Next Article in Journal
The Impact of ESG Performance on Green Technology Innovation: A Moderating Effect Based on Digital Transformation
Previous Article in Journal
Sustainability and Circularity of the Agri-food Systems: How to Measure It? A First Attempt on the Italian System
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Dynamic Minimum Service Level of Demand–Responsive Transit: A Prospect Theory Approach

by
Myeonggeun Jang
1,
Sunghee Lee
1,
Jihwan Kim
2 and
Jooyoung Kim
1,*
1
Department of Transportation Planning & Management, Korea National University of Transportation, Chungju 16106, Republic of Korea
2
Mobility Research Division, Gyeonggi Research Institute, Suwon 16207, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2025, 17(7), 3171; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17073171
Submission received: 21 February 2025 / Revised: 28 March 2025 / Accepted: 30 March 2025 / Published: 3 April 2025

Abstract

Demand–responsive transit (DRT) provides flexible, user-centric services and is gaining attention as a solution to modern transportation challenges. Establishing a minimum service level is crucial for its effectiveness, yet existing methods rely on supplier-centric indicators that fail to reflect user psychology and the flexible nature of DRT. To address this, this study applied a prospect theory from behavioral economics and used logistic regression analysis of stated preference survey data to determine minimum service levels based on user perceptions. To account for regional variations, we classified user groups based on primary transportation mode, travel purpose, and age, proposing dynamic minimum service levels tailored to each group. Additionally, using the maximum likelihood estimation method, we estimated value function parameters for the prospect theory, allowing us to analyze users’ loss aversion and sensitivity to DRT services. The findings indicated that users would accept higher fares for DRT than for conventional public transportation, provided it offers shorter travel times. Sensitivity to service levels varied across user groups, highlighting the need for differentiated policies. This study provides insights to optimize DRT operations, improve user satisfaction, and guide policies that reflect regional and demographic characteristics, enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of DRT services.
Keywords: behavioral economics; demand–responsive transit; minimum service level; prospect theory; value function behavioral economics; demand–responsive transit; minimum service level; prospect theory; value function

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jang, M.; Lee, S.; Kim, J.; Kim, J. Dynamic Minimum Service Level of Demand–Responsive Transit: A Prospect Theory Approach. Sustainability 2025, 17, 3171. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17073171

AMA Style

Jang M, Lee S, Kim J, Kim J. Dynamic Minimum Service Level of Demand–Responsive Transit: A Prospect Theory Approach. Sustainability. 2025; 17(7):3171. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17073171

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jang, Myeonggeun, Sunghee Lee, Jihwan Kim, and Jooyoung Kim. 2025. "Dynamic Minimum Service Level of Demand–Responsive Transit: A Prospect Theory Approach" Sustainability 17, no. 7: 3171. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17073171

APA Style

Jang, M., Lee, S., Kim, J., & Kim, J. (2025). Dynamic Minimum Service Level of Demand–Responsive Transit: A Prospect Theory Approach. Sustainability, 17(7), 3171. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17073171

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop