Religion, Ritual, and Political Leader Cults

A special issue of Religions (ISSN 2077-1444). This special issue belongs to the section "Religions and Health/Psychology/Social Sciences".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 May 2022) | Viewed by 10512

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Political Science and International Relations Programme, School of History, Philosophy, Political Science and International Relations, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington 6040, New Zealand
Interests: non-democratic politics; political leader cults

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

This Special Issue of Religions on Religion, Ritual, and Political Leader Cults addresses the question of the relationship between religious phenomena and political leader cults. To what extent are religious concepts like “cult” or “ritual” useful in describing and understanding phenomena ranging from the Stalin cult in the 1930s to the veneration of Mao’s mangoes during the cultural revolution to the mass rallies at Hugo Chávez’ funeral in 2013? (Plamper, Jan. The Stalin Cult: A Study in the Alchemy of Power. Stanford and New Haven: Hoover Institution and Yale University Press, 2012; Leese, Daniel. Mao Cult: Rhetoric and Ritual in China's Cultural Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011; Chau, Adam Yuet. "Mao’s Travelling Mangoes: Food as Relic in Revolutionary China." Past & Present 206, no. suppl 5 (January 1, 2010 2010): 256-75; Márquez, Xavier. "Two Models of Political Leader Cults: Propaganda and Ritual." Politics, Religion & Ideology 19, no. 3 (2018): 265-84). Are there useful conceptual boundaries between popular admiration, mass veneration, and religious ritual? Is the construction of charismatic authority through political leader cults comparable to the construction of charisma in religious settings? How should we characterize the continuum of practices found in leader cults vis-à-vis similar practices in religious phenomena? Are there parallel processes of semantic inflation in political and religious cults?

Existing literature on political leader cults has tended to focus on their legitimating functions (e.g., Strong, Carol, and Matt Killingsworth. "Stalin the Charismatic Leader?: Explaining the ‘Cult of Personality’ as a Legitimation Technique." Politics, Religion & Ideology 12, no. 4 (2011/12/01 2011): 391-411; Luqiu, Luwei Rose. "The Reappearance of the Cult of Personality in China." East Asia 33, no. 4 (2016): 289-307) or on the production and interpretation of cult artifacts, from paintings to hagiography to posters (Plamper 2012; Apor, Balázs, Jan C Behrends, Polly Jones, and EA Rees, eds. The Leader Cult in Communist Dictatorships. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004). This issue focuses on the practices that might justify understanding certain political phenomena as cults of the leader, ranging from large-scale mass rallies to informal rituals to intimate ceremonies focused on the leader (Marquez 2018).

Some work exists that focuses on cult practices and counter-practices, much of it in the countries of the Soviet world and in China (e.g., Tikhomirov, Alexey. "Symbols of Power in Rituals of Violence: The Personality Cult and Iconoclasm on the Soviet Empire's Periphery (East Germany, 1945-61)." Kritika 13 (2012): 47-88; Tumarkin, Nina. Lenin Lives! The Lenin Cult in Soviet Russia. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1983). This issue aims both to re-focus scholarly attention on cult practices (including rituals and other forms of “cult communication”) and cult reception (including counter-rituals) rather than cult artifacts or top-down cult production, as well as to broaden the geographical focus of the study of leader cults. We thus welcome both theoretical studies and case studies of leader cults from a wide variety of regions, on topics including the emergence of practices of “leader worship”; the boundaries between cult and non-cult phenomena, and the usefulness of religious concepts to understand practices of leader worship; the distinction between practices of worship or charismatic construction from other forms of political followership and admiration; political leader cult reception and “cult communication” at the grassroots level; and any other topic reflecting on the use of religious concepts in the study of leader cults.

Dr. Xavier Marquez
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Religions is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • political leader cults
  • charisma
  • charismatic authority
  • ritual
  • communication

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

24 pages, 4042 KiB  
Article
Belief and Belonging: Ritual Ramifications of the Failed Assassination Attempts on Emperor Alexander II of Russia
by Darin Stephanov
Religions 2022, 13(10), 907; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13100907 - 28 Sep 2022
Viewed by 1928
Abstract
This article opens up a new scholarly subfield (royal-assassination-attempt commemoration) within the long-neglected field of annual (especially, provincial) ruler festivities in the nineteenth-century Russian Empire. It does so by subjecting an array of untapped, geographically dispersed sources to a systematic, highly theoretically underwritten [...] Read more.
This article opens up a new scholarly subfield (royal-assassination-attempt commemoration) within the long-neglected field of annual (especially, provincial) ruler festivities in the nineteenth-century Russian Empire. It does so by subjecting an array of untapped, geographically dispersed sources to a systematic, highly theoretically underwritten analysis. As a result, the article generates many insights into the principles and pathways of pious thought and action of Russian imperial subjects from all walks of life vis-à-vis their monarch. In the process, it provides a methodological template for future studies of the intersections between belief and belonging going into the modern age, not only in Russia, but across the world. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Religion, Ritual, and Political Leader Cults)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 615 KiB  
Article
Personality Cults from a Communicative Standpoint
by Kirill Postoutenko
Religions 2022, 13(7), 627; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13070627 - 6 Jul 2022
Viewed by 2109
Abstract
Drawing upon a wide variety of personality cults in religion, culture and politics from Ancient Egypt to our times, the author attempts to present a summary view of this phenomenon from a communicative standpoint. Personality cult is seen as an attribution of universal [...] Read more.
Drawing upon a wide variety of personality cults in religion, culture and politics from Ancient Egypt to our times, the author attempts to present a summary view of this phenomenon from a communicative standpoint. Personality cult is seen as an attribution of universal and eternal socio-cultural significance to certain beings, messages and interaction scenarios in defiance of changes in and diversity of the surrounding reality. The communicative implementation of such a cult involves the suspension of some of the most basic mechanisms of social coordination. Thus, deification of political, cultural or religious leaders eliminates the subordination of individuals to their social roles, whereas canonization severs the ties of certain selected texts with the contexts of their production and reception. Last, but not least, random signaling between the subject of cultic adoration and his or her subordinates runs counter the standard cooperation rules in interaction (‘turn-taking’). Illustrating these points, the article points out at specific communicative pathologies accompanying personality cults and jeopardizing the stability of their socio-cultural environments. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Religion, Ritual, and Political Leader Cults)
9 pages, 211 KiB  
Article
The Stalin Cult as Political Religion
by Graeme Gill
Religions 2021, 12(12), 1112; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12121112 - 17 Dec 2021
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 4952
Abstract
Political religion is a concept that gained prominence around the middle of the twentieth century, being associated for many with the idea of a totalitarian regime. Political religion was seen as a secular ideology whose followers took it up with the enthusiasm and [...] Read more.
Political religion is a concept that gained prominence around the middle of the twentieth century, being associated for many with the idea of a totalitarian regime. Political religion was seen as a secular ideology whose followers took it up with the enthusiasm and commitment normally associated with adherence to religion. Comprising liturgy, ritual and the sacralization of politics, it created a community of believers, and usually had a transcendental leadership and a millennial vision of a promised future. This paper will explore the utility of this concept for understanding leader cults in authoritarian regimes. Such cults have been prominent features of authoritarian regimes but there is little agreement at the conceptual level about how they should be understood. One of the most powerful of such cults was that of Joseph Stalin in the Soviet Union from 1929 to 1953. This paper analyses this cult in terms of liturgy and ritual and concludes that despite some aspects that are common between the cult and religion, most ritualistic aspects of religion find no direct counterpart in the cult. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Religion, Ritual, and Political Leader Cults)
Back to TopTop