Critical Thinking, Gender, and Education

A special issue of Societies (ISSN 2075-4698).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 December 2023) | Viewed by 5274

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Pedagogy and Didactics, University of Santiago de Compostela, 15705 Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain
Interests: family pedagogy and education; female delinquency and pedagogical intervention; gender and socio-educational capital

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Pedagogy and Didactics, University of Santiago de Compostela, 15705 Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain
Interests: homework; inclusive education; diversity and education from a gender perspective
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Pedagogy and Didactics, University of Santiago de Compostela, 15705 Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain
Interests: gender; education; prevention of multiple forms of violence against women (online and offline)

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The social and political recognition of gender equality and the momentum of feminist movements have generated profound changes in society in recent decades. Since the first wave of the movement, feminist activism has contributed to the recognition of women as independent and autonomous subjects of rights. The commitment to gender equality is part of the agenda of international organizations and, in particular, is the fifth Sustainable Development Goal of the 2030 Agenda. However, despite legislative progress and the efforts of a number of public authorities, effective equality is not yet a reality.

In order to investigate the multiple forms of discrimination and violence that are part of the "continuum" of the lives of too many women, the scientific community has paid great attention to studying problems arising from gender inequality. Today, we know how gender stereotypes and sexism fuel a process of dehumanization that contributes to depriving women of dignity and rights. This situation particularly affects invisible women, such as women in prison, migrant women, or victims of trafficking and sexual exploitation. In this regard, for this Special Issue, all works that explore gender issues from different perspectives are considered relevant, visibilizing women who tend to be hidden socially and academically.      

This monograph cannot ignore the power of education as a lever for real social change. Studies with a co-educational optic and that provide relevant information in the study of the feminist perspective in education come under the thematic line of the monograph, especially research that represents a breakthrough for education in gender equality, investigating all situations of benevolent gender discrimination that continue to place women in a position of manifest inequality.

In this way, this monograph is proposed, anchored in an intersectional paradigm, on gender and education in which different collective and age groups have a place. Empirical, qualitative, quantitative, or mixed studies; theoretical works of reflection and conceptual progress; or evaluation of intervention projects will be accepted. Topics of interest include:

  • Gender and education.
  • Feminist pedagogy.
  • Differential socialization, sexism, and gender stereotypes.
  • Gender and multiple violence.
  • Women in situations of vulnerability, the deprivation of liberty (critical and feminist criminology), sexual exploitation, or victims of trafficking.
  • Education and social change within the framework of gender equality education.

Prof. Dr. María del Mar Lorenzo Moledo
Prof. Dr. Bibiana Regueiro
Prof. Dr. Patricia Alonso Ruido
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as conceptual papers are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Societies is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • gender
  • education
  • sexism
  • gender stereotypes
  • female prisoners
  • victims of trafficking or sexual exploitation
  • gender violence

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

13 pages, 988 KiB  
Article
Toward Gender Understanding: Examining Ambivalent Sexism among University Students and Its Impact on Faculty Evaluation
by Amaia Yurrebaso Macho, Raquel Guzmán-Ordaz, Eva Picado-Valverde and Álvaro Jáñez González
Societies 2024, 14(4), 48; https://doi.org/10.3390/soc14040048 - 08 Apr 2024
Viewed by 499
Abstract
This study examines gender differences in levels of sexism among university students and evaluates variations in assessing sexist attitudes toward professors. The aim is to analyze potential disparities between men and women regarding ambivalent sexism (both hostile and benevolent) and to determine if [...] Read more.
This study examines gender differences in levels of sexism among university students and evaluates variations in assessing sexist attitudes toward professors. The aim is to analyze potential disparities between men and women regarding ambivalent sexism (both hostile and benevolent) and to determine if these differences influence the evaluation of specific behaviors by teaching faculty. Additionally, the present study seeks to validate the variability hypothesis, asserting that men are over-represented in the extremes of distributions compared to women concerning analyzed sexist attitudes. Eighty university students participated voluntarily and anonymously, completing three questionnaires on ambivalent sexism, neosexism, and the assessment of sexist behaviors by their instructors. Consistent with prior research, the results reveal higher levels of sexism among men in this context. Despite these differences, both men and women align in evaluating specific behaviors in teaching faculty, irrespective of their individual levels of sexism. Finally, the data presented support the variability hypothesis, indicating greater variability in sexist attitudes among men than women. These findings suggest that general attitudes assessed in most questionnaires might not be representative of the behaviors and attitudes that people display in real specific situations. This could change how future research and interventions approach these issues. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Critical Thinking, Gender, and Education)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 788 KiB  
Article
Gender Discrimination in Prison: The Perception of Women Inmates and Prison Professionals
by Anaïs Quiroga-Carrillo, María José Ferraces Otero and Mar Lorenzo Moledo
Societies 2024, 14(1), 5; https://doi.org/10.3390/soc14010005 - 05 Jan 2024
Viewed by 1950
Abstract
The prejudices that have traditionally been held against female delinquency and the numerical minority of women in the prison system have led to the invisibility of their needs and characteristics as well as to many situations of inequality while they are incarcerated. This [...] Read more.
The prejudices that have traditionally been held against female delinquency and the numerical minority of women in the prison system have led to the invisibility of their needs and characteristics as well as to many situations of inequality while they are incarcerated. This study is aimed at exploring the gender discrimination perceived by women in Spanish prisons. To this end, a scale for perception of gender discrimination is applied to a sample of incarcerated women. Qualitative data from a questionnaire administered to prison professionals and field notes are also used. The results show that incarcerated women perceive the existence of several situations of discrimination related to socio-educational intervention and to the adaptation of prisons to their unique needs, especially for those housed in male prisons. Prison professionals hold similar views and express their concern about the feminization of activities. The study has implications for the prison system and policy makers, including the implementation of gender-responsive programming in women’s prisons, the development of periodic assessments of the experiences faced by incarcerated women, and the training of prison staff. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Critical Thinking, Gender, and Education)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1210 KiB  
Article
Critical Thinking and Student Well-Being: An Approach in University Students
by José Carlos Vázquez-Parra, Paloma Suárez-Brito, Patricia Esther Alonso-Galicia and Arantza Echaniz-Barrondo
Societies 2023, 13(11), 232; https://doi.org/10.3390/soc13110232 - 31 Oct 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1975
Abstract
Human well-being is a dynamic and changing concept as it depends on personal, social, cultural, and political factors and varies over time according to individual circumstances. Therefore, it is essential to address this issue from a comprehensive and multidisciplinary approach, seeking that individuals, [...] Read more.
Human well-being is a dynamic and changing concept as it depends on personal, social, cultural, and political factors and varies over time according to individual circumstances. Therefore, it is essential to address this issue from a comprehensive and multidisciplinary approach, seeking that individuals, from an early age, manage to develop skills and attitudes that allow them to achieve a balance in their lives. This article presents the results of the measurement of students’ perceived achievement of the competence of complex thinking in a subject focused on human development. Specifically, the research sought to identify whether there is a relationship between the level of critical thinking and the acquisition of skills associated with human well-being. The selection of critical thinking is based on the fact that this cognitive ability is one of the subcompetencies included in complex thinking. The sample was a group of university students from different disciplines and educational levels. Methodologically, descriptive analyses were made on the means of students’ responses to a validated instrument measuring the perceived achievement of complex thinking competency and its subcompetencies and the final evaluations of the students’ course. In conclusion, an improvement in the perception of achievement of complex thinking competency and its subcompetencies is demonstrated in the students, with critical thinking that achieved the best means, its increase being significant for the whole group and for women but not for men. In this sense, although it was not possible to demonstrate a statistically significant relationship between the development of this subcompetency and the acquisition of tools associated with well-being, data showing a possible association between these elements were obtained. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Critical Thinking, Gender, and Education)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop