1. Introduction, Motivation and Preliminaries
Integration is a classical tool in the evaluation of infinite series. The approach was revived recently in the papers by Sofo and Nimbran [
1], Stewart [
2], and Li and Chu [
3,
4,
5,
6,
7]. For instance, Li and Chu review in [
6] a few (known) series involving harmonic numbers
and odd harmonic numbers
such as
obtained by using definite integrals. The authors evaluate difficult addition series involving alternating harmonic and odd harmonic numbers in closed form by employing calculus and complex analysis. Here, as usual, harmonic numbers
and odd harmonic numbers
are defined by
,
, and
Obvious relations between harmonic numbers
and odd harmonic numbers
are the following:
For more information about
and
we refer to the papers [
8,
9,
10,
11,
12,
13].
In their paper [
7] Li and Chu use integration techniques to prove (among other things) the series expression
which converges for
, i.e., for
, and which was conjectured by Sun in his paper [
14]. Another conjecture from Sun’s paper that is strongly related to our study is concerned with the two evaluations
and
where
G is Catalan’s constant. This is Conjecture 2.4 in [
14] (Equations (2.6) and (2.7), respectively). In addition, as reported by Sun in [
14], the similar conjectured identities
and
were proved by Au in the recent paper [
15]. Finally, we mention another recent paper by Sun [
16] dealing with similar series.
In this paper, we proceed in the same direction and study series involving differences of harmonic numbers in the numerator and the binomial coefficients
in the denominator. To be more precise, using integrals in combination with complex analysis and partial fraction decompositions we will evaluate in closed form the Euler-type series
for all
and all
with
. For instance, we will prove that
where
is Catalan’s constant. Another difficult evaluation that will be derived is
We proceed wit two special functions that will be needed. Let
be the dilogarithm defined by (see Lewin [
17])
having the special values
Let also
be the Clausen’s function defined by [
17,
18]
This function has the functional relations
and the special values
and
where
G is Catalan’s constant.
We conclude this section with a motivation of our approach. We start with the Beta integral [
19]:
Differentiating the above definition with respect to
a and using the fact that
we get
where
is the psi or digamma function,
being the Gamma function. This function is related to harmonic numbers via
, where
is the Euler-Mascheroni constant. From here we can make the transformations
and
to obtain
Also, by symmetry or by applying the transformations
and
we obtain
Now, let
. Then
and we can consider the series (for all
with
)
which can also be written as
In particular,
and
Similarly, we obtain
This gives for all
with
or the particular relation
The evaluation of the integrals is not trivial but can be done by applying some additional theory.
2. Main Results, Part 1
In this section, we explicitly deal with the series on the left hand side of (
12).
Lemma 1. For the following identities hold: Proof. Identity (
17) follows immediately from the fact that
Now,
Let
A change of variable
gives
on account of (
17). Thus
since ([
17], p. 283)
□
Lemma 2 ([
17], p. 291)
. For , we have the following relationwhere is Clausen’s function. Proof. Using the decomposition
we have
in view of (
17). Now, (
20) gives
Using (
9) with
gives
so that
Thus, using (
22) and (
24), and the evaluation of
from (
6), we have
and hence (
21), in view of (
14). □
Alternative Proof of Proposition 1. We begin with the partial fraction decomposition
Hence,
As
we get
Next,
and this gives
where the relation (see also [
17])
was used. Finally, from the indefinite integral
we get
Putting everything together we obtain the claimed result. □
Proof. Consider the partial fraction decomposition
which allows the integral on the rhs of (
15) to be written as
which upon using (
17) gives
Use of (
26) in (
15) gives (
25), after simplification. In taking the real part in (
26), it is convenient to use the fact that
for arbitrary
f and
g. □
Differentiating (
12)
m times with respect to
z and thereafter replacing
z with
gives
Theorem 1. Let m be a non-negative integer and let , and be the distinct roots of where z is a real number such that . Then the following identity holds:where, for ,and for r a positive integer and , Proof. We start with the partial fraction decomposition
where, for
, the coefficients
,
,
are found from (
29).
We therefore have
Differentiating (
17)
j times with respect to
gives
which, when utilized in (
33) yields an evaluation of the integral on the right hand side of (
27) and hence (
28). □
Corollary 1. Let m be a non-negative integer and let where i is the imaginary unit. Thenwhere, for , the coefficients are given byand for , , and are found from (31). Proof. Set in Theorem 1. □
We now list some examples from (
35):
Corollary 2. Let m be a non-negative integer and let where i is the imaginary unit. Thenwhere, for , the coefficients are given byand for , , and are found from (31). Proof. Set in Theorem 1. Note that , and are the roots of . □
We give one example from (
43). At
we have
since (
43) at
gives
the right hand side of which can be simplified using
for arbitrary functions
f and
g.
Differentiating (
13)
m times with respect to
z gives
Note that (
49) holds for every real number
m that is not a negative integer.
Setting
in (
49) gives
Theorem 2. Let m be a non-negative integer and let , and be the distinct roots of where z is a real number with . Thenwhere, for ,and , and are calculated using (30) and (31). Proof. Consider the partial fraction decomposition
where, for
, the coefficients
,
,
are found from (
52). We therefore have
and hence (
51). □
Corollary 3. Let m be a non-negative integer and let where i is the imaginary unit. Thenwhere, for , the coefficients are given byand , and can be readily obtained from (30) and (31). Proof. Set in Theorem 2. □
Here are a couple of evaluations using (
55):
Corollary 4. Let m be a non-negative integer and let where i is the imaginary unit. Thenwhere, for , the coefficients are given byand for , , and are found from (31). Proof. Theorem 2 with . □
3. Main Results, Part 2
This section deals with the second category of series, i.e., series of the form
Differentiating (
16)
m times with respect to
z and thereafter replacing
z with
gives
Theorem 3. Let m be a non-negative integer and let , and be the distinct roots of where z is a real number such that . Thenwhere , , are as defined in Theorem 1 and and can be found from (30) and (31) in Theorem 1. Proof. The proof is similar to that of Theorem 1. Note that
□
Corollary 5. Let m be a non-negative integer and let where i is the imaginary unit. Thenwhere , , are as defined in (36)–(38) in Corollary 1 and are found from (30) and (31). Proof. Theorem 3 with . □
Examples from Corollary 5 include
Corollary 6. Let m be a non-negative integer and let where i is the imaginary unit. Thenwhere , , are as defined in (44)–(46) in Corollary 2 and are found from (30) and (31). Proof. Theorem 3 with . □
Here we present a couple of examples from (
73).
As counterpart of (
49), we have
Note that (
76) holds for every real number
m that is not a negative integer.
Setting
in (
76) gives
while setting
gives
Proof. Using (2) and (18), we have
which simplifies to (
79). □
Setting
in (
78) gives
The integral occurring on the RHS can be evaluated. The result is stated in Proposition 4.
Proof. We wish to evaluate the integral in (
80). Proceeding as in Proposition 2, we have
so that upon using (18) we obtain
which simplifies to the RHS of (
81) upon using
. □
Theorem 4. Let m be a non-negative integer and let , and be the distinct roots of where z is a real number such that . Thenwhere , , are as defined in Theorem 2 and and can be found from (30) and (31) in Theorem 1. Proof. The proof is similar to that of Theorem 2. We evaluate the integral on the RHS of (
76). □
Corollary 7. Let m be a non-negative integer and let where i is the imaginary unit. Thenwhere , , are as defined in (56)–(58) in Corollary 3 and are found from (30) and (31). Proof. Theorem 4 with . □
At
and
in (
83) we obtain
and
Corollary 8. Let m be a non-negative integer and let where i is the imaginary unit. Thenwhere , , are as defined in (63)–(65) in Corollary 4 and are found from (30) and (31). Proof. Use Theorem 4 with . □
4. Concluding Remarks
In this paper we have applied integration techniques combined with complex analysis and partial fraction decompositions to derive closed forms for two general classes of series involving differences of harmonic numbers in the numerator. Such series may have applications in combinatorics, signal processing, analysis of algorithms and more.
Theorems similar to those in the previous section can be stated for alternating sums. There does not appear to be values of
z, however, for which the integrals can be evaluated in terms of elementary functions. For a slightly different direction of future research we mention that replacing
z by
and comparing the real and imaginary parts gives integral relations of the form
and
In each case one can attempt to evaluate the integrals appearing on the right hand side.