Nonprofit Governance: Concepts, Visions, and Perspectives

A special issue of Administrative Sciences (ISSN 2076-3387).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 March 2015) | Viewed by 25296

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Emeritus Professor of Management, School of International Affairs, Management and Urban Policy, The New School for Public Engagement, 72 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10011, USA
Interests: associational democracy; membership; intermediate organizations; organizational/societal governance; good governance

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

I am distributing this call for papers to those of you who are interested in contributing to deepening and widening foundational knowledge relating to nonprofits and other so called intermediate organizations.

While in the practice-oriented discipline of management the concept of nonprofit governance is still being used to describe best practices for dealing with boards, a strand of scholarly literature has developed over time that approaches the topic from a theoretical/institutional perspective. It focuses on the contractual arrangements that provide either (material) incentives to managerial agents for investing into achievement of organizational goals from within, or (immaterial) incentives to stakeholders for investing into achievement of such goals from without a particular organization. Although both the principal-agent and the stakeholder models focus on governance on the level of a particular organization, the latter approach has raised the awareness that organizations in general, and nonprofits in particular, are embedded in a larger societal environment and therefore should not be treated as insulated silos. In this context, Administrative Science is soliciting articles for publication in a Special Issue that improve our understanding of how nonprofits are governed at the organizational level (knowledge deepening) and/or extend the analysis to include the role these organizations play in governing society at large (knowledge widening). Especially the latter category of articles requires that the term “nonprofit” be used in the wider sense to include a broad array of so-called intermediate organizations. They all form part of the collaborative system of actors that has emerged in democracies in many parts of the world to advance public problem solving by decentralizing government and pluralizing the state.

Prof. Dr  Antonin Wagner
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All papers will be peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Administrative Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

References

Ghoshal, S. (2005). Bad management theories are destroying good management practice, Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4(1), 75-91.

Glaser, E.L. (2003). The governance of not-for-profit organizations. University of Chicago Press.

Miller-Millesen (2003). Understanding the behavior of nonprofit boards of directors: a theory-based approach. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterl,y 32(4), 521-554.

Ostrower, F., & Stone, M. M. (2006). Governance: Research trends, gaps, and future prospects. In W. Powell & R. Steinberg (Eds.), Nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 612-628). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Pestoff, V., & Brandsen, P. (2010). Public governance and the third sector: Opportunities for co-operation and innovation? Emerging perspectives on the theory and practice of public governance (pp. 223-236). New York: Routledge.

Rosenau, J. N., & Czempiel, E.-O. (Eds.) (1992). Governance without government: Order and change in world politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Stone, M. M., & Ostrower, F. (2007). Acting in the public interest? Another look at research on nonprofit governance. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(3), 416-438.

Wagner, A. (2014). Good Governance: A radical and normative approach to nonprofit management. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 25(3), 797-817.

Young, D. (2011). The prospective role of economic stakeholders in the governance of nonprofit organizations. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 22, 797-817.

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Editorial

Jump to: Research

465 KiB  
Editorial
Nonprofit Governance, Organizational Purposiveness and Design
by Antonin Wagner
Adm. Sci. 2015, 5(4), 177-187; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci5040177 - 16 Oct 2015
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 4493
Abstract
The final article published in this Special Issue on nonprofit governance provides a platform for myself as the guest editor in two ways: both to reflect in a Postscript on the editorial process in which I became involved since posting a call for [...] Read more.
The final article published in this Special Issue on nonprofit governance provides a platform for myself as the guest editor in two ways: both to reflect in a Postscript on the editorial process in which I became involved since posting a call for papers, as well as to write this Foreword that helps readers to become engaged in a meaningful discourse with the contributing authors. Incongruous as it may appear to be, I begin with the Postscript, as the Introductory Note to the Special Issue is not meant to integrate the articles published into a consistent concluding argument, but rather to evaluate my role ex post and at the same time to reveal to readers ex ante the premises based on which as guest-editor I selected articles for this Special Issue on nonprofit governance. [...] Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nonprofit Governance: Concepts, Visions, and Perspectives)

Research

Jump to: Editorial

377 KiB  
Article
Leasehold: An Institutional Framework for Understanding Nonprofit Governance in a Civil Society Context
by Martin M. Greller
Adm. Sci. 2015, 5(3), 165-176; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci5030165 - 23 Sep 2015
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 4766
Abstract
Nonprofit organizations play a role in the creation of a society that is civil, and it is an important one that neither the state nor for-profit organizations undertake. This raises the question of governance and accountability, which is often addressed by looking to [...] Read more.
Nonprofit organizations play a role in the creation of a society that is civil, and it is an important one that neither the state nor for-profit organizations undertake. This raises the question of governance and accountability, which is often addressed by looking to agency-based models from the private sector. The acknowledged problem is that the agency’s notion of owners does not translate well to nonprofits. Adapting the concept of leasehold (wherein the managers and organization operate with broad autonomy, using resources supplied by supporters in exchange for the promise that specific societal value will be created, and are accountable for doing so) allows for a more flexible and responsive arrangement. It also suggests a mechanism whereby many independent nonprofits taking multiple approaches help civil society evolve. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nonprofit Governance: Concepts, Visions, and Perspectives)
629 KiB  
Article
Learning from the Co-operative Institutional Model: How to Enhance Organizational Robustness of Third Sector Organizations with More Pluralistic Forms of Governance
by Keith Taylor
Adm. Sci. 2015, 5(3), 148-164; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci5030148 - 14 Aug 2015
Cited by 18 | Viewed by 7866
Abstract
Third sector organizations are oftentimes seen as contributing to a robust civil society. Yet the dominant modes of third sector organizational governance often adhere to a unitary orientation. The over-reliance on unitary modes of governance introduces two challenges: first, organizational stakeholders are kept [...] Read more.
Third sector organizations are oftentimes seen as contributing to a robust civil society. Yet the dominant modes of third sector organizational governance often adhere to a unitary orientation. The over-reliance on unitary modes of governance introduces two challenges: first, organizational stakeholders are kept from utilizing participatory mechanisms that would enable them to act as societal intermediaries, and; second, these organizations may underperform due to the artificial separation of stakeholders from participating in governance. This paper addresses calls to widen our knowledge by translating theory into practice through a discussion about the efficacy of pluralistic governance. The co-operative enterprise in introduced to focus analyses on pluralist modes of stakeholder governance. A specific co-operative’s governance structure and practice is introduced—Choctaw Electric Co-operative—through an archival analyses of secondary media accounts of a stakeholder-led reform initiative in rural Oklahoma. The Ostrom Design Principles—a diagnostic used to assess institutional robustness—are applied to demonstrate the shortsightedness of unitary governance, and highlight the potential benefits of pluralistic stakeholder engagement. Knowledge is widened in two ways: first, empirical analyses of co-operative enterprise may provide for significant insights and innovations in third sector governance, and; second proper systems of pluralistic governance exhibit enormous capacity to better orient the firm toward better serving the stakeholder base, improving performance and institutional robustness, while empowering stakeholders as societal intermediaries. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nonprofit Governance: Concepts, Visions, and Perspectives)
Show Figures

Figure 1

80 KiB  
Article
Is the Asset Transfer of Public Leisure Facilities in England an Example of Associative Democracy?
by Geoff Nichols, Deborah Forbes, Lindsay Findlay-King and Gordon Macfadyen
Adm. Sci. 2015, 5(2), 71-87; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci5020071 - 11 May 2015
Cited by 19 | Viewed by 7692
Abstract
In England, public sports facilities and libraries provided by local government are being transferred to management and delivery by volunteers. The catalyst for this development has been reductions in local government budgets. However, case studies explore if this asset transfer “offers a way [...] Read more.
In England, public sports facilities and libraries provided by local government are being transferred to management and delivery by volunteers. The catalyst for this development has been reductions in local government budgets. However, case studies explore if this asset transfer “offers a way of restoring the ideal of committed public service in the face of widespread bureaucratic failure and retreat”, as a form of associative democracy and empowerment of both the volunteers and those for whom the services are provided. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nonprofit Governance: Concepts, Visions, and Perspectives)
Back to TopTop