Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of Alternative Models for Respiration Rate of Ready-to-Eat Strawberry (cv. ‘Ágata’)
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biology and Life Sciences Forum
Volume 40
Issue 1
10.3390/blsf2024040055
blsf-logo
Submit to this Journal
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Statement of Peer Review †

by
Arun K. Bhunia
Department of Food Science, Department of Comparative Pathobiology (Courtesy), Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
†
All proceeding papers in this volume are from the 5th International Electronic Conference on Foods, 28–30 October 2024; Available online: https://sciforum.net/event/Foods2024.
Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2024, 40(1), 55; https://doi.org/10.3390/blsf2024040055
Published: 17 April 2025
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 5th International Electronic Conference on Foods)
Versions Notes
In submitting conference proceedings to Biology and Life Sciences Forum, the volume editors of the proceedings certify to the publisher that all papers published in this volume have been subjected to peer review administered by the volume editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal.
  • Type of peer review: single-blind
  • Conference submission management system: SUSY
  • Number of submissions received: 78
  • Number of submissions sent for review: 67
  • Number of submissions accepted: 54
  • Acceptance rate (number of submissions accepted/number of submissions received): 69%
  • Average number of reviews per paper: 98
  • Total number of reviewers involved: 1.46
  • Any additional information on the review process: The review process was conducted in a single blind manner, with the entire procedure administered through the MDPI Submission System. Evaluations were performed by reviewers from various universities and countries. Based on their feedback, revisions were made to each article, encompassing through examinations of the structure, content and writing.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bhunia, A.K. Statement of Peer Review. Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2024, 40, 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/blsf2024040055

AMA Style

Bhunia AK. Statement of Peer Review. Biology and Life Sciences Forum. 2024; 40(1):55. https://doi.org/10.3390/blsf2024040055

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bhunia, Arun K. 2024. "Statement of Peer Review" Biology and Life Sciences Forum 40, no. 1: 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/blsf2024040055

APA Style

Bhunia, A. K. (2024). Statement of Peer Review. Biology and Life Sciences Forum, 40(1), 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/blsf2024040055

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop