Self-Leadership

A special issue of Administrative Sciences (ISSN 2076-3387). This special issue belongs to the section "Leadership".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (15 April 2021) | Viewed by 46374

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Management and Entrepreneurship, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA
Interests: self-leadership; employee fitness

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Marketing and Management, Ball State University, Muncie, IN 47306, USA
Interests: entrepreneurship; self-leadership

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Self-leadership is a process through which individuals control their own behavior, influencing and leading themselves through the use of specific sets of behavioral and cognitive strategies. The concept of self-leadership first emerged in the mid-1980s as an expansion of self-management which was rooted in clinical self-control theory and inspired by the notion of “substitutes for leadership”. Over the past three decades, the self-leadership concept has enjoyed considerable popularity, as evidenced by the large number of practitioner-oriented self-leadership books and articles on the subject. Moreover, self-leadership has earned the respect of many academics, as reflected by a plethora of theoretical and empirical self-leadership journal publications and by coverage in a growing number of management and leadership textbooks. Business executives have also embraced self-leadership concepts through training programs designed to increase self-leadership skills and behaviors in the workplace

While the body of knowledge surrounding self-leadership is substantial, there is still much work to be done to gain a full understanding of self-leadership theory and how individuals can lead themselves within an organization. Hence, the aim of the proposed Special Issue is to deeply investigate existing and/or new topics related to self-leadership in either a conceptual or empirical manner. Research directions to be followed include but are not limited to:

  • What is the relationship between self-leadership and entrepreneurial success?
  • Does the ability to self-lead one’s self impact her ability to communicate to others within an organization and vice versa?
  • What is the state of the art in terms of self-leadership measurement?
  • What has been researched in terms of self-leadership theory in the past and what are future directions for the study of self-leadership?
  • What are the international aspects of the study of self-leadership? Do different cultures self-lead themselves differently?
  • Do emotions impact one’s ability to self-lead themselves?
  • What are the organizational/environmental conditions that enhance/impede successful self-leadership within organizations?
  • Does one’s fitness/health level relate to one’s ability to effectively self-lead themselves?

Please feel free to contact the corresponding guest editor for questions about the suitability of the research paper with the aim of the Special Issue.

Selective References

  1. Anderson, S. and Prussia, G.E. 1997. The self-leadership questionnaire: Preliminary assessment of construct validity. Journal of Leadership Studies 4: 119–143.
  2. Goldsby, G., Neck, C.P., and Gerde, V. W. 1999. Inner leadership: A social cognitive-based approach toward enhanced ethical decision making. Teaching Business Ethics 2: 228–247.
  3. Houghton, D., Wu, J., Godwin, J.L., Neck, C.P., and Manz, C.C. 2012. Effective Stress Management: A Proposed Model of Emotional Intelligence, Self-Leadership, and Student Stress Coping. Journal of Management Education 36: 220–238.
  4. Neck, P., Manz, C.C. and Houghton, J.D. 2020. Self-Leadership: The Definitive Guide to Personal Excellence. Thousand Oaks, CA, United States: Sage.
  5. Neck, P. and Houghton, J.D. 2006. Two decades of self-leadership theory and research: Past developments, present trends, and future possibilities. Journal of Managerial Psychology 21: 270–295.
  6. Neck, P., Houghton, J.D., Sardeshmukh, S.R., Goldsby, M. and Godwin, J.L. 2013. Self-leadership: a cognitive resource for entrepreneurs. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship 26: 463–480.
  7. Neck, P. and Manz, C.C. 1992. Thought self-leadership: The impact of self-talk and mental imagery on performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior 12: 681–699.
  8. Neck, P. and Manz, C.C. 1996a. Total leadership quality: Integrating employee self-leadership and total quality management. In Advances in the Management of Organizational Quality. Edited by S. Goush and D. Fedor. Greenwich, CT, UK: JAI Press.
  9. Neck, P. and Manz, C.C. 1996b. Thought self-leadership: The impact of mental strategies training on employee behavior, cognition, and emotion. Journal of Organizational Behavior 17: 445

Prof. Dr. Christopher Neck
Prof. Dr. Mike Goldsby
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Administrative Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Self-leadership
  • entrepreneurship
  • communication
  • leadership

Published Papers (7 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

30 pages, 1423 KiB  
Article
Sound and Safe: The Role of Leader Motivating Language and Follower Self-Leadership in Feelings of Psychological Safety
by Milton Mayfield and Jacqueline Mayfield
Adm. Sci. 2021, 11(2), 51; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11020051 - 12 May 2021
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 4347
Abstract
This manuscript presents a study on how leader motivating language and follower self-leadership act to influence a follower’s feelings of psychological safety. This study found that both constructs significantly influenced psychological safety in samples from India and the USA. Additionally, this study [...] Read more.
This manuscript presents a study on how leader motivating language and follower self-leadership act to influence a follower’s feelings of psychological safety. This study found that both constructs significantly influenced psychological safety in samples from India and the USA. Additionally, this study found that this influence occurred through the mediating processes of trust in leadership, leader inclusiveness, and role clarity. These mediators fully explained motivating language’s relationship with psychological safety, but only partially explained self-leadership’s relationship. Differences existed in the model between samples, but self-leadership showed an overall consistency between the samples for most relationships. Follow-up analysis indicated that self-leadership without leader communication support lead to a weak or non-existent relationship between self-leadership and psychological safety, but a positive and relatively strong relationship in the presence of motivating language. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Self-Leadership)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 481 KiB  
Article
Self-Leadership and Psychological Capital as Key Cognitive Resources for Shaping Health-Protective Behaviors during the COVID-19 Pandemic
by Sherry A. Maykrantz, Luke A. Langlinais, Jeffery D. Houghton and Christopher P. Neck
Adm. Sci. 2021, 11(2), 41; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11020041 - 12 Apr 2021
Cited by 30 | Viewed by 6526
Abstract
As COVID-19 has become a global pandemic, health researchers and practitioners have focused attention on identifying the factors that may help to shape health-protective behaviors, protecting individual health and well-being, and helping to mitigate the spread of COVID-19. This study explores the potential [...] Read more.
As COVID-19 has become a global pandemic, health researchers and practitioners have focused attention on identifying the factors that may help to shape health-protective behaviors, protecting individual health and well-being, and helping to mitigate the spread of COVID-19. This study explores the potential role of self-leadership and psychological capital (PsyCap) as key cognitive resources for shaping health-protective behaviors. Using multiple theoretical frameworks (social cognitive theory, psychological resources theory, and the health belief model), this paper develops and tests a hypothesized serial mediation model in which PsyCap and coping self-efficacy mediate the relationship between self-leadership and health-protective behaviors including hand washing, wearing face masks, and social distancing. Results suggest that PsyCap and coping self-efficacy mediate the positive relationship between self-leadership and health-protective behaviors. These results yield valuable insights regarding the usefulness of self-leadership and PsyCap as cognitive resources for shaping health-protective behaviors and for possible self-leadership and PsyCap interventions, potentially tailored to at-risk populations, which should have practical benefits for both the current and future pandemics and health crises. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Self-Leadership)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 422 KiB  
Article
Utilizing Self-Leadership to Enhance Gratitude Thought Patterns
by Jeffrey L. Godwin and Susan M. Hershelman
Adm. Sci. 2021, 11(2), 40; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11020040 - 09 Apr 2021
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 3286
Abstract
This article explores the value of integrating thought self-leadership (TSL) and gratitude as a resource for employees to create positive and productive personal and work environments. We propose a conceptual model showing the relationships between TSL, emotional state of gratitude, thought patterns about [...] Read more.
This article explores the value of integrating thought self-leadership (TSL) and gratitude as a resource for employees to create positive and productive personal and work environments. We propose a conceptual model showing the relationships between TSL, emotional state of gratitude, thought patterns about gratitude, and performance. Given the positive benefits of the practice of gratitude in people’s everyday lives and the positive benefits within organizations, TSL can be an important mechanism to enhance the development of gratitude. We argue that the level of gratitude experienced by individuals can be increased through the utilization of TSL. We propose a model which combines the constructs of TSL, gratitude, and performance. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Self-Leadership)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 592 KiB  
Article
A Spoonful of Sugar: Gamification as Means for Enhancing Employee Self-Leadership and Self-Concordance at Work
by Richard A. Oxarart and Jeffery D. Houghton
Adm. Sci. 2021, 11(2), 35; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11020035 - 06 Apr 2021
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 4546
Abstract
Organizations today continue to seek new and effective ways to engage and motivate their workers. Gamification is an emerging means for enhancing employee engagement and motivation at work. Self-leadership is a comprehensive self-influence process that has the potential to help employees find meaning [...] Read more.
Organizations today continue to seek new and effective ways to engage and motivate their workers. Gamification is an emerging means for enhancing employee engagement and motivation at work. Self-leadership is a comprehensive self-influence process that has the potential to help employees find meaning and purpose from their jobs. This paper develops and presents a conceptual model of the relationships between gamification, self-leadership, and valued workplace outcomes. The model suggests that gamification elements trigger multiple self-leadership processes and states that interact in a multiplicative fashion leading to a state of self-concordance in which individuals perceive a close alignment between their work tasks and their personal interests and core values. This serial mediation model helps to explain how and why gamification operates through the mediating mechanisms of self-leadership and self-concordance to effect important individual and organizational outcomes. Future research directions and implications for the proposed conceptual model are also discussed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Self-Leadership)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 604 KiB  
Article
Self-Leadership: A Four Decade Review of the Literature and Trainings
by Michael G. Goldsby, Elizabeth A. Goldsby, Christopher B. Neck, Christopher P. Neck and Rob Mathews
Adm. Sci. 2021, 11(1), 25; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11010025 - 04 Mar 2021
Cited by 29 | Viewed by 14044
Abstract
This paper reviews the fourth decade of self-leadership research. Two previous reviews of self-leadership from 2006 and 2010 are summarized, and the paper applies categories from those reviews to examine recent research in the field. This paper also covers new topics and trends [...] Read more.
This paper reviews the fourth decade of self-leadership research. Two previous reviews of self-leadership from 2006 and 2010 are summarized, and the paper applies categories from those reviews to examine recent research in the field. This paper also covers new topics and trends in self-leadership research. In previous review articles, new theoretical models for extending self-leadership models were proposed. Therefore, this paper continues that tradition by proposing a new model—the Meta-Performance Model—that offers self-leadership as a skillset for enhancing the individual performance of leaders who seek improvement through professional certification programs. Self-leadership and professional certification programs are often treated as a stand alone topics. However, this paper contends professionals would benefit from combining self-leadership training with other professional improvement programs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Self-Leadership)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 515 KiB  
Article
The Impact of Self-Management Practices on Entrepreneurial Psychological States
by Michael Goldsby, James Bishop, Elizabeth Goldsby, Christopher B. Neck and Christopher P. Neck
Adm. Sci. 2021, 11(1), 12; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11010012 - 03 Feb 2021
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 4510
Abstract
It is well-known that entrepreneurs lead extremely busy lives. While research literature reports the stressors of entrepreneurial careers, few empirical studies have examined the actual management of the demands that entrepreneurs face in their daily lives. In this paper, we conducted a study [...] Read more.
It is well-known that entrepreneurs lead extremely busy lives. While research literature reports the stressors of entrepreneurial careers, few empirical studies have examined the actual management of the demands that entrepreneurs face in their daily lives. In this paper, we conducted a study of 472 small business owners and tested hypotheses on the roles of three self-management practices—exercise, work overload, and attention to detail—on stress, security, and job satisfaction. Exercise, work overload, and attention to detail serve as three important self-management practices that are largely under the decision-making of the individual entrepreneur. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Self-Leadership)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 318 KiB  
Article
Core Self-Evaluations, Self-Leadership, and the Self-Serving Bias in Managerial Decision Making: A Laboratory Experiment
by Matteo Cristofaro and Pier Luigi Giardino
Adm. Sci. 2020, 10(3), 64; https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci10030064 - 03 Sep 2020
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 7886
Abstract
The self-leadership construct has received great attention from scholars over the last 40 years due to its capacity to influence personal effectiveness. However, despite strongly influencing individuals’ self-efficacy, performed studies did not determine whether self-leadership is connected, and how, with the Core-Self Evaluation [...] Read more.
The self-leadership construct has received great attention from scholars over the last 40 years due to its capacity to influence personal effectiveness. However, despite strongly influencing individuals’ self-efficacy, performed studies did not determine whether self-leadership is connected, and how, with the Core-Self Evaluation (CSE) trait—a complex personality disposition based on self-efficacy, self-esteem, locus of control, and emotional stability—that has been found impacting decision-making processes within organizations. Moreover, it has not been identified whether individuals with a high level of self-leadership are more prone to be victims of some cognitive biases in decision-making processes, such as the internal attribution of successes and external attribution of failures (i.e., Self-Serving Bias, SSB) that are usually led by the strong belief of individuals in their own capacities. The outlined gaps can be substantiated by the following two research questions: “How is self-leadership related with CSE?” and “How does self-leadership influence the attribution of successes/failures?”. To answer these questions, the following were identified and analyzed for 93 executives: (i) the tendency in the attribution of successes and failures, (ii) the CSE, and (iii) their self-leadership level. Results show that: (i) a high level of CSE is connected with high levels of self-leadership; (ii) high levels of self-leadership bring individuals to the internal attribution of successes and external attribution of failures. This work reinforces the stream of (the few) studies that considers a high level of CSE and self-leadership as not always being desirable for managerial decision-making processes and consequent performance. This paper aims to enrich the debate concerning the relations between, on the one hand, self-leadership and, on the other hand, personality traits between self-leadership and decision making. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Self-Leadership)
Back to TopTop