Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
The Cytotoxicity of RNase-Derived Peptides
Previous Article in Journal
Biomolecules from Different Angles
Previous Article in Special Issue
GSK3α: An Important Paralog in Neurodegenerative Disorders and Cancer
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomolecules
Volume 11
Issue 1
10.3390/biom11010015
biomolecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Phosphorylation of the Regulators, a Complex Facet of NF-κB Signaling in Cancer

by
Aishat Motolani
1,
Matthew Martin
1,
Mengyao Sun
1 and
Tao Lu
1,2,3,*
1
Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
2
Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
3
Department of Medical & Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomolecules 2021, 11(1), 15; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11010015
Submission received: 21 November 2020 / Revised: 15 December 2020 / Accepted: 23 December 2020 / Published: 26 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Protein Phosphorylation in Cancer: Unraveling the Signaling Pathways)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) is a ubiquitous transcription factor central to inflammation and various malignant diseases in humans. The regulation of NF-κB can be influenced by a myriad of post-translational modifications (PTMs), including phosphorylation, one of the most popular PTM formats in NF-κB signaling. The regulation by phosphorylation modification is not limited to NF-κB subunits, but it also encompasses the diverse regulators of NF-κB signaling. The differential site-specific phosphorylation of NF-κB itself or some NF-κB regulators can result in dysregulated NF-κB signaling, often culminating in events that induce cancer progression and other hyper NF-κB related diseases, such as inflammation, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, as well as neurodegenerative diseases, etc. In this review, we discuss the regulatory role of phosphorylation in NF-κB signaling and the mechanisms through which they aid cancer progression. Additionally, we highlight some of the known and novel NF-κB regulators that are frequently subjected to phosphorylation. Finally, we provide some future perspectives in terms of drug development to target kinases that regulate NF-κB signaling for cancer therapeutic purposes.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

1.1. Brief Overview of Cancer and Key Signaling Pathways

Cancer is a diverse and multifactorial genetic disease that arises through a multistep accumulation of genetic alterations, which causes genomic instability in a cell. This genomic instability results in aberrant cellular functions, such as uncontrolled growth, cell death resistance, increased cell migration and invasion, evasion of immune surveillance, metabolic reprograming, etc. [1]. The progression of cancer is further driven by the complex interaction of malignant cells with neighboring cells in their microenvironment [2].
Genetic mutations in multiple signaling pathways have been linked to cancer progression. Several typical examples include the receptor tyrosine kinase/Ki-ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (RTK/KRAS) pathway, tumor protein P53 (p53) pathway, transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) pathway, and phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Akt (PI-3-kinase/Akt) pathway, etc. Interestingly, ample evidences suggest that these signaling pathways frequently promote cancer progression through the nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) activation [3,4]. For example, KRAS oncogenic mutation and p53 loss of function mutation, which is present in approximately 25% and 50% of human tumors, respectively, leads to the constitutive activation of NF-κB, thereby promoting cell survival in multiple cancers. [4]. Similarly, mutations in the PI-3-Kinase/Akt pathway, which exist in over 30% of solid tumors, promotes the activation of components in NF-κB pathway [2,5]. These examples, among many others, demonstrate the complex signaling interactions in cancer and the pivotal role that NF-κB plays in enabling cancer progression. Hence, it is of great clinical importance to fully understand the different facets of NF-κB regulation in cancer. In this review, we will further elaborate on the complexity of NF-κB regulation in cancer, with the goal of providing deep insight and aiding the development strategies of novel NF-κB targeted cancer therapeutics.

1.2. Overview of NF-κB Signaling

Gene transcription plays a fundamental role in mediating several biological processes. Thus, strict regulation of transcription factors is necessary to maintain cellular homeostasis. One such transcription factor is NF-κB. The omnipresent NF-κB is a group of homo- and hetero-dimeric proteins, which was discovered about three decades ago in B lymphocytes. NF-κB was found to bind to a B motif at the enhancer element of the κ light-chain gene to regulate its expression [6,7]. The κB motif, as it is currently termed, consists of the following sequence: 5′-GGGRNNYYCC-3′; wherein Y = pyrimidine, R = purine, and N, any nucleotide. After years of continuous studies on NF-κB, additional mechanistic insights into the roles of NF-κB and its signaling cascade—beyond B-cells—have been elucidated [8]. Mammalian NF-κB is composed of five-member subunits that dimerize at gene promoters to control differential gene expression. The members of the NF-κB family include p65/RelA, RelB, c-Rel, p50/p105 (NF-κB1), and p52/p100 (NF-κB2) [9]. These subunits are characterized by the Rel-homology domains in their N-terminal, which contains a DNA-binding domain, a nuclear localization sequence, and a dimerization domain [8]. Additionally, p65, RelB, and c-Rel contain a transactivation domain in their C-terminal, enabling their transcriptional activity. In contrast, the C-terminal region of p105 and p100, the precursors of p50 and p52 respectively, lacks a transactivation domain but contains several ankyrin repeat sequences that function to inhibit NF-κB [10]. As shown in Figure 1, the mechanism of NF-κB induction is grouped into two pathways: canonical and non-canonical pathways. In the canonical pathway, external stimuli such as growth factors and cytokines bind to NF-κB cell-surface receptors to activate the phosphorylation of Inhibitor of κB (IκB) by Inhibitor of κB kinase (IKK). This phosphorylation results in IκBα degradation, causing the translocation of p65/p50, c-Rel/p50, or p65/p52 dimers to the nucleus. These dimers bind to their respective κB elements on the genes [11,12,13] (Figure 1). Comparably, the non-canonical pathway involves signaling via Cluster of differentiation 40 (CD40) receptor, Lymphotoxin-β receptor (LTβR), and BLyS receptor 3 (BR3) receptors, triggering NF-κB -inducing kinase (NIK) phosphorylation of IKKα dimers, and subsequent phosphorylation of p100 by IKKα [9]. This phosphorylation cascade triggers the translocation of RelB/p52 dimers into the nucleus to modulate gene transcription [14] (Figure 1).

1.3. Implication of NF-κB Signaling in Cancer

Considering the unique mechanism of gene regulation, NF-κB has been implicated in a diverse range of cellular processes such as inflammation, cell survival, and cell differentiation. Notably, there has been a growing amount of evidence indicating the pivotal role of NF-κB in cancer initiation and progression [15]. NF-κB is highly involved in cell proliferation via the regulation of cell cycle proteins. For instance, NF-κB was reported to trigger cyclin D1 expression in breast carcinoma cells and was found to interact with cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (CDK2) and cyclin E complex in lymphocytes [16,17]. Additionally, NF-κB has been shown to contribute to most cancer hallmarks including promoting metastasis, enabling angiogenesis, altering the tumor microenvironment, evading apoptosis, among others, in different tumor types [18]. Cytokines such as interleukin-17A (IL-17A) was shown to cause metastasis in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by upregulating the levels of metalloproteinases (MMP) 2 and 9 through NF-κB induction [19]. Additionally, the constitutive activity of NF-κB in human prostate tumors was reported to be associated with the expression of key angiogenesis promoters such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), MMP 9, and interleukin-8 (IL-8) [20]. Unsurprisingly, the tumor microenvironment, which consists of various immune cells, is invariably transformed into a pro-tumorigenic microenvironment through NF-κB signaling. NF-κB activates the expression of distinct pro-inflammatory cytokines that engage in a feedback-loop to promote NF-κB dependent transcription of oncogenes [21]. Alongside enabling tumor growth, NF-κB also plays a vital role in preventing apoptosis in many cancers. For instance, inhibition of NF-κB activity triggered apoptosis in both lung cancer and colorectal cancer cell lines [22,23]. Cancer cells can evade apoptosis by upregulating a number of NF-κB-dependent anti-apoptotic genes such as B-cell lymphoma-extra-large (Bcl-xL), FLICE-inhibitory protein (FLIP), cellular inhibitor of apoptosis protein (c-IAP), and mouse double minute 2 homolog (Mdm2), a negative regulator of p53. [23,24,25,26]. p53 plays a key role in preserving the genomic integrity of a cell in response to cellular stress by activating cell cycle arrest or inducing apoptosis. Thus, NF-κB signaling has been speculated to hinder p53-induced apoptosis in response to chemotherapeutic agents used for cancer treatment [26]. Overall, the above evidence affirms the key role that NF-κB plays in various types of cancer.

2. General Role of Phosphorylation of NF-κB Pathway in Cancer

The proteins involved within the NF-κB pathway is replete with the examples of post-translational modifications (PTM) that function to regulate NF-κB signaling. One such major PTM example is phosphorylation. Site-specific phosphorylation of both NF-κB and its upstream regulators in the pathway can determine the state of NF-κB activity in a cell. In the canonical pathway, the IKK complex is composed of the catalytic IKKα and IKKβ and the regulatory IKKγ/NEMO component. For example, upon stimulation with tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) or IL-1, IKKβ is phosphorylated by transforming growth factor-β-activated kinase 1 (TAK1) at the serine residues in the signaling loop, activating the enzymatic activity of IKKβ [27]. 3-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase-1 (PDK1) was also reported to exert its cell survival function in tumor cells by phosphorylating IKKβ at serine (S) 181 [28]. Following its activation, IKKβ phosphorylates IκBα at S32 and 36, triggering IκBα proteasomal degradation [29,30] (Figure 1). Furthermore, NF-κB subunits in the canonical pathway, such as p50, p65, c-Rel, are also subjected to phosphorylation to regulate NF-κB activity [31,32,33]. On the other hand, the non-canonical pathway phosphorylation cascade begins with NIK activity on IKKα. NIK phosphorylates IKKα in its activation loop at S176, enabling its activation and recruitment to p100 for processing to p52 [34] (Figure 1). The activated IKKα subsequently mediates the phosphorylation of several serine residues on p100 at position S99, -108, -115, -123, and -82, leading to its processing by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway [35]. The resulting p52 protein dimerizes with RelB, another subunit whose activity can be modified by phosphorylation at S472, -573, -390, and threonine (T) 103 [36]. Collectively, it is inarguable that phosphorylation plays an essential role in the regulation of NF-κB signaling.
Importantly, the distinct kinases and their phosphorylation patterns at each step of the NF-κB pathway have been associated with cancer. For example, the deletion of IKKβ decreases tumor occurrence in intestinal epithelial cells and reduced tumor growth in myeloid cells [37]. This outcome is likely associated with the lack of IκBα phosphorylation, which preludes NF-κB activation. Additionally, our group showed that upon treatment with IL-1β, p65 was found to be phosphorylated on S316, S529, and S536 in 293 cells, thereby enhancing many cellular functions of NF-κB [38]. In prostate cancer cell lines, phosphorylation of p65 at S536 led to increased expression of cytokines and chemokines that promotes tumor development [39]. Likewise, phosphorylation of T254, S529 -276, and -536 residues on p65 has also been reported to promote tumorigenesis in the bone, the breast, and the head and neck tissues [33]. Notably, the constitutive oncogenic activity of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was shown to be reinforced by the phosphorylation of S337 residue on the p50 subunit [40]. These reports strengthen the evidence for the significant role of NF-κB phosphorylation in different types of cancers.

3. Phosphorylation of Novel NF-κB Activators in Cancer

In addition to phosphorylation of the well-known components, such as IKK, IκBα along the traditional NF-κB pathway as we described above, other novel NF-κB regulators, such as the recently identified NF-κB activators, the protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5) and Y-box binding protein 1 (YBX1) can also be phosphorylated. These activators can, in turn, further regulate the NF-κB signaling, adding another complex but fascinating facet to the sophisticated regulation of NF-κB signaling.

3.1. Phosphorylation of NF-κB Activator—PRMT5 in Cancer

3.1.1. PRMT5, a Novel Activator of NF-κB in Cancer

PRMT5 is a member of the PRMT superfamily, a group of enzymes that transfers methyl to arginine residues of histone or non-histone proteins [41]. There are ten PRMTs identified in humans up to now, and all the PRMTs found so far are classified into four types based on the number and location of methylarginine [42]: type I PRMTs catalyze the formation of ω-NG-mono-methylarginine (MMA) and asymmetric ω-NG, NG-dimethylarginine (aDMA), including PRMT 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8; type II PRMTs catalyze MMA and symmetric ω-NG, NG-dimethylarginine (sDMA), including PRMT5, PRMT7, and PRMT9; type III PRMTs catalyze only MMA, and PRMT7 sometimes exhibit the property of type III PRMTs; and type IV produces d-ω-NG-mono-methylarginine, which is only found in yeast [43].
As a primary type II PRMT, PRMT5 has been shown to play a crucial role in mammalian development [44]. In embryonic stem (ES) cells, PRMT5 acts through methylosome protein 50 (MEP50), methylating histone H2A arginine (R) 3 to suppress some differentiation genes, which is pivotal to mouse development [45]. It has been reported that PRMT5 is ubiquitously distributed in different human tissues and both the endoplasm and nucleus, and that it is capable of methylating a set of histone and non-histone proteins to exert various biological effects [46]. For instance, PRMT5 can regulate gene expression, DNA damage repair, mRNA splicing, proliferation, and apoptosis by methylation of histone (H4R3, H3R8, H3R2, and H2AR3) and non-histone proteins such as tumor protein 53 (p53), the p65 subunit of NF-κB, and E2F1, etc. Once the catalytic activity of PRMT5 is dysregulated due to either altered PRMT5 expression or altered expression of its target proteins and regulators that control its enzymatic activity, tumors can occur spontaneously [47]. Gao and his colleagues reported PRMT5 overexpression and mutations found in a broad range of cancers by analyzing the cBioPortal database [48]. This report indicated that PRMT5 might be an oncogene.
Importantly, a few years ago, our lab became the first to discover that PRMT5 dimethylates the p65 subunit of NF-κB at R30 to drive the activation of NF-κB signaling [49]. Our group showed that R30 mutants of p65 significantly downregulate NF-κB biological activity via decreasing the binding affinity of p65 to its target gene. We further reported that the PRMT5-NF-κB signaling axis is critical to the progression of many cancers, including colon cancer and pancreatic cancer [50,51]. Therefore, we identified PRMT5 as a novel activator of NF-κB in cancer.

3.1.2. Effect of PRMT5 Phosphorylation on NF-κB Signaling in Cancer

Interestingly, we further revealed that the novel NF-κB activator—PRMT5—is also subjected to phosphorylation, which can modulate its activity to promote different types of cancers. Given the methyltransferase activity of PRMT5 on NF-κB activation, there is a possibility that the differential phosphorylation marks on PRMT5 may affect the tumor-promoting function of NF-κB in cancers. Recently, our lab discovered the novel phosphorylation on the S15 residue of PRMT5 [50]. We showed that phosphorylation of PRMT5 at S15 by protein kinase C iota (PKCι) enhances colorectal cancer cell growth, motility, colony formation, and anchorage-independent growth. Similarly, alteration of S15 to alanine (A) (S15A) in PRMT5 abrogated the stimulation of PRMT5 activity by IL-1β and consequently inhibits NF-κB activation and the expression of its target genes [50]. This study highlights the crucial role of phosphorylation in modulating not only NF-κB itself but also its activators, such as PRMT5, thereby indirectly regulating the NF-κB signaling.

3.2. Phosphorylation of NF-κB Activator—YBX1 in Cancer

3.2.1. YBX1, a Novel Activator of NF-κB

YBX1 is a well-known DNA/RNA-binding protein that acts to regulate transcription as well as translation. Furthermore, YBX1 is known to interact with DNA and RNA, and it regulates many DNA- and mRNA-dependent processes, several of which include DNA replication, repair, and transcription, as well as DNA-dependent environmental stress, chromatin remodeling, and pre-mRNA splicing [52]. Importantly, knockdown of YBX1 can lead to embryonic lethality [53]. Unsurprisingly, due to YBX1’s critical functions in the cell, its high expression has been identified in a multitude of cancers, including breast, colon, lung, ovarian, prostate, and thyroid cancer [54,55].
Recently, our lab has discovered YBX1 as a novel NF-κB activator in colon cancer [56,57], where overexpression of YBX1 could promote cancerous phenotype. Additionally, YBX1 plays a vital function in renal cancer carcinomas through its interaction with secreted phosphoprotein 1 (SPP1) and Ras-GTPase activating protein SH3 domain-binding proteins 1(G3BP1), where direct protein-protein interaction can promote NF-κB activation and therefore, cancerous phenotype [58]. Moreover, YBX1 interaction with mRNA has been shown to be involved in breast cancer progression, where microRNA miR-886 was shown to bind to YBX1 and downregulate NF-κB signaling [59]. These studies and several others underly the critical importance of YBX1-mediated NF-κB signaling and the critical role of YBX1 as an activator of NF-κB.

3.2.2. Effect of YBX1 Phosphorylation on NF-κB Signaling in Cancer

PTMs on YBX1 can dynamically regulate NF-κB activity in colorectal cancers. Our lab first discovered that the phosphorylation of specific sites on YBX1 is critical for colon cancer progression, including S165 and S176. Furthermore, S176 and S165 have been shown to differentially regulate the expression of different subgroups of NF-κB target genes, thereby leading to NF-κB-mediated regulation of cancerous phenotypes [56,57]. Additionally, S102 is a widely studied residue on YBX1 that is subjected to phosphorylation, and it determines the subcellular localization of YBX1 and has crucial implications for the clinical outcome of different cancers. In breast cancer, inhibition of S102 phosphorylation by Akt activation was shown to reduce tumor growth, attenuate YBX1 nuclear translocation, and led to a decrease in antiestrogen drug resistance [60,61]. The above evidence confirms the important role that phosphorylation of YBX1 plays in cancer progression, either through NF-κB dependent or non-dependent pathways.

4. Phosphorylation of Other Known Regulators of NF-κB Pathway

In addition to PRMT5 and YBX1 phosphorylation described above, NF-κB has a range of other upstream regulators that can modulate its diverse impact on cancer progression (Table 1). The function of these regulators can be modified via phosphorylation, thereby stimulating or inhibiting NF-κB-dependent gene transcription. For example, a study discovered that cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) phosphorylation of Rb at S249 and T252 enhances Rb interaction with p65, thereby inhibiting p65-dependent transcription of programed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), among other genes, in metastatic prostate cancer [62]. This unique interaction, mediated by phosphorylation, highlights the role of NF-κB in regulating cell cycle and promoting evasion of the immune surveillance by tumor cells. Additionally, Deng and colleagues demonstrated that the phosphorylation of eukaryotic initiation factor 2α (eIF2α)—a key process involved in unfolded protein or endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress response—at S51 promotes NF-κB signaling, suggesting another instance through which NF-κB activity enables cancer development [63]. Similarly, phosphorylation of mitogen- and stress-activated protein kinase 1 (MSK1) by p38 has been shown to further promote phosphorylation of p65 at S276, an important residue that aids NF-κB oncogenic function [64,65,66]. Interestingly, IKKα also plays an important role in regulating NF-κB function outside of the proteins within its pathway. For instance, IKKα-mediated phosphorylation of cyclic AMP response element binding protein (CBP) on S1382 and S1386 has been shown to increase NF-κB gene-dependent expression and promote cell proliferation in ovarian, liver, lung, and pancreatic cell lines [67]. This study also showed that this site-specific phosphorylation on CBP switches CBP association from p53 to NF-κB, further indicating the significance of phosphorylation in facilitating the survival state of a cancerous cell. In Table 1, we list some representative examples of other known regulators of NF-κB signaling that are subjected to phosphorylation.

5. Application of Phosphorylation of Regulators in NF-κB Signaling

The impact of phosphorylated PRMT5 and YBX1 on NF-κB signaling in cancer, amongst other regulators, underscores the relevance of phosphorylation in aiding tumor progression. As discussed above, both PRMT5 and YBX1 serve as a potential therapeutic target for cancer treatment. Following the pioneering discovery of PRMT5 methylation of R30 residue on NF-κB by our lab [49], other studies have reported the clinical significance of the NF-κB signaling in perpetuating PRMT5 oncogenicity. In a recent study, the analysis of breast tumor tissue samples collected from 80 breast cancer patients revealed increased expression of PRMT5, which correlated with decreased levels of a tumor suppressor gene, Liver X receptor α (LXRα). Increased levels of LXRα, caused by PRMT5 inhibition, was also reported to inhibit NF-κB expression and consequently reduce cell growth, cell invasion, and glycolysis [71]. Similarly, another study showed increased YBX1 expression in 32 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients, and the genetic ablation of YBX1 in vitro was shown to inhibit the phosphorylation of NF-κB on S536. This pathway is crucial to RCC metastasis [58]. Interestingly, our group recently delineated the relationship between the transcription factors YBX1, NF-κB, and PRMT5 in colorectal cancer. We reported that PRMT5 dimethylates YBX1 on R205, enhancing NF-κB activation. This activation resulted in the proliferation, motility, and anchorage-dependent growth of colorectal cancer cells [72] (Figure 2).
Inhibition of kinases that mediates the phosphorylation of NF-κB regulators and NF-κB subunits may serve as a practical strategy to attenuate the aberrant NF-κB signaling identified in many different cancers. For instance, luteolin, a flavonoid emerging for its anti-cancer potential, has been identified as a p90 ribosomal S6 kinase (RSK) inhibitor by Reipas and colleagues. They further showed that luteolin exerts its anti-tumorigenic action by blocking the phosphorylation of YBX1 by RSK, leading to reduced growth of triple-negative breast cancer cells as well as its tumor-initiating cells [68]. The result of RSK inhibition is the suppression of Notch4 signaling - an important signaling pathway known to activate the NF-κB canonical pathway, leading to the induction of mammary tumorigenesis [73]. Notably, RSK can also influence NF-κB signaling via phosphorylation of IκBα on S32, suggesting both a direct and indirect effect of RSK inhibitors on NF-κB activity [74]. Inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinase 6 (CDK6) by PD332991(Palbociclib), a highly selective CDK4/6 inhibitor, reduced NF-κB-dependent gene transcription, and the genetic ablation of CDK6 was shown to markedly decrease phosphorylation of the p65 subunit of NF-κB at S536. Additionally, increased levels of CDK6 and phosphorylated p65-S536 was observed in lymphoid tumors in mice [75]. Thus, there is a possibility that the anti-tumorigenic action of Palbociclib on certain types of tumors occurs via the CDK6/p65 signaling axis. Similarly, our lab showed that the administration of PKCι inhibitor, CRT0066854, significantly reduced the expression of NF-κB target genes such as Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 20 (CCL20) and IL-8 and decreased colon cancer cells’ growth and migration [50]. A separate study reported the discovery of a host of compounds that selectively inhibits IKKα using molecular dynamics simulations [76]. This indicates a promising path to the development of viable anti-cancer drugs that target IKKα, given its important role in regulating the function of NF-κB activators and the NF-κB non-canonical pathway (Table 1, Figure 1). Notably, the inhibition of casein kinase 2 (CKII)—a putative YBX1 kinase—by its inhibitors, CX-4945 (Silmitasertib) and K27, was shown to sensitize multiple myeloma and mantle cell lymphoma to Bortezomib treatment via downregulating the phosphorylation of p65-S529 and STAT3-S727 [77] (Table 2). This finding highlights the importance of developing inhibitors that target the kinases of NF-κB and its regulators as a treatment option to combat hyper NF-κB related cancers.

6. Perspective and Conclusion

The evidence for the role of NF-κB in the promotion of cell survival pathways in various cancers continues to accumulate over the years. Undoubtedly, NF-κB is key to the inflammation, metastasis, angiogenesis, immune evasion, and metabolic reprograming observed in numerous cancers. Besides other control mechanisms, NF-κB-dependent gene transcription is tightly regulated by distinct PTMs, such as phosphorylation. Both the direct phosphorylation of NF-κB subunits and the phosphorylation of NF-κB regulators have been attributed to the oncogenicity of NF-κB signaling. Particularly, the dysregulation of the p65 site-specific phosphorylation through genetic alteration of kinases, epigenetic enzymes, and transcription factors has been reported to further cause aberrant NF-κB signaling. This phenomenon has been generally observed in breast cancers, renal cell carcinoma, liver cancer, ovarian cancer, hematological malignancies, etc. From cell cycle proteins to translational machinery proteins, NF-κB is regulated by a diverse set of proteins whose activities can be further modulated by distinct kinases. This multi-layered model of regulation of NF-κB illustrates the significant impact of NF-κB signaling in maintaining cellular homeostasis.
There is a myriad of kinase inhibitors on the market and in the cancer drug discovery and development pipeline. Undoubtedly, several of these kinases have been shown to exert considerable influence on NF-κB signaling in cancers. For example, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved inhibitors such as Palbociclib, which can target CDK6, a kinase that directly modifies p65 on S536 [75]. Similarly, Silmitasertib, a known inhibitor of CKII (a YBX1 kinase), is currently in clinical trials for treating sonic hedgehog (SHH) medulloblastoma patients [77]. Although inhibiting the regulators’ kinases may exert its antitumorigenic action on proteins beyond the NF-κB pathway, these examples represent the deep wiring of NF-κB signaling in multiple cellular processes that perpetuate cancer progression. The most common drawback of kinase inhibitors is the lack of specificity, as most of these inhibitors are ATP-analogues. Hence, successfully developed kinase inhibitors need to be highly selective. This can be accomplished by leveraging the minute variation in a kinase structure, among other class of kinases, as it was depicted by Anthony et al. [76]. Since the main challenge associated with directly targeting NF-κB is the potential for systemic toxicity and immunosuppression [80], one of the attractive alternative strategies to overcome these challenges is to target the modulators of NF-κB regulators, such as kinases. Ultimately, the collective implementation of various approaches and complete understanding of the role of phosphorylation in NF-κB signaling offers a promising future for the development of more effective NF-κB inhibitors for cancer treatment, and to a broader scope, other hyper NF-κB related diseases, such as inflammation, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, and neurodegenerative diseases as well.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.M. and T.L.; methodology, Not Applicable; software, Not Applicable; validation, Not Applicable; formal analysis, A.M., M.M., M.S., T.L.; investigation, A.M., M.M., M.S., T.L.; resources, A.M., M.M., M.S., T.L.; data curation, A.M., M.M., M.S., T.L.; writing—original draft preparation, A.M., M.M., M.S., T.L.; writing—review and editing, A.M. and T.L.; visualization, A.M. and T.L.; supervision, T.L.; project administration, T.L.; funding acquisition, T.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Details are included in the “Acknowledgements” section below.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This publication is made possible, in part, with support from NIH NIGMS Grant (#1R01GM120156-01A1 to TL), NIH NCI Grant (#1R03CA223906-01 to TL), and Showalter Scholar Award (to TL).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hanahan, D.; Weinberg, R.A. Hallmarks of Cancer: The Next Generation. Cell 2011, 144, 646–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Sever, R.; Brugge, J.S. Signal Transduction in Cancer. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2015, 5, a006098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Freudlsperger, C.; Bian, Y.; Contag, S.; Burnett, J.; Coupar, J.; Yang, X.; Chen, Z.; Van Waes, C. TGF-β and NF-κB signal pathway cross-talk is mediated through TAK1 and SMAD7 in a subset of head and neck cancers. Oncogene 2013, 32, 1549–1559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Xia, Y.; Shen, S.; Verma, I.M. NF-κB, an active player in human cancers. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2014, 2, 823–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Samuels, Y.; Ericson, K. Oncogenic PI3K and its role in cancer. Curr. Opin. Oncol. 2006, 18, 77–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Sen, R.; Baltimore, D. Multiple nuclear factors interact with the immunoglobulin enhancer sequences. Cell 1986, 46, 705–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sen, R.; Baltimore, D. Inducibility of κ immunoglobulin enhancer-binding protein NF-κB by a posttranslational mechanism. Cell 1986, 47, 921–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tripathi, P.; Aggarwal, A. NF-κB transcription factor: A key player in the generation of immune response. Curr. Sci. 2006, 90, 519. [Google Scholar]
  9. Zhang, Q.; Lenardo, M.J.; Baltimore, D. Leading Edge Review 30 Years of NF-κB: A Blossoming of Relevance to Human Pathobiology. Cell 2017, 168, 37–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Giuliani, C.; Bucci, I.; Napolitano, G. The role of the transcription factor Nuclear Factor-kappa B in thyroid autoimmunity and cancer. Front. Endocrinol. 2018, 9, 471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Oeckinghaus, A.; Ghosh, S. The NF-kappaB family of transcription factors and its regulation. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2009, 1, a000034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Lu, T.; Stark, G.R. Cytokine overexpression and constitutive NF-κB in cancer. Cell Cycle 2004, 3, 1114–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Wei, H.; Prabhu, L.; Hartley, A.-V.; Martin, M.; Sun, E.; Jiang, G.; Liu, Y.; Lu, T. Methylation of NF-κB and its Role in Gene Regulation. In Gene Expression and Regulation in Mammalian Cells—Transcription from General Aspects; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2018; p. 291. [Google Scholar]
  14. Sun, S.C. The noncanonical NF-κB pathway. Immunol. Rev. 2012, 246, 125–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Dolcet, X.; Llobet, D.; Pallares, J.; Matias-Guiu, X. NF-κB in development and progression of human cancer. Virchows Arch. 2005, 446, 475–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Chen, E.; Li, C.C.H. Association of Cdk2/cyclin E and NF-κB complexes at G1/S phase. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1998, 249, 728–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Hinz, M.; Krappmann, D.; Eichten, A.; Heder, A.; Scheidereit, C.; Strauss, M. NF-κB Function in Growth Control: Regulation of Cyclin D1 Expression and G0/G1-to-S-Phase Transition. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1999, 19, 2690–2698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Park, M.; Hong, J. Roles of NF-κB in Cancer and Inflammatory Diseases and Their Therapeutic Approaches. Cells 2016, 5, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, J.; Lau, G.K.-K.; Chen, L.; Dong, S.; Lan, H.-Y.; Huang, X.-R.; Li, Y.; Luk, J.M.; Yuan, Y.-F.; Guan, X. Interleukin 17A Promotes Hepatocellular Carcinoma Metastasis via NF-κB Induced Matrix Metalloproteinases 2 and 9 Expression. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e21816. [Google Scholar]
  20. Huang, S.; Pettaway, C.A.; Uehara, H.; Bucana, C.D.; Fidler, I.J. Blockade of NF-κB activity in human prostate cancer cells is associated with suppression of angiogenesis, invasion, and metastasis. Oncogene 2001, 20, 4188–4197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Inoue, J.I.; Gohda, J.; Akiyama, T.; Semba, K. NF-κB activation in development and progression of cancer. Cancer Sci. 2007, 98, 268–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kim, Y.A.; Lee, W.H.; Choi, T.H.; Rhee, S.H.; Park, K.Y.; Choi, Y.H. Involvement of p21WAF1/CIP1, pRB, Bax and NF-kappaB in induction of growth arrest and apoptosis by resveratrol in human lung carcinoma A549 cells. Int. J. Oncol. 2003, 23, 1143–1149. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  23. Wang, C.Y.; Cusack, J.C.; Liu, R.; Baldwin, A.S. Control of inducible chemoresistance: Enhanced anti-tumor therapy through increased apoptosis by inhibition of NF-κB. Nat. Med. 1999, 5, 412–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Luo, J.-L.; Kamata, H.; Karin, M. IKK/NF-k κB signaling: Balancing life and death-a new approach to cancer therapy. J. Clin. Investig. 2005, 115, 2625–2632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Sevilla, L.; Zaldumbide, A.; Pognonec, P.; Boulukos, K.E. Transcriptional regulation of the bcl-x gene encoding the anti-apoptotic Bcl-xL protein by Ets, Rel/NFkappaB, STAT and AP1 transcription factor families. Histol. Histopathol. 2001, 16, 595–601. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  26. Tergaonkar, V.; Pando, M.; Vafa, O.; Wahl, G.; Verma, I. p53 stabilization is decreased upon NFκB activation: A role for NFκB in acquisition of resistance to chemotherapy. Cancer Cell 2002, 1, 493–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Adhikari, A.; Xu, M.; Chen, Z.J. Ubiquitin-mediated activation of TAK1 and IKK. Oncogene 2007, 26, 3214–3226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Tanaka, H.; Fujita, N.; Tsuruo, T. 3-Phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase-1-mediated IκB kinase β (IKKB) phosphorylation activates NF-κB signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 40965–40973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Chen, Z.; Hagler, J.; Palombella, V.J.; Melandri, F.; Seherer, D.; Ballard, D.; Maniatis, T. Signal-induced site-specific phosphorylation targets IΚB x to the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Genes Dev. 1995, 9, 1586–1597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Karin, M. The IκB kinase (IKK) complex as a critical regulator of immune responses. Int. Congr. Ser. 2005, 1285, 97–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lis, C.-C.H.; Dais, R.-M.; Chens, E.; Longoll, D.L. Phosphorylation of NF-ΚBl-p50 Is Involved in NF-kappa B activation and stable DNA Binding. J. Biochem. 1994, 269, 30089–30092. [Google Scholar]
  32. Martin, A.G.; Fresno, M. Tumor necrosis factor-α activation of NF-κB requires the phosphorylation of Ser-471 in the transactivation domain of c-Rel. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 24383–24391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Martin, M.; Hartley, A.-V.; Jin, J.; Sun, M.; Lu, T. Phosphorylation of NF-κB in Cancer. InTechOpen, 2019. Available online: www.intechopen.com (accessed on 20 October 2020).
  34. Ling, L.; Cao, Z.; Goeddel, D.V. Nf-κB-inducing kinase activates IKK-α by phosphorylation of Ser-176. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 3792–3797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Xiao, G.; Fong, A.; Sun, S.C. Induction of p100 processing by NF-κB-inducing kinase involves docking IκB kinase α (IKKα) to p100 and IKKα-mediated phosphorylation. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 30099–30105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Christian, F.; Smith, E.; Carmody, R. The Regulation of NF-κB Subunits by Phosphorylation. Cells 2016, 5, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Cao, Y.; Bonizzi, G.; Seagroves, T.N.; Greten, F.R.; Johnson, R.; Schmidt, E.V.; Karin, M. IKKα provides an essential link between RANK signaling and cyclin D1 expression during mammary gland development. Cell 2001, 107, 763–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Wang, B.; Wei, H.; Prabhu, L.; Zhao, W.; Martin, M.; Hartley, A.V.; Lu, T. Role of Novel Serine 316 Phosphorylation of the p65 Subunit of NF-κB in Differential Gene Regulation. J. Boil. Chem. 2015, 290, 20336–20347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Zhang, L.; Shao, L.; Creighton, C.J.; Zhang, Y.; Xin, L.; Ittmann, M.; Wang, J. Function of phosphorylation of NF-κB p65 ser536 in prostate cancer oncogenesis. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 6281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Ho, S.H.; Ali, A.; Chin, T.M.; Go, M.L. Dioxonaphthoimidazoliums AB1 and YM155 disrupt phosphorylation of p50 in the NF-κB pathway. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 11625–11636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Wei, H.; Mundade, R.; Lange, K.C.; Lu, T. Protein arginine methylation of non-histone proteins and its role in diseases. Cell Cycle 2014, 13, 32–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Bedford, M.T. Arginine methylation at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 2007, 120 Pt 24, 4243–4246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Stopa, N.; Krebs, J.E.; Shechter, D. The PRMT5 arginine methyltransferase: Many roles in development, cancer and beyond. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2015, 72, 2041–2059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Wang, Y.; Li, Q.; Liu, C.; Han, F.; Chen, M.; Zhang, L.; Cui, X.; Qin, Y.; Bao, S.; Gao, F. Protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (Prmt5) is required for germ cell survival during mouse embryonic development. Biol. Reprod. 2015, 92, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Tee, W.W.; Pardo, M.; Theunissen, T.W.; Yu, L.; Choudhary, J.S.; Hajkova, P.; Surani, M.A. Prmt5 is essential for early mouse development and acts in the cytoplasm to maintain ES cell pluripotency. Genes Dev. 2010, 24, 2772–2777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Chen, M.; Yi, B.; Sun, J. Inhibition of cardiomyocyte hypertrophy by protein arginine methyltransferase 5. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 24325–24335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Kim, H.; Ronai, Z.A. PRMT5 function and targeting in cancer. Cell Stress 2020, 4, 199–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Gao, J.; Aksoy, B.A.; Dogrusoz, U.; Dresdner, G.; Gross, B.; Sumer, S.O.; Sun, Y.; Jacobsen, A.; Sinha, R.; Larsson, E.; et al. Integrative analysis of complex cancer genomics and clinical profiles using the cBioPortal. Sci. Signal. 2013, 6, pl1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Wei, H.; Wang, B.; Miyagi, M.; She, Y.; Gopalan, B.; Huang, D.B.; Ghosh, G.; Stark, G.R.; Lu, T. PRMT5 dimethylates R30 of the p65 subunit to activate NF-kappaB. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 13516–13521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Hartley, A.-V.; Wang, B.; Jiang, G.; Wei, H.; Sun, M.; Prabhu, L.; Martin, M.; Safa, A.; Sun, S.; Liu, Y.; et al. Regulation of a PRMT5/NF-κB Axis by Phosphorylation of PRMT5 at Serine 15 in Colorectal Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Prabhu, L.; Wei, H.; Chen, L.; Demir, Ö.; Sandusky, G.; Sun, E.; Wang, J.; Mo, J.; Zeng, L.; Fishel, M.; et al. Adapting AlphaLISA high throughput screen to discover a novel small-molecule inhibitor targeting protein arginine methyltransferase 5 in pancreatic and colorectal cancers. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 39963–39977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Eliseeva, I.A.; Kim, E.R.; Guryanov, S.G.; Ovchinnikov, L.P.; Lyabin, D.N. Y-box-binding protein 1 (YB-1) and its functions. Biochemistry 2011, 76, 1402–1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Uchiumi, T.; Fotovati, A.; Sasaguri, T.; Shibahara, K.; Shimada, T.; Fukuda, T.; Nakamura, T.; Izumi, H.; Tsuzuki, T.; Kuwano, M.; et al. YB-1 Is important for an early stage embryonic development neural tube formation and cell proliferation. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 40440–40449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Kohno, K.; Izumi, H.; Uchiumi, T.; Ashizuka, M.; Kuwano, M. The pleiotropic functions of the Y-box-binding protein, YB-1. BioEssays 2003, 25, 691–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Kuwano, M.; Oda, Y.; Izumi, H.; Yang, S.J.; Uchiumi, T.; Iwamoto, Y.; Toi, M.; Fujii, T.; Yamana, H.; Kinoshita, H.; et al. The role of nuclear Y-box binding protein 1 as a global marker in drug resistance. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2004, 3, 1485–1492. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  56. Prabhu, L.; Mundade, R.; Wang, B.; Wei, H.; Hartley, A.-V.; Martin, M.; McElyea, K.; Temm, C.J.; Sandusky, G.; Liu, Y.; et al. Critical role of phosphorylation of serine 165 of YBX1 on the activation of NF-κB in colon cancer. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 29396–29412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Martin, M.; Hua, L.; Wang, B.; Wei, H.; Prabhu, L.; Hartley, A.-V.; Jiang, G.; Liu, Y.; Lu, T. Novel Serine 176 Phosphorylation of YBX1 Activates NF-κB in Colon Cancer. J. Biol. Chem. 2017, 292, 3433–3444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Wang, Y.; Su, J.; Wang, Y.; Fu, D.; Ideozu, J.E.; Geng, H.; Cui, Q.; Wang, C.; Chen, R.; Yu, Y.; et al. The interaction of YBX1 with G3BP1 promotes renal cell carcinoma cell metastasis via YBX1/G3BP1-SPP1- NF-κB signaling axis. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019, 38, 386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Blenkiron, C.; Hurley, D.G.; Fitzgerald, S.; Lasham, A. Links between the oncoprotein YB-1 and small non-coding RNAs in breast cancer. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e80171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Shibata, T.; Watari, K.; Kawahara, A.; Sudo, T.; Hattori, S.; Murakami, Y.; Izumi, H.; Itou, J.; Toi, M.; Akiba, J.; et al. Targeting Phosphorylation of Y-Box—Binding Protein YBX1 by TAS0612 and Everolimus in Overcoming Antiestrogen Resistance. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2020, 19, 882–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Sutherland, B.W.; Kucab, J.; Wu, J.; Lee, C.; Cheang, M.C.U.; Yorida, E.; Turbin, D.; Dedhar, S.; Nelson, C.; Pollak, M.; et al. Akt phosphorylates the Y-box binding protein 1 at Ser102 located in the cold shock domain and affects the anchorage-independent growth of breast cancer cells. Oncogene 2005, 24, 4281–4292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Jin, X.; Ding, D.; Yan, Y.; Li, H.; Wang, B.; Ma, L.; Ye, Z.; Ma, T.; Wu, Q.; Rodrigues, D.N.; et al. Phosphorylated RB Promotes Cancer Immunity by Inhibiting NF-κB Activation and PD-L1 Expression. Mol. Cell 2019, 73, 22–35.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Deng, J.; Lu, P.D.; Zhang, Y.; Scheuner, D.; Kaufman, R.J.; Sonenberg, N.; Harding, H.P.; Ron, D. Translational Repression Mediates Activation of Nuclear Factor Kappa B by Phosphorylated Translation Initiation Factor 2. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2004, 24, 10161–10168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Arun, P.; Brown, M.; Ehsanian, R.; Chen, Z.; Van Waes, C. Nuclear NF-κB p65 phosphorylation at Serine 276 by protein kinase A contributes to the malignant phenotype of head and neck cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2009, 15, 5974–5984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. McCOY, C.E.; Campbell, D.G.; Deak, M.; Bloomberg, G.B.; Arthur, J.S.C. MSK1 activity is controlled by multiple phosphorylation sites. Biochem. J. 2005, 387 Pt 2, 507–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Vermeulen, L.; De Wilde, G.; Van Damme, P.; Vanden Berghe, W.; Haegeman, G. Transcriptional activation of the NF-κB p65 subunit by mitogen- and stress-activated protein kinase-1 (MSK1). EMBO J. 2003, 22, 1313–1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Huang, W.-C.; Ju, T.-K.; Hung, M.-C.; Chen, C.-C. Phosphorylation of CBP by IKKα Promotes Cell Growth by Switching the Binding Preference of CBP from p53 to NF-κB. Mol. Cell 2007, 26, 75–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Reipas, K.M.; Law, J.H.; Couto, N.; Islam, S.; Li, Y.; Li, H.; Cherkasov, A.; Jung, K.; Cheema, A.S.; Jones, S.J.M.; et al. Luteolin is a novel p90 ribosomal S6 kinase (RSK) inhibitor that suppresses Notch4 signaling by blocking the activation of Y-box binding protein-1 (YB-1). Oncotarget 2013, 4, 329–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Hoberg, J.E.; Yeung, F.; Mayo, M.W. SMRT Derepression by the IκB Kinase α: A Prerequisite to NF-κB Transcription and Survival. Mol. Cell 2004, 16, 245–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Shembade, N.; Pujari, R.; Harhaj, N.S.; Abbott, D.W.; Harhaj, E.W. The kinase IKKα inhibits activation of the transcription factor NF-κB by phosphorylating the regulatory molecule TAX1BP1. Nat. Immunol. 2011, 12, 834–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Han, X.; Wei, L.; Wu, B. PRMT5 Promotes Aerobic Glycolysis and Invasion of Breast Cancer Cells by Regulating the LXRα/NF-κBp65 Pathway. OncoTargets Ther. 2020, 13, 3347–3357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Hartley, A.-V.; Wang, B.; Mundade, R.; Jiang, G.; Sun, M.; Wei, H.; Sun, S.; Liu, Y.; Lu, T. PRMT5-mediated methylation of YBX1 regulates NF-κB activity in colorectal cancer. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 15934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Raafat, A.; Bargo, S.; McCurdy, D.; Callahan, R. The ANK repeats of Notch-4/Int3 activate NF-κB canonical pathway in the absence of Rbpj and causes mammary tumorigenesis. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 13690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Peng, C.; Cho, Y.-Y.; Zhu, F.; Xu, Y.-M.; Wen, W.; Ma, W.-Y.; Bode, A.M.; Dong, Z. RSK2 mediates NF-κB activity through the phosphorylation of IκBα in the TNF-R1 pathway. FASEB J. 2010, 24, 3490–3499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Buss, H.; Handschick, K.; Jurrmann, N.; Pekkonen, P.; Beuerlein, K.; Müller, H.; Wait, R.; Saklatvala, J.; Ojala, P.M.; Schmitz, M.L.; et al. Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6 Phosphorylates NF-κB P65 at Serine 536 and Contributes to the Regulation of Inflammatory Gene Expression. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e51847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Anthony, N.G.; Baiget, J.; Berretta, G.; Boyd, M.; Breen, D.; Edwards, J.; Gamble, C.; Gray, A.I.; Harvey, A.L.; Hatziieremia, S.; et al. Inhibitory Kappa B Kinase α (IKKα) Inhibitors That Recapitulate Their Selectivity in Cells against Isoform-Related Biomarkers. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 60, 7043–7066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Manni, S.; Brancalion, A.; Mandato, E.; Tubi, L.Q.; Colpo, A.; Pizzi, M.; Cappellesso, R.; Zaffino, F.; Maggio, S.A.D.; Cabrelle, A.; et al. Protein Kinase CK2 Inhibition Down Modulates the NF-κB and STAT3 Survival Pathways, Enhances the Cellular Proteotoxic Stress and Synergistically Boosts the Cytotoxic Effect of Bortezomib on Multiple Myeloma and Mantle Cell Lymphoma Cells. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e75280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Vergote, I.; Heitz, F.; Buderath, P.; Powell, M.; Sehouli, J.; Lee, C.M.; Hamilton, A.; Fiorica, J.; Moore, K.N.; Teneriello, M.; et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 1b/2 study of ralimetinib, a p38 MAPK inhibitor, plus gemcitabine and carboplatin versus gemcitabine and carboplatin for women with recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 2020, 156, 23–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Plevin, R.; Al-Obaidi, A.; Khalaf, Y.; Mackay, S.; Paul, A. Novel selective inhibitors of inhibitory kappa B kinase alpha-new drugs for the treatment of Cancer. In Proceedings for Annual Meeting of the Japanese Pharmacological Society WCP2018 (The 18th World Congress of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology), Kyoto, Japan, 1–6 July 2018; Japanese Pharmacological Society: Kyoto, Japan, 2018; p. OR7-1. [Google Scholar]
  80. Baud, V.; Karin, M. Is NF-κB a good target for cancer therapy? Hopes and pitfalls. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2009, 8, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Biomolecules 11 00015 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of NF-κB canonical and non-canonical pathways. In the canonical pathway, on the left, the stimulation of receptors by cytokine and growth factors lead to the phosphorylation of IKK complex, which in turn phosphorylates IκBα, leading to its proteasomal degradation. The free p65/p50 dimers of NF-κB then translocate into the nucleus to bind to κB motif and promote NF-κB-dependent gene transcription. On the right, the non-canonical pathway is activated by binding of LTβ, CD40L, and B-cell activating factor (BAFF) to their respective receptors, causing NIK-mediated phosphorylation of IKKα. Phosphorylation of p100 by activated IKKα initiates proteasomal processing of p100 N-terminal to form p52. The p52/RelB dimeric complex then undergoes nuclear translocation and binds to its κB motif, resulting in NF-κB-dependent gene transcription.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of NF-κB canonical and non-canonical pathways. In the canonical pathway, on the left, the stimulation of receptors by cytokine and growth factors lead to the phosphorylation of IKK complex, which in turn phosphorylates IκBα, leading to its proteasomal degradation. The free p65/p50 dimers of NF-κB then translocate into the nucleus to bind to κB motif and promote NF-κB-dependent gene transcription. On the right, the non-canonical pathway is activated by binding of LTβ, CD40L, and B-cell activating factor (BAFF) to their respective receptors, causing NIK-mediated phosphorylation of IKKα. Phosphorylation of p100 by activated IKKα initiates proteasomal processing of p100 N-terminal to form p52. The p52/RelB dimeric complex then undergoes nuclear translocation and binds to its κB motif, resulting in NF-κB-dependent gene transcription.
Biomolecules 11 00015 g001
Biomolecules 11 00015 g002 550
Figure 2. Hypothetical model of the complex regulation of NF-κB by YBX1 and PRMT5. Following the induction of NF-κB by IL-1β treatment, IKKβ is activated and phosphorylates IκBα, leading to its proteasomal degradation. This promotes the nuclear translocation of NF-κB dimers. Simultaneously, PRMT5 dimethylate YBX1 at R205 [72], and p65 at R30 [49]. On one hand, the R205me2 modification may enhance the interaction between p65 and YBX1, thereby YBX1-mediated activation of p65. On the other hand, p65-R30me2 augments the NF-κB activity and together with YBX1, to enhance the overall DNA binding capability of p65 and further promote cancer progression.
Figure 2. Hypothetical model of the complex regulation of NF-κB by YBX1 and PRMT5. Following the induction of NF-κB by IL-1β treatment, IKKβ is activated and phosphorylates IκBα, leading to its proteasomal degradation. This promotes the nuclear translocation of NF-κB dimers. Simultaneously, PRMT5 dimethylate YBX1 at R205 [72], and p65 at R30 [49]. On one hand, the R205me2 modification may enhance the interaction between p65 and YBX1, thereby YBX1-mediated activation of p65. On the other hand, p65-R30me2 augments the NF-κB activity and together with YBX1, to enhance the overall DNA binding capability of p65 and further promote cancer progression.
Biomolecules 11 00015 g002
Table
Table 1. Examples of commonly phosphorylated NF-κB regulators.
Table 1. Examples of commonly phosphorylated NF-κB regulators.
NF-κB RegulatorsPhosphorylation SiteKinaseFunction on NF-κB ActivityReference
PRMT5Ser15PKCιEnhances NF-κB[50]
YBX1Ser 102
Ser165 and Ser176		RSK
CKI and CKII		Enhances NF-κB[56,57,68]
CBPSer1382 and Ser1386IKKαEnhances NF-κB[67]
SMRTSer2410IKKαEnhances NF-κB[69]
MSK1Thr581 and Ser360P38Enhances NF-κB[66]
TAX1BP1Ser593 and Ser624IKKαSuppresses NF-κB[70]
eIF2αSer51PKR, PERK, GCN2, or HRIEnhances NF-κB[63]
Rbserine-249 and threonine-252CDK4/6Suppresses NF-κB[62]
SMRT: silencing mediator of retinoic acid and thyroid hormone receptor; TAX1BP1: tax1 binding protein 1.
Table
Table 2. Summary of some developed compounds targeting kinases that activate NF-κB regulators.
Table 2. Summary of some developed compounds targeting kinases that activate NF-κB regulators.
Kinase InhibitorKinaseNF-κB RegulatorsStage in Drug DevelopmentType of CancerReference
CX-4945 (Silmitasertib)
K27		CKIIYBX1Phase I/II clinical trial
Preclinical		Medulloblastoma
Mantle cell lymphoma and Multiple myeloma		ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: [NCT03904862]
[77]
LY2228820 (Ralimetinib)P38MSK1Phase 1b/2 clinical trial in combination with gemcitabine and carboplatinOvarian cancerClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: [NCT01663857]
[78]
CRT0066854PKCιPRMT5PreclinicalColon cancer cell lines[50]
Compound 48 (proprietary code SU909)IKKαp100, TAX1BP1, SMRT, CBPPreclinicalOsteosarcoma and pancreatic cancer cell lines[76,79]
LuteolinRSKYBX1PreclinicalTriple negative breast cancer cell lines[70]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Motolani, A.; Martin, M.; Sun, M.; Lu, T. Phosphorylation of the Regulators, a Complex Facet of NF-κB Signaling in Cancer. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11010015

AMA Style

Motolani A, Martin M, Sun M, Lu T. Phosphorylation of the Regulators, a Complex Facet of NF-κB Signaling in Cancer. Biomolecules. 2021; 11(1):15. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11010015

Chicago/Turabian Style

Motolani, Aishat, Matthew Martin, Mengyao Sun, and Tao Lu. 2021. "Phosphorylation of the Regulators, a Complex Facet of NF-κB Signaling in Cancer" Biomolecules 11, no. 1: 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11010015

APA Style

Motolani, A., Martin, M., Sun, M., & Lu, T. (2021). Phosphorylation of the Regulators, a Complex Facet of NF-κB Signaling in Cancer. Biomolecules, 11(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11010015

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop