Next Article in Journal
Estimating the Impact of Climate and Vegetation Changes on Runoff Risk across the Hawaiian Landscape
Next Article in Special Issue
Leveraging Ecosystem Services and Well-Being in Urban Landscape Planning for Nature Conservation: A Case Study of Peri-Urban Dynamics
Previous Article in Journal
Threatened Habitats of Carnivores: Identifying Conservation Areas in Michoacán, México
Previous Article in Special Issue
Potential of Canna indica in Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment: A Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Pre-Germinative Treatments on Eight Priority Native Species for Reforestation in the Tropical Deciduous Forest

by
Juan De Jesús-Velázquez
,
Alejandro Cisneros-Villaseñor
,
Ricardo Armando Tamayo-Bustamante
,
Dioseline Girón-Gutiérrez
,
Hugo Luna-Soria
and
Víctor Hugo Cambrón-Sandoval
*
Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro, Av. de las ciencias S/N, Juriquilla, Querétaro 76230, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Conservation 2023, 3(2), 277-290; https://doi.org/10.3390/conservation3020019
Submission received: 23 January 2023 / Revised: 4 April 2023 / Accepted: 15 April 2023 / Published: 19 April 2023

Abstract

Increasing the germination percentages from chemical and/or mechanical processes in native species is vital for the conservation of the species. The objective was to evaluate the effect of different treatments on the germination process of species belonging to the tropical deciduous forest (TDF) in a forest nursery. Eight species of trees and shrubs reported to be native to the TDF were selected; the seeds were collected from various sites of the state of Queretaro, Mexico. A randomized design of four replicates with 25 seeds was used, for which three pre-germinative scarification treatments were evaluated for each species: (1) thermal scarification (TS), (2) mechanical scarification (MS), and (3) chemical scarification (CS). Germination was considered as the protrusion of cotyledons onto the substrate and was recorded every 48 h for 60 days. A significant difference was observed between treatments (p ≤ 0.05). The mechanical treatment (MS) obtained the highest germination percentage and the least variation, in contrast to the thermal, chemical, and control treatments, which presented the lowest amount of germinated seeds. The MS treatment was the most effective for all the species studied because it allowed for 100% of the germination to be achieved.
Keywords: scarification; pre-germinative treatments and reforestation scarification; pre-germinative treatments and reforestation

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

De Jesús-Velázquez, J.; Cisneros-Villaseñor, A.; Tamayo-Bustamante, R.A.; Girón-Gutiérrez, D.; Luna-Soria, H.; Cambrón-Sandoval, V.H. Effect of Pre-Germinative Treatments on Eight Priority Native Species for Reforestation in the Tropical Deciduous Forest. Conservation 2023, 3, 277-290. https://doi.org/10.3390/conservation3020019

AMA Style

De Jesús-Velázquez J, Cisneros-Villaseñor A, Tamayo-Bustamante RA, Girón-Gutiérrez D, Luna-Soria H, Cambrón-Sandoval VH. Effect of Pre-Germinative Treatments on Eight Priority Native Species for Reforestation in the Tropical Deciduous Forest. Conservation. 2023; 3(2):277-290. https://doi.org/10.3390/conservation3020019

Chicago/Turabian Style

De Jesús-Velázquez, Juan, Alejandro Cisneros-Villaseñor, Ricardo Armando Tamayo-Bustamante, Dioseline Girón-Gutiérrez, Hugo Luna-Soria, and Víctor Hugo Cambrón-Sandoval. 2023. "Effect of Pre-Germinative Treatments on Eight Priority Native Species for Reforestation in the Tropical Deciduous Forest" Conservation 3, no. 2: 277-290. https://doi.org/10.3390/conservation3020019

APA Style

De Jesús-Velázquez, J., Cisneros-Villaseñor, A., Tamayo-Bustamante, R. A., Girón-Gutiérrez, D., Luna-Soria, H., & Cambrón-Sandoval, V. H. (2023). Effect of Pre-Germinative Treatments on Eight Priority Native Species for Reforestation in the Tropical Deciduous Forest. Conservation, 3(2), 277-290. https://doi.org/10.3390/conservation3020019

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop