Abstract
Diets high in sodium increase blood pressure, which in turn raises the risk of cardiovascular disease. New Zealand (NZ) adults consume 40% more sodium than the World Health Organization recommendations, yet information on the major dietary sources of this nutrient is lacking. Our aim was to determine major dietary sources of sodium for NZ adults by gender, ethnicity, and age. Nationally representative sodium intake data were sourced from the most recent Adult Nutrition Survey (2008/09; n = 4721) including 33 high-level food groups and 343 smaller food categories. Outcomes were: (1) proportional contribution of sodium from high-level food groups up to ~80% consumed, and (2) proportional contribution of sodium from the top 10 smaller food categories. All outcomes were assessed for the total population and by gender, ethnic group (Māori, Pacific, Asian, Other), and age group (15–10, 21–40, 41–60, 61+ years). Average percentage sodium consumed from food groups and categories was calculated using individual weighted 24 h recall data. For the total population, 15 high-level food groups contributed ~80% of sodium consumed; the top three were Bread (18%), Bread-based dishes (11%), and Grains and pasta (7%). Other top three high-level sources for specific groups were Pork (Māori, Other ethnicity, 41–60 years, 61+ years), Sausages and processed meats (Māori, Pacific), Vegetables (Asian), and Soups and stocks (61+ years). For the total population, the top three smaller food category sources were White bread (7%), Sandwiches and filled rolls (6%), and Mixed grain bread (6%). Other top three smaller food category sources for specific groups were Sausages (Māori, Pacific, 21–40 years, 60 years+), Noodles (Pacific, Asian), Fried rice/sushi/risotto (Asian), and Burgers and hot dogs (15–20 years.). The findings should be used to inform much-needed sodium reduction interventions and policies, and a national sodium reduction strategy. Differences by population sub-group should be considered to help reduce disparities in heart health in Aotearoa NZ.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, H.E.; methodology, H.E. and C.C.; formal analysis, C.C.; writing—original draft preparation, H.E.; writing—review and editing, H.E, and C.C., visualization, H.E. and C.C., funding acquisition, H.E. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was funded by the Heart Foundation of New Zealand, grant number 1843.
Institutional Review Board Statement
This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the New Zealand Health and Disability Multi-Region Ethics Committee (MEC/08/04/049).
Informed Consent Statement
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Data Availability Statement
Access to the data used in this study was provided by Statistics New Zealand under conditions designed to keep individual information secure in accordance with requirements of the Statistics Act 1975 (Licence #CURF-2021-17). The opinions presented are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent an official view of Statistics New Zealand.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).