Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction

Background: Otoplasty is a commonly performed cosmetic ear procedure, yet patient-reported outcome data remain limited. This study analyzes otoplasty reviews on RealSelf, a widely used aesthetic review platform that provides insight into patient experiences and outcomes. Methods: A retrospective review of otoplasty-related posts on RealSelf from January 2009 to March 2025 was performed. Reviews were manually screened and coded independently by reviewers. Extracted variables included demographics, procedure location, surgeon specialty, anesthesia type, postoperative pain, satisfaction rating (“Worth It,” “Not Worth It,” “Not Sure”), cost, motivations for surgery, and reasons for choosing the surgeon. Results: A total of 615 reviews met inclusion criteria, and 90.7% rated the procedure as “Worth It.” Protruding ears were the most common motivation for surgery (55.1%), followed by ear asymmetry (17.0%). Surgeon selection was most influenced by the consultation experience (34.4%), credentials (24.8%), and online reviews (21.6%). Positive surgeon comments emphasized comfort (32.3%), personality (27.9%), and communication (25.1%). Satisfaction was significantly associated with postoperative pain level (p < 0.001) and improved confidence after surgery (p = 0.032), but not with age, gender, procedure location, anesthesia type, or cost. Improved confidence (38.5%), enhanced ear shape (27.8%), and natural-appearing results (17.4%) were the most frequently cited reasons for being satisfied with otoplasty. Conclusion: Patient-reported satisfaction with otoplasty on RealSelf is high and is associated with favorable aesthetic results, improved self-confidence, and positive surgeon–patient interactions. In this cohort, effective communication, realistic expectation setting, and postoperative pain management were central to optimizing the patient experience.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the stiffness-related mechanical response and peak von Mises stress distribution of low-profile 2.4 mm mandibular reconstruction systems (a conventional reconstruction plate, a 3D grid-type plate, and a customized plate) in a virtual atrophic mandible model with a 5 cm segmental defect. Materials and Methods: A CT-based three-dimensional mandible model was created and instrumented with three plate configurations (G1–G3). Linear static finite element analyses were performed under a 300-N masticatory load combined with literature-based muscle force vectors. Peak von Mises stresses were recorded for plates and screws, and the locations of maximum stress concentration were identified. Results: Peak plate stress was highest in the conventional reconstruction plate (G1: 695.5 MPa), followed by the 3D grid-type plate (G2: 595.6 MPa), and lowest in the customized plate (G3: 185.2 MPa). The peak screw stress was 692.9 MPa (G1), 898.0 MPa (G2), and 595.6 MPa (G3). The 3D grid-type plate increased construct stiffness but shifted stress concentration toward the mandibular angle and adjacent screws, whereas the customized plate reduced the peak plate stress and limited the extent of the high-stress region across the defect. Conclusions: Within the limitations of a linear static FEA (stiffness/stress distribution rather than failure load or fatigue resistance), the customized plate (G3) demonstrated the most favorable biomechanical performance (lowest peak plate stress). The 3D grid-type plate (G2) reduced peak plate stress compared with the conventional design (G1) but produced the highest peak screw stress. Practical considerations such as manufacturing lead time and resource requirements may favor off-the-shelf plates; however, a formal cost or operative-time analysis was not performed.

Maxillofacial skeletal reconstruction presents significant challenges due to anatomical complexity, functional requirements, and aesthetic demands. Traditional materials such as titanium and autogenous bone grafts have limitations, prompting interest in Polyetheretherketone (PEEK), a versatile thermoplastic polymer with advantages like biocompatibility, radiolucency, and elasticity similar to human bone. This multi-year case series evaluates the clinical outcomes of PEEK implants used in 56 cases on 53 patients for maxillofacial reconstruction, primarily for trauma (44 patients) and deformity (9 patients). PEEK implants were applied to various facial regions including the orbit, zygoma, mandible, and maxilla. The majority of surgeries utilised virtual surgical planning. Patient-specific implants were fabricated using 3D imaging technologies, allowing customisation for optimal fit and functionality. The mean patient age was 37 years with a split of 37 to 16 females. Some complications were noted such as infection and paraesthesia. However, the majority of patients experienced positive outcomes. The findings support PEEK implants as a safe, effective, and adaptable material for maxillofacial surgery, with potential for further advancements in material properties and surgical technologies to improve long-term outcomes.