Next Article in Journal
Individualized Management of Coagulopathy in Patients with End-Stage Liver Disease
Previous Article in Journal
Preliminary Stages for COVID-19 Detection Using Image Processing
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Diagnostics
Volume 12
Issue 12
10.3390/diagnostics12123170
diagnostics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Breath Tests Used in the Context of Bariatric Surgery

by
Daniel Karas
1,
Marek Bužga
2,3,4,*,
David Stejskal
1,4,
Petr Kocna
5,
Pavol Holéczy
6,7,
Adéla Novotná
8 and
Zdeněk Švagera
1,4
1
Institute of Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Syllabova 19, 703 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic
2
Department of Human Movement Studies, Faculty of Education, University of Ostrava, Fráni Šrámka 3, 709 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic
3
Department of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Syllabova 19, 703 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic
4
Institute of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital Ostrava, 17. Listopadu 1790/5, 708 52 Ostrava, Czech Republic
5
Institute of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Kateřinská 1660/32, 121 08 Prague, Czech Republic
6
Department of Surgery, Vítkovice Hospital, Zalužanského 1192/15, 703 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic
7
Department of Surgical Disciplines, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Syllabova 19, 703 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic
8
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Syllabova 19, 703 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2022, 12(12), 3170; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12123170
Submission received: 23 September 2022 / Revised: 1 December 2022 / Accepted: 11 December 2022 / Published: 15 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Clinical Laboratory Medicine)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This review article focuses on the use of breath tests in the field of bariatrics and obesitology. The first part of the review is an introduction to breath test problematics with a focus on their use in bariatrics. The second part provides a brief history of breath testing. Part three describes how breath tests are used for monitoring certain processes in various organs and various substances in exhaled air and how the results are analyzed and evaluated. The last part covers studies that described the use of breath tests for monitoring patients that underwent bariatric treatments. Although the number of relevant studies is small, this review could promote the future use of breath testing in the context of bariatric treatments.

1. Introduction

As modern diagnostic tools, breath tests are rapid, simple, and non-invasive [1,2]. On the other hand, it may be problematic to acquire samples of exhaled air from patients over relatively long periods. Breath tests are used to evaluate the functions of several organs (e.g., liver, pancreas, stomach, intestine), or rather, the processes and phenomena that take place in those organs. The evaluations require measurements of certain gases in exhaled air after administering a specific substrate to the patient.
The usage of breath tests must meet European guidelines on the indications, performance, and clinical impact of hydrogen and methane breath tests in adult and pediatric patients: European Association for Gastroenterology, Endoscopy and Nutrition, European Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, and European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition consensus from 2022 [3].
Table 1 summarizes the features of breath tests in current use, i.e., the processes/phenomena that can be detected in the organism, the organs that can be tested with breath tests, and the substances used for detection. Table 1 also mentions how substrates are administered, what methods are used for detection, and how the results are evaluated.
Breath tests have potentially wide applications in the fields of bariatrics and obesitology. Nevertheless, until recently, they have been scarcely used in these fields. This fact was evident in the small number of relevant studies we identified that were published in the last three decades (1990–2021). Currently, various invasive methods are typically used to monitor patient conditions after bariatric surgery. Therefore, applications for breath tests in bariatrics could be of particular importance because they are non-invasive.

2. Breath Tests

2.1. History of Breath Tests

The breath test is a non-invasive method that focuses on the analysis of exhaled air. Its importance dates back to antiquity when it was known that certain characteristic mouth odors could be associated with specific diseases [6].
The modern breath test was introduced in the early 1960s. The first studies used gas chromatography to measure increases in the hydrogen concentration in exhaled air after the consumption of baked beans [7] and expired 14C after the consumption of 14C-labeled fats [8]. In the 1970s, breath tests were introduced in laboratory diagnostics. Those tests measured hydrogen (H2) and 13C- or 14C-labeled carbon dioxide (CO2) in exhaled air [9]. Specifically, the stable carbon isotope, 13C, was established as a marker by Lacroix in 1973 [10]. Two decades later, a breath test was discovered, which could be used to diagnose Helicobacter pylori based on the administration of 13C/14C-labeled urea. That test initiated a significant expansion in the use of 13C and 14C tests in clinical practice [11,12]. However, due to its radioactive nature, 14C carbon is rarely used in current practices. In the 1990s, nitric oxide (NO) was discovered as a marker that could be detected in a breath test. The exhaled fraction of NO in exhaled air, called fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), is currently used in clinical practice to diagnose and treat asthma [13,14]. NO is also a biomarker in differential diagnosis to distinguish between a peptic ulcer in the stomach and non-ulcer-related dyspepsia [15].

2.2. Description of Breath Tests

Currently, breath tests are most commonly used to measure hydrogen, produced in the colon, together with carbon dioxide, during the anaerobic hydrolysis of carbohydrates. Bacteria metabolize hydrogen to methane and hydrogen sulfide (H2S) [16]. The gases produced in the intestine are transported into the blood and exhaled in the air [17,18]. In hydrogen tests, in addition to methane and CO2, O2 is measured to correct for the alveolar gas concentration. Different breath tests are used to measure specific 13CO2 and 14CO2 markers and FeNO [13]. A novelty in the field of breath tests is the ability to determine expired H2S [19]. Currently, more than 1000 volatile organic compounds (VOCs) have been evidenced in exhaled air [20].
There are data on the normal range of each substance in exhaled air. When that range is exceeded, it indicates a problem with a particular organ or process. For hydrogen breath tests, a positive result is typically considered a 10–20 ppm increase in concentration over the baseline value measured before the substrate is administered [21]. To evaluate the amount of 13C in exhaled air, the δ13C value is determined, which indicates the 13C/12C ratio. This is compared to the internationally accepted Vienna Pee Dee Belemnite standard, which provides the precise amount of 13C (1.11237%) expected under normal conditions [11]. The amount of 13C glucose in exhaled air is expressed as the so-called C120 value, which corresponds to the 13C excretion rate (mmol/h) relative to the body surface area at 120 min after the substrate is administered [22].
The substances in exhaled air must be analyzed with the appropriate methods. To analyze hydrogen in exhaled air, there are simple portable analyzers, hand-held battery detectors with electrochemical sensors, analyzers for home use, and analyzers for laboratory use that determine not only hydrogen but also methane [23,24].
The best analytical method for determining the 13CO2/12CO2 ratio in exhaled air is called isotope ratio mass spectrometry. Other options include nondispersive infrared spectroscopy [25,26], molecular correlation spectroscopy, which provides continuous measurements with a nasal probe, and laser-assisted ratio analysis [27]. Recent technologies currently undergoing testing include laser absorption, hollow waveguides, capillary absorption spectroscopy, tunable diode laser absorption spectroscopy, and cavity ring-down spectroscopy [28,29].
VOCs can be separated and identified with various methods, including gas chromatography for separation, proton transfer reaction-mass spectrometry; selected ion flow tube mass spectrometry (SIFT-MS), and modern nanoarray technology for identification [30,31]. For example, VOC analysis with gas chromatography, in connection with SIFT-MS, can be performed to determine a differential diagnosis for irritable bowel syndrome and idiopathic bowel disease [32,33].

3. Search Strategy and Selection Criteria

To investigate the use of breath tests in the field of bariatric treatments for obesity, we conducted a search of scientific articles published from 1990 to 2021 with the EBSCO Discovery Service tool. We searched all electronic information resources available to our university. Specifically, we searched MEDLINE, Academic Search Complete, Academic Search Ultimate, and CINAHL Plus databases. We searched for the following keywords: “breath tests”, “methacetin breath test”, “bariatrics”, “obesitology”, “obesity”, “metabolic syndrome”, and “basal metabolism”.
In the first phase, we searched for the keywords in the titles of articles; then, we extended the search to the abstracts of the articles. Based on these results, the most relevant publications were selected, and a total of six were found. The search procedure is summarized in Scheme 1.

Application of Breath Tests in Bariatrics

Several studies have described the use of breath tests in different types of bariatric procedures. These procedures include the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB), sleeve gastrectomy (SG), biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD/DS), and jejunoileal bypass procedure (JIBP). The studies are summarized in Table 2.
Among those studies, Coelho et al. (2019) and Mouillot et al. (2020) observed bacterial overgrowth in the small intestine (SIBO) of patients with bariatric disorders [34,39]. In a retrospective study by Coelho et al., patients that underwent the RYGB alone later exhibited changes in gastrointestinal tract anatomy, which could lead specifically to the colonization of fermentative bacteria in the duodenum and jejunum. In that study, 18 patients were followed up with the hydrogen breath test, and the test was positive in seven cases [34]. Moreover, Coelho et al. (2019) mentioned four other studies that described breath tests in patients that required SIBO monitoring [34].
Ishida et al. (2007) performed a retrospective study on the hydrogen lactulose breath test for monitoring bacterial overgrowth in 37 patients that had undergone an RYGB. They found that 40.5% of the patients had positive tests [35]. Interestingly, a retrospective study by Lakhani et al. (2008) found that hydrogen breath tests performed after oral glucose showed positive bacterial overgrowth in all patients after an RYGB [36]. Bacterial overgrowth is a known cause of malabsorption. In this type of breath test, bacterial overgrowth in the upper intestine is detected by an increase in exhaled hydrogen (or methane), above 10 parts per million (ppm), at ≤30 min after oral glucose administration. However, when hydrogen increases to at least 10 ppm at ≥45 min after glucose ingestion, it is a sign of malabsorption. In a retrospective study by Andalib et al. (2015), breath tests for detecting SIBO were performed after patients underwent an RYGB [37]. They found that 51 (81%) of 63 patients showed increases in hydrogen (or methane) above 10 ppm at ≥45 min after RYGB, which indicated malabsorption. Of these 51 patients, 46 (90%) also showed an increase in hydrogen (or methane) concentration above 10 ppm at ≤30 min after glucose ingestion, which indicated SIBO [37].
A prospective study by Sabate et al. (2015) monitored SIBO in obese patients before and after bariatric surgery (RYGB or adjustable gastric banding, AGB) with a hydrogen breath test performed after glucose administration. Before bariatric surgery, the breath test was positive in only 15.4% of patients. After surgery, the breath test was positive in 10% of patients that received AGB and 40% of patients that received an RYGB [38].
A retrospective cohort study by Mouillot et al. (2020) included data from 101 patients: 63 had undergone an RYGB, 31 had undergone an OAGB, and 7 had undergone an SG. The glucose breath test was performed to monitor SIBO. They found positive results in 83% (84) of patients, and no significant differences were observed between the different types of bariatric procedures [39].
In a retrospective study by Mathur et al. (2016), gas chromatography of exhaled air was used to monitor the amount of methane and hydrogen produced by gut bacteria in patients after an RYGB or SG. Out of 156 patients, only 13 showed positive results for both hydrogen and methane [40].
Westerink et al. (2020) also studied patients after an RYGB in an observational study. They monitored lactose malabsorption with a hydrogen breath test after lactose administration. They compared 84 patients that were preparing for the RYGB procedure to 84 patients that had undergone the procedure. Lactose malabsorption was observed in 17.9% (N = 15) of patients before bariatric surgery and in 29.8% (N = 25) of patients after surgery [41].
In their prospective, observational, cross-sectional, comparative study, Uribarri-Gonzalez et al. (2021) assessed and compared pancreatic function, digestive dynamics, and nutrient absorption after bariatric surgery with the 13C-mixed triglyceride breath test in 95 patients treated with SG (N = 23), RYGB (N = 36), or biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD/DS, N = 36) [42]. The breath test was evaluated by calculating the 6 h 13C-cumulative recovery rate (13C-CRR), the 13C exhalation peak, and the 1 h maximal 13C-CRR [42]. They found that the 6 h 13C-CRR was significantly reduced after BPD/DS but not after SG or RYGB. Exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) was defined as a 6 h 13C-CRR below the fifth percentile of the control group. EPI was observed in 75% of patients after BDP/DS, 8.3% of patients after RYGB, and 4.3% of patients after SG. Compared to the control group of obese individuals without bariatric treatment, digestion and nutrient absorption occurred earlier in the SG group and later in the RYGB and BPD/DS groups [42].
Venturi et al. (1994) considered a different bariatric procedure from those mentioned in the previous studies, namely the JIBP. They performed a hydrogen breath test after lactulose administration to investigate why abdominal bloating symptoms persisted in a large number of patients after JIBP treatments for morbid obesity. Abdominal bloating can trigger an overgrowth of hydrogen-producing colonizing bacteria in the small intestine. They found that hydrogen production was >100 ppm in 9 of 30 patients [43].

4. Discussion

In the context of bariatric treatments, bacterial overgrowth was determined with a hydrogen breath test after lactulose administration in studies by Coelho et al. (2019) [34] and Venturi et al. (1994) [43] and with a hydrogen breath test after glucose administration in a study by Mouillot et al. (2020) [39]. In the study by Coelho et al. (2019), the bariatric intervention was RYGB, and the breath test revealed that 38.8% of patients had SIBO [34]. In the study by Venturi et al. (1994), the intervention was JIBP, and 30% of patients had SIBO [43]. However, in the study by Mouillot et al. (2020), patients underwent various bariatric treatments, and the glucose breath test showed that SIBO was present in a large number of patients (83%) [39]. Interestingly, in a study by Newberry et al. (2016), a hydrogen breath test after lactulose administration was performed to monitor SIBO in patients that had not undergone bariatric treatments. They found that 54.4% of 791 patients had SIBO [44]. That result was curious, particularly in view of the fact that bacterial growth in the intestine is expected to increase after bariatric surgery. That rate was much higher than the rate reported by Mattsson et al. (2017), where the glucose breath test showed that SIBO was detected in only 37% of patients that had not undergone bariatric treatments [45].
In addition to monitoring SIBO with the breath test in patients that had undergone bariatric treatments, Coelho et al. (2019) summarized the results of previous studies that used the hydrogen breath test with lactulose or glucose to determine the prevalence of SIBO in healthy and obese patients. In eight studies, SIBO was detected in 7–40% of healthy patients. In six studies, SIBO was detected in 15–56% of obese patients [34].
Large differences were reported in the prevalence of SIBO among studies that monitored patients for SIBO after RYGB with the lactulose or glucose breath test. Ishida et al. (2007), Sabate et al. (2016), and Coelho et al. (2019) reported SIBO prevalences of 40.5, 40%, and 38.8%, respectively [34,35,38]. In contrast, Andalib et al. (2015) and Lakhani et al. (2008) reported SIBO prevalences of 73% and 100%, respectively [35,36,37,38]. However, Sabate et al. (2017) found that patients that underwent a different bariatric intervention (AGB) showed a significantly lower (10%) SIBO prevalence [38]. These results suggest that differences in SIBO prevalence among patients that underwent the same bariatric procedure were probably not due to a different substrate used in the breath test, although using a different substrate in the studies of Lakhani et al. (2008) and Andalib et al. (2015) resulted in a higher incidence of SIBO compared to the three cases mentioned above (Ishida et al. (2007), Sabate et al. (2016), and Coelho et al. (2019)) which was probably due to the inclusion of patients with unspecified digestive complaints. Moreover, the different results for SIBO in the studies by Mouillot et al. (2020) and Venturi et al. (1994) (83% and 30%, respectively) could have been due to the inclusion of a mixed group of patients that underwent different types of bariatric procedures in one study (RYGB, OAGB, and SG), or using another bariatric approach in comparison with the approach used in other studies (JIB vs. RYGB) [39,43].
In general, differences in SIBO can be caused by the absence of information regarding the prevalence of SIBO in patients before surgery, which could change the interpretation of postoperative data. Last but not least, the results may be influenced by an absence of information regarding the patient’s diet, which could influence the result of the breath test. Moreover, the incidence of SIBO could be related to the use of medications, for example, proton pump inhibitors [34].
The importance of comparing prevalences before and after bariatric treatments was highlighted in two studies on lactose breath tests. Westerink et al. (2020) investigated lactose malabsorption and intolerance in 84 patients before undergoing RYGB and 84 patients after undergoing RYGB with a lactose breath test. Before surgery, 17.9% of patients showed positive results for lactose malabsorption. After surgery, 29.8% of patients showed positive results for lactose malabsorption [41]. Sendiny et al. (2020) studied lactose malabsorption in patients that had not undergone bariatric treatments. They found that 26.7% of 430 patients had positive results for lactose malabsorption [46].
Breath tests can also be used to monitor duodenal pancreatic activity. The 13C-mixed triglyceride breath test can detect severe EPI [47,48]. Under stringent conditions, this test can also detect mild to moderate EPI with high sensitivity and specificity [49]. The 13C-mixed triglyceride breath test is based on substrate cleavage by pancreatic lipase [50].
Uribarri-Gonzales et al. (2021) used the 13C-mixed triglyceride breath test to monitor pancreatic function and the dynamics of digestion and nutritional absorption. They found that EPI occurred in 75% of patients after BPD/DS, in 8.3% of patients after RYGB, and in 4.3% of patients after SG [42]. For comparison, Keller et al. (2014) studied pancreatic function with the 13C-mixed triglyceride breath test in patients that did not undergo bariatric treatments. Of the 181 patients studied, 50 (27.6%) had impaired lipolysis and EPI [51].
In addition to conventional breath tests, gas chromatography can be performed to measure the amount of exhaled hydrogen and methane. Mathur et al. (2016) used this approach in patients that underwent RYGB and SG treatments. They found that only 8.3% of patients exhaled both gases, and these patients lost less weight after bariatric surgery than all the other patients. In this publication, the authors mentioned that the presence of both gases, methane and hydrogen, in the case of breath tests, is associated with increased BMI and percentage of body fat in patients [40]. For comparison, the lactulose breath test was used to monitor hydrogen and methane in exhaled air in 11,674 patients that did not undergo bariatric treatments. They showed that relatively few patients (5.5%) had both methane and hydrogen in exhaled air [52].

5. Conclusions

Despite the use of breath testing in the context of bariatric treatment, very few studies have been found in the last three decades that specifically address the use of breath testing in patients undergoing various bariatric procedures.
In most of the publications found, the hydrogen breath test using various substrates was used and it was also found that studies dealt with SIBO monitoring in bariatric patients. With one exception, where JIB was used as a bariatric procedure, the studies used RYGB, either alone or in combination with other bariatric approaches.
It can be said that apart from the similarities in the results in the Coelho et al. (2019) [34] and Ishida et al. (2007) [35] studies, where the same breath test and bariatric approaches were used, and SIBO was followed in both cases, the results differed within the framework of studies using the same breath test, the same bariatric approach, and the same process/phenomenon studied (Ishida et al. (2008) [35] vs. Andalib et al. (2015) [37]). This was also the case across studies, which was due to the use of different breath tests, different processes/phenomenon monitored, and also different bariatric interventions, or rather the use of one versus a combination of bariatric interventions.
As mentioned in the discussion, the results of breath tests while monitoring the same process/phenomenon are also quite different when comparing studies on bariatric and non-bariatric patients.
The future use of breath testing in the case of bariatric patients (either before or after surgery) to monitor their condition certainly looks promising, but more studies would are required to obtain more comprehensive results and ideas on how to use breath testing in bariatrics.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.B., P.H. and A.N.; writing—original draft preparation, D.K.; writing—review and editing, D.S. and P.K.; supervision, Z.Š. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Prokopcová, I.; Dujsíková, H.; Mišejková, M.; Prokešová, J. Přínos dechových testů v gastroenterologii. Med. Praxi 2008, 5, 308–309. [Google Scholar]
  2. Kocna, P. Dechové testy-moderní, neinvazivní diagnostika. Interní Med. 2006, 8, 336–341. [Google Scholar]
  3. Hammer, H.F.; Fox, M.R.; Keller, J.; Salvatore, S.; Basilisco, G.; Hammer, J.; Lopetuso, L.; Benninga, M.; Borrelli, O.; Dumitrascu, D.; et al. European guideline on indications, performance, and clinical impact of hydrogen and methane breath tests in adult and pediatric patients: European Association for Gastroenterology, Endoscopy and Nutrition, European Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, and European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition consensus. United Eur. Gastroenterol. J. 2022, 10, 15–40. [Google Scholar]
  4. Kocna, P. Funkční dechové testy–neinvazivní diagnostika v gastroenterologii. Klin. Biochem. Metab. 2021, 29, 124–131. [Google Scholar]
  5. Campro Scientific GmbH. Available online: https://campro-webshop.eu/epages/8d71b479-42b8-40eb-bc7c-8545d1a52e04.sf/en_GB/?ObjectPath=/Shops/8d71b479-42b8-40eb-bc7c-8545d1a52e04/Categories/Documents/Breath_Test (accessed on 13 December 2022).
  6. Berger, D. A brief history of medical diagnosis and the birth of the clinical laboratory. Part 1—Ancient times through the 19th century. MLO Med. Lab. Obs. 1999, 31, 28–30. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  7. Nielsen, J.P. Trace constituents in breath as related to flatulence. In Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Dry Bean Research Conference, Denver, CO, USA, 5–7 December 1961; p. 49. [Google Scholar]
  8. Schwabe, A.D.; Cozzetto, F.J.; Bennett, L.R.; Mellinkoff, S.M. Estimation of fat absorption by monitoring of expired radioactive carbon dioxide after feeding a radioactive fat. Gastroenterology 1962, 42, 285–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Newman, A. Breath-analysis tests in gastroenterology. Gut 1974, 15, 308–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Lacroix, M.; Mosora, F.; Pontus, M.; Lefebvre, P.; Luyckz, A.; Lopez-Habib, G. Glucose naturally labeled with carbon-13: Use for metabolic studies in man. Science 1973, 181, 445–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Graham, D.Y.; Klein, P.D.; Evans, D.J., Jr.; Evans, D.G.; Alpert, L.C.; Opekun, A.R.; Boutton, T.W. Campylobacter pylori detected noninvasively by the 13C-urea breath test. Lancet 1987, 1, 1174–1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Marshall, B.J.; Surveyor, I. Carbon-14 urea breath test for the diagnosis of Campylobacter pylori associated gastritis. J. Nucl. Med. 1988, 29, 11–16. [Google Scholar]
  13. Alving, K.; Weitzberg, E.; Lundberg, J.M. Increased amount of nitric oxide in exhaled air of asthmatics. Eur. Respir. J. 1993, 6, 1368–1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ulrik, C.S.; Lange, P.; Hilberg, O. Fractional exhaled nitric oxide as a determinant for the clinical course of asthma: A systematic review. Eur. Clin. Respir. J. 2021, 8, 1891725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Som, S.; Dutta Banik, G.; Maity, A.; Chaudhuri, S.; Pradhan, M. Exhaled nitric oxide as a potential marker for detecting non-ulcer dyspepsia and peptic ulcer disease. J. Breath Res. 2018, 12, 026005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Christl, S.U.; Murgatroyd, P.R.; Gibson, G.R.; Cummings, J.H. Production, metabolism, and excretion of hydrogen in the large intestine. Gastroenterology 1992, 102, 1269–1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Ghoshal, U.C. How to interpret hydrogen breath tests. J. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2011, 17, 312–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hammer, K.; Hasanagic, H.; Memaran, N.; Huber, W.D.; Hammer, J. Relevance of Methane and Carbon Dioxide Evaluation in Breath Tests for Carbohydrate Malabsorption in a Paediatric Cohort. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2021, 72, e71–e77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Singer-Englar, T.; Rezaie, A.; Gupta, K.; Pichetshote, N.; Sedighi, R.; Lin, E.A.; Chua, K.; Pimentel, M. Validation of a 4-Gas Device for Breath Testing in the Determination of Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth. Gastroenterology 2018, 154, 281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cao, W.; Duan, Y. Current status of methods and techniques for breath analysis. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2007, 37, 3–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Peron, G.; Dall’Acqua, S.; Sorrenti, V.; Carrara, M.; Fortinguerra, S.; Zorzi, G.; Buriani, A. Retrospective analysis of a lactose breath test in a gastrointestinal symptomatic population of Northeast Italy: Use of (H2+2CH4) versus H2 threshold. Clin. Exp. Gastroenterol. 2018, 11, 243–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Ghosh, C.; Maity, A.; Banik, G.D.; Som, S.; Chakraborty, A.; Selvan, C.; Ghosh, S.; Ghosh, B.; Chowdhury, S.; Pradhan, M. Non-invasive 13C-glucose breath test using residual gas analyzer-mass spectrometry: A novel tool for screening individuals with pre-diabetes and type 2 diabetes. J. Breath Res. 2014, 8, e036001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Peuhkuri, K.; Poussa, T.; Korpela, R. Comparison of a portable breath hydrogen analyser (Micro H2) with a Quintron MicroLyzer in measuring lactose maldigestion, and the evaluation of a Micro H2 for diagnosing hypolactasia. Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Investig. 1998, 58, 217–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Shrestha, A.; Prodhan, U.K.; Mitchell, S.M.; Sharma, P.; Barnett, M.P.G.; Milan, A.M.; Cameron-Smith, D. Validity of a Portable Breath Analyser (AIRE) for the Assessment of Lactose Malabsorption. Nutrients 2019, 11, e1636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Lucero, D.P. An analytical model of the pneumatic nondispersive infrared detector. J. Phys. E Sci. Instrum. 1973, 6, 281–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chleboun, J.; Kocna, P. Isotope Selective Nondispersive Infrared Spectrometry Can Compete with Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometry in Cumulative 13CO2 Breath Tests: Assessment of Accuracy. Klin. Biochem. Metab. 2005, 13, 92–97. [Google Scholar]
  27. Savarino, V.; Landi, F.; Dulbecco, P.; Ricci, C.; Tessieri, L.; Biagini, R.; Gatta, L.; Miglioli, M.; Celle, G.; Vaira, D. Isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS) versus laser-assisted ratio analyzer (LARA): A comparative study using two doses of. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2000, 45, 2168–2174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Robinson, I.; Butcher, H.L.; Macleod, N.A.; Weidmann, D. Hollow waveguide integrated laser spectrometer for 13CO2/12CO2 analysis. Opt. Express 2019, 27, 35670–35688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. O‘Brien, D.M.; Niles, K.R.; Black, J.; Schoeller, D.A. The Breath Carbon Isotope Ratio Reflects Short-term Added-Sugar Intake in a Dose-Response, Crossover Feeding Study of 12 Healthy Adults. J. Nutr. 2021, 151, 628–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Das, S.; Pal, N. Review—Non-Invasive Monitoring of Human Health by Exhaled Breath Analysis: A Comprehensive Review. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2020, 167, e037562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Nakhleh, M.K.; Amal, H.; Jeries, R.; Broza, Y.Y.; Aboud, M.; Gharra, A.; Ivgi, H.; Khatib, S.; Badarneh, S.; Har-Shai, L.; et al. Diagnosis and Classification of 17 Diseases from 1404 Subjects via Pattern Analysis of Exhaled Molecules. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 112–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Van Malderen, K.; De Winter, B.Y.; De Man, J.G.; De Schepper, H.U.; Lamote, K. Volatomics in inflammatory bowel disease and irritable bowel syndrome. eBioMedicine 2020, 54, e102725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Dryahina, K.; Smith, D.; Bortlík, M.; Machková, N.; Lukáš, M.; Španěl, P. Pentane and other volatile organic compounds, including carboxylic acids, in the exhaled breath of patients with Crohn‘s disease and ulcerative colitis. J. Breath Res. 2018, 12, e016002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Coelho, L.K.; Carvalho, N.S.; Navarro-Rodriguez, T.; Marson, F.A.L.; Carvalho, P.J.P.C. Lactulose Breath Testing Can Be a Positive Predictor Before Weight Gain in Participants with Obesity Submitted to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass. Obes. Surg. 2019, 29, 3457–3464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ishida, R.K.; Faintuch, J.; Paula, A.M.; Risttori, C.A.; Silva, S.N.; Gomes, E.S.; Mattar, R.; Kuga, R.; Ribeiro, A.S.; Sakai, P.; et al. Microbial flora of the stomach after gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Obes. Surg. 2007, 17, 752–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lakhani, S.V.; Shah, H.N.; Alexander, K.; Finelli, F.C.; Kirkpatrick, J.R.; Koch, T.R. Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth and thiamine deficiency after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery in obese patients. Nutr. Res. 2008, 28, 293–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Andalib, I.; Shah, H.; Bal, B.S.; Shope, T.R.; Finelli, F.C.; Koch, T.R. Breath Hydrogen as a Biomarker for Glucose Malabsorption after Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Surgery. Dis. Markers 2015, 2015, 102760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Sabaté, J.M.; Coupaye, M.; Ledoux, S.; Castel, B.; Msika, S.; Coffin, B.; Jouet, P. Consequences of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in obese patients before and after bariatric surgery. Obes. Surg. 2017, 27, 599–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Mouillot, T.; Rhyman, N.; Gauthier, C.; Paris, J.; Lang, A.-S.; Lepers-Tassy, S.; Manfredi, S.; Lepage, C.; Leloup, C.; Jacquin-Piques, A. Study of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in a cohort of patients with abdominal symptoms who underwent bariatric surgery. Obes. Surg. 2020, 30, 2331–2337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mathur, R.; Mundi, M.S.; Chua, K.S.; Lorentz, P.A.; Barlow, G.M.; Lin, E.; Burch, M.; Youdim, A.; Pimentel, M. Intestinal methane production is associated with decreased weight loss following bariatric surgery. Obes. Res. Clin. Pract. 2016, 10, 728–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Westerink, F.; Beijderwellen, H.; Huibregtse, I.; De Hoog, M.; De Brauw, L.; Brandjes, D.; Gerdes, V.A. Lactose after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity, is it a problem? Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 2020, 55, 1398–1404. [Google Scholar]
  42. Uribarri-Gonzalez, L.; Nieto-Garcia, L.; Martis-Sueiro, A.; Dominguez-Munoz, J.E. Exocrine pancreatic function and dynamic of digestion after restrictive and malabsorptive bariatric surgery: A prospective, cross-sectional, and comparative study. Surg. Obes. Relat. Dis. 2021, 17, 1766–1772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Venturi, M.; Zuccato, E.; Restelli, A.; Mazzoleni, L.; Mussini, E.; Doldi, S.B. Utility of Hydrogen and Methane Breath Tests in Combination with X-Ray Examination after a Barium Meal in the Diagnosis of Small Bowel Bacterial Overgrowth after Jejuno-Ileal Bypass for Morbid Obesity. Obes. Surg. 1994, 4, 144–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Newberry, C.; Tierney, A.; Pickett-Blakely, O. Lactulose Hydrogen Breath Test Result Is Associated with Age and Gender. Biomed. Res. Int. 2016, 2016, 1064029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Mattsson, J.; Minaya, M.T.; Monegro, M.; Lebwohl, B.; Lewis, S.K.; Green, P.H.; Stenberg, R. Outcome of breath tests in adult patients with suspected small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. Bed Bench 2017, 10, 168–172. [Google Scholar]
  46. Sendino, T.; Sandúa, A.; Calleja, S.; González, Á.; Alegre, E. Lactose tolerance test as an alternative to hydrogen breath test in the study of lactose malabsorption. Adv. Lab. Med. 2020, 1, 20200102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Vantrappen, G.R.; Rutgeerts, P.J.; Ghoos, Y.F.; Hiele, M.I. Mixed triglyceride breath test: A noninvasive test of pancreatic lipase activity in the duodenum. Gastroenterology 1989, 96, 1126–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Löser, C.; Brauer, C.; Aygen, S.; Hennemann, O.; Fölsch, U.R. Comparative clinical evaluation of the 13C-mixed triglyceride breath test as an indirect pancreatic function test. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 1998, 33, 327–334. [Google Scholar]
  49. Keller, J.; Bruckel, S.; Jahr, C.; Layer, P. A modified 13C-mixed triglyceride breath test detects moderate pancreatic exocrine insufficiency. Pancreas 2011, 40, 1201–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kocna, P. Laboratorní diagnostika exokrinní funkce pankreatu. Klin. Biochem. Metab. 2020, 28, 150–160. [Google Scholar]
  51. Keller, J.; Meier, V.; Wolfram, K.U.; Rosien, U.; Layer, P. Sensitivity and specificity of an abbreviated (13)C-mixed triglyceride breath test for measurement of pancreatic exocrine function. United Eur. Gastroenterol. 2014, 2, 288–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Gottlieb, K.; Le, C.; Wacher, V.; Sliman, J.; Cruz, C.; Porter, T.; Carter, S. Selection of a cut-off for high- and low-methane producers using a spot-methane breath test: Results from a large north American dataset of hydrogen, methane and carbon dioxide measurements in breath. Gastroenterol. Rep. 2017, 5, 193–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Diagnostics 12 03170 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Schematic of the search for scientific articles about breath tests in bariatric treatments for obesity.
Scheme 1. Schematic of the search for scientific articles about breath tests in bariatric treatments for obesity.
Diagnostics 12 03170 sch001
Table
Table 1. Current usage of breath tests [4,5].
Table 1. Current usage of breath tests [4,5].
Observed OrganObserved SubstancesObserved Process or PhenomenonAdministered Substrate
Small intestineHydrogen and methane 1Lactose intolerance and malabsorption25 or 50 g lactose
Fructose intolerance and malabsorption25–50 g fructose
SIBO 250–80 g glucose or 10 g lactulose
OCTT 310 g lactulose or inulin
Stomach13CO2Helicobacter pylori in the stomach (13C-urea breath test)10–100 mg 13C-labeled urea
Gastric evacuation rate (13C-gastric emptying breath tests) 13C-octanoate for solid diet;
13C-acetate for liquid diet; 13C-Spirulina platensis
PancreasDiagnosis of exocrine pancreas and determination of exocrine pancreatic insufficiency13C-triolein, 13C-tripalmitin, 13C-trioctanoin, or 13C-hiolen, for lipase activity; 13C-cholesteryl octanoate, for esterase activity; 13C-starch, for amylase activity; or egg-white containing 13C-leucine or 13C-dipeptide (benzoyl-l-tyrosyl-[1-13C]-alanine), for pancreatic peptidase activity. The most widely used substrate is 13C-mixed triglyceride, composed of 1,3-distearyl-2[carboxyl-13C]octanoylglycerol
LiverLiver functions (microsomal, mitochondrial, and cytosolic functions)13C-aminopyrine, 13C-methacetin, 13C-erythromycin, or 13C-caffeine, for monitoring microsomal functions; 13C-alpha-ketoisocaproic acid or 13C-methionine, for monitoring mitochondrial functions; 13C-phenylalanine, 13C-galactose, or 13C-octanoate, for monitoring cytosolic functions
13C glucose (the latest clinical studies)Prediabetes screening100 mg 13C-labeled glucose
Type 2 diabetes screening
Insulin resistance
Metabolic syndrome screening
1 13C breath tests can also be used to determine processes that are currently determined with hydrogen detection, for example: 13C-lactose for lactose intolerance, 13C-lactose ureide for OCTT, and 13C-xylose for bacterial overgrowth in the intestine (Campro Scientific GmbH). 2 SIBO: small intestinal bacterial overgrowth; another name is SBBO, small bowel bacterial overgrowth. 3 OCTT = orocecal transit time, used to determine gastrointestinal motility; other names are SBTT, small bowel transit time, or LHBT, lactulose hydrogen breath test.
Table
Table 2. Summary of studies on the use of breath tests in bariatrics between 1990 and 2021.
Table 2. Summary of studies on the use of breath tests in bariatrics between 1990 and 2021.
Author(s)Breath Test UsedProcess or PhenomenonBariatric Method Patients (N)Positive Tests (N)Positivity Rate (%)
Coelho et al., 2019 [34]Hydrogen breath test with lactuloseSIBORYGB18738.8%
Ishida et al., 2007 [35] *Hydrogen breath test with lactuloseSIBORYGB371540.5%
Lakhani et al., 2008 [36] *Hydrogen breath test with glucoseSIBORYGB2121100%
Andalib et al., 2015 [37] *Hydrogen breath test with glucoseSIBORYGB634673%
Sabate et al., 2016 [38] *Hydrogen breath test with glucoseSIBORYGB, AGB357 (before surgery)55 (before surgery)15.4% (before surgery)
20 (after AGB)2 (after AGB)10% (after AGB)
65 (after RYGB)26 (after RYGB)40% (after RYGB)
Mouillot et al., 2020 [39]Hydrogen breath test with glucoseSIBORYGB, OAGB, SG1018483%
Mathur et al., 2016 [40]Gas chromatography to monitor methane and hydrogen in exhaled air Methane and hydrogen produced by intestinal bacteriaRYGB and SG156138.3%
Westerink et al., 2020 [41]Hydrogen breath test with lactoseLactose malabsorption RYGB84 before treatment,
84 after treatment		15 before treatment, 25 after treatment17.9% before treatment.
29.8% after treatment
Uribarri-Gonzalez et al., 2001 [42]Breath test with 13C-mixed triglycerides Pancreatic function, digestion, and nutrient absorption after bariatric treatmentSG, RYGB, and BPD/DS95 (36 BDP/DS, 36 RYGB, 23 SG)EPI:
N = 27 BDP/DS, N = 3 RYGB, N = 1 SG 		EPI: 75% in BDP/DS; 8.3% in RYGB; 4.3% in SG patients
Venturi et al., 1994 [43]Hydrogen breath test with lactuloseSIBOJIB30930%
* The results of these articles were mentioned in an article by Coelho et al., 2019 and that is why they have been added here.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Karas, D.; Bužga, M.; Stejskal, D.; Kocna, P.; Holéczy, P.; Novotná, A.; Švagera, Z. Breath Tests Used in the Context of Bariatric Surgery. Diagnostics 2022, 12, 3170. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12123170

AMA Style

Karas D, Bužga M, Stejskal D, Kocna P, Holéczy P, Novotná A, Švagera Z. Breath Tests Used in the Context of Bariatric Surgery. Diagnostics. 2022; 12(12):3170. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12123170

Chicago/Turabian Style

Karas, Daniel, Marek Bužga, David Stejskal, Petr Kocna, Pavol Holéczy, Adéla Novotná, and Zdeněk Švagera. 2022. "Breath Tests Used in the Context of Bariatric Surgery" Diagnostics 12, no. 12: 3170. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12123170

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop