Next Article in Journal
The Study of Natural Compounds as Antidepressants by Bioinformatics Methods
Previous Article in Journal
Cytotoxic Activity of Gallic Acid and Myricetin against Ovarian Cancer Cells by Production of Reactive Oxygen Species
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Variability of Selected Traits in Meadow Fescue (Festuca pratensis Huds.) Plants with Different Susceptibility to Seed Shattering †

by
Tomasz Wójtowicz
* and
Andrzej Zieliński
Department of Plant Breeding, Physiology and Seed Science, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Łobzowska 24, 31-140 Kraków, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 1st International Electronic Conference on Agronomy, 3–17 May 2021; Available online: https://sciforum.net/conference/IECAG2021.
Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2021, 3(1), 23; https://doi.org/10.3390/IECAG2021-09910
Published: 6 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 1st International Electronic Conference on Agronomy)

Abstract

:
In meadow fescue (Festuca pratensis Huds.), a perennial fodder grass plant characterized by high quality and yield potential, seed shattering makes seed production difficult. The objective of the research was to compare two subpopulations, differing in a tendency to seed shattering, with respect to their variability in the beginning of the heading and flowering stages, their morphological traits (plant height and panicle length), and changes occurring at the site of the bonding between the caryopsis and the pedicel. The subpopulations were obtained by divergent selection carried out on four meadow fescue cultivars. Significant variability in years and subpopulations in respect of the tested traits was found. The subpopulation with a low tendency to seed shattering was characterized by a 2–3 day delay in the beginning of the heading and flowering stages. However, in both the subpopulations, a good flowering stage synchronization was found, with its variability being several times smaller when compared with the heading stage. Between the starting dates of these stages, a significant correlation was found (r = 0.828; p < 0.01). The clones with a high tendency of seed shattering were approximately 7 cm shorter, while the length of panicles was similar in both the subpopulations. The analysis, which was performed with the use of a scanning microscope, showed that, in genotypes with a low tendency to shattering, the formation of the abscission layer was four days late, which may confirm the effectiveness of the carried out selection.

1. Introduction

Meadow fescue (Festuca pratensis Huds.) is a perennial fodder grass plant that is used as a valuable component of most meadow and pasture mixes because of its good palatability and digestibility. Owing to its high frost resistance, it is commonly grown in North-West and East-Central Europe [1]. In addition, its fodder value is higher when compared with other perennial grasses [2]. In meadow fescue seed production, the main problem consists of heavy seed shattering which already begins in partially green panicles. In this species, the occurrence of one caryopsis in a spikelet is enough to induce the formation of the abscission layer, which causes the separation of the caryopsis from the pedicel and its falling out of the spikelet [3]. Early harvest, aimed at limiting seed losses, may result in the loss of late-ripening genotypes.
The breeding works aimed at decreasing the tendency to seed shattering in meadow fescue cover, both in its morphological traits [4] and the panicle structure, as well as the strength of the caryopsis bonding in spikelets [5]. However, as the available literature shows, the site at which the abscission layer between the caryopsis and the spikelet pedicel is formed in meadow fescue has not been examined using scanning microscopy. In grass breeding, one of the factors which make the selection difficult is a considerable genotype–environment interaction, which, in individual species, contributes to high intra-cultivar variability [6]. Habitat conditions affect not only the heading and flowering phenophases, mainly through air temperature and amount of precipitation [7], but also the morphological traits of plants. As the results of many studies show, the number of seeds produced in grasses depends directly on the number of generative shoots and their length [4,8,9], as well as on the length of their panicles [6,10].
The objective of the research was to compare two subpopulations of meadow fescue obtained via divergent selection, differing in the tendency to seed shattering, in respect of the variability of the heading and flowering stages, morphological traits, such as plant height and panicle length, and to use scanning electron microscopy to evaluate the changes undergoing at the site of the bonding between the caryopsis and the spikelet pedicel which result in seed shattering.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Plant Material and Experimental Design

Field experiments were carried out in the years 2012–2017 at the Experimental Station of the University of Agriculture in Prusy near Krakow, Poland (N 50°07′03″ and E 20°05′13″). The initial material for performing the divergent selection for low and high seed shattering tendencies included meadow fescue (Festuca pratensis Huds.) cultivars: Cykada, Skawa, Skiba and Skra (breeder: Małopolska Hodowla Roślin HBP Sp. z o.o., Kraków, Poland).
The divergent selection was performed on the basis of the results of the experiment carried out in the years 2008–2011 (Scheme 1). The average temperature from April to July during 2008–2011 ranged from 9 °C to 21 °C, and the total precipitation ranged from 335 mm to 582 mm. The susceptibility to seed shattering, determined under laboratory conditions with the use of a modified laboratory shaker, was the main criterion for this selection [11]. The plants in which seed losses exceeded 20% were defined as the plants susceptible to seed shattering, while plants in which seed shattering was lower (losses < 20%) were ranked among the group of plants with a low seed shattering tendency. Selected plants were vegetatively propagated; as a result, five plants within each clone were obtained. The clones were planted, maintaining spatial isolation, according to the randomized block design with five replications, five plants each. Over the entire research period, in accordance with the OECD methodology [12], the following observations were performed: the starting dates of the heading and flowering stages were determined, and one week after the beginning of the flowering the stage plant height and panicle length measurements were taken.

2.2. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

After the divergent selection, the site of the bonding between the caryopsis and the spikelet pedicel was observed using scanning microscopy. Starting with the 18th day after the beginning of the flowering stage, at four dates (from the 14 until the 25 June 2012), from the second branch of panicles, samples of spikelets were taken. In both subpopulations, because of different heading and flowering dates, panicles characterized by their identical degree of ripeness, similar plant habitat, length and number of branches were selected. Samples of spikelets were soaked with 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M PBS (phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.2) for 15 min and then postfixed with 1% osmium tetroxide in PBS for 4 h at room temperature. They were dehydrated using an ethanol series (30, 50, 70, 80, 90, 95 and 100%), then dried with liquid CO2 in a critical point dryer (Type E3100 Industrial LADD, USA). In the next step, samples were coated with gold using a sputter coater (JEOL JFC-1100E, Japan). Finally, samples were observed using a scanning electron microscope (JEOL JSM 5410, Japan).

2.3. Statistical Analysis

The results were analyzed in respect of their variability, calculating the mean values and the coefficient of variation (CV%). The effects of the years and differentiation on the selected genotypes, with respect to the seed shattering tendency on the heading and flowering dates, as well as on plant height and panicle length, were determined on the basis of a two-way ANOVA. The tests were performed according to a mixed model, in which years were the random factor and the genotypes were the fixed factor used. The mean values were compared using the Tukey’s HSD test at p < 0.05. The correlation between heading and flowering starting dates and the length of shoots and panicles was determined using the Pearson’s correlation coefficient at p < 0.05. The analyses were performed with the use of Statistica 13 [13].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization of the Obtained Subpopulations

During the research, the growing conditions and plantation age significantly affected the course of the phenological phases. Before heading, and while entering the heading and flowering stages, the mean air temperature fluctuations were about 2 °C (Table 1). The amount of precipitation underwent much greater changes; its maximum values were noted in April 2017, May 2014 and 2015, and in June 2012 and 2013.
In the years 2012 and 2013, heading began at the latest date, i.e., between the 20 and 22 May, and in 2012, 2015 and 2017 flowering did not occur until 3–6 June (Figure 1a,b). In the first years after selection, i.e., in 2012 and 2015, in plants showing a low seed shattering tendency, the heading stage was significantly late. It was only in 2015 that this delay was found also for the beginning of the flowering stage. In other years, flowering in both the subpopulations occurred at a similar date. In the years 2012, 2015 and 2017, in both the subpopulations, the number of days between the two tested phonological phases was the highest (approximately 15 days). A significant correlation between the heading and flowering dates (r = 0.828; p < 0.01; n = 100) was found.
The range of variability for the observed stages was strongly affected by years. In the third growing year (2014), both the populations showed over twice as high variability in the earliness of heading when compared with other growing seasons (Figure 1a). The best synchronization of the beginning of the flowering stage was found in the year 2012 (Figure 1b). In grass growing, it is important that the successive development stages should occur synchronically during the entire course of production. In fescues, a delay in the beginning of the heading stage is usually connected with a decreased seed yield [14].
The mean length of shoots was 116 cm over the entire research period. In the successive years of growing, it was significantly higher, by 7 cm on average, and plants occurred in the population of genotypes with a low seed shattering tendency (Figure 1c). In both the subpopulations, a tendency of increased plant height in the second year of growing was observed. The highest variability was found for the genotypes with low susceptibility to seed shattering in the first year after cloning the plants, both after the first and the second selection (Figure 1c). In other years of research, variability in both the populations was much the same, i.e., 7%.
Changes in the length of shoots were accompanied by changes in the length of panicles (Figure 1d). In the population with high susceptibility to seed shattering, the correlation between these two traits was higher (r = 0.582; p < 0.01; n = 100) when compared with the population with low susceptibility to seed shattering (r = 0.481; p < 0.01; n = 100). When compared with the first year of analyzing the plants obtained after the divergent selection (2012), in which the length of panicles in both the populations was 22 cm, the decrease in that trait in successive years and after the second selection was from 1 cm to 6 cm (Figure 1d). Genotypes with a lower susceptibility to seed shattering were characterized by an almost double variability of panicle length, ranging from 9 to 13% (Figure 1d). In meadow fescue growing, panicle length is of great importance because, as Mäkelä and Kousa [15] demonstrated, half of fertile spikelets may be located on six or seven branches in the bottom part of the panicle, while sterile spikelets are accumulated mainly in the middle part of the panicle.

3.2. Analysis of the Site of the Bonding between the Caryopsis and the Spikelet Pedicel

In a majority of plants, the formation of the abscission layer between a fruit or a seed and the maternal plant is essential for spreading seeds [16]. In a number of plants of the grass family, spikelets may break down, or whole single-seeded or multi-seeded spikelet seed shattering may occur. Observations of the ventral and dorsal sides of meadow fescue caryopses, performed with the use of SEM, revealed the separation process occurring between the tissues at the base of the caryopsis and the spikelet tissues. The photos of the dorsal side, taken both at the first and successive sampling dates, present a more advanced caryopsis separation process (Figure 2a–d, Ld and Hd).
At the ventral side, the crack that is formed at the base of the caryopsis at the first sampling date was distinctly smaller in the genotype with a low seed shattering tendency (Figure 2a, Lv). At the successive sampling dates, the crack in that genotype did not reach the caryopsis axis (Figure 2b–d, Lv). In the genotype with a high tendency of seed shattering, the formation of the abscission layer proceeded faster. Already, at the second sampling date, the crack occurred along the whole width of the caryopsis base (Figure 2b–d, Hv). Goliński [5] showed that in meadow fescue, before the caryopses reach the wax ripeness stage, the force needed to tear the spikelet away from the pedicel is relatively high. However, at the stage of full ripeness the spikelet could be separated using minimal force.

4. Conclusions

The selection which resulted in obtaining the tested subpopulations with different susceptibilities to seed shattering was based on the simulation of the conditions prevailing on a plantation (panicles hit one another under the influence of wind or seed shattering occurs during mechanical harvest). Thus, the results of the observations with the use of a scanning microscope may indicate the effectiveness of the performed selection, in spite of the fact that the fragility of the caryopsis–spikelet bonding made it difficult to examine the caryopsis separation process that was occurring until the sampling date.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.W.; methodology, T.W.; software, T.W.; validation, T.W.; formal analysis, T.W.; investigation, T.W. and A.Z.; resources, T.W.; data curation, T.W.; writing—original draft preparation, T.W. and A.Z.; writing—review and editing, T.W.; visualization, T.W.; supervision, T.W.; project administration, T.W.; funding acquisition, T.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded in the years 2012–2013 by Polish Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, grant number HOR hn 801-20/12 and HOR hn 801-9/13.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Fjellheim, S.; PaŠakinskiené, I.; Grønnerød, S.; Paplauskiené, V.; Rognli, O.A. Genetic structure of local populations and cultivars of meadow fescue from the Nordic and Baltic regions. Crop Sci. 2009, 49, 200–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Brink, G.E.; Casler, M.D.; Martin, N.P. Meadow fescue, tall fescue, and orchardgrass response to defoliation management. Agron. J. 2010, 102, 667–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Boelt, B.; Studer, B. Breeding for grass seed yield. In Fodder Crops and Amenity Grasses; Boller, B., Posselt, U.K., Veronesi, F., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2010; pp. 161–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wójtowicz, T.; Binek, A.; Moś, M. Correlations and path analysis of the components of Festuca pratensis seed yield. Grassl. Sci. Pol. 2009, 12, 223–232. [Google Scholar]
  5. Goliński, P. Investigations on tensile strength of plant material using a modern measuring stand. Grassl. Sci. Pol. 2009, 12, 47–60. [Google Scholar]
  6. Amini, F.; Majidi, M.M.; Mirlohi, A. Genetic and genotype× environment interaction analysis for agronomical and some morphological traits in half-Sib families of tall fescue. Crop Sci. 2013, 53, 411–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Fjellheim, S.; Boden, S.; Trevaskis, B. The role of seasonal flowering responses in adaptation of grasses to temperate climates. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Abbott, L.; Pistorale, S. Determination of variance components and heritability in prairie grass (Bromus catharticus Vahl.). Agriscientia 2010, 27, 115–123. [Google Scholar]
  9. Wang, Q.; Hu, T.; Cui, J.; Wang, X.; Zhou, H.; Han, J.; Zhang, T. Modelling of seed yield and its components in tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) based on a large sample. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2011, 10, 12584–12594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Żurek, G.; Prokopiuk, K.; Martyniak, D.; Paszkowski, E.; Woźna-Pawlak, U.; Jurkowski, M. Seed yield and its components in three Festuca species. Plant Breed. Seed Sci. 2017, 75, 15–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wójtowicz, T.; Zieliński, A.; Moś, M. The effect of degree of panicle maturity on seed yield and yield components in meadow fescue (Festuca pratensis Huds.). Zesz. Probl. Postępów Nauk Rol. 2014, 579, 111–120. [Google Scholar]
  12. OECD. Guide to the Methods Used in Plot Tests and to the Methods of Field Inspection of Seed Crops; OECD: Paris, France, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  13. Dell Statistica (Data Analysis Software System), version 13; Dell Inc.: Irvine, CA, USA, 2016.
  14. Rognli, O.A.; Saha, M.C.; Bhamidimarri, S.; van der Heijden, S. Fescues. In Fodder Crops and Amenity Grasses; Boller, B., Posselt, U.K., Veronesi, F., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2010; pp. 261–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mäkelä, P.; Kousa, M. Seed production of two meadow fescue cultivars differing in growth habit. Agric. Food Sci. 2009, 18, 91–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Estornell, L.H.; Agustí, J.; Merelo, P.; Talón, M.; Tadeo, F.R. Elucidating mechanisms underlying organ abscission. Plant Sci. 2013, 199, 48–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Scheme 1. Outline of the selection for a varied seed shattering tendency carried out on meadow fescue plants.
Scheme 1. Outline of the selection for a varied seed shattering tendency carried out on meadow fescue plants.
Blsf 03 00023 sch001
Figure 1. Variability of the starting dates of the heading (a) and flowering (b) stages, as well as plant height (c) and panicle length (d) in meadow fescue clones differing in the seed shattering tendency (Hs—high shattering; Ls—low shattering; CV—coefficient of variation; the bars marked with the same letter in a given growing year present the means which do not differ significantly according to the Tukey’s HSD test).
Figure 1. Variability of the starting dates of the heading (a) and flowering (b) stages, as well as plant height (c) and panicle length (d) in meadow fescue clones differing in the seed shattering tendency (Hs—high shattering; Ls—low shattering; CV—coefficient of variation; the bars marked with the same letter in a given growing year present the means which do not differ significantly according to the Tukey’s HSD test).
Blsf 03 00023 g001
Figure 2. Formation of the abscission layer between the caryopsis and the spikelet at successive sampling dates (ad). The genotype with a low seed shattering tendency: Lv—as seen from the ventral side, Ld—as seen from the dorsal side; the genotype with a high seed shattering tendency: Lv—as seen from the ventral side, Ld—as seen from the dorsal side; 150× magnification; magnification of the fragment—1500×.
Figure 2. Formation of the abscission layer between the caryopsis and the spikelet at successive sampling dates (ad). The genotype with a low seed shattering tendency: Lv—as seen from the ventral side, Ld—as seen from the dorsal side; the genotype with a high seed shattering tendency: Lv—as seen from the ventral side, Ld—as seen from the dorsal side; 150× magnification; magnification of the fragment—1500×.
Blsf 03 00023 g002
Table 1. Weather conditions during the heading and flowering, as well as seed ripening stages observed at the Experimental Station in Prusy in the years 2012–2017.
Table 1. Weather conditions during the heading and flowering, as well as seed ripening stages observed at the Experimental Station in Prusy in the years 2012–2017.
MonthTemperature [°C]Precipitation [mm]
201220132014201520162017201220132014201520162017
April9.88.98.39.19.57.66520432459111
May15.014.212.813.314.514.023991081014184
June17.317.515.517.518.818.814321380536045
July20.019.520.420.619.619.26927183729384
Mean/Total14.315.115.614.915.115.5299359414250253325
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wójtowicz, T.; Zieliński, A. Variability of Selected Traits in Meadow Fescue (Festuca pratensis Huds.) Plants with Different Susceptibility to Seed Shattering. Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2021, 3, 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECAG2021-09910

AMA Style

Wójtowicz T, Zieliński A. Variability of Selected Traits in Meadow Fescue (Festuca pratensis Huds.) Plants with Different Susceptibility to Seed Shattering. Biology and Life Sciences Forum. 2021; 3(1):23. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECAG2021-09910

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wójtowicz, Tomasz, and Andrzej Zieliński. 2021. "Variability of Selected Traits in Meadow Fescue (Festuca pratensis Huds.) Plants with Different Susceptibility to Seed Shattering" Biology and Life Sciences Forum 3, no. 1: 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECAG2021-09910

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop