How Biomaterials and Implants Influence the Healing after Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation

A special issue of Journal of Functional Biomaterials (ISSN 2079-4983). This special issue belongs to the section "Bone Biomaterials".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (20 October 2022) | Viewed by 3187

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Dentistry, Saint Camillus International University for Health Sciences (Unicamillus), Rome, Italy
Interests: bone regeneration; histology; biotechnology; dental implants; tissue engineering; bone substitute materials; stem cells
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Sinus floor elevation through a lateral access is a well-documented procedure used to increase bone volume in the posterior segments of the maxilla. Grafts of different nature have been used to fill the elevated space, resulting in optimal results. Nevertheless, several aspects have to be considered when grafts are used. The graft might be resorbed or degraded at various degrees or might be interpenetrated by bone or just surrounded by it. Graft resorption might be more marked with some grafts, resulting in a higher loss of volume and a corresponding lower percentage of graft residual. It has been shown that not resorbed graft granules contained within a composite bone might affect osseointegration of implants. Moreover, the sharpened edges of residual graft in the peripherical regions might induce sinus mucosa thinning and perforations. One of the most beautiful aspects of research is that when a topic seems sufficiently studied and that no news can be added, new discoveries arise that provide new research insights. I kindly ask you to submit to the present Special Issue your novel results in the field of sinus floor elevation.

Dr. Daniele Botticelli
Prof. Dr. Adriano Piattelli
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Functional Biomaterials is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2700 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • implant
  • sinus floor elevation
  • membrane
  • antrostomy
  • CBCT
  • biomaterial
  • sinus augmentation
  • xenograft

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

13 pages, 4091 KiB  
Article
ESEM-EDX Mineralization and Morphological Analysis of Human Retrieved Maxillary Sinus Bone Graft Biopsies before Loading
by Hideki Imai, Carlo Prati, Fausto Zamparini, Giovanna Iezzi, Daniele Botticelli, Maria Giovanna Gandolfi and Shunsuke Baba
J. Funct. Biomater. 2023, 14(7), 391; https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb14070391 - 24 Jul 2023
Viewed by 999
Abstract
This study aimed to analyze the morphology of bone graft granules, the presence of granule demineralization, and bone morphology in retrieved human maxillary sinus bone graft biopsies. Healthy patients underwent sinus bone augmentation using lateral access. Two different dimensions of the antrostomy were [...] Read more.
This study aimed to analyze the morphology of bone graft granules, the presence of granule demineralization, and bone morphology in retrieved human maxillary sinus bone graft biopsies. Healthy patients underwent sinus bone augmentation using lateral access. Two different dimensions of the antrostomy were performed, a 4 mm or 8 mm height. After 6 months, all sites received one implant using a flap technique, crestal positioning, and submerged healing. Implant biopsies were retrieved after 3 months and were histologically processed. The ESEM analysis was performed on the entire portion of the peri-implant bone (up to 750 µm from the implant thread). Three different regions of interest (ROIs) were selected: the coronal, middle, and apical portions of the implant. In these areas, EDX was performed, and calcium (Ca), phosphate (P), nitrogen (N), and their atomic ratios (Ca/P, Ca/N, and P/N) were calculated. Different bone tissue electron-dense areas were detected through grayscale intensity quantification of ESEM images with different organic (N) or inorganic (Ca,P) compositions. A total of 16 biopsies from 16 healthy patients were analyzed. Bone graft granules were mostly detected in the apical ROI. New bone tissue bridges were detected in the apical and middle ROI. These structures, with lower Ca/N and P/N ratios, were connected and enveloped the bone graft granules. Cortical ROI revealed the most mineralized bone tissue. Conclusions: After 9 months, bone graft resorption was only partially completed and new bone tissue appeared less mineralized in the middle and apical ROI than in the coronal ROI. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 2692 KiB  
Article
Evaluation of Bone Response to a Nano HA Implant Surface on Sinus Lifting Procedures: Study in Rabbits
by Sergio H. L. Martins, Uislen B. Cadore, Arthur B. Novaes, Jr., Michel R. Messora, Bruna Ghiraldini, Fabio J. B. Bezerra, Daniele Botticelli and Sergio L. S. de Souza
J. Funct. Biomater. 2022, 13(3), 122; https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb13030122 - 21 Aug 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1563
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the bone response to two different implant surfaces on sinus lift procedures in rabbits. Bilateral sinus lifting with inorganic bovine bone associated with collagen membrane and immediate implantation were performed in 16 rabbits. Custom mini-implants [...] Read more.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the bone response to two different implant surfaces on sinus lift procedures in rabbits. Bilateral sinus lifting with inorganic bovine bone associated with collagen membrane and immediate implantation were performed in 16 rabbits. Custom mini-implants were randomly installed in the prepared sites: one side received a double acid-etched (DAE) surface and the other a nano-hydroxyapatite (NHA) surface. The animals were euthanized 30 and 60 days after surgery, and biopsies were collected for microtomographic and histomorphometric analysis. After 30 days, no intra- and inter-group statistical differences were observed in microtomographic analysis, while at 60 days, bone analysis showed statistically significant differences between groups (p < 0.05) for all the evaluated parameters. Histomorphometric analysis showed, after 30 days, mean % of Bone-to-Implant Contact (BIC) for DAE and NHA of 31.70 ± 10.42% vs. 40.60 ± 10.22% (p > 0.05), respectively; for % of Bone Area Fraction Occupancy (BAFO), mean values were 45.43 ± 3.597% for DAE and 57.04 ± 5.537% for NHA (p < 0.05). After 60 days, mean %BIC and %BAFO for DAE and NHA implants were statistically significant (p < 0.05). The NHA surface showed superior biological features compared to the DAE treatment, promoting higher bone formation around the implants in an experimental model of bone repair in a grafted area. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop