Abstract
Since its appearance in Wuhan in December 2019, finding ways to manage the COVID-19 pandemic has become the biggest challenge the world is facing. In this investigation, we used a quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) study, an absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity (ADMET) analysis, and computational molecular docking simulations to screen and assess the efficacy of 39 bioactive 9,10-dihydrophenanthrene analogues. The density functional theory (DFT) using the B3LYP/6-31G (d, p) level was used for the calculations of molecular descriptors, and principal component analysis (PCA) was used to eliminated redundant and non-significant descriptors. After that, statistically robust models were developed using the multiple linear regression (MLR) method. All the derived models were then subjected to thorough external and internal statistical validations, Y-randomization, and applicability domain analysis. These validations were carried out as per the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) principles. The best built model was used to design new molecules that have good values of inhibitory activity against SARS-CoV-2. The pharmacokinetics properties were then determined using an ADMET analysis to weed out any that would be harmful to the human body or cause adverse effects. Through the use of computational molecular docking simulations, in silico research was conducted on the deigned compounds to forecast their SARS-CoV-2 activity and determine the stability of the evaluated ligands during their contacts with the proteins of the desired activity.
Supplementary Materials
The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ECMC2022-13293/s1.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing, I.Y., S.N.M., O.A. and H.N.; visualization, S.G., M.E.K., S.C.; supervision, M.E.K., S.C.; software, methodology, resources and project administration, S.C.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).