Alzheimer’s Disease: From Molecular Mechanisms to Therapeutic Opportunities

A special issue of Cells (ISSN 2073-4409). This special issue belongs to the section "Cells of the Nervous System".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 November 2021) | Viewed by 7446

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
CHU de Québec Research Center, Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada
Interests: Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy; Friedreich ataxia; Alzheimer’s Disease; CRISPR; base editing; myoblast transplantation

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most prevalent neurodegenerative disease among elderly persons. It is a complex neurodegenerative disorder characterized by the progressive loss of neurons. This typically leads to severe impairments in cognitive functions, including memory and learning. The key pathological features of AD include the deposition of highly insoluble amyloid β peptides and the formation of neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) in the brain. 

There is cumulating evidence that a sustained glial-mediated inflammation is a major contributor of the neurodegenerative processes and cognitive deficits observed in AD.

Recent findings clearly show that epigenetic mechanisms are dysregulated even at the early stage of AD progression. 

Amyloid-β (Aβ) fragments as well as hyperphosphorylation of Tau are hallmarks of AD, and these are found in extracellular plaques and intracellular fibrils in the brain of individuals with AD. Some researchers have demonstrated plaques and tangles as apparently primary lesions. Moreover, experimental data suggest that these two lesions are intimately related. However, whether it is the oligomeric or the soluble species of Aβ and Tau that mediate toxicity is still unclear. Some molecular mechanisms linking tau and Aβ toxicities have been proposed linking oxidative stress, Aβ turnover, the contribution of thiol groups, and the role of mitochondrial activities in the AD pathogenesis. Tau proteins impact on mitochondrial energy metabolism, inflammation, as well as a number of housekeeping processes, including protein degradation through the Ubiquitin–Proteasome System (UPS) and autophagy.

The molecular mechanisms responsible for the initiation and development of both familial and sporadic AD are thus still poorly understood despite intense efforts. There is still no treatment to prevent or cure this disease. However, the Icelandic mutation (APP A673T) has been shown to reduce the formation of beta-amyloid peptides and prevent the development of AD even in persons who are more than 95 years old. This Icelandic mutation also reduces the formation of Aβ even in the presence of some familial AD mutation. This is a clue to a potential preventive treatment.

Many powerful techniques, including genome and exome sequencing, now permit exploring the molecular mechanisms of this disease. CRISPR-derived genome editing technologies even permit intervention, which could prevent or at least slow down the progression of the disease by correcting the mutation responsible for familial forms of AD or by introducing the protective Icelandic mutation.

This Special Issue of Cells will thus review recent research on the amyloid hypothesis. This will include beta-amyloid-induced dysfunction of neuronal synapses due to changes in synaptic proteins and neurotransmitter and potential interventions with CRISPR-derived gene editing technologies.

Prof. Dr. Jacques P. Tremblay
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Cells is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2700 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Alzheimer’s
  • molecular mechanism
  • genome editing
  • CRISPR gene editing

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

23 pages, 5081 KiB  
Article
Astrocytes Derived from Familial and Sporadic Alzheimer’s Disease iPSCs Show Altered Calcium Signaling and Respond Differently to Misfolded Protein Tau
by Veronika Brezovakova, Eva Sykova and Santosh Jadhav
Cells 2022, 11(9), 1429; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11091429 - 22 Apr 2022
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 3240
Abstract
Astrocytes regulate important functions in the brain, and their dysregulation has been linked to the etiology of neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD). The role of astroglia in human AD remains enigmatic, owing to the limitations of animal models, which, while recreating [...] Read more.
Astrocytes regulate important functions in the brain, and their dysregulation has been linked to the etiology of neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD). The role of astroglia in human AD remains enigmatic, owing to the limitations of animal models, which, while recreating some pathological aspects of the disease, do not fully mirror its course. In addition, the recognition of major structural and functional differences between human and mouse astrocytes has also prompted research into human glial cells. In the current study, astrocytes were generated using human iPSCs from patients with sporadic Alzheimer’s disease (sAD), familial Alzheimer’s disease (fAD) and non-demented controls (NDC). All clones gained astrocyte-specific morphological and proteomic characteristics upon in vitro differentiation, without considerable inter-clonal variances. In comparison to NDC, AD astrocytes displayed aberrant calcium dynamics in response to glutamate. When exposed to monomeric and aggregated tau, AD astrocytes demonstrated hypertrophy and elevated GFAP expression, differential expression of select signaling and receptor proteins, and the enhanced production of metalloproteinases (MMPs). Moreover, astrocytic secretomes were able to degrade tau in both monomeric and pathologically aggregated forms, which was mediated by MMP-2 and -9. The capacity to neutralize tau varied considerably between clones, with fAD astrocytes having the lowest degradability relative to sAD and healthy astrocytes. Importantly, when compared to aggregated tau alone, astrocytic secretome pretreatment of tau differentially reduced its detrimental effects on neurons. Our results show crucial differences in sporadic and familial AD astrocytes and suggests that these cells may play distinctive roles in the pathogenesis of early and late onset Alzheimer’s disease. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 3267 KiB  
Article
Neuroprotective Effects of PARP Inhibitors in Drosophila Models of Alzheimer’s Disease
by Anna Maggiore, Assunta Maria Casale, Walter Toscanelli, Ugo Cappucci, Dante Rotili, Maddalena Grieco, Jean-Philippe Gagné, Guy G. Poirier, Maria d’Erme and Lucia Piacentini
Cells 2022, 11(8), 1284; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11081284 - 9 Apr 2022
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 3728
Abstract
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is an irreversible age-related neurodegenerative disorder clinically characterized by severe memory impairment, language deficits and cognitive decline. The major neuropathological hallmarks of AD include extracellular deposits of the β-amyloid (Aβ) peptides and cytoplasmic neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) of hyperphosphorylated tau protein. [...] Read more.
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is an irreversible age-related neurodegenerative disorder clinically characterized by severe memory impairment, language deficits and cognitive decline. The major neuropathological hallmarks of AD include extracellular deposits of the β-amyloid (Aβ) peptides and cytoplasmic neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) of hyperphosphorylated tau protein. The accumulation of plaques and tangles in the brain triggers a cascade of molecular events that culminate in neuronal damage and cell death. Despite extensive research, our understanding of the molecular basis of AD pathogenesis remains incomplete and a cure for this devastating disease is still not available. A growing body of evidence in different experimental models suggests that poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1) overactivation might be a crucial component of the molecular network of interactions responsible for AD pathogenesis. In this work, we combined genetic, molecular and biochemical approaches to investigate the effects of two different PARP-1 inhibitors (olaparib and MC2050) in Drosophila models of Alzheimer’s disease by exploring their neuroprotective and therapeutic potential in vivo. We found that both pharmacological inhibition and genetic inactivation of PARP-1 significantly extend lifespan and improve the climbing ability of transgenic AD flies. Consistently, PARP-1 inhibitors lead to a significant decrease of Aβ42 aggregates and partially rescue the epigenetic alterations associated with AD in the brain. Interestingly, olaparib and MC2050 also suppress the AD-associated aberrant activation of transposable elements in neuronal tissues of AD flies. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop