ijerph-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Trends in Strength Training for Performance, Fitness and Health Improvement

A special issue of International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (ISSN 1660-4601). This special issue belongs to the section "Sport and Health".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (14 April 2023) | Viewed by 3354

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
1. Department of Special Didactics, Faculty of Education and Sport Sciences, University of Vigo, 36005 Pontevedra, Spain
2. Education, Physical Activity and Health Research Group (Gies-10-DE3), Galicia Sur Health Research Institute (IIS Galicia Sur), SERGAS-UVIGO, 36208 Vigo, Spain
Interests: fitness; exercise training; physical activity and health; physical education; eccentric training; sprint performance; sport performance; sports injuries; injury preventions; injury mitigation; rehabilitation

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
1. Department of Special Didactics, Faculty of Education and Sport Sciences, University of Vigo, 36005 Pontevedra, Spain
2. Education, Physical Activity and Health Research Group (Gies-10-DE3), Galicia Sur Health Research Institute (IIS Galicia Sur), SERGAS-UVIGO, 36208 Vigo, Spain
Interests: exercise training; physical activity and health; anthropometry; sport performance; sports injuries; injury preventions; rehabilitation; telerehabilitation; cardiovascular disease prevention

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Special Didactics, Faculty of Education and Sport Sciences, University of Vigo, 36005 Pontevedra, Spain
Interests: physical education; exercise training; physical activity and health; sport performance; sports injuries; injury preventions; rehabilitation; body expression; gymnastics

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Strength and conditioning training has proven to be a basic strategy in exercise programs for athletes of all levels. These programs seek multiple objectives, centered around the improvement of sports performance, physical condition and injury prevention or rehabilitation. Thus, their development is of great interest in sports, clinical and health environments.

Currently, sport and health sciences use eccentric, isometric, plyometric, isoinertial, sprint performance, multidirectional sprint and other methods to obtain neuromuscular, physiological, biomechanical, mechanobiological and psychological adaptations for practitioners of different sports disciplines and activities.

The objective of this Special Issue is to publish applied studies that help to improve the understanding of effective and efficient strategies in the field of strength and conditioning training. We encourage authors to present research showing the acute or chronic effects that strength and conditioning training has on variables that influence performance, health, injury prevention or rehabilitation, quality of life or the improvement of the physical condition of the population—both athletes and practitioners of physical activities. Reviews of the scientific literature that contribute to improving the global understanding of the existing evidence in the field of strength and conditioning training in order to obtain general guidelines and recommendations that help coaches and athletes will also be appreciated.

Prof. Dr. Diego Alonso-Fernandez
Prof. Dr. Yaiza Taboada-Iglesias
Prof. Dr. Rosana Fernández-Rodríguez
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2500 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • strength
  • fitness
  • eccentric training
  • sprint performance
  • jump performance
  • power multidirectional speed
  • injury prevention
  • injury risk
  • injury risk profiling
  • physical activity
  • health

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Review

20 pages, 1972 KiB  
Review
Quo Vadis Nordic Hamstring Exercise-Related Research?—A Scoping Review Revealing the Need for Improved Methodology and Reporting
by Tobias Alt, Jannik Severin and Marcus Schmidt
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(18), 11225; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811225 - 7 Sep 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2912
Abstract
The objective of this scoping review is to assess Nordic Hamstring Exercise quality (ANHEQ) of assessments and interventions according to the ANHEQ rating scales and to present practical recommendations for the expedient design and reporting of future studies. A total of 71 Nordic [...] Read more.
The objective of this scoping review is to assess Nordic Hamstring Exercise quality (ANHEQ) of assessments and interventions according to the ANHEQ rating scales and to present practical recommendations for the expedient design and reporting of future studies. A total of 71 Nordic Hamstring Exercise (NHE) assessments and 83 NHE interventions were selected from the data sources PubMed, Scopus, and SPORTDiscus. Research studies which were presented in peer-reviewed academic journals and implemented the NHE during laboratory-based assessments or multi-week interventions met the eligibility criteria. NHE assessments analyzed force (51%), muscle activation (41%), knee angle kinematics (38%), and bilateral symmetry (37%). NHE interventions lasted 4–8 weeks (56%) and implied an exercise volume of two sessions per week (66%) with two sets per session (41%) and ≥8 repetitions per set (39%). The total ANHEQ scores of the included NHE assessments and interventions were 5.0 ± 2.0 and 2.0 ± 2.0 (median ± interquartile range), respectively. The largest deficits became apparent for consequences of impaired technique (87% 0-point-scores for assessments) and kneeling height (94% 0-point-scores for interventions). The 0-point-scores were generally higher for interventions compared to assessments for rigid fixation (87% vs. 34%), knee position (83% vs. 48%), kneeling height (94% vs. 63%), and separate familiarization (75% vs. 61%). The single ANHEQ criteria, which received the highest score most frequently, were rigid fixation (66% of assessments) and compliance (33% of interventions). The quality of NHE assessments and interventions was generally ‘below average’ or rather ‘poor’. Both NHE assessments and interventions suffered from imprecise reporting or lacking information regarding NHE execution modalities and subsequent analyses. Based on the findings, this scoping review aggregates practical guidelines how to improve the design and reporting of future NHE-related research. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop