for effective immune responses, thereby increasing the risk of secondary infections and organ failure [39].
Autophagy serves a pivotal function in the commencement and modulation of the inflammatory response among innate immune cells. In sepsis, the activation of autophagy functions to protect the host from organ dysfunction by preventing the apoptotic demise of immune cells, maintaining the balance of cytokine homeostasis specifically between the synthesis of pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines, alongside the maintenance of mitochondrial functionality [40].

2.2.5. Key Signaling Pathways in Inflammatory Activation and Modulation

Toll-Like Receptor 4 (TLR4) Signaling Pathway
TLR4-driven PAMP sensing—detailed in earlier sections—triggers downstream activation of proinflammatory cascades, including MyD88-dependent signaling and NF-κB transcriptional upregulation [41].
  • NF-κB Pathway
The nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB) pathway is a central mediator of inflammation and immune responses in sepsis. It is activated in various cell types, including neutrophils and mononuclear cells, contributing to a pro-inflammatory phenotype that exacerbates organ dysfunction [42].
  • JAK/STAT Pathway
The Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK/STAT) pathway is another critical signaling cascade involved in sepsis. It regulates the expression of genes involved in immune responses and inflammation [43].
  • MAPK Pathway
The mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway, including p38 MAPK, is activated in response to stress signals and plays a role in the inflammatory response during sepsis [44].
  • PI3K/Akt Pathway
The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt pathway is involved in cell survival, proliferation, and metabolism [45]. In sepsis, this pathway is implicated in modulating immune responses and inflammation.
  • Notch and mTOR Pathways
The Notch signaling pathway plays a critical role in the processes of cell differentiation and the regulation of immune responses, whereas the mammalian target of the rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway is instrumental in the regulation of cellular growth and metabolic processes [46].
  • Endocannabinoid System
The endocannabinoid system, particularly cannabinoid receptors CB1 and CB2, has been identified as a modulator of immune responses in sepsis [47]. CB1 is primarily involved in the cardiovascular system, which is significantly affected during septic shock, while CB2 activation is noted for its anti-inflammatory effects, which may offer therapeutic benefits in sepsis management.
  • Wnt Signaling Pathway
The Wnt signaling pathway, particularly the Wnt/β-catenin axis, has been implicated in the regulation of inflammation during sepsis [48].
  • VEGFR-3/VEGF-C Axis
The VEGFR-3/VEGF-C signaling pathway acts as a natural brake on inflammation by modulating NF-κB activity and reducing the expression of inflammatory cytokines [49].
  • Cell Death Pathway
Sepsis induces various forms of cell death, including apoptosis, necroptosis, and pyroptosis. These processes are regulated by signaling pathways that include caspase-1-dependent pyroptosis, which is promoted by the IL-17 signaling pathway [50].

2.3. Systemic Inflammation and Multiorgan Consequences

Sepsis has the potential to progress into a systemic manifestation characterized by an aberrant and exaggerated systemic reaction to infectious agents. This response affects multiple organ systems and is characterized by widespread inflammation, immune dysfunction, metabolic disturbances, and organ injury. The hallmark of sepsis is a systemic inflammatory response that can progress to multiple organ failure and death if not managed promptly.

2.3.1. Endothelial Dysfunction and Immunothrombosis: A Central Nexus in Sepsis Progression

In sepsis, endothelial cells are both targets and amplifiers of systemic inflammation. Under the influence of proinflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α and IL-1β, endothelial cells shift from a quiescent, antithrombotic phenotype to an activated, proinflammatory state [51]. This transition is marked by the upregulation of adhesion molecules (e.g., ICAM-1, VCAM-1), increased vascular permeability, and enhanced leukocyte recruitment and extravasation [52].
The resulting endothelial dysfunction contributes to widespread microvascular damage. Activated endothelial cells express tissue factor and suppress anticoagulant pathways—most notably thrombomodulin and protein C—priming the coagulation system for thrombin generation. Simultaneously, the endothelial glycocalyx is shed, exposing adhesion sites and intensifying leukocyte–endothelial interactions.
These changes converge with the procoagulant effects of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), which activate factor XII and potentiate clot formation. Histones and DNA fragments released from NETs further stimulate platelet aggregation and initiate the contact pathway of coagulation via polyphosphate release. Platelet-derived mediators, including P-selectin and platelet-activating factor, reinforce this thromboinflammatory state [53].
This interplay between endothelial activation, immune cell signaling, and thrombin generation forms the basis of immunothrombosis—a central feature of advanced sepsis [54,55,56]. Immunothrombosis facilitates microvascular occlusion, impairs organ perfusion, and accelerates the progression to multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) [57].

2.3.2. Bioenergetic Collapse and Mitochondrial Injury in Sepsis

Mitochondrial dysfunction plays a critical role in the pathophysiology of sepsis, contributing significantly to cytotoxicity and organ dysfunction, with mitochondria being central to this process due to their role in energy production and regulation of cell death pathways. The mechanisms of mitochondrial dysfunction in sepsis involve oxidative stress, impaired mitophagy, and disruptions in mitochondrial dynamics, which collectively exacerbate cellular damage and inflammation.
Mitochondria are major sources of ROS, which are significantly elevated during sepsis. The excessive production of ROS leads to oxidative stress, damaging cellular macromolecules, such as lipids, proteins, and DNA, thereby impairing organ function. ROS-induced oxidative stress is a primary factor in the injury of vital organs, including the heart, lungs, liver, and kidneys, contributing to the progression of sepsis-induced organ dysfunction [58].
Sepsis alters mitochondrial dynamics, including fission and fusion processes, which are crucial for maintaining mitochondrial integrity and function. Disruptions in these processes can lead to mitochondrial fragmentation and dysfunction. Mitochondrial membrane permeabilization is another critical event, leading to the release of pro-apoptotic factors and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), which further amplify the inflammatory response and cellular damage [59].
Mitophagy, the selective autophagic removal of damaged mitochondria, is impaired in sepsis, resulting in the accumulation of dysfunctional mitochondria that exacerbate cellular stress and energy deficiency. Energy deficiency due to impaired mitochondrial function is a hallmark of sepsis, contributing to organ dysfunction by limiting the ATP production necessary for cellular processes [60].
Damaged mitochondria in sepsis activate inflammatory pathways, including those mediated by Toll-like receptors and NOD-like receptors, which contribute to immune dysregulation and the cytokine storm characteristic of sepsis. The release of mtDNA into the cytosol acts as a damage-associated molecular pattern (DAMP), further stimulating inflammatory responses and exacerbating tissue injury [61].

3. Cell Death Mechanisms

As mitochondrial function deteriorates, the balance between cellular survival and programmed death shifts decisively. Sepsis-induced stressors converge to trigger diverse cell death pathways that not only impair immune clearance but amplify organ injury.

Apoptosis and Immune Response Modulation

Sepsis disrupts normal cell death pathways—particularly apoptosis and pyropto-sis—across immune and parenchymal cells. Lymphocyte and dendritic cell apoptosis diminishes the antigen presentation and antimicrobial defense, contributing to immu-nosuppression. Simultaneously, inflammasome-induced pyroptosis amplifies IL-1β re-lease, perpetuating inflammation. These death programs, often overlapping and caspase-regulated, are tightly linked to sepsis morbidity [62]. Apoptosis, which is fre-quently referred to as programmed cell death, delineates a series of meticulously regu-lated physiological and morphological alterations at the cellular level that culminate in cell demise. These phenomena represent the primary mechanism through which se-nescent or dysfunctional cells are systematically removed, and it constitutes the pre-dominant process for the resolution of inflammation following the cessation of an in-fectious episode [63].
In the context of sepsis, proinflammatory cytokines may impede apoptosis in ac-tivated macrophages and neutrophils, thus prolonging or exacerbating the inflamma-tory response and contributing to the onset of multiple organ dysfunction. Sepsis fur-ther precipitates substantial apoptosis in lymphocytes and dendritic cells, which mod-ifies the efficacy of the immune response and leads to a diminished capacity for the eradication of pathogenic microorganisms.
Pyroptosis is the inflammatory form of cell death mediated by the activation of inflammasomes and caspase-1, leading to the release of IL-1β and IL-18 [62]. PRRs possess the capability to form inflammasomes [64]. Intricate and sophisticated, in-flammasomes are assemblies of extensive protein complexes that meticulously regulate the initiation of caspase-1, alongside the synthesis and release of proinflammatory cy-tokines, such as IL-1 beta and IL-18 [65]. The activation of NOD-like receptor protein (NLRP) 3 can instigate a highly inflammatory form of programmed cell death that is characterized by the caspase-mediated rapid disruption of the plasma membrane [66].
Numerous cellular demise mechanisms may be instigated in the context of sepsis, encompassing necrosis, apoptosis, necroptosis, pyroptosis, and autophagy-mediated cellular death. A substantial number of these mechanisms of cellular demise undergo modifications during sepsis, either as a consequence of the pathological processes in-herent to sepsis and the concomitant inflammatory response or through direct en-gagement with infectious agents.

4. From Cellular Injury to Organ Failure: The Final Cascade

The cumulative toll of immune dysregulation, mitochondrial collapse, and cell death ultimately culminates in multiorgan dysfunction—the defining hallmark of severe sepsis. This syndrome can impair multiple organs, including the lungs, kidneys, liver, cardiovascular system, and brain. Underlying mechanisms such as microcirculatory alterations, capillary leak, tissue edema, and mitochondrial failure collectively contribute to the development of multiorgan dysfunction syndrome (MODS).
Adding further complexity, recent advances have illuminated the critical role of neutrophil heterogeneity and their dynamic interactions with other cell types in driving metabolic disturbances and sustained inflammation [67]. Proteomic analyses have complemented these findings by identifying organ-specific endothelial phenotypes that mediate increased vascular permeability and leukocyte recruitment, which are central features of sepsis-induced organ failure [68].
In parallel, exosomes released during sepsis have been shown to carry inflammatory mediators and damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), amplifying tissue injury. Moreover, noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs), including microRNAs, long noncoding RNAs, and circular RNAs, have emerged as pivotal regulators in the pathogenesis of sepsis and sepsis-associated organ dysfunction (SAOD) [69].
Single-cell RNA sequencing has further enriched our understanding by revealing a marked reduction in both the quantity and fidelity of intercellular communication under septic conditions, particularly within skeletal muscle tissue. This disruption includes significant alterations in key pathways such as Tnf–Tnfrsf1a, Itgb2–Icam2, and Cd209a–Ceacam1, reflecting compromised immune signaling and muscular function [70]. When integrated with metabolomic profiling, these transcriptomic insights unveil additional disparities in lipid metabolism and immune responsiveness—both of which contribute substantively to the development and progression of SAOD [71].

5. Conclusions

Sepsis represents a complex interplay of systemic inflammation, cellular dysfunction, and organ-specific impairments. From circulatory collapse to the disruption of vital systems, such as respiratory, digestive, renal, and nervous functions, the cascade of physiological alterations highlights the intricate and multifaceted nature of the condition. Addressing these diverse mechanisms requires a holistic approach to both research and clinical management, underscoring the importance of understanding the molecular, cellular, and systemic pathways involved. With ongoing advancements in sepsis-related studies, the potential for improved therapeutic interventions continues to grow, offering hope for better outcomes in this life-threatening syndrome. Translating these mechanistic insights into targeted therapies—such as immunomodulation, anticoagulant strategies, and mitochondrial stabilization—holds promise for reducing the global burden of sepsis. Continued efforts bridging molecular understanding with clinical innovation remain essential for improving outcomes in this high-mortality syndrome.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.Y., M.U., A.K. and S.Y.; Methodology, H.Y., M.U., A.K. and S.Y.; Software, H.Y., M.U., A.K. and S.Y.; Validation, H.Y., M.U., A.K. and S.Y.; Formal Analysis, H.Y., M.U., A.K. and S.Y.; Investigation, H.Y., M.U., A.K. and S.Y.; Resources, H.Y., M.U., A.K. and S.Y.; Data Curation, H.Y., M.U., A.K. and S.Y.; Writing — Original Draft Preparation, H.Y.; Writing — Review & Editing, S.Y.; Visualization, S.Y.; Supervision, S.Y.; Project Administration, S.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Caraballo, C.; Jaimes, F. Organ Dysfunction in Sepsis: An Ominous Trajectory From Infection To Death. Yale J. Biol. Med. 2019, 92, 629–640. [Google Scholar]
  2. Almalki, W.H. The Sepsis Induced Defective Aggravation of Immune Cells: A Translational Science Underling Chemico-Biological Interactions from Altered Bioenergetics and/or Cellular Metabolism to Organ Dysfunction. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2021, 476, 2337–2344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Cárdenas-Calderón, C.; Veloso-Giménez, V.; González, T.; Wozniak, A.; García, P.; Martín, S.S.; Varas, J.F.; Carrasco-Wong, I.; Vera, M.; Egaña, J.T. Development of an Implantable Three-Dimensional Model of a Functional Pathogenic Multispecies Biofilm to Study Infected Wounds. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 21846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Dempfle, C.-E. Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation and Coagulation Disorders. Curr. Opin. Anaesthesiol. 2004, 17, 125–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. McKernan, D.P. Pattern Recognition Receptors as Potential Drug Targets in Inflammatory Disorders. Adv. Protein Chem. Struct. Biol. 2020, 119, 65–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mahla, R.S. Sweeten PAMPs: Role of Sugar Complexed PAMPs in Innate Immunity and Vaccine Biology. Front. Immunol. 2013, 4, 248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Qian, C.; Liu, J.; Cao, X. Innate Signaling in the Inflammatory Immune Disorders. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2014, 25, 731–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Vénéreau, E.; Ceriotti, C.; Bianchi, M.E. DAMPs from Cell Death to New Life. Front. Immunol. 2015, 6, 422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bleharski, J.R.; Kiessler, V.; Buonsanti, C.; Sieling, P.A.; Stenger, S.; Colonna, M.; Modlin, R.L. A Role for Triggering Receptor Expressed on Myeloid Cells-1 in Host Defense During the Early-Induced and Adaptive Phases of the Immune Response. J. Immunol. 2003, 170, 3812–3818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Murao, A.; Jha, A.; Aziz, M.; Wang, P. Transcriptomic Profiling of Immune Cells in Murine Polymicrobial Sepsis. Front. Immunol. 2024, 15, 1347453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Matsumoto, H.; Yamakawa, K.; Ogura, H.; Koh, T.; Matsumoto, N.; Shimazu, T. Enhanced Expression of Cell-Specific Surface Antigens on Endothelial Microparticles in Sepsis-Induced Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation. Shock 2015, 43, 443–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rosales, C.; Demaurex, N.; Lowell, C.A.; Uribe-Querol, E. Neutrophils: Their Role in Innate and Adaptive Immunity. J. Immunol. Res. 2016, 2016, 1–2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. McDonald, B.; Davis, R.; Jenne, C.N. Neutrophil Extracellular Traps (NETs) Promote Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation in Sepsis. J. Immunol. 2016, 196, 60.8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gabarin, R.S.; Li, M.; Zimmel, P.A.; Marshall, J.C.; Li, Y.; Zhang, H. Intracellular and Extracellular Lipopolysaccharide Signaling in Sepsis: Avenues for Novel Therapeutic Strategies. J. Innate Immun. 2021, 13, 323–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tripathi, P.; Aggarwal, A. NF-kB Transcription Factor: A Key Player in the Generation of Immune Response. Curr. Sci. 2006, 90, 519–531. [Google Scholar]
  16. Khakpour, S.; Wilhelmsen, K.; Hellman, J. Vascular Endothelial Cell Toll-like Receptor Pathways in Sepsis. 2015. Available online: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1753425915606525 (accessed on 7 July 2025).
  17. Hopps, E.; Presti, R.L.; Caimi, G. Pathophysiology of Polymorphonuclear Leukocyte in Arterial Hypertension. Clin. Hemorheol. Microcirc. 2009, 41, 209–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Meyer, O. Role of TNF-alpha and cytokines in the physiopathology of rheumatoid arthritis. Therapeutic perspectives. Bull. L’academie Natl. Med. 2003, 187, 935–954, discussion 954–955. [Google Scholar]
  19. Morales-Primo, A.U.; Becker, I.; Zamora-Chimal, J. Neutrophil Extracellular Trap-Associated Molecules: A Review on Their Immunophysiological and Inflammatory Roles. Int. Rev. Immunol. 2022, 41, 253–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nowak, J.Z. Anti-inflammatory pro-resolving derivatives of omega-3 and omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids. Postep. Hig. I Med. Dosw. (Online) 2010, 64, 115–132. [Google Scholar]
  21. Abdulkhaleq, L.A.; Assi, M.A.; Abdullah, R.; Zamri-Saad, M.; Taufiq-Yap, Y.H.; Hezmee, M.N.M. The Crucial Roles of Inflammatory Mediators in Inflammation: A Review. Vet. World 2018, 11, 627–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Oikonomopoulou, K.; Ricklin, D.; Ward, P.A.; Lambris, J.D. Interactions between Coagulation and Complement—Their Role in Inflammation. Semin. Immunopathol. 2012, 34, 151–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kulkarni, O.P.; Lichtnekert, J.; Anders, H.-J.; Mulay, S.R. The Immune System in Tissue Environments Regaining Homeostasis after Injury: Is “Inflammation” Always Inflammation? Mediat. Inflamm. 2016, 2016, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zimbler, N.; Campbell, A. Sepsis, SIRS and MODS. Surg.—Oxf. Int. Ed. 2004, 22, 73–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Schulte, W.; Bernhagen, J.; Bucala, R. Cytokines in Sepsis: Potent Immunoregulators and Potential Therapeutic Targets—An Updated View. Mediat. Inflamm. 2013, 2013, 165974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cristofaro, P.; Opal, S.M. The Toll-like Receptors and Their Role in Septic Shock. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 2003, 7, 603–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yang, J.; Yang, L.; Wang, Y.; Huai, L.; Shi, B.; Zhang, D.; Xu, W.; Cui, D. Interleukin-6 Related Signaling Pathways as the Intersection between Chronic Diseases and Sepsis. Mol. Med. 2025, 31, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Nakazawa, J.; Song, S. Mechanism and Clinical Significance of IL-6 Combined with TNF-α or IL-1 for the Induction of Acute Phase Proteins SAA and CRP in Chronic Inflammatory Diseases. J. Alcohol. Drug Depend. 2016, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Heinrich, P.C.; Dufhues, G.; Flohe, S.; Horn, F.; Krause, E.; Krüttgen, A.; Legres, L.; Lenz, D.; Lütticken, C.; Schooltink, H.; et al. Interleukin-6, Its Hepatic Receptor and the Acute Phase Response of the Liver. In Molecular Aspects of Inflammation; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1991; pp. 129–145. ISBN 978-3-642-76414-1. [Google Scholar]
  30. Das, U.N. Infection, Inflammation, and Immunity in Sepsis. Biomolecules 2023, 13, 1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Abe, T.; Saito, K.; Nagano, T.; Yamada, Y.; Ochiai, H. Complement System Activation through the Alternative Pathway Associates with Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation to Increase Mortality in Sepsis. Thromb. Res. 2025, 247, 109281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Falguni, M.M.; Hunat, J.C.; Nunez, K.E.; Ngo, V.; Harberts, E.M. TLR4-Independent Mechanisms of Complement Activation During Endotoxemia. J. Immunol. 2023, 210, 160.28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Charchaflieh, J.; Wei, J.; Labaze, G.; Hou, Y.J.; Babarsh, B.; Stutz, H.; Lee, H.; Worah, S.; Zhang, M. The Role of Complement System in Septic Shock. J. Immunol. Res. 2012, 2012, 407324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Appasamy, P.M. Biological and Clinical Implications of Interleukin-7 and Lymphopoiesis. Cytokines Cell. Mol. Ther. 1999, 5, 25–39. [Google Scholar]
  35. Ghosh, S.; Huang, J.; Inkman, M.; Zhang, J.; Thotala, S.; Tikhonova, E.; Miheecheva, N.; Frenkel, F.; Ataullakhanov, R.; Wang, X.; et al. Radiation-Induced Circulating Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells Induce Systemic Lymphopenia after Chemoradiotherapy in Patients with Glioblastoma. Sci. Transl. Med. 2023, 15, eabn6758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wu, Y.; Wang, L.; Li, Y.; Cao, Y.; Wang, M.; Deng, Z.; Kang, H. Immunotherapy in the Context of Sepsis-Induced Immunological Dysregulation. Front. Immunol. 2024, 15, 1391395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Luperto, M.; Zafrani, L. T Cell Dysregulation in Inflammatory Diseases in ICU. Intensive Care Med. Exp. 2022, 10, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Luan, Y.; Yao, Y.; Xiao, X.; Sheng, Z. Insights into the Apoptotic Death of Immune Cells in Sepsis. J. Interf. Cytokine Res. 2015, 35, 17–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Cao, C.; Yu, M.; Chai, Y. Pathological Alteration and Therapeutic Implications of Sepsis-Induced Immune Cell Apoptosis. Cell Death Dis. 2019, 10, 782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kong, C.; Song, W.; Fu, T. Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome Is Triggered by Mitochondrial Damage (Review). Mol. Med. Rep. 2022, 25, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zheng, Y.; Gao, Y.; Zhu, W.; Bai, X.-G.; Qi, J. Advances in Molecular Agents Targeting Toll-like Receptor 4 Signaling Pathways for Potential Treatment of Sepsis. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2024, 268, 116300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Li, W.; Li, D.; Chen, Y.; Abudou, H.; Wang, H.; Cai, J.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Liu, Y.; Fan, H. Classic Signaling Pathways in Alveolar Injury and Repair Involved in Sepsis-Induced ALI/ARDS: New Research Progress and Prospect. Dis. Markers. 2022, 2022, 6362344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Matsukawa, A. STAT Proteins in Innate Immunity during Sepsis: Lessons from Gene Knockout Mice. Acta Med. Okayama 2007, 61, 239–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Asaduzzaman, M.; Wang, Y.; Thorlacius, H. Critical Role of P38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Signaling in Septic Lung Injury. Crit. Care Med. 2008, 36, 482–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Manukyan, M.C.; Weil, B.R.; Wang, Y.; Abarbanell, A.M.; Herrmann, J.L.; Poynter, J.A.; Meldrum, D.R. The Phosphoinositide-3 Kinase Survival Signaling Mechanism in Sepsis. Shock 2010, 34, 442–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Cobbold, S.P. The mTOR Pathway and Integrating Immune Regulation. Immunology 2013, 140, 391–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Leite-Avalca, M.C.G.; Zampronio, A.; Lehmann, C. Cannabinoid Receptor 1 and 2 Signaling Pathways Involved in Sepsis. Shock 2021, 56, 673–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Houschyar, K.S.; Chelliah, M.P.; Rein, S.; Maan, Z.N.; Weissenberg, K.; Duscher, D.; Branski, L.K.; Siemers, F. Role of Wnt Signaling during Inflammation and Sepsis: A Review of the Literature. Int. J. Artif. Organs 2018, 41, 247–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhang, Y.; Lu, Y.; Ma, L.; Cao, X.; Xiao, J.; Chen, J.; Jiao, S.; Gao, Y.; Liu, C.; Duan, Z.; et al. Activation of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-3 in Macrophages Restrains TLR4-NF-κB Signaling and Protects against Endotoxin Shock. Immunity 2014, 40, 501–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Li, L.-L.; Dai, B.; Sun, Y.-H.; Zhang, T.-T. The Activation of IL-17 Signaling Pathway Promotes Pyroptosis in Pneumonia-Induced Sepsis. Ann. Transl. Med. 2020, 8, 674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. ten Cate, H. Pathophysiology of Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation in Sepsis. Crit. Care Med. 2000, 28, S9. [Google Scholar]
  52. Theofilis, P.; Sagris, M.; Oikonomou, E.; Antonopoulos, A.S.; Siasos, G.; Tsioufis, C.; Tousoulis, D. Inflammatory Mechanisms Contributing to Endothelial Dysfunction. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Shannon, O. The Role of Platelets in Sepsis. Res. Pract. Thromb. Haemost. 2021, 5, 27–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Assinger, A.; Schrottmaier, W.C.; Salzmann, M.; Rayes, J. Platelets in Sepsis: An Update on Experimental Models and Clinical Data. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 1687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ngo, A.T.P.; Sarkar, A.; Levine, N.; Bochenek, V.; Zhao, G.; Rauova, L.; Kowalska, M.A.; Eckart, K.; Mangalmurti, N.S.; Rux, A.; et al. Neutrophil Extracellular Traps (NETs) Thrombogenicity and Endothelial Cell Toxicity Are Ameliorated By Platelet Factor 4 (PF4): Implications to the Treatment of Sepsis. Blood 2022, 140, 5529–5530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Verhoef, J.J.F.; Barendrecht, A.D.; Nickel, K.F.; Dijkxhoorn, K.; Kenne, E.; Labberton, L.; McCarty, O.J.T.; Schiffelers, R.; Heijnen, H.F.; Hendrickx, A.P.; et al. Polyphosphate Nanoparticles on the Platelet Surface Trigger Contact System Activation. Blood 2017, 129, 1707–1717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Iba, T.; Connors, J.M.; Nagaoka, I.; Levy, J.H. Recent Advances in the Research and Management of Sepsis-Associated DIC. Int. J. Hematol. 2021, 113, 24–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kumar, S.; Srivastava, V.K.; Kaushik, S.; Saxena, J.; Jyoti, A. Free Radicals, Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Sepsis-Induced Organ Dysfunction: A Mechanistic Insight. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2024, 30, 161–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Hu, D.; Sheeja Prabhakaran, H.; Zhang, Y.-Y.; Luo, G.; He, W.; Liou, Y.-C. Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Sepsis: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Perspectives. Crit. Care 2024, 28, 292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Yang, H.; Zhang, Z. Sepsis-Induced Myocardial Dysfunction: The Role of Mitochondrial Dysfunction. Inflamm. Res. 2021, 70, 379–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Sygitowicz, G.; Sitkiewicz, D. Molecular Mechanisms of Organ Damage in Sepsis: An Overview. Braz. J. Infect. Dis. 2020, 24, 552–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Yang, C.S.; Coopersmith, C.M.; Lyons, J.D. Cell Death Proteins in Sepsis: Key Players and Modern Therapeutic Approaches. Front. Immunol. 2023, 14, 1347401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Honardoost, M.; Soleimanjahi, H.; Rajaei, F. Apoptosis: Programmed Cell Death. J. Inflamm. Dis. 2013, 17, 48–57. [Google Scholar]
  64. Herring, S.E.; Mao, S.; Bhalla, M.; Tchalla, E.Y.I.; Kramer, J.M.; Bou Ghanem, E.N. Mitochondrial ROS Production by Neutrophils Is Required for Host Antimicrobial Function against Streptococcus Pneumoniae and Is Controlled by A2B Adenosine Receptor Signaling. PLoS Pathog. 2022, 18, e1010700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Konecna, B.; Park, J.; Kwon, W.-Y.; Vlkova, B.; Zhang, Q.; Huang, W.; Kim, H.I.; Yaffe, M.B.; Otterbein, L.E.; Itagaki, K.; et al. Monocyte Exocytosis of Mitochondrial Danger-Associated Molecular Patterns in Sepsis Suppresses Neutrophil Chemotaxis. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021, 90, 46–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Maneta, E.; Aivalioti, E.; Tual-Chalot, S.; Emini Veseli, B.; Gatsiou, A.; Stamatelopoulos, K.; Stellos, K. Endothelial Dysfunction and Immunothrombosis in Sepsis. Front. Immunol. 2023, 14, 1144229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Jin, S.; Zhang, H.; Lin, Q.; Yang, J.; Zeng, R.; Xu, Z.; Sun, W. Deciphering the Immune-Metabolic Nexus in Sepsis: A Single-Cell Sequencing Analysis of Neutrophil Heterogeneity and Risk Stratification. Front. Immunol. 2024, 15, 1398719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Langston, J.C.; Rossi, M.T.; Yang, Q.; Ohley, W.; Perez, E.; Kilpatrick, L.E.; Prabhakarpandian, B.; Kiani, M.F. Omics of Endothelial Cell Dysfunction in Sepsis. Vasc. Biol. 2022, 4, R15–R34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Zhang, T.; Yang, Y.-H.; Liu, Y.-P.; Zhang, T.-N.; Yang, N. Regulatory role of noncoding rna in sepsis and sepsis-associated organ dysfunction: An updated systematic review. Shock 2022, 58, 434–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Tao, Y.; Song, L.; Xiao, H.; Liu, C. Inference and Analysis of Cell-Cell Communication of Post-Sepsis Skeletal Muscle Based on Single-Cell RNA-Seq. Hum. Gene 2023, 38, 201236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. She, H.; Tan, L.; Wang, Y.; Du, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, J.; Du, Y.; Guo, N.; Wu, Z.; Li, Q.; et al. Corrigendum: Integrative Single-Cell RNA Sequencing and Metabolomics Decipher the Imbalanced Lipid-Metabolism in Maladaptive Immune Responses during Sepsis. Front. Immunol. 2024, 15, 1418495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Response to infection. (1) Pathogen recognition: Microbial components such as endotoxins and exotoxins (PAMPs) are recognized by pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) on immune cells, including Toll-like receptors (TLRs) and NOD-like receptors (NLRs). These interactions initiate the host immune response. (2) Macrophage activation: Activated macrophages release pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1, IL-6) that amplify immune signaling and recruit additional immune cells to the infection site. (3) Neutrophil response and NET formation: Neutrophils migrate to the affected tissue, undergoing NETosis, which involves extruding chromatin and antimicrobial peptides into the extracellular space. While aiding pathogen clearance, NETs also contribute to intravascular coagulation and tissue damage. (4) Endothelial activation and leukocyte migration: Pro-inflammatory mediators induce endothelial cell activation, increasing the vascular permeability. Leukocytes adhere to the endothelium, migrate via diapedesis, and initiate phagocytosis. (5) Immune collapse and systemic inflammation: Excessive cytokine production leads to widespread inflammation, contributing to multiorgan dysfunction. Anti-inflammatory cytokines attempt to balance the response, but dysregulation can result in immune paralysis. (6) Tissue damage and resolution: Depending on the immune equilibrium, inflammation may resolve, allowing for tissue repair, or escalate into severe sepsis with organ failure.
Figure 1. Response to infection. (1) Pathogen recognition: Microbial components such as endotoxins and exotoxins (PAMPs) are recognized by pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) on immune cells, including Toll-like receptors (TLRs) and NOD-like receptors (NLRs). These interactions initiate the host immune response. (2) Macrophage activation: Activated macrophages release pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1, IL-6) that amplify immune signaling and recruit additional immune cells to the infection site. (3) Neutrophil response and NET formation: Neutrophils migrate to the affected tissue, undergoing NETosis, which involves extruding chromatin and antimicrobial peptides into the extracellular space. While aiding pathogen clearance, NETs also contribute to intravascular coagulation and tissue damage. (4) Endothelial activation and leukocyte migration: Pro-inflammatory mediators induce endothelial cell activation, increasing the vascular permeability. Leukocytes adhere to the endothelium, migrate via diapedesis, and initiate phagocytosis. (5) Immune collapse and systemic inflammation: Excessive cytokine production leads to widespread inflammation, contributing to multiorgan dysfunction. Anti-inflammatory cytokines attempt to balance the response, but dysregulation can result in immune paralysis. (6) Tissue damage and resolution: Depending on the immune equilibrium, inflammation may resolve, allowing for tissue repair, or escalate into severe sepsis with organ failure.
Jmp 06 00018 g001
Figure 2. Sepsis pathogenesis overview.
Figure 2. Sepsis pathogenesis overview.
Jmp 06 00018 g002
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yamamoto, H.; Usman, M.; Koutrouvelis, A.; Yamamoto, S. Mechanism of Sepsis. J. Mol. Pathol. 2025, 6, 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmp6030018

AMA Style

Yamamoto H, Usman M, Koutrouvelis A, Yamamoto S. Mechanism of Sepsis. Journal of Molecular Pathology. 2025; 6(3):18. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmp6030018

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yamamoto, Hideaki, Muhammad Usman, Aristides Koutrouvelis, and Satoshi Yamamoto. 2025. "Mechanism of Sepsis" Journal of Molecular Pathology 6, no. 3: 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmp6030018

APA Style

Yamamoto, H., Usman, M., Koutrouvelis, A., & Yamamoto, S. (2025). Mechanism of Sepsis. Journal of Molecular Pathology, 6(3), 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmp6030018

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop