In Vitro Preservation of Somatic Seeds and Nonencapsulated Hemp Shoot Tips †
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Plant Material and Source of Explants
2.2. Preparation and Storage of Nonencapsulated Explants
2.3. Preparation and Storage of Encapsulated Explants
2.4. Acclimatization Conditions
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Storage and Recovery of Nonencapsulated Explants
3.2. Storage and Recovery of Somatic Seeds
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Lisek, A.; Orlikowska, T. In vitro storage of strawberry and raspberry in calcium alginate beads at 4 °C. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2004, 78, 167–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kikowska, M.; Sliwinska, E.; Thiem, B. Micropropagation and Production of Somatic Seeds for Short-Term Storage of the Endangered Species Eryngium alpinum L. Plants 2020, 9, 498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Asadi, R.; Abdollahi, M.R.; Moosavi, S.S.; Mirzaie-Asl, A. Alginate encapsulation of micro-cuttings in endangered Satureja khuzistanica species: A promising method for obtaining genetically stable plants with high rosmarinic acid content. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2022, 151, 307–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, J.G.; Yi, G.; Choi, J.H.; Lee, E.J. Analyses of targeted/untargeted metabolites and reactive oxygen species of pepper fruits provide insights into seed browning induced by chilling. Food Chem. 2020, 332, 127406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zarei, A.; Feyissa, B.A.; Davis, B.; Tavakouli Dinani, E. Cannabis Synthetic Seeds: An Alternative Approach for Commercial Scale of Clonal Propagation and Germplasm Conservation. Plants 2022, 11, 3186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lata, H.; Chandra, S.; Khan, I.A.; ElSohly, M.A. Propagation through alginate encapsulation of axillary buds of Cannabis sativa L. An important medicinal plant. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2009, 15, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lata, H.; Chandra, S.; Techen, N.; Khan, I.A.; ElSohly, M.A. Molecular analysis of genetic fidelity in Cannabis sativa L. plants grown from synthetic (encapsulated) seeds following in vitro storage. Biotechnol. Lett. 2011, 33, 2503–2508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lata, H.; Chandra, S.; Mehmadic, Z.; Khan, I.A.; ElSohly, M.A. In vitro Germplasm Conservation of High THC Yielding Elite Clones of Cannabis sativa L. under Slow Growth Conditions. Planta Med. 2011, 77, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Murashige, T.; Skoog, F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 1962, 15, 473–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wróbel, T.; Dreger, M.; Wielgus, K.; Słomski, R. Modified Nodal Cuttings and Shoot Tips Protocol for Rapid Regeneration of Cannabis sativa L. J. Nat. Fibers 2022, 19, 536–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Accession | Storage in Months | Survival (%) | Rooting Rate (%) | Mean No. of Roots per Explants (±SD) | Mean Shoot Length [cm] | Callusing Explants (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Epsilon 68 | 3 | 100.0 | 85.7 | 5.00 ± 3.61 | 3.08 ± 1.72 | 31.0 |
6 | 58.1 | 27.9 | 2.18 ± 0.98 | 1.55 ± 1.40 | 41.9 | |
9 | 16.7 | 4.8 | 0.92 ± 0.17 | 0.56 ± 0.24 | 2.4 | |
Carmagnola × K290 (1565) | 3 | 100.0 | 71.4 | 4.45 ± 4.38 | 2.58 ± 1.56 | 40.5 |
6 | 81.8 | 45.5 | 3.48 ± 1.95 | 1.92 ± 1.59 | 72.7 | |
9 | 52.4 | 28.6 | 2.82 ± 1.29 | 1.02 ± 1.40 | 11.9 | |
Globa | 3 | 90.7 | 48.8 | 2.48 ± 1.63 | 1.84 ± 1,43 | 72.1 |
6 | 86.0 | 44.2 | 2.30 ± 1.90 | 1.50 ± 0.76 | 69.8 | |
9 | 78.6 | 35.7 | 2.21 ± 1.33 | 1.66 ± 1.49 | 73.8 |
Accession | Survival (%) | Rooting Rate (%) | Mean No. of Roots Per Explants (±SD) | Mean Shoot Length [cm] | Callusing Explants (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Epsilon 68 | 90 | 55.0 | 2.34 ± 1.19 | 3.37 ± 3.20 | 50.0 |
Carmagnola × K290 (1565) | 100.0 | 90.0 | 2.98 ± 2.35 | 1.50 ± 1.12 | 70.0 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Dreger, M.; Deja, A.; Szalata, M.; Słomski, R. In Vitro Preservation of Somatic Seeds and Nonencapsulated Hemp Shoot Tips. Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2023, 27, 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECAG2023-15146
Dreger M, Deja A, Szalata M, Słomski R. In Vitro Preservation of Somatic Seeds and Nonencapsulated Hemp Shoot Tips. Biology and Life Sciences Forum. 2023; 27(1):15. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECAG2023-15146
Chicago/Turabian StyleDreger, Mariola, Aleksandra Deja, Milena Szalata, and Ryszard Słomski. 2023. "In Vitro Preservation of Somatic Seeds and Nonencapsulated Hemp Shoot Tips" Biology and Life Sciences Forum 27, no. 1: 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECAG2023-15146
APA StyleDreger, M., Deja, A., Szalata, M., & Słomski, R. (2023). In Vitro Preservation of Somatic Seeds and Nonencapsulated Hemp Shoot Tips. Biology and Life Sciences Forum, 27(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECAG2023-15146