The Ethics of Abortion: New Arguments and New Insights to Old Arguments

A special issue of Philosophies (ISSN 2409-9287). This special issue belongs to the section "Virtues".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 September 2021) | Viewed by 11485

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Philosophy, Moravian College, Bethlehem, PA 18018, USA
Interests: ethics of abortion; applied ethics; metaethics

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Abortion is a contemporary moral issue that remains a topic of theoretical ethical inquiry with far-reaching and grave practical consequences for society and individuals, particularly women. It is also a central moral issue that transcends disciplinary boundaries, involving health sciences, biology, political science, sociology, religion, legal studies, cultural studies, and contemporary women’s issues. While the geopolitical space and context is clearly relevant to the legal status of abortion, some question whether the moral issue is also subject to such geopolitical constraints. Much has already been written on the ethics of abortion, and there is a wide range of pro-choice and pro-life arguments that exists in print. Nevertheless, there is still much room for growth and progress in our understanding of this complex and nuanced moral issue. In addition, the evolution of the legal status of abortion has been considerable since Roe v. Wade, and yet, given the new conservative make-up of the U.S. Supreme Court, its future has never been more perilous and uncertain. As a consequence, the moral issue of abortion continues to be a relevent and timely moral issue.

This Special Issue of Philosophies invites contributions from philosophers and ethicists who desire to continue the dialogue, discussion, and argumentation over the moral issue of abortion, focusing on new arguments and original insights into old arguments. Our goal is to introduce new lines of thought that contribute original arguments to the ethics of abortion or original insights and responses to some of the most influential and prominent literature on this topic, such as Judith Jarvis Thomson’s A Defense of Abortion (1971); Michael Tooley’s Abortion and Infanticide (1972); Mary Anne Warren’s On the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion (1973); R. M. Hare’s Abortion and the Golden Rule (1975); and Don Marquis’s Why Abortion is Immoral (1989), just to name a few. We are open to a wide array of topics in the ethics of abortion, including but not limited to the following: the metaphysical issue of personhood; the moral status of the fetus; pro-life and pro-choice arguments based on the potentiality of the fetus; feminist approaches to the abortion issue; abortion within the contexts of broader social, racial, and ethnic issues; a rights perspective to the abortion issue; killing and deprivation arguments on abortion; a virtue ethics approach to abortion; and personal identity arguments. Arguments that defend pro-choice and pro-life positions are welcome, as well as arguments that attempt to find a middle ground.

Prof. Dr. Bernie Cantens
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Philosophies is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • abortion
  • ethics of abortion
  • pro-life
  • pro-choice
  • potentiality of the fetus
  • deprivation argument
  • personhood
  • personal identity
  • feminism and abortion
  • moral status of the fetus
  • women’s rights

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

13 pages, 245 KiB  
Article
A Pro-Choice Response to New York’s Reproductive Health Act
by Bertha Alvarez Manninen
Philosophies 2021, 6(1), 15; https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies6010015 - 16 Feb 2021
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 7830
Abstract
On 22 January 2019, New York state passed the Reproductive Health Act (RHA), which specifies three circumstances under which a healthcare provider may perform an abortion in New York: (1) the patient is within twenty-four weeks of pregnancy, (2) the fetus is non-viable, [...] Read more.
On 22 January 2019, New York state passed the Reproductive Health Act (RHA), which specifies three circumstances under which a healthcare provider may perform an abortion in New York: (1) the patient is within twenty-four weeks of pregnancy, (2) the fetus is non-viable, or (3) the abortion is necessary to protect the patient’s life or health. The first one, that of abortion being accessible within the first twenty-four weeks of pregnancy, is not unique to New York, as many other states allow medical professionals to provide abortions during this time. The latter two have caused significant controversy because they detail certain circumstances in which abortions would be accessible after twenty-four weeks. This paper will focus on these latter two circumstances. I will first argue that any debate or discussion about (2) must go beyond the conventional debate about the ethics of abortion and incorporate, more appropriately, a discussion on euthanasia and the ethics of end-of-life care for nascent human life. In particular, it requires us to consider the morality of non-voluntary active euthanasia for non-viable fetuses, rather than just a discussion of the ethics of late term abortions. When it comes to (3), I will argue that assessing its moral permissibility actually raises some legitimate moral concerns, even from a reproductive rights perspective. On certain readings, it seems as if condition (3) would allow for the termination of a healthy fetus for reasons not related to the mother’s physical health or life. If this is the case, I argue, the right to an abortion would be construed as a right to fetal termination, rather than just fetal evacuation. However, I will argue that there are good reasons that pro-choice advocates should interpret the right to an abortion as a right to fetal evacuation instead of termination, and if this is the case, a woman should not be able to demand the death of a healthy fetus if ending the pregnancy safely via fetal evacuation would suffice. Full article
Back to TopTop