ijerph-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Psychological Strategies for the Development of Healthy Eating Habits and Self-Care

A special issue of International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (ISSN 1660-4601).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (28 March 2023) | Viewed by 4453

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Education and Psychology, University of Navarra, 31009 Pamplona, Spain
Interests: cognitive science; biological psychology; neuropsychology; self-care; affective neuroscience; clinical health psychology; eating behaviour

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Nutrition Research Center, University of Navarra, 31009 Pamplona, Spain
Interests: clinical health psychology; eating behavior; coping and adjustment behavior

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Education and Psychology, University of Navarra, 31009 Pamplona, Spain
Interests: affective neuroscience; research methods and psychometry

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Obesity has reached epidemic proportions globally. In Spain, around 16% of the population, aged 18 years and over, suffer from obesity, and 38% are overweight [1]. Increased adiposity is widely recognized as among the major public health threats, as it increases the risk of most leading causes of death around the world, such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and cancer [2,3]. People suffering from obesity are also more vulnerable to infectious diseases [4]. In the context of the current coronavirus pandemic, obesity has been shown to be an important risk factor for severe COVID-19, including in young patients with no other risk factors [5,6]. Therefore, the development of effective weight management strategies for obesity is paramount. Evidence suggests that even a modest weight loss, as low as 5% of initial body weight, produces significant health benefits and decreases risk factors related to obesity [7,8]. One of the key causes of obesity lies in habits that lead to excessive energy consumption, such as eating too large portions of food [9]. In this regard, studies show that the size of food portions has increased over time and changed the population’s perception of what an appropriate amount to eat in a single eating occasion should look like, a phenomenon known as portion distortion [10]. However, urging people to “eat less” of all foods might be challenging as individuals are used to consuming a certain volume of food to feel [11,12]. Instead, a more effective approach may be to help people lower the energy density of their meals, that is, the amount of energy (kcal) provided by the given weight of food (g). This may be achieved by increasing the amount of low-energy-dense foods in the diet, such as fruits and vegetables, and foods rich in water and low in fat (e.g., broth-based soups), while limiting amounts of high-energy-dense foods, such as starchy and fatty foods [13,14]. The above-mentioned changes in eating patterns would allow individuals not only to eat satisfying portions, reducing post-meal hunger sensations, but also to increase their diet quality, leading to beneficial health effects [15,16].

Over the past few years, different portion control tools have been commercialized that claim to help people manage their weight and eat healthier. A recent systematic review identified and categorized a wide variety of such instruments, which ranged from different components of tableware to cooking utensils, educational aids, and web-based or mobile software [17]. Therefore, and bearing in mind the above, the objective of this topic is to present a body of knowledge related to the development of studies on psychological strategies aimed at controlling intake and developing healthier eating habits (nutritional self-care). 

References

1. EESE. Encuesta Europea de Salud en España 2020. Avalible online: https://www.sanidad.gob.es/estadEstudios/estadisticas/EncuestaEuropea/EncuestaEuropea2020/
Metodologia_EESE_2020.pdf
(accessed on 15 November 2022).
2. WHO. Obesity: Health consequences of being overweight. 2013. Avalible one: https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/obesity-health-consequences-of-being-overweight (accessed on 15 November 2022).
3. NHLBI. Managing Overweight and Obesity in Adults: Systematic Evidence Review from the Obesity Expert Panel. 2013. Avalible online: https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/managing-overweight-obesity-in-adults (accessed on 15 November 2022).
4. Falagas, M.E.; Kompoti, M. Obesity and infection. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2006, 6, 438–446.
5. WOB. COVID-19 and Obesity: The 2021 Atlas. 2021. Avalible online: https://www.worldobesity.org/resources/resource-library/covid-19-and-obesity-the-2021-atlas (accessed on 15 November 2022).
6. Chua, M.W.J.; Zheng, S. Obesity and COVID-19: The clash of two pandemics. Obes. Res. Clin. Pract. 2020, 14, 380–382.
7. Blackburn, G. Effect of Degree of Weight Loss on Health Benefits. Obes. Res. 1995, 3, 211s-216s.
8. Wing, R.R.; Lang, W.; Wadden, T.A.; Safford, M.; Knowler, W.C.; Bertoni, A.G. Hill, J.O.; Brancati, f.l.; Peters, A.; Wagenknecht,L.; et al. Benefits of modest weight loss in improving cardiovascular risk factors in overweight and obese individuals with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2011, 34, 1481–1486.
9. Borer, K.T. Why we eat too much, have an easier time gaining than losing weight, and expend too little energy: Suggestions for counteracting or mitigating these problems. Nutrients 2021, 13, 3812.
10. Steenhuis, I.H.; Vermeer, W.M. Portion size: review and framework for interventions. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2009, 6, 58.
11. Bell, E.A.; Rolls, B.J. Energy density of foods affects energy intake across multiple levels of fat content in lean and obese women. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2001, 73, 1010–1018.
12. Shrapnel, B. Is energy density a useful concept for understanding and preventing obesity? Nutr. Diet. 2010, 67, 281–286.
13. Smethers, A.D.; Rolls, B.J. Dietary Management of Obesity: Cornerstones of Healthy Eating Patterns. Med. Clin. North Am. 2018, 102, 107–124.
14. Rolls, B.J. Dietary energy density: Applying behavioural science to weight management. Nutr. Bull. 2017, 42, 246–253.
15. Rolls, B.J. What is the role of portion control in weight management? Int. J. Obes. 2014, 38, S1-S8.
16. Gil, Á., de Victoria, E.M.; Olza, J. Indicadores de evaluación de la calidad de la dieta. Nutr. Hosp. 2015, 31, 128–144.
17. Vargas-Alvarez, M.A.; Navas-Carretero, S.; Palla, L.; Martínez, J.A.; Almiron-Roig, E. Impact of portion control tools on portion size awareness, choice and intake: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutrients 2021, 13, 1978.

Dr. Elkin O. Luis
Dr. Martín Martínez Villar
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2500 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

19 pages, 1342 KiB  
Article
Adopting an Extended Theory of Planned Behaviour to Examine Buying Intention and Behaviour of Nutrition-Labelled Menu for Healthy Food Choices in Quick Service Restaurants: Does the Culture of Consumers Really Matter?
by Abu Elnasr E. Sobaih, Mohamed Algezawy and Ibrahim A. Elshaer
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(5), 4498; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20054498 - 3 Mar 2023
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 3764
Abstract
This research aims to examine an extended model of the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) to understand the determinants of consumers’ intentions to buy and recommend nutrition-labelled menu (NLM) items for making healthy food choices. The research examines the influence of attitude towards [...] Read more.
This research aims to examine an extended model of the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) to understand the determinants of consumers’ intentions to buy and recommend nutrition-labelled menu (NLM) items for making healthy food choices. The research examines the influence of attitude towards behaviour (ATT), subjective norms (SNs), perceived behavioural control (PBC) and health consciousness on consumers’ intentions to buy and recommend NLM. The research also examines the role of culture in shaping buying and recommendation intentions of NLM by undertaking a comparative study of the extended model among consumers in two different countries that have enough variation based on Hofstede’s cultural dimensions, i.e., the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) and the United Kingdom (UK). The results of questionnaire surveys analysed with SmartPLS version 4 showed that ATT, SNs and health consciousness significantly predict intentions to buy NLM items among KSA consumers in quick service restaurants (QSRs). However, PBC did not have a significant influence on KSA consumers’ intentions to buy NLM items. On the other hand, ATT, PBC and health consciousness significantly predict intentions to buy NLM items among UK consumers in QSRs. Nonetheless, SNs did not have a significant influence on UK consumers’ intentions to buy NLM items. The intention to buy NLM significantly predicts the intentions to recommend NLM among consumers in both countries (KSA and UK). The results of a multi-group analysis showed significant differences between the KSA and the UK regarding the influence of both SNs and PBC on consumers’ intentions to buy NLMs as well as on their indirect influence on intentions to recommend NLM items. The results value the role of culture in shaping consumers’ intentions to buy and to recommend NLM items for healthy food choices, which has numerous implications for international QSRs, policy makers, and academics. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop