Gender, Dress and Religion: Contexts and Configurations

A special issue of Religions (ISSN 2077-1444).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (1 April 2020) | Viewed by 24923

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Religion Department, Dickinson College, 28 N College St, Carlisle, PA 17013, USA
Interests: gender and religiosity; Islamic (modest) fashion; plain dress; non-fashion; church–state relations

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Religious dress visibly signifies difference. This call for papers invites scholars to investigate the practical, symbolic, and gendered meanings attached to religious clothing. How are intangible values such as modesty, piety, propriety, comfort vs. confinement, purity, ostentation vs. simplicity, decorum, respectability, decency, and responsibility portrayed through religious clothing prescriptions and prohibitions? How do these reflect on gender in particular religious traditions?

Submissions may address changes in religious dress over time and place, according to political or social changes, including prevailing views of morality—the latter a measure most often applied to women’s dress. Taking dress seriously in religious studies makes visible the interplay between group norms and individuality, highlighting gender distinctions. Papers are invited which illustrate the sartorial properties associated with socially constructed categories of masculinity and femininity.

How one clothes the body may offer sartorial clues to religious devotion and one’s place in a spiritual community, and/or how the wearer balances faith, modernity vs. tradition, and “modest fashion”—a distinction used by Mormon, Mennonite, and Muslim women. Theoretical comparative models as well as individual case studies are welcome.

Religious dress may illustrate negotiated understandings between the interior and exterior. How do clothes affect the wearer, constituting particular experiences of self and gender roles? To what extent is dress used to interpret levels of spirituality by members or outsiders because they dress distinctively?

Finally, if we accept a relationship between clothing and religiosity, and if traditional gender roles are part of a group’s religious understandings, to what degree does clothing reflect such changes or to what degree does it help create changes in gender roles? To what extent can you read dress without considering the motives of the wearer, whose dress manifestations are seldom clear-cut? Is the intended message the one that is received, given that meaning-making, in regard to dress, is subject to imitation, artifice, appropriation, and performance?

Contributions addressing these questions and themes are welcome.

Dr. Beth E. Graybill
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Religions is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • religiosity
  • attire
  • apparel
  • “plain dress”
  • gender roles
  • sartorialism
  • modest fashion
  • veiling
  • hijab
  • anti-fashion

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

34 pages, 4136 KiB  
Article
The Burka Ban: Islamic Dress, Freedom and Choice in The Netherlands in Light of the 2019 Burka Ban Law
by Bat-sheva Hass
Religions 2020, 11(2), 93; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel11020093 - 18 Feb 2020
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 24041
Abstract
This article, part of an evolving and large project, examines the relationship between clothing, freedom and choice, and specifically Islamic dress in shaping the identity of Dutch Muslim women after the Burka Ban that was voted into law on 1 August 2019 in [...] Read more.
This article, part of an evolving and large project, examines the relationship between clothing, freedom and choice, and specifically Islamic dress in shaping the identity of Dutch Muslim women after the Burka Ban that was voted into law on 1 August 2019 in the Netherlands. It discusses the debates before and after this date, as well as the background to the ban. A veil covering the face is a garment worn by some Muslim women to adhere to an interpretation of hijab (modest dress). It can be referred to as a burqa or niqab. In the aftermath of the Burka Ban that prompted considerable public alarm on the part of Muslim men and women, niqab-wearing women, as well as women who do not wear a veil, but are in solidarity with their niqabi sisters, raised a number of questions that form the basis for the analysis presented here: how do Dutch Muslim women shape their identity in a way that it is both Dutch and Muslim? Do they incorporate Dutch parameters into their Muslim identity, while at the same time weaving Islamic principles into their Dutch sense of self? The findings show how Islamic clothing can be mobilized by Dutch Muslim women to serve identity formation and personal (religious) choice in the Netherlands, where Islam is largely considered by the non-Muslim population to be a religion that is oppressive and discriminatory towards women. It is argued that in the context of being Dutch and Muslim, these women express their freedom of choice through clothing, thus pushing the limits of the archetypal Dutch identity and criticizing Dutch society while simultaneously stretching the meaning of Islam to craft their own identity. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gender, Dress and Religion: Contexts and Configurations)
Show Figures

Figure A1

Back to TopTop