Building Religious Solidarity in the Wake of the Increased Global Migration

A special issue of Religions (ISSN 2077-1444). This special issue belongs to the section "Religions and Health/Psychology/Social Sciences".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (15 December 2023) | Viewed by 3373

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Associate Professor, Department of Sociology, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
Interests: sociology of religion

E-Mail Website
Co-Guest Editor
Department of Sociology, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
Interests: sociology of religion; pentecostalism & charismatic Christianity studies; embodied religion

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The current and future social instability associated with the possible consequences of climate catastrophe and environmental disasters require an urgent reconsideration of our mechanisms of social solidarity. Data on global migration, including projected climate migration, i.e., migration caused by global climate change, delineate shifting demographic changes. Famine, drought, earthquakes, armed conflicts, as well as the decline in democratic standards of basic human rights, will inevitably lead to ever-increasing numbers of global migrants. This will inescapably cause social confrontations—including those on the basis of religious preferences—which could lead to the rise of radicalism, racism, Islamophobia, xenophobia, right-wing extremism, etc.

Sheer numerical scale aside, one of the main qualitative consequences of these demographic shifts is an increased plurality of local and global religious fields. This plurality underscores the need for academic (as well as public) discussion on how to enable and manage religious solidarity in these increasingly precarious conditions of religious pluralism.

Once renowned as a firm supporter of the secularisation thesis, sociologist Peter Berger later formulated a theory of religious pluralism. According to Berger, the latter—not religious decline—is the most important consequence of modernity vis-à-vis religions. Following Berger, we can broadly point out the double pluralism of contemporary societies: the coexistence of religions and the coexistence of religious and secular discourses and practices. We believe academic discussions of religious solidarity should take this double pluralism as a starting point. On the one hand, the goal is to flesh out specific religious conceptualizations of interreligious solidarity; on the other, it is vital to recognize the state as the fundamental guarantor of peaceful and creative religious coexistence. There are two main questions to be answered: firstly, how do specific religious actors—institutions—understand and practice religious solidarity?; and secondly, how does the state take on an active role in assuring interreligious solidarity while acting in accordance with basic stipulations of secularity and/or laicism?

Religions are not ahistorical social entities. For example, Christians migrating to the Global North are not simply “Christian”. The Christianity of the Global South, predominantly of the Charismatic variety, may in some aspects be fundamentally different from the Christianity of the Global North. Thus, the question is not simply about building interreligious solidarity, between Muslim and Christians for example, but intrareligious solidarity as well. How do religious actors reconcile basic doctrinal and practical differences within their own ranks? Furthermore, how does the state ensure that the public and the state itself are sufficiently informed on such differences? In other words, the social management of religious solidarity entails both intra- and interreligious solidarity, as well as well the solidarity between secular and religious actors.

These are just some of the challenges humanity faces in building present and future religious solidarity. Plentiful challenges call for plentiful discussions, which is why we welcome diverse and original scientific contributions to this Special Issue.

We request that, prior to submitting a manuscript, interested authors initially submit a proposed title and an abstract of 400–600 words summarizing their intended contribution. Please send it to the guest editors ([email protected] ) or to the Religions editorial office ([email protected]). Abstracts will be reviewed by the guest editors for the purposes of ensuring a proper fit within the scope of the Special Issue. Full manuscripts will undergo double-blind peer-review.

Dr. Anja Zalta
Mr. Igor Jurekovič
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Religions is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • religious solidarity
  • secularism
  • laicism
  • post-secularism
  • religious plurality
  • state
  • religions
  • migration
  • climate change
  • Christian solidarity
  • Muslim solidarity
  • Buddhist solidarity
  • Hindu solidarity
  • Global North
  • Global South
  • new religious movement solidarity
  • interreligious and intrareligious solidarity

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

23 pages, 975 KiB  
Article
Islamophobia beyond Explicit Hate Speech: Analyzing the Coverage of Muslims in Slovenia’s Public Broadcasting
by Igor Jurekovič
Religions 2024, 15(6), 697; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15060697 - 4 Jun 2024
Viewed by 360
Abstract
Religion in Europe has been undergoing two fundamental changes in the past four decades. As a side effect of secularization, religious fields have been pluralizing. On the other hand, religions themselves have taken a qualitative shift towards lived, material characteristics. Focusing exclusively on [...] Read more.
Religion in Europe has been undergoing two fundamental changes in the past four decades. As a side effect of secularization, religious fields have been pluralizing. On the other hand, religions themselves have taken a qualitative shift towards lived, material characteristics. Focusing exclusively on the diversification of European religious fields, we are interested in the concept of religious literacy as a tool for competent engagement in contemporary religious plural societies. To better understand the role of public media in fostering religious literacy, we offer an analysis of the public broadcaster’s coverage of smaller religious communities in Slovenia. Focusing particularly on Muslims as the largest religious minority in Slovenia, we provide an analysis of 245 episodes, consisting of 540 items, in the 2015–2020 period. We show that the coverage given to smaller religious communities is unevenly spread amongst the communities, with disproportional airtime given to Christian churches and communities. Furthermore, we pinpoint the key qualitative difference in portrayals of Slovenian Muslims and non-Catholic Christians, explaining how the process of racialized Islamophobia may continue beyond explicit hate speech. In conclusion we set out limitations of our study and provide guidelines for future research. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 285 KiB  
Article
The Catholic Church and Refugees in Slovenia
by Srečo Dragoš
Religions 2024, 15(4), 387; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15040387 - 22 Mar 2024
Viewed by 881
Abstract
In Slovenia, the Roman Catholic Church (RCC) is the largest, most influential, richest, and most politically significant among all religious organisations. In estimating its contribution related to migration and the refugee situation it is necessary to consider the wider context of Slovenian society, [...] Read more.
In Slovenia, the Roman Catholic Church (RCC) is the largest, most influential, richest, and most politically significant among all religious organisations. In estimating its contribution related to migration and the refugee situation it is necessary to consider the wider context of Slovenian society, primarily four characteristics: (1) despite the principle of separation of state and religious spheres, it is in relation to the Roman Catholic Church that the bulk of unresolved issues and occasional exacerbations occur; (2) while Slovenian public opinion is rather volatile in its expression of social distance to foreigners, it does not represent the main problem; (3) Slovenia’s state politics are very closed to refugees; and (4) political parties from the right wing of the political spectrum are rather xenophobic. While the Catholic Caritas plays a positive role in the care of refugees, the RCC has always supported the right-wing political parties when they come to power, and it is also susceptible to Islamophobia. Full article
14 pages, 262 KiB  
Article
Faith in Humanity: Religious Charitable Organizations Solidarity towards Migrants in the United Arab Emirates
by Wafa Barhoumi Hamdi, Semiyu Adejare Aderibigbe, Mesut Idriz and Mouza Mohamed Alghfeli
Religions 2024, 15(3), 266; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15030266 - 22 Feb 2024
Viewed by 1492
Abstract
The plight of migrants and the need to foster their integration into diverse societies are of concern to global communities, governments, and charitable organizations. This study explored the roles of philanthropic organizations in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) in demonstrating solidarity towards migrants, [...] Read more.
The plight of migrants and the need to foster their integration into diverse societies are of concern to global communities, governments, and charitable organizations. This study explored the roles of philanthropic organizations in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) in demonstrating solidarity towards migrants, exploring the multifaceted dimensions of compassion and support rooted in diverse religious principles. The study adopted a qualitative approach guided by the interpretivist paradigm when collecting and analyzing data. From its findings, the study highlights the integral role they play in addressing the complex needs of migrant communities. For instance, they provide food and financial support in clearing hospitals, tuition, and rent bills. In addition, the findings show that the organizations identify migrants in need through their open-door policy, encouraging those in need of support to contact them directly, with collaboration also being essential for the effectiveness of their services. By affirming the positive contributions of religious charities, this study underscores their role in promoting the well-being and social cohesion of migrants, ultimately exemplifying a shared commitment to humanitarian values and reinstating faith in the collective capacity for compassion and solidarity. Full article
Back to TopTop