Membrane Contact Sites with Mitochondria: Molecular Determinants and Pathophysiological Role

A special issue of Cells (ISSN 2073-4409). This special issue belongs to the section "Mitochondria".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 November 2019) | Viewed by 59356

Special Issue Editors

1. Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
2. Padova Neuroscience Center (PNC), University of Padova, Padova, Italy
Interests: organelle contact sites; mitochondria; calcium signaling; genetically encoded sensors; neurodegenerative diseases; endoplasmic reticulum; plasma membrane calcium pumps
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Biology, Università degli Studi di Padova, 35131 Padua, Italy
Interests: Ca2+ signaling; Ca2+ pumps; mitochondria; bioenergetics; signal transduction; ER–mitochondria interplay; Parkinson’s disease; neurodegeneration

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Contact sites are discrete areas of organelles in proximity that coordinate essential physiological processes across membranes, which are closely apposed and tethered without undergoing fusion events. Here, various protein complexes can work in concert to perform specialized functions such as binding, sensing, and transferring molecules, as well as organelle biogenesis and dynamics. In all eukaryotes, virtually every organelle is engaged in membrane contact sites (MCSs). The ER forms MCSs with mitochondria, Golgi, endosomes, peroxisomes, lipid droplets, and with the plasma membrane. Several lines of evidence have revealed that mitochondria are tightly associated with the tubular ER to perform important functions involved in lipid biosynthesis and Ca2+ signaling and transport. In the last decade, the molecular determinants that underlie ER–mitochondria contact site formation and function have been identified. These studies have also revealed an unexpected scenario in which mitochondria, by making contacts with multiple organelles, generate specialized microdomains that serve to fine-tune specific and unique cellular activities, such as the integration of mitochondrial dynamics with cell stress signaling pathways, both in time and space.

In this Special Issue of Cells, we invite your contributions, either in the form of original research articles, reviews, or shorter perspective articles on all aspects related to the theme of “Membrane Contact Sites with Mitochondria: Molecular Determinants and Pathophysiological Role”. Articles with mechanistic and functional insights from a cell and molecular biological perspective are especially welcome.

Dr. Tito Calì
Prof. Marisa Brini
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Cells is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2700 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Mitochondria
  • Endoplasmic reticulum
  • Calcium
  • Bioenergetics
  • Peroxisome
  • Lysosomes
  • Vacuole
  • Mitochondria-derived vesicles
  • Lipid homeostasis
  • Neurodegenerative diseases
  • Parkinson’s disease
  • Alzheimer’s disease
  • Mitochondria dynamics

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (8 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

22 pages, 3926 KiB  
Article
Regulation of Mitochondria-Associated Membranes (MAMs) by NO/sGC/PKG Participates in the Control of Hepatic Insulin Response
by Arthur Bassot, Marie-Agnès Chauvin, Nadia Bendridi, Jingwei Ji-Cao, Guillaume Vial, Léa Monnier, Birke Bartosch, Anaïs Alves, Cécile Cottet-Rousselle, Yves Gouriou, Jennifer Rieusset and Béatrice Morio
Cells 2019, 8(11), 1319; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8111319 - 25 Oct 2019
Cited by 24 | Viewed by 4707
Abstract
Under physiological conditions, nitric oxide (NO) produced by the endothelial NO synthase (eNOS) upregulates hepatic insulin sensitivity. Recently, contact sites between the endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria named mitochondria-associated membranes (MAMs) emerged as a crucial hub for insulin signaling in the liver. As mitochondria [...] Read more.
Under physiological conditions, nitric oxide (NO) produced by the endothelial NO synthase (eNOS) upregulates hepatic insulin sensitivity. Recently, contact sites between the endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria named mitochondria-associated membranes (MAMs) emerged as a crucial hub for insulin signaling in the liver. As mitochondria are targets of NO, we explored whether NO regulates hepatic insulin sensitivity by targeting MAMs. In Huh7 cells, primary rat hepatocytes and mouse livers, enhancing NO concentration increased MAMs, whereas inhibiting eNOS decreased them. In vitro, those effects were prevented by inhibiting protein kinase G (PKG) and mimicked by activating soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) and PKG. In agreement with the regulation of MAMs, increasing NO concentration improved insulin signaling, both in vitro and in vivo, while eNOS inhibition disrupted this response. Finally, inhibition of insulin signaling by wortmannin did not affect the impact of NO on MAMs, while experimental MAM disruption, using either targeted silencing of cyclophilin D or the overexpression of the organelle spacer fetal and adult testis-expressed 1 (FATE-1), significantly blunted the effects of NO on both MAMs and insulin response. Therefore, under physiological conditions, NO participates to the regulation of MAM integrity through the sGC/PKG pathway and concomitantly improves hepatic insulin sensitivity. Altogether, our data suggest that the induction of MAMs participate in the impact of NO on hepatocyte insulin response. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

18 pages, 1872 KiB  
Article
splitGFP Technology Reveals Dose-Dependent ER-Mitochondria Interface Modulation by α-Synuclein A53T and A30P Mutants
by Tito Calì, Denis Ottolini, Mattia Vicario, Cristina Catoni, Francesca Vallese, Domenico Cieri, Lucia Barazzuol and Marisa Brini
Cells 2019, 8(9), 1072; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8091072 - 12 Sep 2019
Cited by 33 | Viewed by 4865
Abstract
Familial Parkinson’s disease (PD) is associated with duplication or mutations of α-synuclein gene, whose product is a presynaptic cytosolic protein also found in mitochondria and in mitochondrial-associated ER membranes. We have originally shown the role of α-syn as a modulator of the ER-mitochondria [...] Read more.
Familial Parkinson’s disease (PD) is associated with duplication or mutations of α-synuclein gene, whose product is a presynaptic cytosolic protein also found in mitochondria and in mitochondrial-associated ER membranes. We have originally shown the role of α-syn as a modulator of the ER-mitochondria interface and mitochondrial Ca2+ transients, suggesting that, at mild levels of expression, α-syn sustains cell metabolism. Here, we investigated the possibility that α-syn action on ER-mitochondria tethering could be compromised by the presence of PD-related mutations. The clarification of this aspect could contribute to elucidate key mechanisms underlying PD. The findings reported so far are not consistent, possibly because of the different methods used to evaluate ER-mitochondria connectivity. Here, the effects of the PD-related α-syn mutations A53T and A30P on ER-mitochondria relationship were investigated in respect to Ca2+ handling and mitochondrial function using a newly generated SPLICS sensor and aequorin-based Ca2+measurements. We provided evidence that A53T and A30P amino acid substitution does not affect the ability of α-syn to enhance ER/mitochondria tethering and mitochondrial Ca2+ transients, but that this action was lost as soon as a high amount of TAT-delivered A53T and A30P α-syn mutants caused the redistribution of α-syn from cytoplasm to foci. Our results suggest a loss of function mechanism and highlight a possible connection between α-syn and ER-mitochondria Ca2+ cross-talk impairment to the pathogenesis of PD. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 7954 KiB  
Article
The Multifunctional Sorting Protein PACS-2 Controls Mitophagosome Formation in Human Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells through Mitochondria-ER Contact Sites
by Manon Moulis, Elisa Grousset, Julien Faccini, Kevin Richetin, Gary Thomas and Cecile Vindis
Cells 2019, 8(6), 638; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8060638 - 25 Jun 2019
Cited by 61 | Viewed by 6921
Abstract
Mitochondria-associated ER membranes (MAMs) are crucial for lipid transport and synthesis, calcium exchange, and mitochondrial functions, and they also act as signaling platforms. These contact sites also play a critical role in the decision between autophagy and apoptosis with far reaching implications for [...] Read more.
Mitochondria-associated ER membranes (MAMs) are crucial for lipid transport and synthesis, calcium exchange, and mitochondrial functions, and they also act as signaling platforms. These contact sites also play a critical role in the decision between autophagy and apoptosis with far reaching implications for cell fate. Vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) apoptosis accelerates atherogenesis and the progression of advanced lesions, leading to atherosclerotic plaque vulnerability and medial degeneration. Though the successful autophagy of damaged mitochondria promotes VSMC survival against pro-apoptotic atherogenic stressors, it is unknown whether MAMs are involved in VSMC mitophagy processes. Here, we investigated the role of the multifunctional MAM protein phosphofurin acidic cluster sorting protein 2 (PACS-2) in regulating VSMC survival following a challenge by atherogenic lipids. Using high-resolution confocal microscopy and proximity ligation assays, we found an increase in MAM contacts as in PACS-2-associated MAMs upon stimulation with atherogenic lipids. Correspondingly, the disruption of MAM contacts by PACS-2 knockdown impaired mitophagosome formation and mitophagy, thus potentiating VSMC apoptosis. In conclusion, our data shed new light on the significance of the MAM modulatory protein PACS-2 in vascular cell physiopathology and suggest MAMs may be a new target to modulate VSMC fate and favor atherosclerotic plaque stability. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

18 pages, 662 KiB  
Review
Chemical Modulation of Mitochondria–Endoplasmic Reticulum Contact Sites
by Ana Paula Magalhães Rebelo, Federica Dal Bello, Tomas Knedlik, Natasha Kaar, Fabio Volpin, Sang Hun Shin and Marta Giacomello
Cells 2020, 9(7), 1637; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9071637 - 7 Jul 2020
Cited by 22 | Viewed by 5591
Abstract
Contact sites between mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) are points in which the two organelles are in close proximity. Due to their structural and functional complexity, their exploitation as pharmacological targets has never been considered so far. Notwithstanding, the number of compounds described [...] Read more.
Contact sites between mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) are points in which the two organelles are in close proximity. Due to their structural and functional complexity, their exploitation as pharmacological targets has never been considered so far. Notwithstanding, the number of compounds described to target proteins residing at these interfaces either directly or indirectly is rising. Here we provide original insight into mitochondria–ER contact sites (MERCs), with a comprehensive overview of the current MERCs pharmacology. Importantly, we discuss the considerable potential of MERCs to become a druggable target for the development of novel therapeutic strategies. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 730 KiB  
Review
Inter-Organelle Membrane Contact Sites and Mitochondrial Quality Control during Aging: A Geroscience View
by Anna Picca, Riccardo Calvani, Hélio José Coelho-Junior, Francesco Landi, Roberto Bernabei and Emanuele Marzetti
Cells 2020, 9(3), 598; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9030598 - 3 Mar 2020
Cited by 27 | Viewed by 7217
Abstract
Mitochondrial dysfunction and failing mitochondrial quality control (MQC) are major determinants of aging. Far from being standalone organelles, mitochondria are intricately related with cellular other compartments, including lysosomes. The intimate relationship between mitochondria and lysosomes is reflected by the fact that lysosomal degradation [...] Read more.
Mitochondrial dysfunction and failing mitochondrial quality control (MQC) are major determinants of aging. Far from being standalone organelles, mitochondria are intricately related with cellular other compartments, including lysosomes. The intimate relationship between mitochondria and lysosomes is reflected by the fact that lysosomal degradation of dysfunctional mitochondria is the final step of mitophagy. Inter-organelle membrane contact sites also allow bidirectional communication between mitochondria and lysosomes as part of nondegradative pathways. This interaction establishes a functional unit that regulates metabolic signaling, mitochondrial dynamics, and, hence, MQC. Contacts of mitochondria with the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) have also been described. ER-mitochondrial interactions are relevant to Ca2+ homeostasis, transfer of phospholipid precursors to mitochondria, and integration of apoptotic signaling. Many proteins involved in mitochondrial contact sites with other organelles also participate to degradative MQC pathways. Hence, a comprehensive assessment of mitochondrial dysfunction during aging requires a thorough evaluation of degradative and nondegradative inter-organelle pathways. Here, we present a geroscience overview on (1) degradative MQC pathways, (2) nondegradative processes involving inter-organelle tethering, (3) age-related changes in inter-organelle degradative and nondegradative pathways, and (4) relevance of MQC failure to inflammaging and age-related conditions, with a focus on Parkinson’s disease as a prototypical geroscience condition. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 785 KiB  
Review
Mitochondria Associated Germinal Structures in Spermatogenesis: piRNA Pathway Regulation and Beyond
by Xiaoli Wang, Chunyu Lv, Ying Guo and Shuiqiao Yuan
Cells 2020, 9(2), 399; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9020399 - 10 Feb 2020
Cited by 31 | Viewed by 6032
Abstract
Multiple specific granular structures are present in the cytoplasm of germ cells, termed nuage, which are electron-dense, non-membranous, close to mitochondria and/or nuclei, variant size yielding to different compartments harboring different components, including intermitochondrial cement (IMC), piP-body, and chromatoid body (CB). Since mitochondria [...] Read more.
Multiple specific granular structures are present in the cytoplasm of germ cells, termed nuage, which are electron-dense, non-membranous, close to mitochondria and/or nuclei, variant size yielding to different compartments harboring different components, including intermitochondrial cement (IMC), piP-body, and chromatoid body (CB). Since mitochondria exhibit different morphology and topographical arrangements to accommodate specific needs during spermatogenesis, the distribution of mitochondria-associated nuage is also dynamic. The most relevant nuage structure with mitochondria is IMC, also called pi-body, present in prospermatogonia, spermatogonia, and spermatocytes. IMC is primarily enriched with various Piwi-interacting RNA (piRNA) proteins and mainly functions as piRNA biogenesis, transposon silencing, mRNA translation, and mitochondria fusion. Importantly, our previous work reported that mitochondria-associated ER membranes (MAMs) are abundant in spermatogenic cells and contain many crucial proteins associated with the piRNA pathway. Provocatively, IMC functionally communicates with other nuage structures, such as piP-body, to perform its complex functions in spermatogenesis. Although little is known about the formation of both IMC and MAMs, its distinctive characters have attracted considerable attention. Here, we review the insights gained from studying the structural components of mitochondria-associated germinal structures, including IMC, CB, and MAMs, which are pivotal structures to ensure genome integrity and male fertility. We discuss the roles of the structural components in spermatogenesis and piRNA biogenesis, which provide new insights into mitochondria-associated germinal structures in germ cell development and male reproduction. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 1518 KiB  
Review
ER-Mitochondria Communication in Cells of the Innate Immune System
by Dmitry Namgaladze, Vera Khodzhaeva and Bernhard Brüne
Cells 2019, 8(9), 1088; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8091088 - 15 Sep 2019
Cited by 41 | Viewed by 11559
Abstract
In cells the interorganelle communication comprises vesicular and non-vesicular mechanisms. Non-vesicular material transfer predominantly takes place at regions of close organelle apposition termed membrane contact sites and is facilitated by a growing number of specialized proteins. Contacts of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and [...] Read more.
In cells the interorganelle communication comprises vesicular and non-vesicular mechanisms. Non-vesicular material transfer predominantly takes place at regions of close organelle apposition termed membrane contact sites and is facilitated by a growing number of specialized proteins. Contacts of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and mitochondria are now recognized to be essential for diverse biological processes such as calcium homeostasis, phospholipid biosynthesis, apoptosis, and autophagy. In addition to these universal roles, ER-mitochondria communication serves also cell type-specific functions. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge on ER-mitochondria contacts in cells of the innate immune system, especially in macrophages. We discuss ER- mitochondria communication in the context of macrophage fatty acid metabolism linked to inflammatory and ER stress responses, its roles in apoptotic cell engulfment, activation of the inflammasome, and antiviral defense. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 2193 KiB  
Review
Mechanistic Connections between Endoplasmic Reticulum (ER) Redox Control and Mitochondrial Metabolism
by Yuxiang Fan and Thomas Simmen
Cells 2019, 8(9), 1071; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8091071 - 12 Sep 2019
Cited by 98 | Viewed by 11180
Abstract
The past decade has seen the emergence of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) chaperones as key determinants of contact formation between mitochondria and the ER on the mitochondria-associated membrane (MAM). Despite the known roles of ER–mitochondria tethering factors like PACS-2 and mitofusin-2, it is not [...] Read more.
The past decade has seen the emergence of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) chaperones as key determinants of contact formation between mitochondria and the ER on the mitochondria-associated membrane (MAM). Despite the known roles of ER–mitochondria tethering factors like PACS-2 and mitofusin-2, it is not yet entirely clear how they mechanistically interact with the ER environment to determine mitochondrial metabolism. In this article, we review the mechanisms used to communicate ER redox and folding conditions to the mitochondria, presumably with the goal of controlling mitochondrial metabolism at the Krebs cycle and at the electron transport chain, leading to oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS). To achieve this goal, redox nanodomains in the ER and the interorganellar cleft influence the activities of ER chaperones and Ca2+-handling proteins to signal to mitochondria. This mechanism, based on ER chaperones like calnexin and ER oxidoreductases like Ero1α, controls reactive oxygen production within the ER, which can chemically modify the proteins controlling ER–mitochondria tethering, or mitochondrial membrane dynamics. It can also lead to the expression of apoptotic or metabolic transcription factors. The link between mitochondrial metabolism and ER homeostasis is evident from the specific functions of mitochondria–ER contact site (MERC)-localized Ire1 and PERK. These functions allow these two transmembrane proteins to act as mitochondria-preserving guardians, a function that is apparently unrelated to their functions in the unfolded protein response (UPR). In scenarios where ER stress cannot be resolved via the activation of mitochondrial OXPHOS, MAM-localized autophagosome formation acts to remove defective portions of the ER. ER chaperones such as calnexin are again critical regulators of this MERC readout. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop