New Tools for the Evaluation of Animal Welfare

A special issue of Animals (ISSN 2076-2615). This special issue belongs to the section "Animal Welfare".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 December 2020) | Viewed by 87407

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Animal Physiology and Behavior Unit, Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70121 Bari, Italy
Interests: animal physiology; behavioral neuroscience; brain lateralization; emotion; animal communication; human–animal relationship
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Research applied to the study of animal welfare, which embraces different scientific areas and a wide range of professionals such as biologists, veterinarians, psychologists, bioethicists and legislators, has increased significantly in recent years. Several techniques are used to measure animal welfare, including physiological, behavioral and immunological responses to different environmental stimuli.

Very recently, much attention has been paid to the study of new methods for the evaluation of animal welfare through the analysis of animal emotional state. The latter, despite being a very promising tool for animal welfare measurement, remains an extremely challenging research area.

Scientific methods and techniques are constantly under development and revision to aid in the design of highly reliable indicators for the evaluation of animal welfare. We invite authors to contribute original manuscripts that address any aspects of animal welfare to this Special Issue of Animals. Topics of special interest include techniques used to study animal emotional state and the human–animal relationship which may improve the understanding of animal welfare measurement.

Prof. Dr. Marcello Siniscalchi
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Animals is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • animal welfare
  • welfare indicators
  • physiology
  • behavior
  • emotions
  • human-animal relationship.

Published Papers (9 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review, Other

9 pages, 1405 KiB  
Article
Social Nesting, Animal Welfare, and Disease Monitoring
by Lydia Giménez-Llort and Virginia Torres-Lista
Animals 2021, 11(4), 1079; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11041079 - 9 Apr 2021
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 2771
Abstract
The assessment of welfare and disease progression in animal models is critical. Most tools rely on evaluating individual subjects, whereas social behaviors, also sensitive to acute illness, chronic diseases, or mental health, are scarcely monitored because they are complex and time-consuming. We propose [...] Read more.
The assessment of welfare and disease progression in animal models is critical. Most tools rely on evaluating individual subjects, whereas social behaviors, also sensitive to acute illness, chronic diseases, or mental health, are scarcely monitored because they are complex and time-consuming. We propose the evaluation of social nesting, a species-typical behavior naturally occurring in standard housing conditions, for such behavioral monitoring. We provide an example of its use to evaluate social deficits and the long-term effects of neonatal tactile-proprioceptive sensorial stimulation from postnatal day 1 to 21, in male and female adult 3xTg-AD mice for Alzheimer’s disease compared to sex- and age-matched non-transgenic (NTg) counterparts with normal aging. Social nesting was sensitive to genotype (worse in 3xTg-AD mice), sex (worse in males), profile, and treatment (distinct time to observe the maximum score and incidence of the perfect nest). Since social nesting can be easily included in housing routines, this neuroethological approach can be useful for animal welfare, monitoring the disease’s progress, and evaluating potential risk factors and effects of preventive/therapeutical strategies. Finally, the noninvasive, painless, simple, short time, and low-cost features of this home-cage monitoring are advantages that make social nesting feasible to be successfully implemented in most animal department settings. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Tools for the Evaluation of Animal Welfare)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 512 KiB  
Article
Cortisol Levels of Shelter Dogs in Animal Assisted Interventions in a Prison: An Exploratory Study
by Danila d’Angelo, Serenella d’Ingeo, Francesca Ciani, Michele Visone, Luigi Sacchettino, Luigi Avallone and Angelo Quaranta
Animals 2021, 11(2), 345; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11020345 - 29 Jan 2021
Cited by 17 | Viewed by 5599
Abstract
Previous studies regarding the Animal Assisted Interventions (AAI) have mainly focused on the beneficial effects of human–animal interactions on human health; whereas the impact of such activities on the welfare of the animals involved has received limited attention. So far, few studies have [...] Read more.
Previous studies regarding the Animal Assisted Interventions (AAI) have mainly focused on the beneficial effects of human–animal interactions on human health; whereas the impact of such activities on the welfare of the animals involved has received limited attention. So far, few studies have addressed this issue by evaluating the physiological and behavioral reactions of therapy dogs during the interventions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential effect of AAI on the cortisol levels of shelter dogs. Five dogs participated in weekly AAI working activities with adult inmates held at a prison of the South of Italy for two months. Saliva samples were collected every two weeks in three conditions: at the kennel (baseline), after transportation and at the end of the working sessions. The results revealed a significant decrease in the cortisol baseline at the end of the AAI program, suggesting that the activities carried out with humans and in a different environment could improve the welfare of dogs housed in kennels. Moreover, we found that transportation significantly increased subjects’ cortisol levels, suggesting that it is a critical phase that deserves particular care. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Tools for the Evaluation of Animal Welfare)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 855 KiB  
Article
Automatic Assessment of Keel Bone Damage in Laying Hens at the Slaughter Line
by Lisa Jung, Abozar Nasirahmadi, Jan Schulte-Landwehr and Ute Knierim
Animals 2021, 11(1), 163; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11010163 - 12 Jan 2021
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2807
Abstract
Keel bone damage (KBD) can be found in all commercial laying hen flocks with a wide range of 23% to 69% of hens/flock found to be affected in this study. As KBD may be linked with chronic pain and a decrease in mobility, [...] Read more.
Keel bone damage (KBD) can be found in all commercial laying hen flocks with a wide range of 23% to 69% of hens/flock found to be affected in this study. As KBD may be linked with chronic pain and a decrease in mobility, it is a serious welfare problem. An automatic assessment system at the slaughter line could support the detection of KBD and would have the advantage of being standardized and fast scoring including high sample sizes. A 2MP stereo camera combined with an IDS imaging color camera was used for the automatic assessment. A trained human assessor visually scored KBD in defeathered hens during the slaughter process and compared results with further human assessors and automatic recording. In a first step, an algorithm was developed on the basis of assessments of keel status of 2287 hens of different genetics with varying degrees of KBD. In two optimization steps, performance data were calculated, and flock prevalences were determined, which were compared between the assessor and the automatic system. The proposed technique finally reached a sensitivity of 0.95, specificity of 0.77, accuracy of 0.86 and precision of 0.81. In the last optimization step, the automatic system scored on average about 10.5% points lower KBD prevalences than the human assessor. However, a proposed change of scoring system (setting the limit for KBD at 0.5 cm deviation from the straight line) would lower this deviation. We conclude that the developed automatic scoring technique is a reliable and potentially valuable tool for the assessment of KBD. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Tools for the Evaluation of Animal Welfare)
Show Figures

Figure 1

29 pages, 3653 KiB  
Article
MyFishCheck: A Model to Assess Fish Welfare in Aquaculture
by Linda Tschirren, David Bachmann, Ali Cem Güler, Oliver Blaser, Nicola Rhyner, Andreas Seitz, Erich Zbinden, Thomas Wahli, Helmut Segner and Dominik Refardt
Animals 2021, 11(1), 145; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11010145 - 11 Jan 2021
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 7244
Abstract
Welfare in animal husbandry includes considerations of biology, ethics, ecology, law and economics. These diverse aspects must be translated into common quantifiable parameters and applicable methods to objectively assess welfare in animals. To assist this process in the field of aquaculture, where such [...] Read more.
Welfare in animal husbandry includes considerations of biology, ethics, ecology, law and economics. These diverse aspects must be translated into common quantifiable parameters and applicable methods to objectively assess welfare in animals. To assist this process in the field of aquaculture, where such methods are largely missing, we developed a model to assess fish welfare. A network of information was created to link needs, i.e., fundamental requirements for welfare, with parameters, i.e., quantifiable aspects of welfare. From this ontology, 80 parameters that are relevant for welfare, have practicable assessment methods and deliver reliable results were selected and incorporated into a model. The model, named MyFishCheck, allows the evaluation of welfare in five distinct modules: farm management, water quality, fish group behaviour, fish external and fish internal appearance, thereby yielding five individual grades categorising welfare ranging from critical, to poor, to acceptable, and good. To facilitate the use of the model, a software application was written. With its adaptability to different fish species, farming systems, regulations and purposes as well as its user-friendly digital version, MyFishCheck is a next step towards improved fish welfare assessment and provides a basis for ongoing positive developments for the industry, the farmers and the fish. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Tools for the Evaluation of Animal Welfare)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

21 pages, 4088 KiB  
Article
Utilizing Camera Traps, Closed Circuit Cameras and Behavior Observation Software to Monitor Activity Budgets, Habitat Use, and Social Interactions of Zoo-Housed Asian Elephants (Elephas maximus)
by Jilian M. Fazio, Tony Barthel, Elizabeth W. Freeman, Kay Garlick-Ott, Anne Scholle and Janine L. Brown
Animals 2020, 10(11), 2026; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10112026 - 3 Nov 2020
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 5948
Abstract
Accredited zoos and aquariums value superior animal husbandry and strive to ensure that the physical, psychological, and social needs of animals are met. In North America, the Association of Zoos and Aquariums (AZA) relies on species-specific standards to ensure facilities provide the best [...] Read more.
Accredited zoos and aquariums value superior animal husbandry and strive to ensure that the physical, psychological, and social needs of animals are met. In North America, the Association of Zoos and Aquariums (AZA) relies on species-specific standards to ensure facilities provide the best care for collection animals. The AZA also makes explicit recommendations for long-term monitoring of welfare. Data collected through behavioral observations can be used to modify management as animals respond over time to social, environmental, or physical changes. In long-lived, social species like elephants, it is particularly important to document herd dynamics, calf development, geriatric health, and social bonds throughout their lifetimes. The Smithsonian’s National Zoological Park housed one male and six female Asian elephants in dynamic social groupings. Behavioral observations were conducted on all elephants for two years using two methods involving ZooMonitor, closed circuit cameras, and camera traps. The goal was to compare how these two methods function to provide individual activity budgets, habitat use, and social interactions. Methodologies such as these, alone or in combination, have the potential to produce valuable data about potential changes in welfare over time in a zoological setting and can be performed either by staff or volunteers with high reliability. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Tools for the Evaluation of Animal Welfare)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

13 pages, 1743 KiB  
Article
Emotion Recognition in Cats
by Angelo Quaranta, Serenella d’Ingeo, Rosaria Amoruso and Marcello Siniscalchi
Animals 2020, 10(7), 1107; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10071107 - 28 Jun 2020
Cited by 39 | Viewed by 36747
Abstract
Recent studies demonstrated that cats form social bonds with both conspecifics and humans. One of the key factors regulating social interactions is the transfer of emotions between the individuals. The present study aimed at investigating cats’ spontaneous ability to match acoustic and visual [...] Read more.
Recent studies demonstrated that cats form social bonds with both conspecifics and humans. One of the key factors regulating social interactions is the transfer of emotions between the individuals. The present study aimed at investigating cats’ spontaneous ability to match acoustic and visual signals for the recognition of both conspecific and human emotions. Different conspecific (cat “purr” and “hiss”) and heterospecific (human “happiness” and “anger”) emotional stimuli were presented to the tested population using a cross-modal paradigm. Results showed that cats are able to cross-modally match pictures of emotional faces with their related vocalizations, particularly for emotions of high intensity. Overall, our findings demonstrate that cats have a general mental representation of the emotions of their social partners, both conspecifics and humans. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Tools for the Evaluation of Animal Welfare)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research, Other

20 pages, 1040 KiB  
Review
Animal Welfare Implications of Digital Tools for Monitoring and Management of Cattle and Sheep on Pasture
by Anders Herlin, Emma Brunberg, Jan Hultgren, Niclas Högberg, Anna Rydberg and Anna Skarin
Animals 2021, 11(3), 829; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11030829 - 15 Mar 2021
Cited by 66 | Viewed by 11477
Abstract
The opportunities for natural animal behaviours in pastures imply animal welfare benefits. Nevertheless, monitoring the animals can be challenging. The use of sensors, cameras, positioning equipment and unmanned aerial vehicles in large pastures has the potential to improve animal welfare surveillance. Directly or [...] Read more.
The opportunities for natural animal behaviours in pastures imply animal welfare benefits. Nevertheless, monitoring the animals can be challenging. The use of sensors, cameras, positioning equipment and unmanned aerial vehicles in large pastures has the potential to improve animal welfare surveillance. Directly or indirectly, sensors measure environmental factors together with the behaviour and physiological state of the animal, and deviations can trigger alarms for, e.g., disease, heat stress and imminent calving. Electronic positioning includes Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) for the recording of animals at fixed points. Positioning units (GPS) mounted on collars can determine animal movements over large areas, determine their habitat and, somewhat, health and welfare. In combination with other sensors, such units can give information that helps to evaluate the welfare of free-ranging animals. Drones equipped with cameras can also locate and count the animals, as well as herd them. Digitally defined virtual fences can keep animals within a predefined area without the use of physical barriers, relying on acoustic signals and weak electric shocks. Due to individual variations in learning ability, some individuals may be exposed to numerous electric shocks, which might compromise their welfare. More research and development are required, especially regarding the use of drones and virtual fences. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Tools for the Evaluation of Animal Welfare)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research, Review

36 pages, 2720 KiB  
Viewpoint
Casting the Net Widely for Change in Animal Welfare: The Plight of Birds in Zoos, Ex Situ Conservation, and Conservation Fieldwork
by Gisela Kaplan
Animals 2022, 12(1), 31; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12010031 - 23 Dec 2021
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 7340
Abstract
This paper discusses paradoxes in our relationship to and treatment of birds in captive and conservation contexts. The paper identifies modern and new challenges that arise from declining bird numbers worldwide. Such challenges have partly changed zoos into providers of insurance populations specifically [...] Read more.
This paper discusses paradoxes in our relationship to and treatment of birds in captive and conservation contexts. The paper identifies modern and new challenges that arise from declining bird numbers worldwide. Such challenges have partly changed zoos into providers of insurance populations specifically for species at risk of extinction. They have also accelerated fieldwork projects, but by using advanced technological tools and in increasing numbers, contradictorily, they may cause serious harm to the very birds studied for conservation purposes. In practice, very few avian species have any notable protection or guarantee of good treatment. The paper first deals with shortcomings of identifying problematic avian behavior in captive birds. It then brings together specific cases of field studies and captive breeding for conservation in which major welfare deficits are identified. Indeed, the paper argues that avian welfare is now an urgent task. This is not just because of declining bird numbers but because of investment in new technologies in field studies that may have introduced additional stressors and put at risk bird survival. While the paper documents a substantial number of peer-reviewed papers criticizing practices counter to modern welfare standards, they have by and large not led to changes in some practices. Some solutions are suggested that could be readily implemented and, to my knowledge, have never been considered under a welfare model before. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Tools for the Evaluation of Animal Welfare)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 745 KiB  
Commentary
Human-Animal Relationship Dysfunction: A Case Study of Animal Hoarding in Italy
by Danila d’Angelo, Francesca Ciani, Alessandra Zaccherini, Simona Tafuri, Luigi Avallone, Serenella d’Ingeo and Angelo Quaranta
Animals 2020, 10(9), 1501; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10091501 - 25 Aug 2020
Cited by 17 | Viewed by 6216
Abstract
“Animal hoarding” or “compulsive hoarding of animals” is a psychiatric disease, which has important social implications and a profound influence on animal welfare. To date, this phenomenon has been little investigated and largely unexplored. The present study aims to systematically describe a case [...] Read more.
“Animal hoarding” or “compulsive hoarding of animals” is a psychiatric disease, which has important social implications and a profound influence on animal welfare. To date, this phenomenon has been little investigated and largely unexplored. The present study aims to systematically describe a case of animal hoarding, which remains unresolved. The report refers to a case of a woman suffering from animal hoarding that emerged in 2005. From March 2014 to December 2019, 450 animals were seized over nine different occasions. This disease had significant implications on the welfare of the animals collected, which lived in poor housing and hygiene conditions that frequently led to their death. Since animal hoarding cases involve sanitary, legal, and veterinary aspects, we believe that a multidisciplinary approach is necessary in order to prevent a recurrence and a new accumulation of animals. A holistic approach should be taken according to the One Health principle that involves different stakeholders at every level in order to adopt an efficient solution. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Tools for the Evaluation of Animal Welfare)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop