Religion and Child Development

A special issue of Religions (ISSN 2077-1444). This special issue belongs to the section "Religions and Health/Psychology/Social Sciences".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (10 July 2023) | Viewed by 6295

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
College of Human Sciences and Humanities, University of Houston-Clear Lake, Houston, TX 77058, USA
Interests: cognitive development in early childhood; development of social cognition; development of religious cognition; embodied cognition and development

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Educational Psychology, College of Education, University of North Texas, 1300 W. Highland St., Denton, TX 76201, USA
Interests: cognitive development in early and middle childhood; worldview development and socialization; socioemotional development

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Over the past two decades, the study of religion and child development has grown rapidly (Richert, Boyatzis, & King, 2017). Religion continues to play an extensive role in the lives of children across the globe. The study of children’s religious experiences can reveal a great deal about broader mechanisms concerning social learning, enculturation, and cognitive maturation, including the active role that children play in curating and applying the religious information they receive from others. Studying religious development with children can also reveal important trends in identity development, civic engagement, well-being, and decision-making in later life (Mahoney, 2021; Richert & Saide, 2020). However, as noted in many reviews of the literature on religion and child development (e.g., Bengston, 2017; King, & Boyatzis, 2015; Mahoney, 2021; Richert, & Granqvist, 2013; Roehlkepartain, 2013; Schweitzer, 2014; Strhan, Parker, & Ridgely, 2017), current research, theories, and methodologies are underdeveloped. The goal of this Special Issue is therefore to feature articles that address key theoretical and methodological issues in order to advance the study of religion and child development.

We welcome manuscripts that represent work from a range of disciplinary perspectives (e.g., sociology, psychology, religious studies) and highlight contributions that can be made to the larger study of religion and/or child development. Attention to the following areas is particularly encouraged:

  1. Children’s experiences of religion: Children are not passive recipients of religious socialization: they play an active role in making meaning of their religious experiences (Boyatzis, 2005; Richert & Granqvist, 2013). Children think about, reflect upon, and emotionally react to every aspect of religion. However, research rarely examines the experience of childhood religion from the child’s perspective.
  2. Incorporation of child development in theories and models of religion: Most theories of religion have been developed through a focus on religion as it exists among adults (Schweitzer, 2014; Strhan, Parker, & Ridgely, 2017). An assumption sometimes found in these theories is that children do not have the cognitive or emotional capacity for religious thought, and any religious expressions are just rote imitations of adults. However, young children do have rich religious lives, and empirical research is needed to adapt theories and models of religion to account for children’s experiences.
  3. Diverse backgrounds: The vast majority of empirical research on religion and child development focuses on children and families from Western and Christian backgrounds (Abo-Zena, & Midgette, 2019; Roehlkepartain, 2013) due to researcher convenience and familiarity (Henrich, Heine, & Norenzayan, 2010). Importantly, adults are increasingly choosing to refrain from religious tradition and religious practice (Smith, 2021), which necessitates an examination of how children of secular parents might also process the religious messages they receive. Excluding religiously diverse people harms ecological validity and construct validity. Empirical research with diverse samples is required for methodological and theoretical progress.
  4. Multidimensional measures: Religious experiences are complex and multidimensional (King & Boyatzis, 2015; Mahoney, 2021; McCaffree, 2017; Richert & Saide, 2020; Roehlkepartain, 2013). However, research studies often use single-item or single-dimension measures of religion, making a more nuanced application of their findings difficult. King and Boyatzis (2015, pp.1011) insightfully ask, "What dimensions of religion or spirituality are related to which outcomes in which populations?"
  5. Parenting and socialization: Parenting practices are strongly influenced by the parents' child-rearing goals and how parents conceive childhood. Importantly, parenting goals and concepts often differ between religious traditions, and even differ between individuals within religious traditions (Abo-Zena, & Midgette, 2019; Mahoney, 2021; Manning, 2013; Strhan, Parker, & Ridgely, 2017). Parents and other members of the immediate family serve as primary agents of socialization during early life (Bronfenbrenner & Morris, 2006); empirical research is needed to examine how differences in rearing between and within religions affect child development.

We request that, prior to submitting a manuscript, interested authors initially submit a proposed title and an abstract of 400–600 words summarizing their intended contribution. Please send it to the Guest Editors ([email protected]; [email protected]) or to the Religions editorial office ([email protected]). Abstracts will be reviewed by the Guest Editors for the purpose of ensuring proper fit within the scope of the Special Issue. Full manuscripts will undergo double-blind peer review.

References:

Abo-Zena, M. M., & Midgette, A. (2019). Developmental implications of children’s early religious and spiritual experiences in context: A sociocultural perspective. Religions, 10(11), 631.

Bengtson, V. L. (2017). Families and faith: How religion is passed down across generations. Oxford University Press.

Boyatzis, C. J. (2005). Religious and Spiritual Development in Childhood. In R. F. Paloutzian & C. L. Park (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (pp. 123–143). The Guilford Press.

Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2006). The ecology of developmental processes. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development (pp. 993– 1028). Wiley.

Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2-3), 61-83.

King, P. E., & Boyatzis, C. J. (2015). Religious and spiritual development. In M. E. Lamb & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science: Socioemotional processes (pp. 975–1021). John Wiley & Sons, Inc..

Mahoney, A. (2021). The science of children's religious and spiritual development (Elements in child development). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Manning, C. J. (2013). Unaffiliated parents and the religious training of their children. Sociology of Religion, 74(2), 149-175.

McCaffree, K. (2017). The secular landscape: The decline of religion in America. Palgrave Macmillan.

Richert, R. A., & Granqvist, P. (2013). Religious and spiritual development in childhood. In R. F. Paloutzian & C. L. Park (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (2nd ed.) (pp. 165-182). Guliford Press.

Richert, R. A., & Saide, A. R. (2020). Religious engagement. In S. Hupp & J. D. Jewell (Eds.), The encyclopedia of child and adolescent development, John Wiley & Sons.

Richert, R. A., Boyatzis, C. J., & King, P. E. (2017). Introduction to the British Journal of Developmental Psychology special issue on religion, culture, and development. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 35, 1–3.

Roehlkepartain, E. (2013). Children, religion, and spiritual development: Reframing a research agenda. In A. Ben-Arieh, G. S. Goodman, G. B. Melton, J. Cashmore, & N. K. Worley (Eds.), The sage handbook of child research (pp. 81-99). SAGE Publications.

Schweitzer, F. (2014). Religion in childhood and adolescence: How should it be studied? A critical review of problems and challenges in methodology and research. Journal of Empirical Theology, 27(1), 17-35.

Smith, G. A. (2021). About three-in-ten U.S. adults are now religiously unaffiliated. Retrieved June 5, 2022, from https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2021/12/14/about-three-in-ten-u-s-adults-are-now-religiously-unaffiliated/

Strhan, A., Parker, S.G., & Ridgely, S. (2017). Introduction. In A. Strhan, S. G. Parker, & S. Ridgely (Eds.), The Bloomsbury reader in religion and childhood (pp.1-14). Bloomsbury Publishing.

  • Abstract submission deadline: 11 October 2022
  • Notification of abstract acceptance: 31 October 2022
  • Full manuscript deadline: 20 March 2023

Dr. Nicholas Shaman
Dr. Anondah Saide
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Religions is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • child development
  • religious development
  • childhood
  • religiosity
  • parenting
  • socialization
  • cross-cultural
  • diverse samples
  • methodology
  • transmission
  • spirituality

Published Papers (5 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

15 pages, 902 KiB  
Article
Does God Comfort You When You Are Sad? Religious Diversity in Children’s Attribution of Positive and Negative Traits to God
by Hea Jung Lee, Ashley B. Marin, Jiayue Sun and Rebekah A. Richert
Religions 2023, 14(9), 1181; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14091181 - 15 Sep 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 766
Abstract
Children actively construct their understanding of God in early childhood, an understanding that incorporates affect-laden mental representations often referred to as God images. To explore religious variations in children’s association of positive and negative traits to God, 254 preschool-aged children from Protestant Christian, [...] Read more.
Children actively construct their understanding of God in early childhood, an understanding that incorporates affect-laden mental representations often referred to as God images. To explore religious variations in children’s association of positive and negative traits to God, 254 preschool-aged children from Protestant Christian, Catholic, Muslim, and Non-Affiliated religious backgrounds indicated their certainty that God scares them, punishes them, is angry at them, loves them, comforts them, and helps people. Parents indicated the frequency of children’s religious engagement. Older children were more certain than younger children that God did not scare or punish them and that God loved and comforted them, and helped people. Moreover, religious affiliation differences emerged in children’s attribution of both positively and negatively valenced properties to God, and more frequent religious engagement was related to a higher degree of certainty that God loves, comforts, helps, and becomes angry, but was unrelated to the certainty that God scares or punishes. The findings suggest that religious engagement plays an important role in children’s developing God image. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Religion and Child Development)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 514 KiB  
Article
Asking God for Help: Children’s Views on What to Pray for When
by Nicholas J. Shaman, Anondah R. Saide, Rebekah A. Richert and Alisha Conover
Religions 2023, 14(9), 1164; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14091164 - 12 Sep 2023
Viewed by 761
Abstract
By the end of early childhood, children indicate that prayer is more effective than wishes or magic to prevent an unwanted, negative outcome from occurring. However, research has not yet delineated whether children would ask God to resolve a problem by changing the [...] Read more.
By the end of early childhood, children indicate that prayer is more effective than wishes or magic to prevent an unwanted, negative outcome from occurring. However, research has not yet delineated whether children would ask God to resolve a problem by changing the internal state of the person facing the problem (e.g., changing someone’s desires or emotions) or changing the external state of the world (e.g., physical or biological change). The current study examined if children request God to act through psychological or physical mechanisms. The participants were 122 4-to-8-year-old children (M = 6.160, SD = 0.918; 63.0% female) who returned to be interviewed for the third wave of a six-wave longitudinal study. The sample was racially–ethnically and religiously diverse. Children heard stories about characters facing two different problems. The results revealed that the children demonstrated a preference for petitioning for physical solutions, rather than biological, psychological, or emotion regulation solutions. The preferences did not vary by religious affiliation, religious exposure, or age. However, children with a more sophisticated social cognition ranked petitioning for physical changes higher. These findings suggest that children’s understanding of prayer (in this case, the most efficient ways for God to answer prayers) involves their coordination of developing folk theories about the world. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Religion and Child Development)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1029 KiB  
Article
Children’s and Adults’ Perceptions of Religious and Secular Interventions for Incarcerated Individuals in the United States
by Aaron Cohen, James P. Dunlea and Larisa Heiphetz Solomon
Religions 2023, 14(7), 821; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14070821 - 22 Jun 2023
Viewed by 1256
Abstract
Religious involvement is prevalent in prisons, a context where questions of moral redemption are particularly salient. We probed the developmental origins of adults’ perceptions that religion might lead to redemption following transgressions. Six- to eight-year-olds (n = 50 United States residents) and [...] Read more.
Religious involvement is prevalent in prisons, a context where questions of moral redemption are particularly salient. We probed the developmental origins of adults’ perceptions that religion might lead to redemption following transgressions. Six- to eight-year-olds (n = 50 United States residents) and adults (n = 53 United States residents) learned about incarcerated characters who had taken religion classes, art classes, or life classes (about right and wrong) while imprisoned. They then rated their agreement with statements assessing attitudes toward the incarcerated individuals, the effectiveness of each character’s time in prison, and their likelihood of recidivism. Children were more likely than adults to report that classes, in general, would effectively rehabilitate incarcerated individuals. However, participants of all ages reported more positive attitudes toward people who took religion classes and life classes rather than art classes. Further, participants of all ages reported that people who took art classes, versus religion or life classes, would be more likely to continue transgressing. These findings highlight the important role that religious and secular learning plays in perceptions of redemption across development. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Religion and Child Development)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 6865 KiB  
Article
The Role of Ritual in Children’s Acquisition of Supernatural Beliefs
by Anna Mathiassen and Mark Nielsen
Religions 2023, 14(6), 797; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14060797 - 15 Jun 2023
Viewed by 1195
Abstract
This study investigated how observing the ritualisation of objects can influence children’s encoding and defence of supernatural beliefs. Specifically, we investigated if ritualising objects leads children to believe those objects might be magical, buffering against favouring contrary evidence. Seventy-nine children, aged between 3 [...] Read more.
This study investigated how observing the ritualisation of objects can influence children’s encoding and defence of supernatural beliefs. Specifically, we investigated if ritualising objects leads children to believe those objects might be magical, buffering against favouring contrary evidence. Seventy-nine children, aged between 3 and 6 years, were presented with two identical objects (e.g., two colour-changing stress balls) and tasked with identifying which was magical after being informed that one had special properties (e.g., could make wishes come true). In a Ritual condition, an adult acted on one of the objects using causally irrelevant actions and on the other using functional actions. In an Instrumental condition, both objects were acted on with functional actions. The children were given a normative rule relating to the use of the objects and an opportunity to imitate the actions performed on them. A second adult then challenged their magical belief. Ritualistic actions increased the likelihood of children attributing magical powers to the associated object but did not affect resistance to change or adherence to normative rules. However, children who engaged in ritual actions protested more when the magical belief was challenged. Our findings suggest that rituals can play an important role in shaping children’s perception and defence of supernatural beliefs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Religion and Child Development)
18 pages, 1021 KiB  
Article
How Children Co-Construct a Religious Abstract Concept with Their Caregivers: Theological Models in Dialogue with Linguistic Semantics
by Franziska E. Viertel and Oliver Reis
Religions 2023, 14(6), 728; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14060728 - 31 May 2023
Viewed by 1041
Abstract
In acquiring a meaningful and rich religious language, children need to build up semantic knowledge about religious words. Most religious concepts do not refer directly to visible entities. Instead, their meanings are often abstract and emerge from the social observation of the world. [...] Read more.
In acquiring a meaningful and rich religious language, children need to build up semantic knowledge about religious words. Most religious concepts do not refer directly to visible entities. Instead, their meanings are often abstract and emerge from the social observation of the world. In our pilot study, we investigate the acquisition of the religious word merciful in 7–8-year-olds during dialogic reading of a biblical story. Merciful is a prototypical religious concept and therefore a fruitful subject for research on the acquisition of religious concepts. First, following the perspective of religious education, we present theological models that identify relevant semantic aspects that constitute mercy. Two of these models relate to interpersonal behavior, which is most common in contemporary understanding. In a second step, we analyze which theological models of mercy are evoked in dialogic reading between caregivers and their children and how they are expressed linguistically. In a third step, we designed a picture story test that allowed us to investigate how children apply their knowledge to novel (secular) contexts and which theological models are evident in children’s problem solving. Our results show that two different theological models of mercy prevail during dialogic reading: the model of forgiveness and the model of compassion. Although the model of forgiveness is central in our settings, the language data show that the model of compassion is also present in the caregiver’s and children’s language. During dialogic reading, the frequency of the semantic aspects of the model of forgiveness expressed between child and caregiver is significantly related. In the picture story test, children are more likely to select semantic aspects of the model of forgiveness in religious contexts than in secular contexts. Interestingly, in secular contexts, children chose semantic neighbors more often, indicating a more diffuse understanding of merciful. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Religion and Child Development)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop