Understanding the Impact of Oxidative Stress on Ovarian Cancer: Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment

Abstract

Ovarian cancer (OC) ranks as the fifth most common cancer among women in the United States and globally, posing a significant health threat. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) have emerged as critical factors in the pathophysiology of this malignancy. ROS, characterized by their instability due to an unpaired electron, are involved in essential cellular functions and play a crucial role in the immune response under normal physiological conditions. However, an imbalance in ROS homeostasis, leading to excessive ROS production, results in oxidative stress (OS), which can cause indiscriminate damage to cellular structures and contribute to the pathogenesis of specific diseases, including OC. OC is primarily classified based on the originating cell type into epithelial, stromal, and germinal tumors, with epithelial tumors being the most prevalent. Despite advancements in medical technology, early detection of OC remains challenging, often leading to delayed treatment initiation. Current therapeutic approaches include surgical excision of tumor tissue, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. While these treatments are effective in early-stage OC, high mortality rates and frequent relapse underscore the urgent need for novel diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. This review aims to elucidate the role of ROS in OC, emphasizing the potential for developing innovative diagnostic tools and treatments that target ROS-mediated pathways. Given the critical impact of early detection and effective treatment, advancing our understanding of ROS in the context of OC could significantly enhance patient outcomes.

1. Introduction

Ovarian cancer (OC) is a group of neoplasms that develop in the ovaries, classified by the type of cell differentiation [1]. OC ranks as the eighth most common cancer type [2] and is the fifth leading cause of cancer-related deaths among women, with a survival rate of only 30% [3]. Currently, detection methods often identify OC at a late stage [4], resulting in poor treatment outcomes due to drug resistance, metastasis, angiogenesis, and a high recurrence rate [5,6]. The standard treatment involves surgical removal of the tumor, chemotherapy, and targeted therapies such as anti-VEGF (Vascular endothelial growth factor) and PARP (Poly ADP-ribose polymerase) inhibitors [7]. Early detection significantly improves survival rates, with a 92% survival rate when OC is caught early compared to just 29% for advanced stages. However, early-stage OC typically presents no visible symptoms or signs [8], leading to 70% of cases being diagnosed at stage III or IV [9].

Detection of OC primarily involves ultrasound and the measurement of biomarkers such as cancer antigen-125 (CA-125), human epididymis protein 4 (HE4), and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) [10]. However, these methods are not effective for early-stage OC detection, contributing to high cancer mortality rates. To address this, improvements may include investigating early-stage symptoms [11], surgical removal of compromised tissues, a better understanding of molecular pathogenesis, and studying new biomarkers for earlier detection [12]. Additionally, the recurrence rate of OC in late-stage patients exceeds 50% within two years, highlighting the urgent need for new early detection approaches [13]. Current diagnostic standards involve collecting samples for histopathology, transvaginal ultrasonography, and measuring CA-125 and HE4 antigens in serum to stage malignancy risk [14,15]. For more accurate diagnosis, biopsy samples are also important. Treatment primarily includes surgical intervention, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy [16].

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) play a crucial role in regulating ovarian cycles and are involved in numerous signaling pathways, such as WNT/β-catenin, Keap1/Nrf2/ARE (Kelch-like ECH-Associating protein 1/Nuclear factor erythroid 2 related factor 2/Antioxidant response element), Notch, and PI3K/AKT/mTOR (Phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Protein kinase B/Mammalian target of rapamycin). These pathways are vital for the physiological functions of the ovary. However, an imbalance between ROS and antioxidants can lead to the development of OC. Excessive ROS accumulation creates oxidative stress (OS), causing multiple disruptions in cell division. Additionally, ROS buildup in the tumor microenvironment (TME) fosters an immunosuppressive environment, contributing to OC development and progression by affecting immune cells [17]. This raises important questions about the role of ROS in OC and underscores the need for further investigation into its significance.

2. OC: Etiology, Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Characteristics, and Prognosis

Globally, OC affected 324,603 women in 2022, leading to an average of 206,956 deaths in the United States. Around 19,680 new cancer cases are diagnosed with OC annually, resulting in 12,740 deaths—a 64% mortality rate [18]. In Great Britain, 6390 women are diagnosed with OC each year, with a mortality rate close to 60% [19]. The average age of diagnosis for patients with OC is 58 years, with an incidence rate ranging from 1 to 10 per 100,000 women [20]. Despite advancements in medical science, OC mortality rates have not significantly declined over the past decades, with an overall survival rate of 45.6% [21]. OC is typically diagnosed at advanced stages, contributing to its high mortality rate due to the absence of specific OC-related symptoms. Common symptoms include abdominal pain, bloating or distension, back pain, irregular periods, frequent urination, weight loss, fatigue, early satiety, and pain during intercourse [22].

OC can be classified into three major types: epithelial, germ cell, and sex-cord-stromal. Within these, there are nine subtypes, including mixed epithelial and mesenchymal, miscellaneous, soft tissue, monodermal teratoma and somatic-type tumors arising in dermoid cysts, mesothelial, tumor-like lesions, secondary tumors, and lymphoid/myeloid tumors (Figure 1A) [23]. The epithelial type is the most common and, based on tumorigenic pathways, the World Health Organization has divided it into two categories: type I and type II. Type I epithelial OC is typically diagnosed at an early stage and includes low-grade, well-differentiated tumors such as low-grade serous carcinoma, low-grade epithelial carcinoma, mucinous carcinoma, and clear-cell carcinoma. In contrast, type II epithelial OC is usually diagnosed at a late stage and is characterized by rapid and aggressive progression. This type includes high-grade serous tumors, carcinosarcoma, and undifferentiated carcinoma [24]. Ovarian epithelial tumors can also be classified based on tumor cell morphology (Figure 1B) into serous, endometrioid, clear cell, Brenner, mucinous, and seromucinous tumors. Serous tumors, which account for approximately 70% of epithelial tumors, share similarities with the neoplastic epithelial cells of the fallopian tube. Endometrioid tumors, making up 10–20%, resemble endometrial cells, while mucinous tumors, constituting up to 3%, resemble endocervical cells. Clear-cell tumors account for about 10% of epithelial tumors [24]. Serous carcinomas are further divided into high-grade and low-grade subtypes. Specific genetic mutations, including those in the PIK3CA (Phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha), PTEN (Phosphatase and tensin homolog), and BRCA1/BRCA2 (Breast cancer gene 1/2) genes, have been found to lead to the formation of different types of serous tumors [25].

In high-grade serous carcinomas, the predominant mutations occur in the TP53 (Tumor protein 53) gene (Figure 1D). Conversely, low-grade carcinomas show a higher frequency of mutations in KRAS (Kirsten ras oncogene) and BRAF (B-Raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase), which activate the MAPK (Mitogen-activated kinase-like protein) pathway, resulting in cyclin D1 overexpression. Low-grade carcinomas also exhibit elevated levels of p21/WAF1 (Wild-type p53-activated fragment 1) and express cell growth suppressors such as B cell translocation gene 2 and GADD34 (Growth arrest and deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) damage-inducible protein) [26]. Interestingly, KRAS and BRAF mutations have also been detected in high-grade serous carcinomas. Both types of OCs evade immune responses through increased expression of human leukocyte antigen-G [27]. Mutations in genes responsible for DNA repair also elevate OC risk; mutations in BRIP1 (BRCA1 interacting helicase 1) increase risk by 5.8%, RAD51C (RAD51 homolog C) by 5.2%, and RAD51D (RAD51 paralog D) by 12% [28].

One of the most significant risk factors for OC is a family history of the disease, particularly among first-degree relatives. Having a relative diagnosed with OC increases the chance of developing the disease by 36%, especially if the diagnosis occurred at age 50 or older [29]. The presence of a BRCA1 mutation elevates the risk of OC to as high as 50%, while a BRCA2 mutation increases it to 10–20% [30]. Additionally, specific loci such as CHEK2 (Checkpoint kinase 2), WNT4 (Wnt family member 4), TERT (Telomerase reverse transcriptase), and ABO (Alpha 1-3-N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase and alpha 1-3-galactosyltransferase), and regions like 3q25, 17q12, 17q21, and 19p13.11 are associated with increased cancer risk, as are mutations in the BRIP1 and RAD51 genes [31]. Dysfunction of the p53 gene, a tumor suppressor, also heightens cancer risk [32]. Interestingly, pregnancies reduce OC risk, even among BRCA1 mutation carriers, with each childbirth lowering the risk by 10–20%. Age and menopausal onset are crucial risk factors [33]. Being overweight increases OC risk by 5 to 30% due to lower globulin levels and higher estradiol levels. Conversely, breastfeeding, which inhibits ovulation, reduces OC risk by 20–25%. The use of oral contraceptives lowers OC risk by 30% in both women with BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations and the general population, with protection persisting for up to 5 years after cessation, potentially preventing about 30,000 new cases [34]. Menopausal hormone therapy can reduce OC risk by 40%, but discontinuation increases risk by 20% after 5 years. Tubal ligation decreases risk by 20–30% [35]. Other conditions such as endometriosis have been shown to increase the risk of OC by 2.5 times. Pelvic inflammatory diseases elevate OC risk by 30–50%, and women with diabetes face a 17% increased risk of developing OC. Certain medications like insulin and sulfonylureas are associated with higher OC risk, whereas metformin has been linked to reduced risk. Additionally, the use of acetylsalicylic acid, an anti-inflammatory and analgesic drug, lowers OC risk by 20%. Lifestyle factors such as smoking and alcohol consumption are subtype-specific risk factors, while diet, including consumption of eggs and lactose, may also impact OC risk [36].

3. ROS: General Definition, Balance and Levels of ROS, and Positive Role of ROS

3.1. Introduction to ROS

Free radicals are highly reactive molecules or atoms that typically possess at least one unpaired electron in their outer electron layer, leading to their remarkable reactivity and unstable nature. Today, we recognize their crucial roles in various physiological processes, influencing both health and disease states [37].

Free radicals typically arise from cellular metabolic processes when electrons with unpaired spins in the outer energy shells engage in reactions, forming partially reduced and highly reactive particles [38]. These radicals are categorized based on which atom carries the unpaired electron in the outer electron layer, such as oxygen, nitrogen, chlorine, and others. ROS are derivatives known for their ability to oxidize organic substrates [39]. The composition of ROS remains debated, but four species are most commonly recognized: superoxide (O₂^•−), singlet oxygen (¹O₂), hydroxyl radical (HO•), and hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂), of which hydrogen peroxide is the least reactive [40]. ROS can exist in radical and non-radical forms; non-radical forms include hydrogen peroxide and singlet oxygen, while radical forms include hydroxyl radical and superoxide [40,41].

3.2. The Balance between ROS and Antioxidants

Intracellular metabolic processes inevitably generate a significant amount of ROS, which play a crucial role in mediating intracellular and intercellular signaling within the human body [42]. Despite their essential functions, excessive ROS production can lead to OS, where ROS accumulate within cells, potentially damaging various cellular structures and increasing the risk of mutations [43]. Currently, OS is classified in at least two ways based on its intensity and level, although consensus on a unified classification remains elusive [44]. To counteract OS, the body relies on an antioxidant defense system [45]. This system involves the production of antioxidants that help reduce ROS levels and restore balance between antioxidants and ROS. Antioxidants can be synthesized by the body itself or obtained externally through the consumption of foods rich in these compounds [46].

Antioxidants are classified into enzymatic and non-enzymatic groups based on their nature and mode of action, with enzymatic antioxidants playing a critical role in maintaining ROS homeostasis within cells [46]. Non-enzymatic antioxidants include zinc, taurine, vitamin C, glutathione (GSH), selenium, β-carotene, and vitamin E, which react with ROS and convert them into compounds that are less harmful to the body [47]. Among these, GSH is particularly significant; the reduced GSH and oxidized GSSG (glutathione disulfide), can serve as markers of OS based on their ratio within cells [47]. GSH not only directly neutralizes ROS and supports antioxidant enzymes but also regenerates vitamins C and E to their active forms [48]. Enzymatic antioxidants encompass superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase, glutathione reductase (GR), and catalase (CAT) (Figure 2) [49]. CAT, primarily located in peroxisomes in mammals, is crucial for converting hydrogen peroxide into water and oxygen, thus regulating ROS balance effectively [50]. SOD exists in various forms throughout the body; copper–zinc SOD (Cu/ZnSOD) is found in the cytoplasm, manganese SOD (MnSOD) in both the cytoplasm and mitochondria, while an extracellular form also exists [50,51].

3.3. Representation of ROS and Enzymatic and Non-Enzymatic Antioxidants Balance in Healthy Cells

SOD functions primarily by catalyzing the dismutation of superoxide anions, converting them into less reactive hydrogen peroxide, which is subsequently broken down into water and oxygen with the assistance of other enzymes [51]. Glutathione peroxidase exists in two forms: selenium-dependent (GPx) and selenium-independent (GST), located within the cell in both the cytosol and mitochondrial matrix. This enzyme primarily reduces ROS by converting peroxides into water, utilizing GSH in the process, which is converted from its reduced form GSH to its oxidized form GSSG [52]. GR is a key enzyme in the ascorbate– GSH cycle, crucial for maintaining ROS balance. It facilitates the conversion of oxidized GSSG back to reduced GSH using NADPH (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate) as an electron donor [53].

3.4. Beneficial Role of ROS in Physiological Processes of the Healthy Ovary, and Use of Potential Antioxidants in OS Reduction

Initially, ROS were thought to be exclusively harmful agents, associated with cellular damage due to their high levels. However, it has since been discovered that their role is more nuanced, and under certain conditions, they can benefit the organism [54]. ROS serve as crucial effectors and signaling molecules in essential biological processes at the cellular level. They regulate cell growth, apoptosis, proliferation, and various signaling pathways, including those involved in inflammatory responses and responses to growth factors. At the organismal level, ROS play a key role in immune function [54,55]. Their immune function includes limiting specific immune responses, regulating inflammation, and directly targeting bacteria and fungi for destruction [55].

In the ovary, ROS play a crucial role in regulating the ovarian cycle, which includes processes such as meiosis and ovulation, as well as influencing the corpus luteum and related hormone production. During meiosis, the interplay between ROS and antioxidants directly impacts the entire process: during meiosis I, the balance shifts towards ROS, while during meiosis II, antioxidants become predominant [56]. Ovulation, akin to an inflammatory process, involves the production of ROS similar to inflammatory cells like neutrophils and macrophages [57]. Prior to ovulation, luteinizing hormone induces an environment with heightened ROS levels, triggering processes that facilitate ovulation (Figure 3) [57]. Following ovulation, the corpus luteum forms in the ovary, producing progesterone. In the event of fertilization, progesterone supports pregnancy; without fertilization, the corpus luteum regresses, reducing progesterone levels in preparation for the next ovulation cycle. Maintaining a balance between ROS and SOD is critical in regulating progesterone levels. SOD aids in neutralizing ROS, thereby sustaining the corpus luteum and ensuring adequate progesterone levels (Figure 3) [58]. Conversely, when regression of the corpus luteum and reduction in progesterone levels are required, SOD activity decreases and ROS levels increase, leading to corpus luteum regression (Figure 3) [59]. This regression involves a gradual decline in function followed by a complete disappearance from the ovary [60].

To control ROS levels in healthy ovaries, several potential antioxidant mechanisms are used by cells, such as N-acetylcysteine (NAC), coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10), and CoQ10 reduced form, ubiquinol.

NAC is recognized for its safety, affordability, and tolerability as an antioxidant with a well-defined mechanism of action. Its favorable risk/benefit ratio and low incidence of adverse events make it beneficial across a range of clinical applications [61]. Oral NAC has been shown to significantly alleviate endometriosis-related pain, such as dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and chronic pelvic pain, and reduce the size of ovarian endometriomas [62].

NAC enhances tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) expression on stimulated T cells and increases TNFα receptors on both tumor cell lines and T cells. This effect is achieved through early inhibition of TNFα and TNF-R shedding, followed by increased mRNA expression. In vivo, orally administered NAC inhibits tumor development in a significant portion of mice and confers resistance to tumor re-inoculation, demonstrating potent antitumoral activity without detectable toxicity [63]. Pretreatment of CaOV3 cells with NAC has been shown to potentiate doxorubicin-induced phosphorylation of p53 and ATM, thereby enhancing efficacy [64]. Another study found that co-administration of NAC and vitamin E effectively mitigates the ovarian damage caused by cyclophosphamide, improving antioxidant capacity and reducing inflammation, thereby preserving ovarian function and fertility (Impact of Co-Administration of N-Acetylcysteine and Vitamin E on Cyclophosphamide-Induced Ovarian Toxicity in Female Rats [65]).

Another potential antioxidant, CoQ10 and ubiquinol, the reduced form of CoQ10, offer enhanced bioavailability and may provide superior antioxidant protection compared to CoQ10 alone. They are known for their role in mitochondrial function, and as antioxidants are found to effectively reduce oxidative stress and utero-ovarian damage caused by methotrexate (MTX) in rats. CoQ10 restores oxidative stress markers and antioxidant and anti-inflammatory levels in ovarian and uterine tissues, suggesting that it is a protective agent against MTX-induced reproductive toxicity [66]. Current evidence suggests antioxidants could be beneficial as adjuvants in ovarian cancer treatment by reducing oxidative stress and enhancing conventional therapies like chemotherapy and radiation. Some studies report improved patient quality of life and reduced side effects, but others indicate potential interference with therapeutic effects. While promising preclinical data exist for antioxidants as stand-alone therapies, robust clinical trials are needed to confirm their efficacy and safety.

4. Generation of ROS, the Role of OS in OC Pathogenesis, and the Clinical Impact of ROS

OS is a condition where the balance between reactive metabolites, the antioxidant defense system, and free radicals is disrupted. This imbalance leads to damage to molecules, thereby impairing tissue or organismal functions [67]. An imbalance in the levels of ROS and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) can disrupt normal bodily functions. Excessive amounts of these components can overwhelm antioxidant defenses, resulting in oxidative damage to lipids, proteins, nucleic acids, and other cellular structures [68,69]. ROS are primarily generated in mitochondria during cellular respiration (endogenous sources) or through the damage of cellular macromolecules (exogenous sources) (Figure 4). Environmental factors such as heavy metals, pollutants, ionizing radiation, UV light, and chemotherapeutics can also lead to the formation of ROS, thereby altering cellular functions [70,71].

ROS are involved in regulating the ovarian cycle and participate in key signaling pathways in the ovary. The ROS/antioxidant balance significantly influences the development of OC. When ROS production exceeds the capacity of the antioxidant defense system, it can lead to the development of OC and other serious diseases by affecting cell proliferation signaling pathways and apoptotic genes. Moreover, ROS act as signaling molecules, directly affecting the activation of pro-oncogenic pathways and metastasis development. Cancer cells tend to produce increased amounts of ROS through NADPH oxidase (NOX) proteins and mitochondria [72]. Chronic inflammation in cells leads to the production of ROS and RNS, immune cells activation, and cause dysregulation, which may result in the formation of preneoplastic cells. When ROS and RNS levels surpass the antioxidant response, irreversible reactions occur, leading to protein carbonylation, lipid peroxidation (malondialdehyde), and nucleic acid damage (8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine or 8-OHdG). These changes can cause genetic and epigenetic alterations, contributing to carcinogenesis by dysregulating oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes [73,74]. Epigenetic changes encompass modifications in histones, DNA methylation, chromatin remodeling, and the expression of miRNA (microribonucleic acid) [74]. miRNA represents a small class of endogenous non-coding RNA molecules, typically 18–25 nucleotides in length. It regulates gene expression at the post-transcriptional level by recognizing target sequences based on complementary 3′ UTR (untranslated) regions, leading to the inhibition of the translation process and miRNA degradation [75]. miRNAs are located within cancer-related genomic regions and can function as tumor promoters or suppressors at different stages of cancer initiation. Altered miRNA expression is considered a hallmark of cancer and is associated with cancer development, progression, and metastasis [76].

OS contributes to the development of OC by causing dysregulation of genes, signaling pathways, and the TME. When ROS levels exceed the body’s antioxidant defense, OS occurs, resulting in damage and altered function of biomolecules along with abnormal cellular events [70]. The high rate of aerobic glycolysis (Warburg effect) in cancer cells is proportional to OS and ROS generation [77]. Alterations in genetic and metabolic processes, along with changes in the TME, cause persistent generation of high levels of ROS in cancer cells [78]. The TME is often characterized by hypoxia, OS, and excess ROS molecules [79]. Altered signaling pathways, such as integrin activation during metastasis, can also lead to higher ROS generation [80]. These mechanisms contribute to significant increases in ROS levels in cancer cells, thereby implicating them in cancer initiation, progression, and metastasis [81]. ROS-mediated metastasis is driven by anoikis resistance, which uncouples attachment and programmed cell death in cancer cells [82].

Research indicates that ROS trigger the activation of ERK1/2 (extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2), MAPK, PI3K, and AKT signaling pathways, all of which play significant roles in cell division [83]. They also increase the level of gene mutations, such as in TP53, PTEN/PIK3CA, and BRCA1/BRCA2, which can trigger the development of cancer. The increase in ROS is associated with NADPH oxidase activity, mitochondrial activity, and NADPH oxidase 4 (NOX4). Additionally, NOX, TGF-β1 (transforming growth factor-beta), and NF-κB (Nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells) activation have also been linked to increased ROS levels [84]. ROS and RNS alter genetic and molecular mechanisms to promote rapid and aggressive tumor division and growth, reducing the chance of cure [85,86]; however, a crucial aim for tumors is to find a way to regulate ROS to both promote accelerated proliferation and avoid inducing apoptosis or ferroptosis [87,88]. ROS leads to DNA damage, contributing to carcinogenesis, while the regulation of gene expression influences redox balance and activates transcription factors in cancer cells [89]. Overall, OS promotes the production of ROS by inducing genetic changes, such as damage to mitochondrial and nuclear DNA, altering miRNA expression, activating transcription factors, influencing signaling pathways, and affecting the TME. Additionally, OS leads to modifications in signaling pathways, including Notch, Wnt/β-catenin, Keap1-Nrf2-ARE, and PI3K/AKT/mTOR [89].

When the balance between the production and utilization of ROS is disturbed in cancer cells, large amounts of ROS accumulate, negatively affecting cellular metabolism and potentially disrupting cellular structures. Despite this, cancer cells do not die on their own, as they have developed the ability to affect antioxidant functions and counteract OS over time. Moreover, increased OS is associated with chemoresistance. It has been proposed that chemotherapy induces point mutations in redox enzymes, leading to a pro-oxidant state in cancer cells [90].

5. OS and Signaling Pathways

OS is characterized by the excessive generation of ROS and/or a reduction in antioxidant defenses during cellular metabolism. OS has been found to play a role in the pathophysiology of many human malignancies. ROS-mediated cellular pathways promote cell survival, oncogenesis, and metastasis and render cancer cells resistant to treatment (Figure 5) [91].

5.1. Keap1-Nrf2-ARE Signaling Pathway

The Keap1-Nrf2-ARE pathway plays a crucial role in regulating cellular metabolism and redox balance [92]. This pathway consists of three components: Keap1, Nrf2, and ARE. Nrf2 activation is associated with various human malignancies, including breast, prostate, and ovarian cancers. Abnormalities in the Keap1-Nrf2-ARE pathway can result in genomic instability, drug resistance, metastasis, resistance to apoptosis, and alterations in metabolic functions [93,94]. Under normal conditions, Keap1 inhibits Nrf2 by binding to it and promoting cullin3-mediated ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation. However, during OS, ROS oxidizes Keap1 cysteine residues, preventing Nrf2 degradation and leading to its activation. The activated Nrf2 then forms a heterodimer with Maf proteins in the nucleus and binds to AREs located within the promoter regions of target genes [95]. Keap1 and Nrf2 act as sensors for ROS-induced damage through the constant shuttling of Keap1 between the nucleus and the cytoplasm under physiological conditions [96]. Any alterations in this pathway can lead to OS, mitochondrial dysfunction, and inflammation [97]. Moreover, hyperactivation of the Keap1-Nrf2-ARE pathway supports the growth and survival of both normal and cancer cells by shielding them from OS, radiation, and chemotherapeutics, thereby contributing to oncogenesis and making it an attractive target for cancer therapy [98,99,100]. In epithelial OC cells, ROS-activated miRNAs, such as miR-200a and miR-141, lead to OS and Nrf2 signaling activation, ultimately promoting ovarian tumorigenesis [101].

5.2. PI3K/AKT/mTOR Signaling Pathway

The PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway is the most frequently altered pathway in human malignancies, playing a central role in regulating cellular activities and cancer development processes. These include cell survival, cell cycle progression, drug resistance, apoptosis regulation, protein synthesis, hormone and growth factor response, angiogenesis, and genomic instability [102,103,104,105,106]. Ovarian tumors often carry abnormalities in the PIK3CA gene, which encodes the catalytic subunit of class I PI3K, and the PIK3R1 gene, which encodes the regulatory subunit of class I PI3K [107,108]. ROS activates this pathway by inhibiting protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTPs) and PTEN activity in OC [109,110,111]. OC-mediated activation of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway results in the upregulation of VEGF and promotes de novo fatty acid and cholesterol biosynthesis, thereby facilitating OC growth and metastasis. In a transgenic mouse model, a combination of the PIK3CA H1047R mutation and PTEN deletion resulted in the development of granulosa cell tumors and ovarian serous adenocarcinoma [112].

5.3. Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling Pathway

There are three well-defined Wnt signaling pathways: the canonical Wnt/β-catenin pathway, the non-canonical planar cell polarity pathway, and the non-canonical Wnt–Ca²⁺ pathway. The canonical Wnt/β-catenin pathway is β-catenin-dependent and the non-canonical pathway is β-catenin-independent [113]. Accumulating evidence shows that hyperactivation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway is associated with key aspects of cancer development in various cancer types, including proliferation, chemoresistance, metastasis, immune suppression, and angiogenesis [114,115,116,117]. Although recent studies show that genetic alterations in this pathway are uncommon, signaling components still play an important role in the molecular events that lead to ovarian oncogenesis, mostly of the serous type [118].

Epithelial OC harbors gene aberrations in the β-catenin gene, CTNNB1, accounting for 54% of cases [119,120,121]. A previous study showed that NOX1-derived ROS, by inactivating nucleoredoxin (a redox-sensitive protein that negatively controls the Wnt/β-catenin pathway), stimulates this pathway, thereby promoting cancer progression [122]. Tankyrase, a tumorigenic regulator, activates the Wnt/β-catenin/Snail pathway and favors aerobic glycolysis in OC [123].

5.4. Notch Signaling Pathway

Notch receptors are transmembrane proteins comprising an extracellular portion rich in epidermal growth factor-like repeats, a transmembrane domain, and a large intracellular domain containing a regulation of amino acid metabolism 23 site [124]. Notch signaling is involved in the activation of the nitric oxide-soluble guanylate cyclase pathway resulting in OC cell growth and survival. A study conducted by Jung et al. reported high miRNA levels of Notch3, Jag1, and Jag2 and high Notch3 and Jag2 protein levels in serous OC samples compared to benign controls [125]. According to previous findings, there were high Notch1 intracellular domain (NICD1) levels in OVCAR3, SKOV3, and CaOV3 cell lines. Western blot confirmed NICD1 expression in 76% of primary human serous OC samples [126]. Retrovirus-mediated overexpression of the Notch3 intracellular domain (NICD3) in ovarian surface epithelium and low-grade serous OC cells with low endogenous Notch3 levels resulted in upregulation of the Nanog and Oct4 genes, implying a main role of the Notch pathway in cancer stemness [127]. NICD3 was also overexpressed in OVCA429 serous OC cells inducing the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) process and was confirmed by high levels of mesenchymal markers and low levels of epithelial markers. Compared to OVCA429 control cells, NICD3-overexpressing cells showed resistance to carboplatin-induced apoptosis [128]. An investigation revealed upregulation of 23 genes in ovarian tumor endothelial cells compared to benign ovarian endothelial cells, among which Jag1 was responsible for tube formation and migration of endothelial cells [129]. Altogether, these studies evidence the role of the Notch pathway in EMT, invasion, metastasis, stemness, endothelial cell function, and angiogenesis in serous ovarian tumors.

6. Diagnostic Methods

Detecting OC early is crucial to reduce mortality rates associated with the disease, as it is often diagnosed at advanced stages. That is why improvement of the specificity and sensitivity of detection methods could introduce novel approaches for diagnosing OC at stages where treatment outcomes are more favorable [130]. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network in the USA and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence in the UK recommend to test individuals for OC when particular symptoms occur, such as abdominal pain, bloating, unexplained weight loss, loss of appetite, or early satiety after eating small meals, changes in bowel habits, or increased urinary frequency. These symptoms warrant prompt evaluation to facilitate early detection and intervention [131].

While ultrasonography is a recommended method for detecting OC, testing serum levels of CA125 and other biomarkers (Figure 6) is considered more reliable. This approach aims to facilitate early surgical removal of tumors [132]. CA125, a heavily glycosylated membrane-spanning mucin (MUC16) glycoprotein of approximately 5 MDa, is released into the pericellular space and blood when the extracellular domain of MUC16 is cleaved near the surface of OC cells. Elevated CA125 levels are typically found in patients with OC stages III–IV [133]; however, CA125 can also be elevated in cases of menstruation, ovarian cysts, or endometriosis, indicating its presence in benign conditions and as a physiological precursor to ovulation [134].

Moreover, only half of women with stage I OC exhibit elevated CA125 levels, making it unreliable for evaluating benign diseases. In contrast, ultrasonography can detect both malignant and benign lesions using the “malignant” (m) and “benign” (b) rules, achieving sensitivities of 95% and specificities of 91%, respectively [135]. The risk of OC algorithm (ROCA) utilizes CA125 marker levels for OC screening, categorizing patients into three risk groups. Depending on the ROCA results, women may be recommended for annual screening using ultrasonography, repeat CA125 testing in three months, or repeat CA125 testing combined with transvaginal ultrasonography in six weeks. While ROCA screening has demonstrated higher rates of early-stage OC detection, it has not significantly reduced mortality rates [136]. Transvaginal sonography can perform image analysis, but it may not adequately detect small pre- or invasive lesions. Additionally, this method primarily images the adnexa, and it cannot visualize the fallopian tubes [137].

Another imaging method involves the use of microbubble contrast, which has demonstrated promising results in distinguishing malignant from benign lesions. In contrast, hyperpolarized 13C MRI (Hyperpolarized carbon-13 magnetic resonance imaging), magnetic relaxometry, and superconducting quantum interference detection have shown distinctive characteristics in various other cancer types and may potentially be employed for detecting OC [138,139].

Human epididymal protein 4 (HE4) is another biomarker utilized for detecting OC, characterized as a 124 amino acid glycosylated whey protein. Elevated levels of HE4 in serum are observed in 65–75% of patients with OC [140]. In contrast, cancer antigen 15.3 (CA15.3) and cancer antigen 72.4 (CA72.4) represent distinct epitopes on the MUC1 mucin. However, only 18% of patients who are negative for CA125 can be diagnosed using HE4, CA15.3, and CA72.4 [141]. Other biomarkers include OVA1 (Ovarian malignancy algorithm) and mesothelin. OVA1 assesses the levels of Beta2-microglobulin, CA125, transthyretin (pre-albumin), ApoA1 (Apolipoprotein A1), and transferrin in serum to evaluate the risk of OC. This algorithm considers biomarker levels along with the menopausal status of patients. Mesothelin is a protein associated with OC cells’ adherence, survival, and disease progression. Increased levels of mesothelin indicate the presence of OC, and it has been observed in 40–67% of patients [142].

Another potential option is the detection of TP53 alterations, as TP53 mutations are prevalent in OC, particularly in 96% of high-grade serous carcinomas. Testing for TP53 autoantibody levels has demonstrated significant advantages over CA125 testing, with clinical implications suggesting reduced detection times [143]. Additionally, autoantibodies targeting interleukin-8 (IL-8), EpCAM (Epithelial cell adhesion molecule), PLAT (Tissue type plasminogen activator), c-Myc (Cellular myelocytomatosis oncogene), MDM2 (Mouse double minute 2 homolog), and HOXA7 (Homeobox A7) have shown sensitivities ranging from 9% to 67% at specificities of between 98% and 100% for detecting OC across all stages [130].

Proximal tumor fluids can serve as screening tools, as somatic mutations in TP53 have been isolated from uterine lavage and even menstrual blood in women with OC. The PapSEEK test, an experimental liquid biopsy test, is utilized for early detection of endometrial and OC based on DNA alterations caused by these diseases. The PapSEEK test exhibits a sensitivity of 33% and a specificity of 99% in detecting OC [144].

miRNAs play strong regulatory roles in various cellular processes and any alteration in their expression results in various cancer types, especially chemotherapy-resistant OC; thus, there is a need to identify novel targets like OC-associated miRNAs for early diagnosis and treatment [145]. Often, miRNA levels differ in healthy persons and patients with OC, and as such their levels are not increased in patients with benign OC [146]. Likewise, the expression profiles of miR-200A, miR-200B, and miR-200C are significantly greater in healthy tissues, and the expression profiles of miR-199A, miR-140, miR-145, and miR-125B1 are lower in OC [147]. miR-10a and miR-10b considerably suppressed the proliferation of ovarian granulosa cells [148]. Various types of RNA, including miR-182 and miR-200 family members (mainly miR-200a, miR-200b, and miR-200c), are overexpressed in high-grade serous epithelial OC [149,150]. miR-183 is highly expressed in OC and its downregulation induced apoptosis, thereby inhibiting the growth and progression of OVCAR-3 and SKOV-3 cell lines [151]. miR-151 activates the AKT/mTOR pathway and results in tumorigenesis and the progression of OC [152]. Overexpressed miR-10b in OC activates Ras homolog family member C and matrix metallopeptidase 14, which are responsible for metastasis [153]. It was shown that miRNA can be detected in the body fluids of patients with OC, highlighting the significance of miRNA as a biomarker [154].

To conclude, all currently used detection methods are not reliable due to the risk of false-negative results and there are no markers that can be used as stand-alone screening tests. Even two-stage methods that are used do not have reliable sensitivity, despite adequate specificity. Early detection of OC is key to reducing mortality and is a field for future studies and investigations. Early detection remains an elusive goal, and the significance of both cost-effective and efficient methods for diagnosing OC is key.

7. Role of OS Inducers as Therapeutic Agents in OC Therapy, Treatment Options for OC, and the Role of Oxidative Stress in Chemotherapy Resistance

Clinically approved anticancer drugs effectively eliminate the cancer cells by inducing ROS either directly or indirectly [155]. For instance, chemotherapeutics that interfere with cell division (like taxanes) or nucleic acid synthesis (like anthracyclines) can trigger ROS generation via mitochondrial dysfunction [156,157,158]. Recent studies also highlight the superior pro-oxidant activity of some novel compounds and repurposed drugs showing prominent therapeutic efficacy [159,160]. Phytochemicals and nanoparticles also act by increasing intracellular ROS levels, resulting in ROS-mediated apoptosis of cancer cells [89]; however, OS can act as a double-edged sword where it has a detrimental effect on healthy cells, resulting in toxicity [161,162]. Other adverse effects also reduce the efficacy of chemotherapy, e.g., cancer cell adaptivity to OS, cell cycle aberrations, and cancer stem cell escape from oxidative DNA damage, thereby promoting cancer metastasis and recurrence [163,164,165].

Currently, the standard treatment for OC includes chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgical intervention. Combination therapy involving these approaches may be tailored based on factors such as the patient’s condition, treatment sensitivity, disease stage, and other variables [166]. Before initiating treatment, several considerations must be taken into account, including the type of cancer, location and presence of metastases, and biopsy results. Primary surgical cytoreduction is the primary treatment for newly diagnosed OC. The main objective of surgery is the complete resection of disseminated carcinomatosis and en bloc removal of any affected organs such as the bowel, uterus, or adnexal masses, ensuring that tumors are surgically removed intact without breaching their capsules [167]. Furthermore, pelvic and para-aortic lymph node dissection is essential for patients at both early and late stages of OC, as lymph node metastases can complicate treatment and increase risks. In some instances, additional procedures such as colonoscopy and/or upper endoscopy may be necessary to rule out the possibility of primary gastrointestinal cancer [168].

Surgical intervention for OC primarily aims at debulking, which involves removing the ovaries, fallopian tubes, and, in some cases, a partial or complete hysterectomy, along with the omentum and other affected tissues. If the disease has spread to other organs, additional resections may be necessary, including the spleen, bowel, peritoneum, and diaphragm [169]. Whole-abdomen radiotherapy, developed in the 1960s, uses high doses of radiation to induce antitumor effects by causing DNA lysis in tumor cells. Radiotherapy can be applied after surgery at lower doses in combination with other treatments to minimize the toxic effects of each method while enhancing the overall therapeutic effect [170].

Adjuvant chemotherapy is another treatment approach used for OC. Whether to use adjuvant chemotherapy or not depends on a biopsy confirming pathological changes in ovarian, tubal, or peritoneal cancer, as well as on the grade and stage of the cancer. For stage I OC, surgical removal often leads to a cure. However, patients receiving chemotherapy are typically treated with carboplatin in combination with paclitaxel, carboplatin alone, or with neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone [30]. There are two main types of chemotherapeutic drugs used for OC treatment: platinum-based drugs, including carboplatin and cisplatin, and taxanes, such as paclitaxel and docetaxel. Carboplatin, a platinum-based drug, is less toxic and has fewer adverse effects. Patients with OC often show significant sensitivity to carboplatin, which can increase survival rates. The drug can be administered intravenously or through heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy [157].

Nevertheless, chemotherapy has significant limitations due to the development of chemotherapy resistance. Research has shown that the inactivation of tumor-suppressor genes such as PTEN, RB1 (retinoblastoma transcriptional corepressor 1), RAD51B, and NF1 (neurofibromin 1) contributes to this resistance [171]. Additionally, changes at the molecular level within cells, often induced by OS, further complicate treatment. High-dose chemotherapeutic agents also cause significant side effects, presenting another major challenge in the effective management of OC [172].

The recurrence of OC is a significant issue, as it is incurable in most cases. Approximately 80% of patients with advanced-stage OC experience recurrence, and only a small percentage can achieve a cure upon recurrence. Therefore, monitoring CA125 levels, evaluating symptoms, and performing radiographic imaging every 2 to 4 months after treatment completion are essential [173]. OC cells possess certain genes that inhibit apoptosis, allowing cancer cells to survive and proliferate. Apoptosis inhibition occurs through two main pathways: the intrinsic pathway (regulated by Bcl-2 family proteins) and the extrinsic pathway (regulated by tyrosine-protein kinases). Both intrinsic and extrinsic apoptotic inhibitors contribute to chemotherapy resistance [174].

The Bcl-2 protein family, which includes Bcl-X and Mcl-1, is not only overexpressed in OC but also contributes to decreased survival due to chemotherapy resistance. Clinical trials for Bcl-2 inhibitors have shown improved survival rates and a high response to cisplatin treatment [175]. Another well-studied inhibitor is survivin, which targets apoptotic proteins. The use of drugs that suppress survivin results in tumor regression and enhanced sensitivity to chemotherapy [176]. Tyrosine-protein kinase Met (c-Met) levels are elevated in patients with OC, promoting angiogenesis, anti-apoptotic activity, and cancer cell proliferation. Studies have shown that radiotherapy can induce c-Met expression, leading to better treatment responses and higher survival rates by reducing apoptosis and cancer cell proliferation [177].

OC cells commonly develop resistance to chemotherapeutic treatments like paclitaxel, cisplatin, vincristine, and doxorubicin due to P-glycoprotein (Pgp), which is often overexpressed in patients with OC [178]. Pgp functions by actively transporting drugs out of the cell against their concentration gradient, thereby reducing their cytotoxic effects. Additionally, OC cells can express MRP1 (encoded by ABCC1 or ATP-binding cassette subfamily C member 1) and MRP2 (encoded by ABCC2 or ATP-binding cassette subfamily C member 2) through the formation of transport proteins. The MDR-1 (multidrug resistance mutation 1) gene, which encodes the 170-kD adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-dependent glycoprotein, also known as MDR-associated proteins, also contributes to drug resistance. These mechanisms collectively hinder the efficacy of chemotherapy in treating OC [179].

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are a subpopulation of tumor cells with the ability to self-renew, be pluripotent, participate in tumor growth, and induce recurrence, metastasis, and chemoresistance. CSCs have similar molecular properties and the same hierarchical organization as normal stem cells; however, they express cell surface markers, including CD44, CD24, and CD133, and secrete cytokines and chemokines IL8, IL-6, and IL-4 for self-renewal. New methods of targeting CSCs have demonstrated promising results. Metformin has anticancer properties, improves sensitivity to chemotherapy, and has antiproliferative and pro-apoptotic effects by inhibiting CD44 + CD117 + OCSCs. Salinomycin has also shown significant results, including the selective targeting of CSCs, enhanced cytotoxic effect on CD133+OC cells, and reduced percentage of CSCs in OC cells. Calcium channel blockers induce OCSC apoptosis, have antitumor effects on CSCs, and inhibit the expression of stem cell markers [180].

In OC, chromatin alterations and the activation of insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1) pathways contribute to increased drug resistance. Inhibiting IGF-1 and targeting cytotoxic genes represent potential strategies for enhancing therapeutic efficacy and improving patient survival [181]. During OC progression, EMT occurs alongside angiogenesis. Overexpression of endothelin-1 and endothelin-A promotes this transition, transforming epithelial cells into mesenchymal cells with anti-apoptotic properties. This transition contributes to drug resistance and higher OC mortality rates [182].

Molecularly targeted therapy and immunotherapy represent innovative approaches for treating OC. Immunotherapy aims to activate the adaptive or innate immune systems by enhancing T-cell or Natural killer (NK) cell activation, or by modulating immune responses through the inhibition of immune checkpoints, targeting regulatory T cells, or overcoming immunosuppression in the TME [183]. Targeted therapy can be classified into passive and active approaches. Passive targeted therapy involves delivering generic antibodies, lymphocytes, or other immune system components to target OC cells. Active immunotherapy stimulates the patient’s immune response to produce antibodies or lymphocytes specifically targeting OC cells [184].

Immunotherapy uses multiple strategies, including viruses (T-VEC/Talimogene laherparepvec), bacteria, therapeutic vaccines (Intravenous oncolytic vaccinia virus GL-ONC1), NK cells, dendritic cells (DC), TIL (tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes), or T-cell transfer, monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), immunostimulatory cytokines, and antigen-specific chimeric antigen receptors or CARs (CTL019/tisagenlecleucel; Axicabtagene ciloleucel). Checkpoint inhibitors that are currently in clinical trials are Ipilimumab (CTLA-4 inhibitor); Nivolumab and Pembrolizumab (programmed cell death or PD-1 inhibitors); Durvalumab, Atezolizumab, and Avelumab (Programmed death-ligand 1 or PD-L1 inhibitors); and Relatlimab (Lymphocyte activation gene-1 or LAG-1 inhibitor), which target angiogenesis [185].

The success rate for OC treatment remains low and there are only certain drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) [186], including melphalan (Alkeran) [187], carboplatin (Paraplatin) [188,189], cyclophosphamide [190], topotecan hydrochloride (Hycamtin) [191], and cisplatin [192], which are chemotherapeutic drugs that cause tumor cell growth arrest via DNA damage [189]. Other chemotherapeutic agents include doxorubicin hydrochloride (Anthracycline) and doxorubicin hydrochloride liposomes, which cause DNA damage by targeting topoisomerase II activity [193], and gemcitabine hydrochloride (Gemzar, Infugem), which targets cancer cells’ DNA and RNA formation by mimicking their block-building [194]. Paclitaxel taxane chemotherapy is also approved by the FDA and inhibits tumor cell division via chromosomal changes [195].

Other FDA-approved drugs include bevacizumab (Avastin, Alymsys, Mvasi, Zirabev), which is a VEGF inhibitor [196,197]; mirvetuximab soravtansine-gynx (Elahere), which is a maytansinoid microtubule inhibitor and a folate receptor alpha (FRα)-directed antibody conjugate [198,199]; niraparib tosylate monohydrate (Zejula) and olaparib (Lynparza), which are PARP inhibitors that prevent DNA breaks from getting repaired, causing tumor cell death [200]; and rucaparib camsylate (Rubraca), which is a PARP-1, PARP-2, and PARP-3 inhibitor [201].

8. Future Perspectives for OC Diagnosis and Treatment

In the future, new types of biomarkers may emerge that will be superior in accuracy and efficiency to existing ones. The most promising diagnostic methods are nucleic acids-based biomarkers, which are a new group of serum biomarkers. They include free DNA, mRNA, microRNAs, and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) [202]. The next step for nucleic acid-based biomarkers is the use of molecules enclosed within exosomes. The advantage of this method is greater specificity due to increased stability; moreover, exosomes can contain not only nucleic acids but also proteins and lipids, which expands the range of use of lysosomes. Another potential method for diagnosing OC is based on copper isotope ratios. It was shown that in the serum of patients with certain types of cancers, the ratio of 63Cu/65Cu isotopes changed; that is, the heavier isotope was concentrated in the tumor, and the lighter isotope was concentrated in the serum [203]. It is worth noting that the described promising diagnostic methods do not contradict each other, and given the proper level of their development, it is possible to combine them to obtain the most accurate results.

Despite advancements in treating OC, the disease’s mortality remains high in late stages, with limited variability in effective treatments. As a result, ongoing research is focusing on experimental methods that promise to be more targeted and efficacious compared to current therapies for patients with stage III and IV OC [204]. One promising approach under investigation is Vigil, a tumor vaccine designed to target TGFβ1 and TGFβ2, which play roles in cell motility, angiogenesis, and immunity [205]. By affecting the proprotein convertase furin, Vigil aims to enhance its therapeutic effects without significant side effects, as observed in a study involving 92 patients with stage III and IV OC [206]. CAR-T immunotherapy, another innovative method, involves genetically modifying T cells with chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) to target cancer cells more effectively. Despite the potential for severe cytokine release syndrome, CAR-T therapy has shown promise in attacking OC cells [207]. DCVAC (Dendritic cell-based immunotherapy) utilizes a patient’s dendritic cells exposed to tumor-associated antigens to stimulate an immune response against cancer cells. This approach has demonstrated effectiveness in clinical trials with minimal side effects, warranting further investigation [208].

Peptide-based chemotherapy, leveraging proteins to specifically bind to cancer cell receptors and deliver chemotherapy drugs, offers advantages such as low toxicity and high specificity. However, its efficacy remains to be fully validated through ongoing research [209]. Viral treatments, utilizing oncolytic viruses like adenoviruses to induce cancer cell lysis and stimulate tumor-specific immunity, have shown potential when combined with chemotherapy. Challenges include delivery limitations due to existing immunity against adenoviruses, and their inability to replicate effectively in studied models [210]. Cell metabolism targeting focuses on disrupting cancer cells’ vital metabolic pathways, such as lipid and glucose metabolism. While promising, this approach carries risks of affecting immune cell function and potentially accelerating tumor growth, necessitating careful exploration in future studies [211]. Immune checkpoint inhibitors, which block immune cell checkpoints to enhance the immune system’s ability to recognize and attack cancer cells, have shown effectiveness in treating some cancers [212] but remain less effective in OC compared to other malignancies like uterine endometrial cancer [213]. In conclusion, these innovative therapies represent promising avenues for improving OC treatment outcomes, addressing current limitations, and advancing toward more personalized and effective treatment strategies.

ROS-mediated cell signaling pathways are also a promising target for the treatment of OC. The PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway performs essential cellular functions but can contribute to the development of chemoresistance and is, therefore, a promising target in OC treatment. Currently, there are many inhibitors of various components of this signaling pathway that are being tested, for example, BGB-10188 (PI3Kδ inhibitor), Everolimus (mTORC1 inhibitor), and Afuresertib (Pan-AKT isoform inhibitor). However, despite the abundance of inhibitors being tested, none have reached late-stage clinical trials [214]. The Keap1-Nrf2 pathway is another promising target; under normal conditions, it helps cells protect against OS, but when Nrf2 activity is too high, cancer cell survival increases. There are currently no inhibitors that specifically inhibit NRF2 and help in the treatment of OC [215]. The notch signaling pathway in a healthy ovary plays an important role in vascular homeostasis; however, this signaling pathway is key in OC angiogenesis and is also associated with chemoresistance, which makes it a promising target against OC. Currently, many compounds are being tested, such as MK-0752 and RO4929097, which are inhibitors, and noticumab and Demcizumab, which are monoclonal antibodies; however, they are all still in the first or second stages of discovery [216]. The Wnt/β-catenin pathway, despite its essential role in embryonic development and tissue homeostasis, is also involved in OC initiation, metastasis, chemoresistance, and relapse; therefore, the development of therapies targeting the Wnt/β-catenin pathway will significantly improve the strategies against OC [121]. Despite this, of all the 37 registered clinical trials of targeted therapies, of which several are aimed at curing OC, only 35% have reached stage P2, while the rest remain at stage P1. This is due to their low specificities and frequent side effects [120].

9. Conclusions

OC is a prevalent and highly lethal disease, primarily due to challenges in early diagnosis. Despite being one of the most common cancers affecting women, effective methods for early detection remain elusive, leading to limited treatment options in advanced stages. Risk factors such as genetic mutations, family history, obesity, age, and comorbidities contribute to its onset. ROS play a pivotal role in OC development by influencing cellular pathways, OS, and signaling. Maintaining a balance between ROS and antioxidants is critical, as ROS can function as vital molecules in immune response, signaling, and ovarian cycle regulation. Early diagnosis is paramount, as survival rates drastically improve when OC is detected early, contrasting starkly with late-stage diagnoses where survival rates are significantly lower. Current diagnostic methods like CA125 are limited by the disease’s asymptomatic early stages. Treatment typically involves surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Despite ongoing challenges in diagnosis and treatment, research on OC remains critical due to its high mortality rate and nonspecific early symptoms.