Next Article in Journal
Nutrient and Antinutrient Composition of Pleurotus ostreatus Grown on Different Substrates
Previous Article in Journal
Quercus suber Transcriptome Analyses: Identification of Genes and SNPs Related to Cork Quality
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Effects of High Boron on the Nutrients Uptake of Aegilops Genotypes Differing in Their B Tolerance Level †

1
Department of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, Faculty of Agriculture, Selcuk University, Konya 42079, Turkey
2
Department of Field Crops, Faculty of Agriculture, Selcuk University, Konya 42079, Turkey
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 2nd International Electronic Conference on Plant Sciences—10th Anniversary of Journal Plants, 1–15 December 2021; Available online: https://iecps2021.sciforum.net/.
Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2022, 11(1), 75; https://doi.org/10.3390/IECPS2021-11996
Published: 30 November 2021

Abstract

:
Boron (B) toxicity is a damaging abiotic stress condition that significantly affects wheat production, especially in the dry regions of the world. Other than having several detrimental effects on the metabolic and physiological activities of wheat plants, high B may hinder the uptake of elements from the soil, developing a nutrient imbalance in plants. Focusing on this issue, in this experiment, we used 19 Aegilops genotypes differing in their boron (B) toxicity tolerance level along with a B toxicity tolerant cultivar, Bolal, and estimated their root–shoot nutrient concentrations under B toxic growth condition. Furthermore, the association between their root–shoot nutrient concentrations and level of B toxicity tolerance was evaluated. The experimental genotypes were grown under three different B growth conditions in hydroponic system including 3.1 μM B (Control); 1 mM B (toxic), and 10 mM B (highly toxic) treatment. The macro and micronutrient concentrations in the shoots and roots of the genotypes showed large variations and were observed to be differentially influenced by high B stress.

1. Introduction

Wheat wild relatives are considered an important source of tolerance to several abiotic stress conditions [1,2,3]. Their genetic diversity can be effectively utilized to develop breeding lines and modern wheat cultivars with greater stress tolerances. Despite their great potential, Aegilops species have not been completely explored for such tolerances and mechanisms involved in making them tolerant. Boron (B) toxicity is one of the crucial abiotic stress conditions that negatively affect the wheat productivity, especially in water-stressed areas of the world. Other than several symptoms, high B is known to impede the uptake and translocation of macro and micronutrients in plants [4]. Thus, we hypothesized that the plants showing less effect of B toxic growth conditions on nutrient uptake and translocation can be more tolerant to B toxicity. To test this hypothesis, an elemental analysis of root and shoot samples of 19 Aegilops genotypes (Figure 1) grown under different B concentrations in hydroponic system was undertaken. The goal of this experiment was to explore the effect of high B on the macro and micronutrient content in roots and shoots of experimental genotypes. The results may provide an answer to the question of whether the accumulation of different nutrients can be associated with the B toxicity tolerance of the Aegilops genotypes. Further, research can be conducted to see the effect of additional supply of those nutrients towards increasing the tolerance level of less tolerant genotypes.

2. Materials and Methods

The study comprised 19 Aegilops genotypes supplied by the Turkish Seed Gene Bank (TSGB), Ankara, and AARI National Gene Bank, Izmir, Turkey, as well as Turkish hexaploid cultivar Bolal 2973 which is well-known for its B toxicity tolerance [5]. The B tolerance level of these genotypes has already been identified in one of our previous studies [3].

2.1. B Treatment and Harvest

The genotypes were grown in a hydroponic system with conditions adjusted to 22 ± 10 °C, 16,000 Lx/day light intensity, 16/8 h light/dark photoperiod, and 45–55% humidity. Initially, germinated seeds were transferred to the hydroponic system, then following three days of growth plants were given different treatments. Three replicates of all the genotypes with five plants each were grown in three different B concentrations including 1/5th Hoagland solution containing 3.1 µM B (Control), 1 mM B (toxic B), and 10 mM B (highly toxic B) for 7 days. After 7 days, root and shoot samples were harvested for conducting ICP-AES analysis.

2.2. ICP-AES Analysis

After washing with 0.1 N HCl and double distilled water, the harvested root–shoot samples were left in an oven at 70 °C for drying. This was followed by the crushing of the dried samples and dissolving 0.15–0.20 g of the ground sample in 2 mL of 35% H2O2 and 5 mL of 65% HNO3. The mixture was processed in a closed microwave accelerating reaction system (CemMarsxpress, Matthews, NC, USA). Further, ICP-AES (Varian, Vista) was employed to identify the nutrient amount in the stock solution [6]. MS Excel 2010 was used to estimate the percentage changes in each of the studied macro and micronutrient under two different B treatments as compared to Control.

3. Results

The purpose of this experiment was to determine the variation in 19 Aegilops genotypes in terms of nutrient accumulation in roots and shoots under different B toxic growth environments. Moreover, it aimed to identify whether the accumulation of nutrients is associated with the tolerance level of experimental genotypes which were already identified by Khan et al. [3].

3.1. Calcium (Ca)

The percentage change in shoot Ca (SCa) accumulation in 10 mM B treatment ranged from −145% to 38% in comparison to the Control. While At3 and At4 showed a 145% and 71% decrease, respectively, in the SCa content in 10 mM B treatment, Ac4 and Bolal both showed the maximum upsurge of (38%) in SCa content in comparison to Control (Table 1).
In root Ca (RCa) accumulation, the percentage change in 10 mM B treatment ranged from −287% to 60%. A maximum reduction (287%) was observed in Ac2 followed by Ac1 (251%). However, the Aegilops accessions, At1 (60%) and Al1 (56%), revealed the highest increases in RCa content in highly toxic B treatment in comparison to Control.

3.2. Phosphorus (P)

The percentage change in shoot P (SP) accumulation in 10 mM B treatment ranged from −181% to 50% in comparison to Control. While At3 and As2 showed 181% and 170% decrement in the SP content in 10 mM B treatment, respectively, Ac4 and Au2 showed the maximum upsurge of 50% and 35%, respectively, in SP content in comparison to Control (Table 1).
In root P (RP) accumulation, the percentage change in 10 mM B treatment ranged from −457% to 100%. A maximum reduction (457%) was observed in As2 followed by Ac2 (313%). However, the Aegilops accession, Ab2 (100%) and Ab3 (48%), revealed the highest increases in RP content in highly toxic B treatment in comparison to Control.

3.3. Sodium (Na)

The percentage change in shoot Na (SNa) accumulation in 10 mM B treatment ranged from −47% to 76% in comparison to Control. While As2 showed a 47% decrement in the SNa content in 10 mM B treatment, Au2 and Au3 showed the maximum upsurge of 76% and 71%, respectively, in SNa content in comparison to Control (Table 1).
In root Na (RNa) accumulation, the percentage change in 10 mM B treatment ranged from −236% to 78%. A maximum reduction (236%) was observed in As2 followed by Ac1 (212%). However, the Aegilops accession, Ab3 (78%) and Ac4 (58%), revealed the highest increases in RNa content in highly toxic B treatment in comparison to Control.

3.4. Magnesium (Mg)

The percentage change in shoot Mg (SMg) accumulation in 10 mM B treatment ranged from −146% to 26% in comparison to Control. While At3 and As2 showed 146% and 117% decrement, respectively, in the SMg content in 10 mM B treatment, Ac4 and Bolal 2973 showed the maximum upsurge of 26% and 24%, respectively, in SMg content in comparison to Control (Table 1).
In root Mg (RMg) accumulation, the percentage change in 10 mM B treatment ranged from −404% to 42%. A maximum reduction (404%) was observed in Ac2 followed by Ac1 (395%). However, the Aegilops accession, At1 (42%) and Ab3 (32%), revealed the highest increases in SMg content in highly toxic B treatment in comparison to Control.

3.5. Manganese (Mn)

The percentage change in shoot Mn (SMn) accumulation in 10 mM B treatment ranged from −350% to 40% in comparison to Control. While At3 and As2 showed 350% and 213% decrement in the SMn content in 10 mM B treatment, respectively, Ac4 and Bolal 2973 showed the maximum upsurge of 40% and 5%, respectively, in SMn content in comparison to Control (Table 1).
In root Mn (RMn) accumulation, the percentage change in 10 mM B treatment ranged from −393% to 52%. A maximum reduction (393%) was observed in Ac2 followed by As1 (300%). However, the Aegilops accession, Au3 (52%) and At1 (41%), revealed the highest increases in RMn content in highly toxic B treatment in comparison to Control.

3.6. Copper (Cu)

The percentage change in shoot Cu (SCu) accumulation in 10 mM B treatment ranged from −229% to 37% in comparison to Control. While Ac3 and Ab3 showed 229% and 192% decrement in the SCu content in 10 mM B treatment, respectively, Au2 and At2 showed the maximum upsurge of 37% and 31%, respectively, in SCu content in comparison to Control (Table 1).
In root Cu (RCu) accumulation, the percentage change in 10 mM B treatment ranged from −492% to 44%. A maximum reduction (492%) was observed in Ac2 followed by Ac1 (173%). However, the Aegilops accession, Al1 (44%) and At1 (38%), revealed the highest increases in RCu content in highly toxic B treatment in comparison to Control.

4. Discussion

A large variability was observed in the root–shoot nutrient content of the studied Aegilops genotypes under B toxic stress condition. The two Aegilops genotypes, Ab2 and Ac4, that were found to be tolerant in our previous study [3] did not show maximum decrement in the uptake and translocation of any of the studied nutrients. In fact, among the two genotypes, Ac4 showed maximum concentration of several nutrients in shoots, including Ca, P, Mg, and Mn. However, no clear association has been found between the tolerance level of the genotypes and uptake or accumulation of any specific nutrient. The large folds of increment and decrement in the nutrient uptake of different genotypes showed the greater influence of high B stress on the ion equilibrium of plants. The results were in accordance with the results of several previous studies where abiotic stress is known to be affecting nutrient content in roots and shoots [7,8].

5. Conclusions

From the results obtained, it can be concluded that B tolerance of Aegilops genotypes was not found to be associated with the enhanced or decreased accumulation of any specific nutrients in root and shoot samples. Moreover, B toxicity changes the ion balance of plants by influencing the elements uptake from the nutrient media.

Author Contributions

M.K.K. and A.P. conceived, wrote, and edited the manuscript. M.K.K., A.P., M.H., M.O. and M.R.O. performed the experiment and analysis. M.K.K. organized Figure 1, which shows the original photographs of spikes of all the studied Aegilops accessions. F.G., A.T. and S.G. made an intellectual contribution to the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors acknowledge the TUBITAK 1001 (No. 119O455) project for the funding provided to conduct this research work.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge TSGB, Ankara, and AARI National Gene Bank, Izmir, Turkey, for providing the Aegilops accessions used in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ahmadi, J.; Pour-Aboughadareh, A.; Ourang, S.F.; Mehrabi, A.A.; Siddique, K.H.M. Wild relatives of wheat: Aegilops–Triticum accessions disclose differential antioxidative and physiological responses to water stress. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2018, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Olivera, P.D.; Rouse, M.N.; Jin, Y. Identification of New Sources of Resistance to Wheat Stem Rust in Aegilops spp. in the Tertiary Genepool of Wheat. Front. Plant. Sci 2018, 9, 1719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Khan, M.K.; Pandey, A.; Hamurcu, M.; Avsaroglu, Z.Z.; Ozbek, M.; Omay, A.H.; Elbasan, F.; Omay, M.R.; Gokmen, F.; Topal, A.; et al. Variability in Physiological Traits Reveals Boron Toxicity Tolerance in Aegilops Species. Front. Plant. Sci. 2021, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Pandey, A.; Khan, M.K.; Hakki, E.E.; Gezgin, S.; Hamurcu, M. Combined Boron Toxicity and Salinity Stress-An Insight into Its Interaction in Plants. Plants 2019, 8, 364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Pallotta, M.; Schnurbusch, T.; Hayes, J.; Hay, A.; Baumann, U.; Paull, J.; Langridge, P.; Sutton, T. Molecular basis of adaptation to high soil boron in wheat landraces and elite cultivars. Nature 2014, 514, 88–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Pandey, A.; Khan, M.K.; Hakki, E.E.; Thomas, G.; Hamurcu, M.; Gezgin, S.; Gizlenci, O.; Akkaya, M.S. Assessment of genetic variability for grain nutrients from diverse regions: Potential for wheat improvement. SpringerPlus 2016, 5, 1912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Loudari, A.; Benadis, C.; Naciri, R.; Soulaimani, A.; Zeroual, Y.; Gharous, M.E.; Kalaji, H.M.; Oukarroum, A. Salt stress affects mineral nutrition in shoots and roots and chlorophyll a fluorescence of tomato plants grown in hydroponic culture. J. Plant. Interact. 2020, 15, 398–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ali, S.; Tyagi, A.; Bae, H. Ionomic Approaches for Discovery of Novel Stress-Resilient Genes in Plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 7182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Spike photographs of 19 Aegilops genotypes obtained from the AARI National Gene Bank, Izmir, Turkey, and Turkish Seed Gene Bank (TSGB), Ankara. (a) Ab1 (Aegilops biuncialis1: TGB 026218; 4x); (b) Ab2 (A. biuncialis2: TGB 026219; 4x); (c) Ab3 (A. biuncialis3: TGB 037313; 4x); (d) Ac1 (A. columnaris1: TGB 037373; 4x); (e) Ac2 (A. columnaris2: TGB 038488; 4x); (f) Ac3 (A. columnaris3: TGB 037489; 4x); (g) Ac4 (A. columnaris4: TGB 000107; 4x); (h) Ac5 (A. columnaris5: TR57295; 4x); (i) As1 (A. speltoides1: TGB 037791; 2x); (j) As2 (A. speltoides2: TR 62174; 2x); (k) Al1 (A. ligustica1: TGB 000803; 2x); (l) Al2 (A. ligustica2: TR 39488;2x); (m) At1 (A. triuncialis1: TGB 037311; 4x); (n) At2 (A. triuncialis2: TGB 037355; 4x); (o) At3 (A. triuncialis3: TGB 037376; 4x); (p) At4 (A. triuncialis4: TR 72224; 4x); (q) Au1 (A. umbellulata1: TGB 037353; 2x); (r) Au2 (A. umbellulata2: TGB 037356; 2x); and (s) Au3 (A. umbellulata1: TR 72200; 2x) [3].
Figure 1. Spike photographs of 19 Aegilops genotypes obtained from the AARI National Gene Bank, Izmir, Turkey, and Turkish Seed Gene Bank (TSGB), Ankara. (a) Ab1 (Aegilops biuncialis1: TGB 026218; 4x); (b) Ab2 (A. biuncialis2: TGB 026219; 4x); (c) Ab3 (A. biuncialis3: TGB 037313; 4x); (d) Ac1 (A. columnaris1: TGB 037373; 4x); (e) Ac2 (A. columnaris2: TGB 038488; 4x); (f) Ac3 (A. columnaris3: TGB 037489; 4x); (g) Ac4 (A. columnaris4: TGB 000107; 4x); (h) Ac5 (A. columnaris5: TR57295; 4x); (i) As1 (A. speltoides1: TGB 037791; 2x); (j) As2 (A. speltoides2: TR 62174; 2x); (k) Al1 (A. ligustica1: TGB 000803; 2x); (l) Al2 (A. ligustica2: TR 39488;2x); (m) At1 (A. triuncialis1: TGB 037311; 4x); (n) At2 (A. triuncialis2: TGB 037355; 4x); (o) At3 (A. triuncialis3: TGB 037376; 4x); (p) At4 (A. triuncialis4: TR 72224; 4x); (q) Au1 (A. umbellulata1: TGB 037353; 2x); (r) Au2 (A. umbellulata2: TGB 037356; 2x); and (s) Au3 (A. umbellulata1: TR 72200; 2x) [3].
Blsf 11 00075 g001
Table 1. The percentage changes in the macro- and micronutrient content of 19 Aegilops genotypes and the B-tolerant check cultivar, Bolal 2973, in highly toxic B (10 mM B) treatment as compared to Control.
Table 1. The percentage changes in the macro- and micronutrient content of 19 Aegilops genotypes and the B-tolerant check cultivar, Bolal 2973, in highly toxic B (10 mM B) treatment as compared to Control.
CodeTaxonPloidySCaRCaSPRPSNaRNaSMgRMgSMnRMnSCuRCuSFeRFe
Ab1Aegilops biuncialis−2020−28314550−20−4−5−21−1672−5755
Ab2Aegilops biuncialis−13−3741005858−12−95−1−104−124−123−81−152
Ab3Aegilops biuncialis−3926−17482778−3232−2433−19236−10460
Ac1Aegilops columnaris−42−251−78−30053−212−49−395−103−65−80−173−71−211
Ac2Aegilops columnaris−11−287−2−3134−27−7−404−55−393−78−492−115−456
Ac3Aegilops columnaris−29−10−62−30322−204−23−76−25−156−22910−79−98
Ac4Aegilops columnaris38−1750−102585826−10040−131−68−9211−97
Ac5Aegilops columnaris−57−74−80−19530−71−49−188−757−11−37−148−210
As1Aegilops speltoides5−29−30−24260−1580−183−48−3002332−26−14
As2Aegilops speltoides−69−131−170−457−47−236−117−210−213−241−52−89−211−177
Al1Aegilops ligustica−19561−174113−5−25−359−19441927
Al2Aegilops ligustica−45−5−120−22720−130−91−156−107−152−21−116−72−156
At1Aegilops triuncialis660−55165048−3342−37413038−1357
At2Aegilops triuncialis26372416153817−92931−18−83−31
At3Aegilops triuncialis−145−11−181−11537−19−146−54−350−165−108−44−193−9760
At4Aegilops triuncialis−71−72−94−13726−19−50−44−81−11−62−31−83−218
Au1Aegilops umbellulata−30−27−3−274831−10−54−17−9−409−51−75
Au2Aegilops umbellulata24−8735−7176820−109−12−1037−13133−186
Au3Aegilops umbellulata1819−5−100713711−45−4522923−44−35
BolalTriticum aestivum38−36−1−7651−924−9152516−39−621
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Khan, M.K.; Pandey, A.; Hamurcu, M.; Ozbek, M.; Omay, M.R.; Gokmen, F.; Topal, A.; Gezgin, S. Effects of High Boron on the Nutrients Uptake of Aegilops Genotypes Differing in Their B Tolerance Level. Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2022, 11, 75. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECPS2021-11996

AMA Style

Khan MK, Pandey A, Hamurcu M, Ozbek M, Omay MR, Gokmen F, Topal A, Gezgin S. Effects of High Boron on the Nutrients Uptake of Aegilops Genotypes Differing in Their B Tolerance Level. Biology and Life Sciences Forum. 2022; 11(1):75. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECPS2021-11996

Chicago/Turabian Style

Khan, Mohd. Kamran, Anamika Pandey, Mehmet Hamurcu, Merve Ozbek, Makbule Rumeysa Omay, Fatma Gokmen, Ali Topal, and Sait Gezgin. 2022. "Effects of High Boron on the Nutrients Uptake of Aegilops Genotypes Differing in Their B Tolerance Level" Biology and Life Sciences Forum 11, no. 1: 75. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECPS2021-11996

APA Style

Khan, M. K., Pandey, A., Hamurcu, M., Ozbek, M., Omay, M. R., Gokmen, F., Topal, A., & Gezgin, S. (2022). Effects of High Boron on the Nutrients Uptake of Aegilops Genotypes Differing in Their B Tolerance Level. Biology and Life Sciences Forum, 11(1), 75. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECPS2021-11996

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop