Long-Term Effects of Pesticides and Herbicides on Soil and Environment

A special issue of Agriculture (ISSN 2077-0472). This special issue belongs to the section "Agricultural Soils".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (25 May 2023) | Viewed by 8804

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Soil Science Department, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 119991, Russia
Interests: pesticides risk assessment; soil amendment; soil microorganisms diversity; land-use management; agricultural soils

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Pesticides have been one of the most widely used chemical groups in the world in recent decades. Despite the obvious positive aspects, primarily the fight against famine by obtaining a higher crop yield, the risk of the negative impact of pesticides on the environment also remains possible. Some pesticides can accumulate in the soil, migrate to ground and surface waters, and also have a toxic effect on non-target groups of organisms—from microorganisms to mammals. In addition, the long-term use of pesticides from the same group can lead to a decrease in their effectiveness due to the adaptation of pests or weeds. Therefore, this is absolutely vital to understanding how long-term pesticide application might affect the sustainable agri-food production in an environmentally friendly way.

This Special Issue focuses on the assessment of the long-term effects of pesticide application on biodiversity, soil health and minimizing environmental load. This issue will include inter- and trans-disciplinary studies from multiple disciplines (e.g., agricultural sciences, biology, environmental sciences, data science) for a comprehensive analysis of the stated topic. The use of simulation models for predicting the behavior of pesticides in the environment in the study would also be welcome. This Special Issue invites original research, as well as reviews and opinions.

Dr. Mikhail Maslov
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Agriculture is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • pesticides
  • plant protection products
  • risk assessment
  • behavior of pesticides in soil and water
  • pesticide toxicity
  • pesticide pollution
  • sustainable land-use
  • biodiversity
  • soil health
  • environmental quality

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

15 pages, 2817 KiB  
Article
Effects of the Pesticides Benomyl, Metribuzin and Imidacloprid on Soil Microbial Communities in the Field
by Rostislav Streletskii, Angelika Astaykina, Vladimir Cheptsov, Andrey Belov and Victor Gorbatov
Agriculture 2023, 13(7), 1330; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13071330 - 29 Jun 2023
Viewed by 1524
Abstract
Pesticide preparations based on benomyl, metribuzin and imidacloprid were used on a potato plot for three years. Every year soil samples were taken at 0, 7, 14, 28, 56 and 84 days after treatment. For all samples, the pesticide residues in the soil [...] Read more.
Pesticide preparations based on benomyl, metribuzin and imidacloprid were used on a potato plot for three years. Every year soil samples were taken at 0, 7, 14, 28, 56 and 84 days after treatment. For all samples, the pesticide residues in the soil were measured. A study of the soil’s bacterial and fungal community structures was preformed using next-generation sequencing. It was found that the rate of decomposition of the pesticides increased every year, while the pesticides affected only certain phylogenetic groups of microorganisms. The most significant effect was the decrease in the proportion of Ascomycota. Additionally, in the field, as well as previously in the laboratory, pesticides have had an impact on the relative abundance of the genera Haliangium, Solicoccozyma and Humicola. It can be assumed that the repeated application of pesticides does not have a significant effect on the microbial communities of soils, provided that they are applied according to the application rate. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 11602 KiB  
Article
Identifying the Best Herbicides for Weed Control in Chicory (Cichorium intybus)
by Angelika Astaykina, Sergey Elansky, Evgeniy Kubarev, Daniil Semeniushkin, Irina Smirnova, Elena Chudinova, Vladimir Demin, Alexander Nikolaev and Sergey Shoba
Agriculture 2023, 13(6), 1152; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13061152 - 30 May 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2700
Abstract
Chicory (Cichorium intybus) is a commercially cultivated root crop in many countries of the world. Weeds have a depressing effect on the growth and development of root chicory. There are currently no herbicides registered for use on chicory in the Russian [...] Read more.
Chicory (Cichorium intybus) is a commercially cultivated root crop in many countries of the world. Weeds have a depressing effect on the growth and development of root chicory. There are currently no herbicides registered for use on chicory in the Russian Federation. The objective of this work was to identify potential herbicides for controlling a broad range of weed species under the soil and climatic conditions of the Russian Federation. For the field experiment, herbicides were selected according to: (1) previous studies in USA, EU and South Africa; (2) the spectrum of weeds controlled; and (3) the probability of crop damage. All the herbicides used were registered in Russia for the control of certain weeds in other crops. Crop biomass, damage, and weed control were assessed to identify suitable herbicides. The results suggested that the best weed control herbicides would be a Zeta, SC (100 g/L imazethapyr) and Paradox, SC (120 g/L imazamox). These herbicides controlled, on average, 80% or more of the dicotyledonous weeds such as lamb’s quarters (Chenopodium album), field pennycress (Thlaspi arvense), and sow thistles (Sonchus spp.). Since these herbicides do not reduce chicory biomass, they can be considered for registration or use on chicory. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 3201 KiB  
Article
Chili Pepper Farmers’ Pesticide Use and Residues under Thailand’s Public Good Agricultural Practices Standard: A Case Study in Chiang Mai Province
by Yuichiro Amekawa, Surat Hongsibsong, Nootchakarn Sawarng and Girma Gezimu Gebre
Agriculture 2023, 13(5), 1105; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13051105 - 22 May 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 3806
Abstract
This multi-level study focuses on Thailand’s public good agricultural practices certification standard (Q-GAP) and compares the performance of 100 certified and 229 uncertified growers regarding their pesticide use practices and the levels of pesticide residues detected in on-farm samples. Chili pepper, a crop [...] Read more.
This multi-level study focuses on Thailand’s public good agricultural practices certification standard (Q-GAP) and compares the performance of 100 certified and 229 uncertified growers regarding their pesticide use practices and the levels of pesticide residues detected in on-farm samples. Chili pepper, a crop primarily marketed domestically, was the focal point of this study conducted in the production context of Chiang Mai province. The data for the study were collected through field interview surveys and chili pepper sample collections. The collected crop samples underwent organophosphate pesticide and synthetic pyrethroid analyses using gas chromatography. Statistical analysis techniques, including one-way ANOVA, chi-square tests, probit regression, and multiple linear regression, were employed to analyze the numerical data using the Stata software. The study’s findings revealed several key points. The certified farmers’ main motivation for adopting Q-GAP was to meet market requirements, rather than ensuring safety assurance. They exhibited a significantly lower adoption of insecticides compared to the uncertified farmers, but no significant differences were observed for fungicide or herbicide adoption. The analysis of the pesticide residue results yielded mixed findings, making it challenging to conclude whether certified farmers have better control over pesticide residues compared to uncertified farmers. A probit regression analysis highlighted the critical importance of training for growers’ adoption of the standard. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop