Current Advances in T-cell-Based Cancer Immunotherapy

A special issue of Cells (ISSN 2073-4409). This special issue belongs to the section "Cellular Immunology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 September 2021) | Viewed by 3640

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Center for Medical Innovation, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki 852-8588, Japan
Interests: γδ T cell; NK cell; cancer immunotherapy; PD-1; IL-18; adoptive transfer
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Johnson County, IA 52242, USA
Interests: γδ T cells; human immunology; cancer immunotherapy

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The idea of harnessing a patient’s immune system to combat cancer originated in the nineteenth century. Wilhelm Busch and Friedrich Fehleisen first described the association between spontaneous regression of tumors and the development of erysipelas caused by Streptococcus pyogenes. Subsequently, William B. Coley treated patients with sarcoma with cultured streptococci and observed the shrinkage of malignant tumors, suggesting that the immune system stimulated by infections might be responsible for tumor regression. Based on these initial observations on the possible link between infections and tumor rejection, many researchers explored the development of immunotherapy of cancer. Most of the attempts had been, however, unsuccessful until recently because of the lack of reproducibility and the complexity of the immune system. Whereas increasing evidence had accumulated that the immune system, especially T cells, could recognize neoantigens derived from tumors, only limited success was achieved in developing T cell-based cancer immunotherapy. In fact, dark clouds were looming over the development of cancer immunotherapy even in the early 2000s.

The development of immnune checkpoint inhibitors, such as anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) mAb, anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) mAb and anti-PD-1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) mAb, suddenly revolutionized cancer treatments in the early 2010s. The immune checkpoint molecules are physiologically negative regulators of T cell activation and maintain self-tolerance. The rationale of this therapy is to target the host immune system, in particular, T cells, but not malignant tumors per se as in conventional treatments like chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Whereas the introduction of the immune checkpoint inhibitors opened the new era of cancer therapy, their efficacy is not yet satisfactory. It is thus imperative to further develop T-cell-based immunotherapies, including adoptive transfer of cytotoxic αβ T cells, chimeric antigen receptor T cells, and γδ T cells. In order to improve the efficacy of such T-cell-based cancer treatments, it is essential to delineate the precise mechanism underlying the effect of cultured or genetically-engineered T cells on tumor cells. Within this Special Issue of Cells, we will highlight the molecular mechanisms and future directions of T-cell-based immunotherapies, and we would highly appreciate the submission of original articles, reviews, commentaries, short reports, or protocols in this exciting field of research. Clinical studies are excluded from this Special Issue of Cells.

Prof. Dr. Yoshimasa Tanaka
Prof. Dr. Craig T. Morita
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Cells is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2700 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • T-cell-based cancer immunotherapy
  • γδ T cells
  • CAR-T cells
  • immune checkpoint inhibitors
  • combination therapy

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

14 pages, 2044 KiB  
Article
Evaluation of Production Protocols for the Generation of NY-ESO-1-Specific T Cells
by Wenjie Gong, Lei Wang, Sophia Stock, Ming Ni, Maria-Luisa Schubert, Brigitte Neuber, Christian Kleist, Angela Hückelhoven-Krauss, Depei Wu, Carsten Müller-Tidow, Anita Schmitt, Hiroshi Shiku, Michael Schmitt and Leopold Sellner
Cells 2021, 10(1), 152; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10010152 - 14 Jan 2021
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2606
Abstract
NY-ESO-1-specific T cells have shown promising activity in the treatment of soft tissue sarcoma (STS). However, standardized protocols for their generation are limited. Particularly, cost-effectiveness considerations of cell production protocols are of importance for conducting clinical studies. In this study, two different NY-ESO-1-specific [...] Read more.
NY-ESO-1-specific T cells have shown promising activity in the treatment of soft tissue sarcoma (STS). However, standardized protocols for their generation are limited. Particularly, cost-effectiveness considerations of cell production protocols are of importance for conducting clinical studies. In this study, two different NY-ESO-1-specific T cell production protocols were compared. Major differences between protocols 1 and 2 include culture medium, interleukin-2 and retronectin concentrations, T cell activation strategy, and the transduction process. NY-ESO-1-specific T cells generated according to the two protocols were investigated for differences in cell viability, transduction efficiency, T cell expansion, immunophenotype as well as functionality. NY-ESO-1-specific T cells showed similar viability and transduction efficiency between both protocols. Protocol 1 generated higher absolute numbers of NY-ESO-1-specific T cells. However, there was no difference in absolute numbers of NY-ESO-1-specific T cell subsets with less-differentiated phenotypes accounting for efficient in vivo expansion and engraftment. Furthermore, cells generated according to protocol 1 displayed higher capacity of TNF-α generation, but lower cytotoxic capacities. Overall, both protocols provided functional NY-ESO-1-specific T cells. However, compared to protocol 1, protocol 2 is advantageous in terms of cost-effectiveness. Cell production protocols should be designed diligently to achieve a cost-effective cellular product for further clinical evaluation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Advances in T-cell-Based Cancer Immunotherapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop