J. Innov. 2026, 1(1), 2; https://doi.org/10.3390/joi1010002 - 21 Aug 2026
Abstract
►
Show Figures
This article examines how Michael Crichton’s novels can help us understand how organizations and societies make sense of innovation and technological complexity, uncertainty, and conflicting values when confronting grand challenges. It presents technofear and technosolutionism as contrasting but interconnected ways of interpreting technological
[...] Read more.
This article examines how Michael Crichton’s novels can help us understand how organizations and societies make sense of innovation and technological complexity, uncertainty, and conflicting values when confronting grand challenges. It presents technofear and technosolutionism as contrasting but interconnected ways of interpreting technological situations and justifying action. Based on a narrative analysis of The Andromeda Strain, The Terminal Man, Prey, and State of Fear, the study shows that these responses can coexist, alternate, and generate one another. Attempts to restore control can create new dependencies, reduce transparency, and blur responsibility, thereby generating technofear. Conversely, fear rarely leads to the abandonment of technology. Instead, it often encourages reliance on alternative experts and specific forms of knowledge. The article develops a dynamic framework for understanding this recursive relationship and presents fiction as a resource for innovation management, managerial reflection, foresight, and responsible innovation. Fiction is not treated as evidence of managerial behaviour or as validation of scientific claims. Rather, it provides material for examining how narratives construct and challenge claims about technological certainty, responsibility, control, and legitimacy.
Full article
Figure 1
