Next Article in Journal
Preterm Cesarean Delivery and Safety of Subsequent Delivery: Risk of Uterine Rupture and Other Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes—Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study
Next Article in Special Issue
HPV Infection in Children and Adolescents—A Comprehensive Review
Previous Article in Journal
Local and Loco-Regional Anesthesia in Patients Who Underwent Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Cervicovaginal Microbiome: Physiology, Age-Related Changes, and Protective Role Against Human Papillomavirus Infection

1
School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan
2
Clinical Academic Department of Women’s Health, CF “University Medical Center”, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan
3
Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(5), 1521; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14051521
Submission received: 16 January 2025 / Revised: 17 February 2025 / Accepted: 23 February 2025 / Published: 24 February 2025

Abstract

:
Background/Objectives: Persistent high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) infections are the leading cause of cervical cancer. Developing evidence suggests that the cervicovaginal microbiome plays a significant role in modulating HPV persistence and progression to cervical neoplasia. This review synthesizes the current knowledge on the interplay between the cervicovaginal microbiome and local immunity in HPV infections, emphasizing microbial diversity, immune responses, and potential therapeutic implications. Methods: A thorough review of the literature was performed using Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar, encompassing studies published between 2000 and 2024. Studies examining the composition of the microbiome, immune responses, and HPV-related outcomes were evaluated and synthesized into a comprehensive review. Results: A Lactobacillus-dominant microbiome, particularly with L. crispatus, creates a protective environment through lactic acid production, maintenance of low pH, and anti-inflammatory immune modulation, facilitating HPV clearance. Dysbiosis, often characterized by a dominance of L. iners and overgrowth of anaerobic bacteria, fosters chronic inflammation, cytokine imbalance, and a microenvironment conducive to HPV persistence and progression. Hormonal changes and menopause exacerbate these microbial shifts, increasing the risk of cervical lesions. Studies suggest that cytokine profiles and antimicrobial peptides significantly influence local immune responses, further modulating infection outcomes. Conclusions: The cervicovaginal microbiome is a critical determinant in HPV infection outcomes, with therapeutic potential for modulating the microbiome to enhance immune responses and prevent cervical cancer. Personalized microbiome-targeted therapies may offer a novel avenue for managing HPV and reducing cervical cancer incidence.

1. Introduction

Persistent high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) infections cause up to 95% of precancerous cervical lesions and subsequent cervical cancer [1,2,3,4,5]. Up to 80–90% of women could be infected with either type of HPV at some point in their lifetime; however, the infection is usually cleared by the immune system in 12–24 months [1,2,6].
The local immune environment in the cervix and vagina, including the microbiome, could have an impact on HPV infection persistence [1,7]. In the cervicovaginal area, the optimal microbiome is featured by a high abundance of Lactobacilli species (spp.) [7]. In healthy conditions, the domination of Lactobacilli spp. in the cervicovaginal microbiome has been reported to support homeostasis through a variety of mechanisms, including maintenance of acidic pH serving as a protective factor against pathologic microbes [7]. Hence, the normal cervicovaginal microbiome influences the natural history of HPV infection and its protective role against other infections [1,7,8].
Although the development of precancerous cervical lesions and cervical cancer is associated with a long-term high-risk HPV infection persistence, the role of cervicovaginal microbiome stability in the natural history of cervical cancer is important [1,7,8]. Thus, in this review, we aim to summarize and update the knowledge on the role of the cervicovaginal microbiome in the pathogenesis and natural history of precancerous cervical lesions and cervical cancer. A better understanding of the local cervicovaginal immunity in the development of cervical malignancy might open new opportunities for the precancerous cervical lesion management and prevention of cervical cancer.

2. Material and Methods

Articles published in English were searched in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Google Scholar databases from January 2000 to December 2024. The search was performed using the following keywords: “microbiota”, “cervical microbiome”, “vaginal microbiome”, “cervicovaginal microbiota”, “cervicovaginal immunity”, “Lactobacillus”, “human papillomavirus”, “HPV”, “high-risk HPV”, “host-microbial interactions”, “precancerous cervical lesions”, “cervical intraepithelial neoplasia”, “uterine cervical dysplasia”, and “early-stage cervical cancer”. Medical subject heading (MeSH) terms were used whenever available: “microbiota” (MeSH Unique ID: D064307), “Lactobacillus” (MeSH Unique ID: D007778), “uterine cervical dysplasia” (MeSH Unique ID: D002578), “Uterine Cervical Neoplasms” (MeSH Unique ID: D002583), “human papillomavirus” (MeSH Unique ID: D000094302), and “host-microbial interactions” (MeSH Unique ID: D000076662). The search was specified and targeted by using the abovementioned keywords and keyword combinations. The search results are presented in Figure 1.
The manuscript is best classified as a comprehensive review. This approach is particularly suited for synthesizing findings across diverse study designs and identifying overarching themes in a field that is still evolving. The comprehensive review structure allows for flexibility in integrating studies with varying methodologies and contexts, enabling the authors to provide a qualitative synthesis rather than a rigid, quantitative summary. This method is especially valuable when addressing complex topics like the interaction between the cervicovaginal microbiome, local immunity, and HPV, where the evidence base includes both experimental and observational studies. By adopting a narrative approach, the manuscript effectively highlights trends, identifies research gaps, and proposes potential areas for future exploration. Furthermore, this approach facilitates the incorporation of clinical and theoretical perspectives, bridging the gap between foundational research and practical applications. While it does not aim to map all available evidence comprehensively as a scoping review would, the narrative format allows for a nuanced discussion that aligns with this review’s objectives. The following research questions are discussed in this review:
  • What is the composition of a healthy cervicovaginal microbiome?
  • What are the age-related changes in the cervicovaginal microbiome?
  • Which microbial species and compositions significantly modify the HPV acquisition, persistence, clearance, and development of pre-cancerous/cancerous cervical lesions?
  • How does the cervicovaginal microbiome impact immunity against HPV?

3. Physiology of Cervicovaginal Microbiome

3.1. Microbiome Profile Within the Female Reproductive System

A wide range of microbial communities colonize the surfaces and cavities of the human body. These microorganisms coexist in a symbiotic relationship with the host, with the composition of each community shaped by the unique environmental and host factors at different body sites [9]. The makeup of these microbial populations varies across anatomical regions and could differ from one individual to another, as well as over time, due to complex interactions between the host and microbes, as well as changes in the environment [7,10].
The female reproductive tract acts as an essential microenvironment, where various microbial communities establish themselves and interact with the mucosal surfaces, creating a complex microbial ecosystem [11,12]. The vagina hosts a vast and complex microecosystem comprising billions of microorganisms [7]. Employing 16S rRNA gene sequencing has enabled the systematic identification of microbial biomass throughout the female reproductive tract [13]. Analysis of data from 110 individuals of reproductive age indicated that the vaginal environment harbors between 1010 and 1011 bacteria. Studies on the microecology of reproductive organs have demonstrated that the microbiome of the reproductive tract plays an essential role by influencing anatomical structure, tissue histology, and immune function [11]. Through its interactions with these components, this microbiome holds considerable potential in supporting reproductive health [11,14,15].
The microbiota composition in the female reproductive system is shaped by both host and environmental factors, which typically coexist congruently [16,17]. Changes in this microbiota can lead to physiological or pathological shifts within the reproductive tract. Aging, menstrual cycles, and estrogen fluctuations are key drivers of microbiota alterations [18]. Prolonged exposure to adverse factors may cause dysbiosis, contributing to reproductive tract diseases. Strategies aimed at restoring microbial balance hold promise for improving reproductive health [19,20,21,22].
Anatomically, the female reproductive tract is divided into the upper (uterus, fallopian tubes, and ovaries) and the lower (vagina and cervix) parts, which have direct exposure to the external environment [11]. Research on reproductive tract microbiota has revealed that it is not sterile but rather harbors diverse microbial communities [11,12,13,16,23]. Interestingly, despite their anatomical connection, distinct microbial differences exist, with a decrease in Lactobacillus and total bacterial load but increasing microbial diversity from the lower to the upper reproductive tract [11,12,16,21,23].

3.2. Healthy Vaginal and Cervical Microbiome

The vagina, which is an inlet part of the female reproductive tract, harbors a high diversity of bacterial biomass representing the resident vaginal microbiome [12,24,25]. Lactobacillus spp. are predominantly abundant at the genus level, comprising over 89% of the microbial population, whereas the presence of genera such as Prevotella, Sneathia, Staphylococcus, Veillonella, and Streptococcus remains a subject of ongoing debate [12,24,26]. Some researchers propose that a high prevalence of Lactobacillus within the vaginal microbiome signifies a healthy and typical microbial environment. The relative abundance of this dominant Lactobacillus spp. is thought to define various bacterial community structures, referred to as community state types [27,28,29]. Based on sequencing studies, five community state types were classified based on the vaginal microbiome: types I, II, III, and V have dominant L. crispatus, L. gasseri, L. iners, and L. jensenii, respectively, while type IV refers to the high diversity of the microbial ecosystem featured by obligate anaerobic bacteria [28,30]. Currently, community state types I, III, and IV are frequently observed in women and have been the focus of extensive research, while community state types II and V are relatively uncommon [31]. Research indicates that a vaginal microbiome predominantly composed of L. crispatus (type I) consistently supports vaginal health, whereas a microbial ecosystem with L. iners being dominant (type III) is associated with a higher susceptibility to vaginal infections [32,33]. Some microbial taxa within the vaginal microbiome can influence vaginal health and disease by modulating pro-inflammatory factors and their derivatives. This underscores the importance of thoroughly investigating the intricate relationships between these microbial communities and host inflammation responses [34,35,36].
There are variations in vaginal microbiome composition across different ethnic groups and races [13]. Out of the five community state types, type I, II, III, and V exist in 89.7% of white women and 80.2% of Asian women, while in black and Hispanic women, these indicators are lower—61.9% and 59.6%, respectively [13]. This diversity is possibly regulated by host genetic factors, such as the quantity and composition of vaginal mucus, epithelial cells, and immune system features [13]. Hereditary host features could play a more significant role in determining the vaginal microbiome among ethnic groups and races than behavioral and cultural factors [13,24,36,37,38,39]. For a long time, it has been commonly assumed that the cervical microbiome simply extends from the vaginal microbiome. However, emerging research has demonstrated that there are specific variations between the microbial communities of the cervix and the vagina [12]. Studies have shown that within the cervical microbiome, the phylum Firmicutes is the most prevalent, with the genus Lactobacillus making up a significant portion—up to 80.2% [40,41,42]. In addition, some studies have shown that lactic acid can be produced by L. crispatus in the cervix, which serves as an antimicrobial compound by inhibiting inflammation, therefore decreasing the incidence of local infections [43]. The phylum Bacteroidetes ranks as the second-most prevalent within the cervical microbiome, with Prevotella being the predominant genus, which is known as an essential member of the cervical microbiome [44]. Lactobacillus spp. thrive within the cervicovaginal anaerobic environment and synthesize a range of antimicrobial agents, including lactic acid, hydrogen peroxide, and bacteriocins [45,46,47,48]. These compounds play a crucial role in maintaining a balanced cervicovaginal microbiome and providing a protective barrier against pathogenic microorganisms. Specifically, Lactobacillus spp. are the primary producers of L-lactic and D-lactic acid, which help sustain the habitat’s pH below 4.5, while epithelial cells contribute approximately 20% of L-lactic acid production [46,47,48]. However, the role of hydrogen peroxide in the cervicovaginal microbiome is still debated. Although recent studies have shown its positive impact in inhibiting the overgrowth of pathogenic organisms [46,47,48,49], questions remain regarding the extent of its protective function and overall influence within the microbiome. Research by O’Hanlon et al. (2011) demonstrated that hydrogen peroxide, at physiological concentrations, exhibits minimal capability to eliminate pathogenic microbes [50]. At elevated levels, hydrogen peroxide displayed more pronounced antimicrobial activity but was found to be more detrimental to Lactobacillus spp. than to pathogenic organisms. These findings suggest that hydrogen peroxide may not play a central role as an antimicrobial agent in maintaining vaginal microbiome stability. Additionally, Lactobacillus spp. produce bacteriocins, antimicrobial peptides that can disrupt the cell membrane integrity of non-native microorganisms [51,52,53]. They also exhibit the ability to adhere to vaginal epithelial cells, thereby outcompeting other microbes for adhesion sites [53,54,55,56]. This adhesion is significant as it prevents pathogen attachment, a critical initial step in infection [56,57,58]. The dominant species of Lactobacillus ultimately influences the degree of protection offered by the vaginal ecosystem [59,60].
Local microbiome functional composition, along with its alterations in response to infection and disease progression, remains an area that requires further comprehensive investigation [59,60]. Key factors that influence the vaginal microenvironment, such as vaginal pH regulation, the role of lactic acid bacteria, microbial metabolites, and local inflammatory responses, collectively contribute to the maintenance of vaginal health [45,59,60,61]. Shifts in vaginal pH toward more alkaline conditions have been associated with an increased susceptibility to HPV infection [59,60,62,63,64]. Additionally, enzymes present in the vaginal ecosystem are pivotal in sustaining microbiota homeostasis and overall vaginal health. These insights into the factors that regulate vaginal microecology can be further explored to enhance prevention strategies and the management of precancerous cervical lesions [7,59,60].

4. Sex Hormone Levels and Cervicovaginal Microbiota

Variations in hormone levels from puberty to menopause also result in significant changes in the microbial ecology of the vagina [65]. The composition of the vaginal microbiota is primarily modulated by different levels of estrogen and progesterone [66]. Different concentrations of sex steroid hormones were found to affect the characteristics of the cervicovaginal microbiome during puberty, reproductive age, pregnancy, and menopause (Table 1) [65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83].
Evidence indicates that neonates harbor a diverse microbial community within the gut during the initial week of life, with ongoing, dynamic shifts in bacterial composition persisting until a relatively stable and mature state is attained between 1 and 3 years of age [70]. In the first week of life, the gut microbiota of healthy neonates is primarily composed of Actinobacteria (notably Bifidobacterium), Proteobacteria, Bacteroides, and Firmicutes, including Lactobacillus, which also predominates in the vaginal flora [67]. Studies suggest that microbial colonization in infants may originate at the maternal–fetal interface, with variations potentially influenced by the duration of gestation. However, the microecological features of the female reproductive system during these stages remain poorly understood, primarily due to the limited availability of samples collected from the reproductive tracts of infants and children [69,70,71].
Adolescence can be defined as a developmental period that encompasses progressive endocrine, reproductive, physical, and psychological maturation [75]. During early adolescence, when estrogen and progesterone levels remain low, the vaginal microbiota is characterized by high alpha diversity, including a predominance of Aspergillus, Actinobacteria, and various bacterial genera such as Prevotella, Bacteroides, Gastrodia, anaerobes, and small populations of Bacteroides and Lactobacillus [66]. Researchers explained these dynamics in the cervicovaginal microbiome with a rise in circulating estrogen levels only during the late stages of puberty, leading to increased glycogen production on and in epithelial cells lining the vagina, which serves to be a source for lactic-acid-producing Lactobacilli spp. that release hydrogen peroxidase and lactic acid to inhibit other bacterial species [75]. As gonadal maturation progresses, increasing sex hormone levels promote the thickening of the vaginal epithelium and the accumulation of glycogen, providing an essential nutrient source to support the growth and proliferation of vaginal microbes [72].
The reproductive years in women refer to the phase of life during which they are biologically capable of conceiving and bearing children. This period typically begins with menarche, the onset of menstruation, which usually occurs between the ages of 10 and 16, and continues until menopause. During menstruation, the vaginal microbiota undergoes significant changes, characterized by a shift in pH and microbial diversity. Its composition, similar to that in early adolescence, includes Clostridium, Aspergillus, Actinobacteria, and Streptococcus, which are unique to this phase [73,74,75,76]. The neutral pH of menstrual blood (7.2–7.4) reduces the antibacterial effects of lactic acid, promoting the growth of anaerobic microorganisms that utilize iron from menstrual blood as a nutrient source [74]. Microorganisms like Streptococcus and Gardnerella secrete iron-chelating complexes to facilitate growth, while neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) in Lactobacillus-dominated ecosystems inhibits iron-dependent bacteria [75]. The elevated pH and iron levels, coupled with a decrease in Lactobacillus, enhance microbial diversity. As menstruation transitions to the follicular phase, rising sex hormones thicken the vaginal epithelium, increase glycogen secretion, and lower pH through lactic acid and hydrogen peroxide production, promoting Lactobacillus proliferation and reducing anaerobic bacterial diversity [76].
During pregnancy, specific immunological, metabolic, and endocrine changes influence the structural composition and abundance of microbial communities across the body, including the vaginal, intestinal, oral, and placental microbiota. Pregnancy is marked by increased diversity in vaginal microbes, including Atopobium, Sneathia, and Gardnerella, which decline by mid-pregnancy as Lactobacillus dominance increases, stabilizing the vaginal environment and lowering pH to limit pathological bacterial growth [77,78,79,80].
Women in menopause, typically around the age of 50, experience notable changes in sex steroid hormones, such as decreased estrogen levels and increased follicle-stimulating hormone levels. Upon reaching the menopause period, the level of estrogen hormone declines, thereby causing a reduction in Lactobacillus concentration and promoting the growth of anaerobic bacteria in the vaginal environment [84].
Gliniewicz et al. (2019) investigated the vaginal microbiome of perimenopausal women, considering hormone replacement therapy (HRT) [82]. They found that postmenopausal women on HRT had bacterial counts comparable to premenopausal women, while those not on HRT had bacterial counts nearly ten times lower (p < 0.05) [85]. Other studies have identified an increase in anaerobic and vaginosis-related bacteria, such as Bacteroides mimics and Gardnerella vaginalis, in postmenopausal women [83].
A study by Gandhi et al. (2020) analyzed patients where L. iners was the most abundant species followed by L. gasseri and L. jensenii with no detection of L. crispatus and L. jensenii in postmenopausal women [86]. Additional evidence comes from Yoshikata et al. (2022), who analyzed the vaginal microbiome of 70 Japanese women and demonstrated that three main Lactobacillus spp. (L. crispatus, L. iners, and L. gasseri) were the most dominant in premenopausal women, contributing to 71.6% of their vaginal microbiota [87]. Conversely, postmenopausal women had an almost negligible proportion of L. crispatus, with L. iners and L. gasseri becoming the main species, totaling 10.3%. The authors correlated that with the effect of declining estrogen [87].

5. Role of the Local Cervicovaginal Microbiome in HPV Infection and Its Persistence

5.1. Human Papillomavirus: Epidemiology, Persistence, and Cancerogenic Properties

Human papillomaviruses are small-sized, non-enveloped viruses that belong to the family of Papillomaviridae and possess a circular double-stranded DNA genome [6].
HPV particularly has a tropism for the transformation zone, the area between the paved stratified epithelium of the ectocervix and the cylindrical epithelium of the endocervix. This zone is “biologically” sensitive as it is the easiest path to reach the basal layer, which is the specific target of some carcinogenic agents like HPV [88].
HPV is proven to be a causative agent for 95% of cervical cancer cases. In 2020, 600,000 new cervical cancer cases were diagnosed in the world. It is most detected in females between 35 and 44 years old, with the average age being 50–53 [3,89,90,91,92]. The incidence rates of cervical cancer increase worldwide among women after the age of 25 years with the peak at the age of 50–54 years [92]. Cervical cancer remains the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death among women [3,89,90,91,92].
HPV types 16 and 18 were found in 75% of cervical cancer specimens, while HPV31, 33, 45, 52, and 58 were identified in an additional 20% of HPV-attributable cancers [3,90]. Although the development of cervical pre-invasive and invasive conditions is strongly linked with HPV infection, there are other factors involved [93]. Immunodeficiency state, smoking habits, Chlamydia trachomatis infection, and the patient’s age are among the other responsible factors that heavily predispose individuals to virus persistence. Imbalances in cervicovaginal microbiota and inflammation also predispose individuals to the persistence of HPV and further cancer progression [94,95].
Moreover, a high number of sexual partners, the simultaneous presence of other sexually transmitted diseases, the early start of sexual relationships, and poor hygiene practices also make the individual prone to developing infection [96,97,98].
According to recent research, there is a substantial correlation between immunological health and viral infection as well as the vaginal microbiota, which influences the female lower genital tract’s immune system [44,99,100].

5.2. Lactobacillus Species as a Defense Mechanism Against HPV

In addition to the HPV infection properties (virulence, contagiousness, oncogenic potential, etc.), the vaginal microenvironment plays an intermediary role in making an individual susceptible to developing HPV persistence and further cancer (Figure 2).
The eubiotic microbiota in the vagina among reproductive-aged women mostly consists of various Lactobacillus spp., having protective reactions through the generation of multiple types of compounds such as lactic acid, bacteriocins, polysaccharides, peptidoglycans, and hydrogen peroxide, as well as through reducing the pH, enhancing the cervicovaginal mucus viscosity properties, and inhibiting the attachment of cells to epithelial tissue and HPV entry [101]. Specific strains of Lactobacillus residing in the cervicovaginal microbiota include L. gasseri, L. crispatus, L. jensenii, and L. iners [24,102].
It was shown that not all Lactobacillus spp. are defensive while maintaining the normal conditions in the reproductive tract of females and the stable microbial environment of the vagina [94].

5.2.1. Lactobacillus iners and Cervicovaginal Microbiome

L. iners distinctively differs from L. crispatus, L. gasseri, and L. jensenii in several traits: high prevalence in vaginal microbiomes worldwide, smallest genome size, ability to produce only the L-isomer of lactic acid, and inconsistent correlations with the reproductive health of women [103]. This capability of producing only the L-lactic acid isomer makes it different from other major Lactobacillus spp., as L. iners lacks the gene encoding the enzyme D-lactate dehydrogenase [30]. Therefore, the L/D lactic acid ratio is highest in L. iners. Such a ratio may increase extracellular matrix metalloproteinase inducer (EMMPRIN), which in turn activates matrix metalloproteinase-8 (MMP-8), a metalloproteinase that breaks down the extracellular matrix, aiding bacteria in passing through the cervix and starting upper genital tract infections [104], which explains the reason why the overgrowth of L. iners in the vagina largely affects cervicovaginal microbiome disruption compared to other species. In addition to that, it was proven that D-lactic acid is more effective in the inhibition of bacteria in comparison to L-lactic acid [102], which serves as another reason for L. iners’s lesser capability in defending the cervicovaginal microbiome. One of the ways Lactobacillus spp. are thought to be able to stop anaerobic bacteria from colonizing the vagina is by producing hydrogen peroxidase. Apart from being limited in L-isomer lactic acid production, L. iners lacks the cellular and molecular resources necessary for pyruvate oxidation to produce hydrogen peroxidase [105].
According to Leizer et al. (2017), when an L. iners-dominated vaginal microbiome was compared against an L. crispatus-dominated microenvironment, more mediators were found to be released during microbiome disturbance in the presence of former species, which explains its larger role in defense mechanisms [106]. A higher level of NGAL and calprotectin production, both responsible for sequestering metal ions, released by bacteria [107,108] and MMP-8, serving as an indicator of disturbed vaginal ecology and further facilitating other defense pathways [109], are all the result of L. iners predominating the cervicovaginal microbiome under non-physiological conditions [106]. In addition to that, the studies postulated that there is enhanced generation of alpha-amylase as well to set a selective environment for Lactobacillus spp. besides L. iners utilizing glycogen mostly for their growth—another way to set homeostasis back. Moreover, L. iners obstructs dangerous bacteria from acquiring essential nutrients, such as iron, and impedes their persistent proliferation by activating the innate immune response in vaginal epithelial cells [110].
Kwak et al. (2020) were able to construct the first complete genome of L. iners and identify the high adaptability of this species to changing conditions. One of the causes of the abrupt decline in Lactobacillus spp. in cases of bacterial vaginosis was bacteriophages; however, L. iners can enhance defense mechanisms such as the type I restriction modification (RM) system, clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPRs), and its unique hsdR gene to resist bacteriophage invasion during bacterial vaginosis [111].
Leizer et al. (2017) reported that the L. crispatus-dominated cervicovaginal microbiome showed low levels of hsp70 and increased autophagy, while the reverse was true for the L. iners-dominated microbiome under stress conditions. Also, Toll-like receptors were activated for inducing pattern recognition receptors in the latter condition [106].
Vaginal microbiota characterized by non-Lactobacilli spp. or L. iners predominance correlated with up to five-fold greater odds of prevalent HPV and up to three times greater odds for high-risk HPV and dysplasia/cervical cancer when compared to an ecosystem with L. crispatus as the leading type [112].
This microorganism was determined to be the most dominant species in women with high-risk HPV infection in a study conducted in Singapore [113]. According to a systematic review performed in 2021, the role of L. iners was not exactly determined, as the review suggested a dual role of this microbe in maintaining a healthy vaginal environment while also outnumbering other species during bacterial vaginosis, largely contributing to a disturbed microenvironment [114].
A study which involved 800 African women proved that an L. crispatus-prevalent and less L. iners-dominated cervicovaginal microecology has a strong association with a lower chance of developing sexually transmitted infections [115]. Another study supports this finding and reported next-generation sequencing (NGS) results highlighting L. iners’s consistent prevalence in HPV-diagnosed as well as healthy patients [26].
Upon thorough investigation and comparison among persistent, transient, and healthy HPV cervicovaginal microbiome states, Qingqing et al. (2021) identified L. iners species to be correlated with the transient condition, with persistent infection having the lowest overall Lactobacilli count, though it was relatively abundant among other species [116].

5.2.2. Lactobacillus gasseri and Cervicovaginal Microbiome

The addition of Lactobacillus, particularly L. gasseri, L. fermentum, and L. plantarum, to treatment with antimicrobial drugs was found to be effective and beneficial for the prevention of recurrent HPV infection [76]. L. gasseri and L. crispatus co-cultured with a normal cervical cell line exhibited minimal cytotoxicity after 24 h, yet effectively inhibited the proliferation of cervical tumor cells (HeLa). Interestingly, researchers hypothesized that non-lactate molecules were specifically responsible for the demonstrated antitumor activities that were safe for normal tissues residing in the cervix [117,118,119,120]. Vaginal lactobacilli have been shown to have cytotoxic effects on cervical tumor cells in vitro, not considering lactic acid and pH [118,119].
According to Nicolò et al. (2022), all species of vaginal microbiota stimulated the production of interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), interleukin-17 (IL), IL-6, and IL-10 in considerable amounts, with insignificant production of interferon-alfa (IFN-α), interferon gamma-induced protein 10, and IL-4. Among selected species of Lactobacilli, L. gasseri resulted in the highest amounts of IFN-γ and the lowest amounts of IL-17, whereas L. iners had optimally induced IFN-γ and IL-17 release [121,122].
Females with a cervicovaginal microbiota that was extremely diversified or dominated by L. iners were more likely to be HPV-positive in a 16-week longitudinal trial, whereas a microbiota that was dominated by L. gasseri was linked to the fastest remission rate from HPV infection [123]. A study by Nicolò et al. (2022) demonstrated the immunomodulatory potential of L. gasseri, which produced the most effective stimulus resulting in IFN-γ production by human mononuclear cells [121,122]. Other researchers performed luminex cytokine/chemokine panel analysis and were able to extract and highlight particularly L. gasseri LGV03 as an agent that was beneficial for HPV clearance through alterations in the host’s epithelial immune response [124]. The studies confirmed that L. gasseri is essential for local immune response [121,122,124]. However, a prior cross-sectional study that used quantitative PCR revealed that women with HPV had a greater prevalence of Gardnerella vaginalis and L. gasseri [125].
An original study led by Xiao et al. (2016), which compared dynamic changes occurring in the vaginal microbiota with different treatment methods for bacterial vaginosis, concluded that in most bacterial vaginosis-developed cases, Lactobacillus spp. reduced the recurrence rate of this state, though some showed relapse within a month [126]. Another extensive review performed on HPV persistence and microbial species came to the conclusion that species of L. gasseri, L. jensenii, and L. crispatus exert protective effects from HPV, while species of Anaerococcus tetradius, Fusobacterium, Gardnerella vaginalis, Peptostreptococcus, Sneathia, and L. iners in combination with other factors lead to a higher HPV rate and a lower HPV remission rate [127]. Meanwhile, L. gasseri was commonly found in HPV-infected patients in another study together with Gardnerella vaginalis [128]. To support the latter, the latest data collected among Iranian women diagnosed with bacterial vaginosis and infected with HPV showed a statistically significant correlation, with L. gasseri and L. jensenii colony counts being high [129]. Furthermore, it was demonstrated that decreases in HPV infection development risks are positively correlated with the presence of certain Lactobacillus groups, L. gasseri and L. rhamnosus [129].
Thus, L. gasseri and L. iners are not uniformly consistent in appearance and function during infection and healthy states. While L. iners is more often showcased as a “contributor” to a disturbed microbiome profile and also “predisposes” individuals to persistent HPV, consequently leading to cancer development, L. gasseri is more associated with prevalence in a normal cervicovaginal microbiome and stays dominant under the bacterial vaginosis state, when most Lactobacillus spp. are low in number.
A study led by Atassi et al. (2019) investigated mechanisms beyond the defense of the cervicovaginal microbiome by strains of L. crispatus and L. gasseri, eventually proving that most strains exert non-strain-specific protective properties, whereas a few still exhibited strain-specific antimicrobial activities [130]. All strains showed lactic acid-dependent killing of bacterial vaginosis-related microbes: Prevotella bivia, Gardnerella vaginalis, and Escherichia coli [130]. L. crispatus mostly exploits hydrogen peroxide-dependent killing by direct contact, which was demonstrated in the same study.
In a study involving Chinese women who had not been vaccinated previously, L. gasseri dominated among participants in the HPV-positive group [131]. A recently conducted systematic review of nine original studies from 2013 to 2021 determined that in cases when cancer cells were co-cultured with Lactobacillus strains, certain species such as L. gasseri, L. crispatus, and L. casei were able to result in HPV clearance in vitro [132].

5.2.3. Lactobacillus crispatus and Its Role in Cervicovaginal Microbiome Modulation

The dominance of L. crispatus is responsible for the mucosal microenvironment’s high lactic acid production and protective protein release, both of which have been closely linked to a healthy vaginal microbiome [95]. According to Nicolò et al. (2023), out of all Lactobacillus spp., L. crispatus was proven the most effective in protecting against high-risk HPV [122]. One of the ways L. crispatus exerts its protective effect is through the synthesis of high amounts of D-lactic acid enhancing the viscosity properties of the cervicovaginal environment, resulting in the immobilization of viruses [133]. The NGS study results revealed that L. crispatus, L. iners, and L. taiwanensis were the most represented species among HPV-positive patients with low-grade squamous lesions (LSILs) and high-grade squamous lesions (HSILs) [26].
The L. crispatus-prevalent cervicovaginal microbiome had a statistically significant positive correlation with risk reduction for new HPV type acquisition or clearance of existing HPV types [134]. Moreover, Reimers et al. (2016) concluded that the clearance of HPV infection in the presence of L. crispatus or other Lactobacillus subgroups is carried out by different biological mechanisms (other than acid-base status). The researchers suggest a beneficial effect of L. crispatus on the burden of HPV in HIV-positive and HIV-negative women; thus, L. crispatus could contribute to the reduction in HPV infection and cervical disease [134].
As shown in a study by Ghanavati et al. (2020), a bacterial cocktail consisting of L. crispatus, L. gasseri, and L. jensenii reduced the expression of HPV oncogenic markers, particularly E6, E7, cyclin A, and cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (CDK2), thereby diminishing the probability of malignant transformation in cervical epithelial cells [135].

5.2.4. Lactobacillus jensenii and Its Role in Cervicovaginal Microbiome

According to Nicolò et al. (2022), L. iners and L. jensenii were found to be responsible for the slight induction of viral E7 gene expression, while L. crispatus never induced the synthesis of viral genes or proteins when tested on SiHa cells [121]. A study involving young Korean women that had been previously vaccinated against HPV showed that not only bacterial vaginosis-related microbes but also L. jensenii and L. iners had a positive association with high-risk HPV cases and higher microbial diversity in the cervicovaginal microbiome [136]. Interestingly, in a study involving HPV-positive and HPV-negative pregnant women who were tested for cervical microbial composition, community state type IV with the prevalence of L. jensenii was found in HPV-positive pregnant patients [137].
Fang et al. (2022) found that L. jensenii, L. crispatus, and L. helvetius were highly prevalent in healthy individuals, which undermines their biomarker significance [138]. The authors concluded that L. crispatus and L. jensenii are potent defenders against high-risk HPV infections among all other lactobacilli representatives [138]. In a study by Hu et al. (2021), L. casei LH23 was proven to be effective in reducing the expression of E6/E7 genes, which are important causative factors for the emergence and development of cervical cancer [139]. Another recent study proposed L. acidophilus and L. paracasei as promising candidates for inducing apoptosis in cervical cancer cells (Table 2) [140].

5.2.5. Mechanisms Underlying Defense by Lactobacilli spp.

After analyzing the effect of L. crispatus on cervical precancerous cells, Wan et al. (2023) found that this strain could prevent the proliferation and migration of infected cells with no significant effect on cell invasion [117].
A study by Lebeau et al. (2022) uncovered a novel viral immune evasion mechanism; namely, it showed that HPV inhibits basal and pro-inflammatory-induced host defense peptide expression [149].
Later, a systematic review on the implications and mechanisms of the antiviral effects of Lactobacilli spp. by Farahmandi et al. (2023) categorized the antiviral mechanisms into three groups: directly affecting the viruses, production/synthesis of specific antiviral compounds, or immune system activation against viruses [150]. According to this study, Lactobacilli spp. has significant antiviral effects.
A novel microorganism found in patients with cervical cancer is Porphyromonas asaccharolytica, which was able to activate genes responsible for inflammation. The basis for the following findings might be correlated with the results by Lithgow et al. (2022), which imply Porphyromonas spp. interaction with extracellular matrix proteases, leading to collagen degradation and subsequent disturbance of the coagulation system [151].
Moreover, type I interferons, such as IFN-α, IFN-β, and TLR3, are globally downregulated in HPV-positive patients with long-term HPV persistence, as reported by Gao et al. (2023) [124]. L. gasseri LGV03 helps maintain immune system vigilance against potential pathogens and reduces the inflammatory effects of persistent infection [124].
Cervicovaginal epithelial cells’ pro-inflammatory characteristics may be modulated by Lactobacilli’s high lactate synthesis and low short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) production [152]. Vaginal Lactobacilli have been shown to have cytotoxic effects on cervical tumor cells in vitro, not considering lactic acid and pH [118].

6. Local Cervicovaginal Immunity

6.1. Mechanisms and Factors Involved in Immune Response

The cervicovaginal immunological profile plays a crucial role in protecting the female reproductive tract from infections while maintaining a balanced microbiome. This immunity is characterized by a complex interplay of cellular and humoral responses, involving various immune cells, cytokines, and antimicrobial peptides [153].
The cervix consists of two immunologically distinct regions: the ectocervix, which harbors microorganisms, and the endocervix, considered “sterile”, separated by the cervical transformation zone [49,154]. The epithelial cells in both regions play a crucial role in immune defense, forming physical barriers through mechanisms like mucus secretion and tight junctions, and producing antimicrobial agents [155].
The mucus secreted by cervical epithelial cells serves as a protective barrier, containing antimicrobial proteins such as lysozyme and lactoferrin that neutralize potential microbial threats [156]. Additionally, cervical epithelial cells secrete various antimicrobial peptides, cytokines, and chemokines, enhancing the immune response. Notable secreted factors include β-defensins, secretory leukocyte protease inhibitors, and immunoglobulins (IgA and IgG), which are essential in preventing ascending infections to the upper reproductive tract [157].
These epithelial cells also express pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), which detect microbial pathogens and activate immune responses [158]. In the ectocervix and vagina, immune cells like T-cells, natural killer (NK) cells, and macrophages work in conjunction with epithelial cells to sustain local immunity. The concentration of these immune cells fluctuates with the menstrual cycle and pregnancy, reflecting an increase in immune activity during certain reproductive phases [159].
The immune environment of the vaginal mucosa interacts with the composition of the vaginal microbiome and regulates its function [160,161]. This complex interaction involves pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines, antibodies, and epithelial and immune cells, as well as antimicrobial peptides [17,37,162,163]. Epithelial and immune cells, including dendritic cells in the vaginal mucus, play a dual role by detecting infections and maintaining balance with the VMB. These cells identify microbial components (antigens) through PRRs such as Toll-like receptors (TLRs), triggering the production of antimicrobial peptides and immunomodulatory cytokines/chemokines. Dendritic cells are also essential for linking the innate and adaptive immune responses, by presenting antigens to immune cells: macrophages, neutrophils, T and B cells, and NK cells [164,165].

6.2. Local Immune Response to HPV Infection

The innate and adaptive immune responses constitute the primary line of host defense at mucosal surfaces against infections like HPV [165]. The mucosal barrier present in the vagina plays a protective role as a result of co-interaction between epithelial cells, microorganisms, and the immune system [115,166].
The mucus is a gel-like layer that is primarily made up of mucins (MUCs), which are highly glycosylated mucous glycoproteins [44,167]. MUC5AC, MUC5B, and MUC6 mucins are secreted by cervical cells into the cervix. These mucins then flow into the vagina, where interaction with bacteria and vaginal epithelial cell products appear to form the cervicovaginal microbiome [168].
Furthermore, defense is provided through vaginal antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) which are responsible for not allowing foreign proteins to adhere to cells lining the genital tract [169]. Among them, the class of defensin molecules provides several ways of defense against the commonest microbial agents invading the vagina, which include HPV as well as the herpes simplex virus (HSV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Particularly, human β-defensin-2 (HBD-2) was highly expressed when the vaginal environment was abundant with bacterial species appearing during HPV infection, namely Atopobium vaginae and Prevotella bivia [170]. Other representatives of AMP are secretory leukocyte protease inhibitors, LL-37, and surfactant proteins A and D [164]. Just as defensins provide protection, surfactant proteins also exert inhibitory effects on viruses by binding to gp120 and CD4 expressed on host cells [171].
In addition, IgG and IgA prevent vaginal epithelial cell adherence and intake [170]. Moreover, these immunoglobulins play essential roles in neutralizing infectious agents and facilitating their clearance from the vaginal microenvironment [172].
Another protective mechanism is realized by PRRs, specifically DNA sensors involved in innate immunity reactions. Several PRRs act to recognize DNA upon HPV entry: IFN-γ-inducible protein 16 [173,174], TLR2, TLR4 [175], TLR 5, TLR 9 [176], and cyclic GMP-AMP synthase [177].
The innate immune response employs polymorphonuclear neutrophils and macrophages, which are implicated in oxidative bursts by reacting myeloperoxidase present in them with hydrogen peroxidase released by Lactobacilli [178]. NK and dendritic cells (DCs) are activated upon virus-like particles (VLPs) used in vaccines against HPV. Specifically, there is an upregulation of CD86 and human leucocyte antigen DR (HLA-DR), responsible for DC maturation; cell surface activation markers (CD69 and HLA-DR), responsible for the further activation of NK cells; increased production of IL-12p70; and an increase in IFN-γ secretion and cytotoxic activity by NK cells [179], which demonstrates the immune responsiveness of these cells against HPV.
Vaginal microbiome composition monitors the activation of different antigen-presenting cells (APCs) such as memory Th1, Th17, and Treg lymphocytes [180], cervicovaginal Langerhans cells (cvLCs), CD14 DCs, CD14+ DCs, and CD14+ macrophages [181]. When HPV-negative women and those with persistent infection were compared against those who succeeded in HPV clearance, the number of LCs was higher, while not much difference was observed in the number of CD4+ T-cells, mDCs, or monocytes [182].
Furthermore, Th17 and IL-17 were determined to be critical components of the immune response throughout disease progression; however, this was not true for high-risk HPV cases [183]. Conversely, IL-17 was previously shown to suppress immunity in HPV-associated cases [184].
According to a review performed by Passmore and Williamson (2016), Toll-like receptor 9 (TLR-9) stimulates the release of several cytokines and chemical mediators, namely tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-8 (IL-8), macrophage inflammatory protein-3α (MIP-3α), monokine induced by gamma interferon (MIG), and interferon alpha (IFN-α). Despite TLR-9’s ability to recognize DNA pathogen-associated molecular patterns, HPV possesses E6 and E7 proteins, which interact with molecules within the TLR-9 intracellular signaling pathway, resulting in a reduction in the amount of IFN-α secreted [185]. In vitro studies proved that a cervicovaginal microbiome composed of more diverse bacterial species was characterized by higher levels of pro-inflammatory cytokine levels, such as IL-1α, IL-1β, and IL-8 [37]. In vivo studies by Thurman et al. (2015) confirmed the presence of IL-1β and TNF-α in high amounts when the vaginal microbiome was disturbed [186].
Interestingly, certain major histocompatibility complex I (MHC I) alleles predispose individuals to HPV persistence, a fact which gives another ground for thinking that the affinities of HPV antigens displayed by MHC molecules vary, and they might or might not be immunogenic enough to effectively prime immune cells specific to HPV in protected vs. at-risk individuals [187].
Other researchers reported that due to the long persistence of HPV and HPV detection at late stages of disease progression, the virus might employ strategies to evade the host immune response [188]. Another mechanism utilized by HPV is through reducing antigen synthesis while the virus is in its vegetative life stage, a process termed the passive immune evasion strategy [188]. As the name implies, a virus expresses an extremely low number of proteins during the early stages of its lifecycle, so very poor antigen presentation occurs [188].
In general, the local cervicovaginal immune reaction’s extent is determined by community state types in the female vaginal microbiome: while type IV results in the highest pro-inflammatory reaction, type I and type II have the lowest protective properties [164].

7. Strengths and Limitations

This manuscript demonstrates several notable strengths. It offers a comprehensive literature overview on the cervicovaginal microbiome, its physiological roles, age-related variations, and its interactions with HPV, providing a holistic view of the subject matter. The authors conducted a robust literature review, utilizing multiple databases such as PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Google Scholar, ensuring a broad and current literature base. By focusing on studies from the past two decades, this manuscript maintains relevance and comprehensiveness. Its emphasis on the interaction between local immunity and the microbiota in HPV persistence and progression offers a fresh perspective, adding depth to the understanding of cervical cancer pathogenesis. The inclusion and exclusion criteria are clearly defined, ensuring the quality and relevance of the incorporated studies.
Despite these strengths, this manuscript also has notable limitations. As a narrative review, it lacks the statistical rigor of a quantitative meta-analysis, which could provide stronger evidence for the relationships discussed. The restriction to English-language articles introduces potential selection bias, possibly excluding valuable research in other languages. The absence of original experimental or clinical data limits its capacity to present novel findings. Variability in the designs, populations, and methodologies of the included studies introduces heterogeneity, which may affect the consistency of its conclusions. Many of the cited studies are cross-sectional, limiting the ability to infer causality between microbiota changes and HPV outcomes. Additionally, integrating interdisciplinary perspectives, such as epigenetics and behavioral science, could provide a more comprehensive understanding of the microbial ecosystem and immunity interactions. These limitations suggest that further studies on the effects of cervicovaginal microbiota and its impact on the persistence of HPV should be further investigated.

8. Conclusions

The findings of this comprehensive review highlight the critical role of the cervicovaginal microbiome and local immune responses in shaping the natural history of HPV infection and its progression to cervical cancer. Cervical cancer, a leading cause of cancer-related mortality among female, is primarily driven by persistent infections with high-risk HPV types, notably HPV-16 and HPV-18. However, the persistence and progression of HPV infection are not solely dependent on viral presence but are significantly influenced by the composition and stability of the cervicovaginal microbiome and the host’s immune response.
A healthy cervicovaginal microbiome, dominated by Lactobacillus species, particularly Lactobacillus crispatus and Lactobacillus gasseri, is associated with a protective microenvironment that suppresses HPV persistence. These beneficial bacteria maintain an acidic pH through the production of lactic acid, hydrogen peroxide, and bacteriocins, creating a hostile environment for pathogenic microorganisms and modulating local immune responses. In contrast, microbial dysbiosis—marked by a reduction in Lactobacillus dominance and an overgrowth of anaerobic bacteria such as Gardnerella, Prevotella, and Sneathia—is closely linked to chronic inflammation, epithelial barrier disruption, and increased HPV persistence. Notably, Lactobacillus iners presents a paradox, being prevalent in both healthy and dysbiotic states, suggesting its dual role as a potential transitional species in microbiome instability.
The local immune response is another key factor in HPV infection outcomes. Although immune protective mechanisms are present, HPV employs sophisticated immune evasion strategies, such as downregulating interferon responses and limiting antigen presentation, enabling its long-term persistence and progression toward malignancy.
Hormonal fluctuations, particularly variations in estrogen levels, further influence the cervicovaginal microbiome. During reproductive years, high estrogen levels promote a Lactobacillus-rich environment by increasing glycogen availability, which supports lactic acid production. However, menopause-associated estrogen decline disrupts this balance, leading to a rise in vaginal pH and microbial diversity, thereby increasing the risk of HPV persistence and cervical dysplasia.
These insights into the interplay between the cervicovaginal microbiome, immune responses, and HPV infection suggest several promising therapeutic avenues. Modulating the microbiome through probiotics, prebiotics, or microbial transplantation could potentially enhance HPV clearance and restore microbial balance. Additionally, immunomodulatory therapies targeting the local immune environment may offer innovative approaches to prevent the progression of HPV-related lesions and reduce the burden of cervical cancer.
Therefore, the cervicovaginal microbiome and local immunity play a pivotal role in determining the outcome of HPV infections. A well-balanced Lactobacillus-dominant microbiome acts as a natural defense against HPV persistence, while microbial dysbiosis and immune evasion strategies contribute to the development of cervical cancer. Future research should focus on elucidating these complex interactions further and exploring microbiome-targeted and immunotherapeutic strategies to improve HPV management and cervical cancer prevention. This integrated understanding offers a promising pathway for developing personalized, non-invasive interventions that could transform the landscape of cervical cancer prevention and treatment.

Funding

This research was funded by the Science Committee of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan (Grant No. BR24992853, Title: National program for study of HPV with development of integrated approach to the effective diagnosis and treatment of precancerous conditions). Talshyn Ukybassova is a PI of the research project. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Nazarbayev University School of Medicine for the continuous support that enabled the completion of this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Usyk, M.; Zolnik, C.P.; Castle, P.E.; Porras, C.; Herrero, R.; Gradissimo, A.; Gonzalez, P.; Safaeian, M.; Schiffman, M.; Burk, R.D.; et al. Cervicovaginal microbiome and natural history of HPV in a longitudinal study. PLoS Pathog. 2020, 16, e1008376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Imankulova, B.; Babi, A.; Issa, T.; Zhumakanova, Z.; Knaub, L.; Yerzhankyzy, A.; Aimagambetova, G. Prevalence of Precancerous Cervical Lesions among Nonvaccinated Kazakhstani Women: The National Tertiary Care Hospital Screening Data (2018). Healthcare 2023, 11, 235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Aimagambetova, G.; Bapayeva, G.; Ukybassova, T.; Kamzayeva, N.; Sakhipova, G.; Shanazarov, N.; Terzic, M. Risks of Cervical Cancer Recurrence After Fertility-Sparing Surgery and the Role of Human Papillomavirus Infection Types. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 6318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Aimagambetova, G.; Azizan, A. Human Papillomavirus Vaccination: Past, Present and Future. Vaccines 2022, 10, 1398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Babi, A.; Issa, T.; Gusmanov, A.; Akilzhanova, A.; Issanov, A.; Makhmetova, N.; Marat, A.; Iztleuov, Y.; Aimagambetova, G. Prevalence of high-risk human papillomavirus infection and genotype distribution among Kazakhstani women with abnormal cervical cytology. Ann. Med. 2024, 56, 2304649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Chan, C.K.; Aimagambetova, G.; Ukybassova, T.; Kongrtay, K.; Azizan, A. Human Papillomavirus Infection and Cervical Cancer: Epidemiology, Screening, and Vaccination-Review of Current Perspectives. J. Oncol. 2019, 2019, 3257939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Huang, R.; Liu, Z.; Sun, T.; Zhu, L. Cervicovaginal microbiome, high-risk HPV infection and cervical cancer: Mechanisms and therapeutic potential. Microbiol. Res. 2024, 287, 127857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Zhang, Y.; Wu, X.; Li, D.; Huang, R.; Deng, X.; Li, M.; Du, F.; Zhao, Y.; Shen, J.; Chen, Y.; et al. HPV-associated cervicovaginal microbiome and host metabolome characteristics. BMC Microbiol. 2024, 24, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Hou, K.; Wu, Z.X.; Chen, X.Y.; Wang, J.Q.; Zhang, D.; Xiao, C.; Zhu, D.; Koya, J.B.; Wei, L.; Li, J.; et al. Microbiota in health and diseases. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2022, 7, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  10. Costello, E.K.; Lauber, C.L.; Hamady, M.; Fierer, N.; Gordon, J.I.; Knight, R. Bacterial community variation in human body habitats across space and time. Science 2009, 326, 1694–1697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gao, H.; Liu, Q.; Wang, X.; Li, T.; Li, H.; Li, G.; Tan, L.; Chen, Y. Deciphering the role of female reproductive tract microbiome in reproductive health: A review. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2024, 14, 1351540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Chen, C.; Song, X.; Wei, W.; Zhong, H.; Dai, J.; Lan, Z.; Li, F.; Yu, X.; Feng, Q.; Wang, Z.; et al. The microbiota continuum along the female reproductive tract and its relation to uterine-related diseases. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chen, X.; Lu, Y.; Chen, T.; Li, R. The Female Vaginal Microbiome in Health and Bacterial Vaginosis. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2021, 11, 631972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Muzny, C.A.; Łaniewski, P.; Schwebke, J.R.; Herbst-Kralovetz, M.M. Host-vaginal microbiota interactions in the pathogenesis of bacterial vaginosis. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 2020, 33, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhu, N.; Yang, X.; Liu, Q.; Chen, Y.; Wang, X.; Li, H.; Gao, H. “Iron triangle” of regulating the uterine microecology: Endometrial microbiota, immunity and endometrium. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 928475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Łaniewski, P.; Ilhan, Z.E.; Herbst-Kralovetz, M.M. The microbiome and gynaecological cancer development, prevention and therapy. Nat. Rev. Urol. 2020, 17, 232–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Wang, N.; Chen, L.; Yi, K.; Zhang, B.; Li, C.; Zhou, X. The effects of microbiota on reproductive health: A review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 64, 1486–1507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, J.; Li, Z.; Ma, X.; Du, L.; Jia, Z.; Cui, X.; Yu, L.; Yang, J.; Xiao, L.; Zhang, B.; et al. Translocation of vaginal microbiota is involved in impairment and protection of uterine health. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 4191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Recine, N.; Palma, E.; Domenici, L.; Giorgini, M.; Imperiale, L.; Sassu, C.; Musella, A.; Marchetti, C.; Muzii, L.; Panici, P.B. Restoring vaginal microbiota: Biological control of bacterial vaginosis. A prospective case-control study using Lactobacillus rhamnosus BMX 54 as adjuvant treatment against bacterial vaginosis. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2016, 293, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cohen, C.R.; Wierzbicki, M.R.; French, A.L.; Morris, S.; Newmann, S.; Reno, H.; Green, L.; Miller, S.; Powell, J.; Parks, T.; et al. Randomized trial of lactin-V to prevent recurrence of bacterial vaginosis. N Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 1906–1915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Huang, W. Effect of live Lactobacillus capsules andinterferon a-2b suppository combined with LEEP on cervical in-traepithelial neoplasia with high risk human papilloma virus. J. Chin. J. Microecol. 2017, 29, 587–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Iwami, N.; Kawamata, M.; Ozawa, N.; Yamamoto, T.; Watanabe, E.; Mizuuchi, M.; Moriwaka, O.; Kamiya, H. Therapeutic intervention based on gene sequencing analysis of microbial 16S ribosomal RNA of the intrauterine microbiome improves pregnancy outcomes in IVF patients: A prospective cohort study. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2023, 40, 125–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Łaniewski, P.; Herbst-Kralovetz, M.M. Bacterial vaginosis and health-associated bacteria modulate the immunometabolic landscape in 3D model of human cervix. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 2021, 7, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  24. Ravel, J.; Gajer, P.; Abdo, Z.; Schneider, G.M.; Koenig, S.S.K.; McCulle, S.L.; Karlebach, S.; Gorle, R.; Russell, J.; Tacket, C.O.; et al. Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 108 (Suppl. S1), 4680–4687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Integrative, H.M.P. (iHMP) research network consortium. The integrative human microbiome project. Nature 2019, 569, 641–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Santella, B.; Schettino, M.T.; Franci, G.; De Franciscis, P.; Colacurci, N.; Schiattarella, A.; Galdiero, M. Microbiota and HPV: The role of viral infection on vaginal microbiota. J. Med. Virol. 2022, 94, 4478–4484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kroon, S.J.; Ravel, J.; Huston, W.M. Cervicovaginal microbiota, women’s health, and reproductive outcomes. Fertil. Steril. 2018, 110, 327–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Lloyd-Price, J.; Mahurkar, A.; Rahnavard, G.; Crabtree, J.; Orvis, J.; Hall, A.B.; Brady, A.; Creasy, H.H.; McCracken, C.; Giglio, M.G.; et al. Strains, functions and dynamics in the expanded Human Microbiome Project. Nature 2017, 550, 61–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Younes, J.A.; Lievens, E.; Hummelen, R.; van der Westen, R.; Reid, G.; Petrova, M.I. Women and their microbes: The unexpected friendship. Trends Microbiol. 2018, 26, 16–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. France, M.T.; Mendes-Soares, H.; Forney, L.J. Genomic Comparisons of Lactobacillus crispatus and Lactobacillus iners Reveal Potential Ecological Drivers of Community Composition in the Vagina. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2016, 82, 7063–7073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Doyle, R.; Gondwe, A.; Fan, Y.-M.; Maleta, K.; Ashorn, P.; Klein, N.; Harris, K. A lactobacillus-deficient vaginal microbiota dominates postpartum women in rural Malawi. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2018, 84, e02150-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Brennan, C.; Chan, K.; Kumar, T.; Maissy, E.; Brubaker, L.; Dothard, M.I.; Gilbert, J.A.; Gilbert, K.E.; Lewis, A.L.; Thackray, V.G.; et al. Harnessing the power within: Engineering the microbiome for enhanced gynecologic health. Reprod. Fertil. 2024, 5, e230060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Romero, R.; Theis, K.R.; Gomez-Lopez, N.; Winters, A.D.; Panzer, J.J.; Lin, H.; Galaz, J.; Greenberg, J.M.; Shaffer, Z.; Kracht, D.J.; et al. The Vaginal Microbiota of Pregnant Women Varies with Gestational Age, Maternal Age, and Parity. Microbiol. Spectr. 2023, 11, e0342922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. De Seta, F.; Campisciano, G.; Zanotta, N.; Ricci, G.; Comar, M. The vaginal community state types microbiome-immune network as key factor for bacterial vaginosis and aerobic vaginitis. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 2451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bommana, S.; Hu, Y.-J.; Kama, M.; Wang, R.; Kodimerla, R.; Jijakli, K.; Read, T.D.; Dean, D. Unique microbial diversity, community composition, and networks among Pacific Islander endocervical and vaginal microbiomes with and without Chlamydia trachomatis infection in Fiji. mBio 2024, 15, e0306323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Fuochi, V.; Cardile, V.; Petronio Petronio, G.; Furneri, P.M. Biological properties and production of bacteriocins-like-inhibitory substances by Lactobacillus sp. strains from human vagina. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2019, 126, 1541–1550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Anahtar, M.N.; Byrne, E.H.; Doherty, K.E.; Bowman, B.A.; Yamamoto, H.S.; Soumillon, M.; Padavattan, N.; Ismail, N.; Moodley, A.; Sabatini, M.E.; et al. Cervicovaginal bacteria are a major modulator of host inflammatory responses in the female genital tract. Immunity 2015, 42, 965–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Manhanzva, M.T.; Abrahams, A.G.; Gamieldien, H.; Froissart, R.; Jaspan, H.; Jaumdally, S.Z.; Barnabas, S.L.; Dabee, S.; Bekker, L.G.; Gray, G.; et al. Inflammatory and antimicrobial properties differ between vaginal Lactobacillus isolates from South African women with non-optimal versus optimal microbiota. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 6196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gupta, V.K.; Paul, S.; Dutta, C. Geography, Ethnicity or Subsistence-Specific Variations in Human Microbiome Composition and Diversity. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Onywera, H.; Williamson, A.-L.; Mbulawa, Z.Z.A.; Coetzee, D.; Meiring, T.L. The cervical microbiota in reproductive-age South African women with and without human papillomavirus infection. Papillomavirus Res. 2019, 7, 154–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Onywera, H.; Williamson, A.; Mbulawa, Z.Z.; Coetzee, D.; Meiring, T.L. Factors associated with the composition and diversity of the cervical microbiota of reproductive-age Black South African women: A retrospective cross-sectional study. PeerJ 2019, 7, e7488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Takada, K.; Melnikov, V.G.; Kobayashi, R.; Komine-Aizawa, S.; Tsuji, N.M.; Hayakawa, S. Female reproductive tract-organ axes. Front. Immunol. 2023, 14, 1110001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  43. Keburiya, L.K.; Smolnikova, V.Y.; Priputnevich, T.V.; Muravieva, V.V.; Gordeev, A.B.; Trofimov, D.Y.; Shubina, E.S.; Kochetkova, T.O.; Rogacheva, M.S.; Kalinina, E.A.; et al. Does the uterine microbiota affect the reproductive outcomes in women with recurrent implantation failures? BMC Womens Health 2022, 22, 168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Dong, M.; Dong, Y.; Bai, J.; Li, H.; Ma, X.; Li, B.; Wang, C.; Li, H.; Qi, W.; Wang, Y.; et al. Interactions between microbiota and cervical epithelial, immune, and mucus barrier. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2023, 13, 1124591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Amabebe, E.; Anumba, D.O.C. The Vaginal Microenvironment: The Physiologic Role of Lactobacilli. Front. Med. 2018, 5, 181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Witkin, S.S.; Linhares, I.M. Why do lactobacilli dominate the human vaginal microbiota? BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2017, 124, 606–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Liu, Y.; Zhao, X.; Wu, F.; Chen, J.; Luo, J.; Wu, C.; Chen, T. Effectiveness of vaginal probiotics Lactobacillus crispatus chen-01 in women with high-risk HPV infection: A prospective controlled pilot study. Aging 2024, 16, 11446–11459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Liu, Y.; Wang, S.; Mu, B.; Li, R.; Liu, J.; Liang, X.; Su, M. Exploring the vaginal microbiome’s role in HPV infection dynamics: A Prospective Cohort study. Res. Sq. 2024. preprints. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Edwards, V.L.; Smith, S.B.; McComb, E.J.; Tamarelle, J.; Ma, B.; Humphrys, M.S.; Gajer, P.; Gwilliam, K.; Schaefer, A.M.; Lai, S.K.; et al. The Cervicovaginal Microbiota-Host Interaction Modulates Chlamydia trachomatis Infection. mBio 2019, 10, e01548-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  50. O’Hanlon, D.E.; Moench, T.R.; Cone, R.A. In vitro activity of Lactobacillus species against Gardnerella vaginalis. J. Infect. Dis. 2011, 204, 857–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Pendharkar, S.; Skafte-Holm, A.; Simsek, G.; Haahr, T. Lactobacilli and Their Probiotic Effects in the Vagina of Reproductive Age Women. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  52. Darbandi, A.; Asadi, A.; Mahdizade Ari, M.; Ohadi, E.; Talebi, M.; Halaj Zadeh, M.; Darb Emamie, A.; Ghanavati, R.; Kakanj, M. Bacteriocins: Properties and potential use as antimicrobials. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 2022, 36, e24093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Parolin, C.; Marangoni, A.; Laghi, L.; Foschi, C.; Ñahui Palomino, R.A.; Calonghi, N.; Cevenini, R.; Vitali, B. Isolation of Vaginal Lactobacilli and Characterization of Anti-Candida Activity. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0131220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  54. Monteagudo-Mera, A.; Rastall, R.A.; Gibson, G.R.; Charalampopoulos, D.; Chatzifragkou, A. Adhesion mechanisms mediated by probiotics and prebiotics and their potential impact on human health. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 103, 6463–6472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Scillato, M.; Spitale, A.; Mongelli, G.; Privitera, G.F.; Mangano, K.; Cianci, A.; Stefani, S.; Santagati, M. Antimicrobial properties of Lactobacillus cell-free supernatants against multidrug-resistant urogenital pathogens. Microbiologyopen 2021, 10, e1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Asadi, A.; Lohrasbi, V.; Abdi, M.; Mirkalantari, S.; Esghaei, M.; Kashanian, M.; Oshaghi, M.; Talebi, M. The probiotic properties and potential of vaginal Lactobacillus spp. isolated from healthy women against some vaginal pathogens. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2022, 74, 752–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zárate, G.; Nader-Macias, M.E. Influence of probiotic vaginal lactobacilli on in vitro adhesion of urogenital pathogens to vaginal epithelial cells. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2006, 43, 174–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Ribet, D.; Cossart, P. Pathogen adhesion as a critical step in infection. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2015, 13, 310–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Li, J.; Jiang, L.; Wang, C.; Meng, J.; Wang, H.; Jin, H. Investigation of the relationship between the changes in vaginal microecological enzymes and human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. Medicine 2024, 103, e37068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Miko, E.; Barakonyi, A. The Role of Hydrogen-Peroxide (H2O2) Produced by Vaginal Microbiota in Female Reproductive Health. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  61. Wang, Y.; Thakur, R.; Shen, Q.; He, Y.; Chen, C. Influences of vaginal microbiota on human papillomavirus infection and host immune regulation: What we have learned? Decod. Infect. Transm. 2023, 1, 100002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zhang, Z.; Ma, Q.; Zhang, L.; Ma, L.; Wang, D.; Yang, Y.; Jia, P.; Wu, Y.; Wang, F. Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer in the microbial world: Exploring the vaginal microecology. Front. Cell Infect Microbiol. 2024, 14, 1325500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  63. Clarke, M.A.; Rodriguez, A.C.; Gage, J.C.; Herrero, R.; Hildesheim, A.; Wacholder, S.; Burk, R.; Schiffman, M. A large, population-based study of age-related associations between vaginal pH and human papillomavirus infection. BMC Infect Dis. 2012, 12, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Norenhag, J.; Blomberg, M.; Ahrlund-Richter, A. Impact of vaginal pH on HPV infection and disease progression: A systematic review. J. Clin. Virol. 2020, 128, 104431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Vitali, D.; Wessels, J.M.; Kaushic, C. Role of sex hormones and the vaginal microbiome in susceptibility and mucosal immunity to HIV-1 in the female genital tract. AIDS Res. Ther. 2017, 14, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Shen, L.; Zhang, W.; Yuan, Y.; Zhu, W.; Shang, A. Vaginal microecological characteristics of women in different physiological and pathological period. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 959793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Stout, M.J.; Conlon, B.; Landeau, M.; Lee, I.; Bower, C.; Zhao, Q.; Roehl, K.A.; Nelson, D.M.; Macones, G.A.; Mysorekar, I.U. Identification of intracellular bacteria in the basal plate of the human placenta in term and preterm gestations. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2013, 208, 226.e1–226.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Lehtoranta, L.; Ala-Jaakkola, R.; Laitila, A.; Maukonen, J. Healthy Vaginal Microbiota and Influence of Probiotics Across the Female Life Span. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 819958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Beharry, K.D.; Latkowska, M.; Valencia, A.M.; Allana, A.; Soto, J.; Cai, C.L.; Golombek, S.; Hand, I.; Aranda, J.V. Factors Influencing Neonatal Gut Microbiome and Health with a Focus on Necrotizing Enterocolitis. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 2528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Dombrowska-Pali, A.; Wiktorczyk-Kapischke, N.; Chrustek, A.; Olszewska-Słonina, D.; Gospodarek-Komkowska, E.; Socha, M.W. Human Milk Microbiome—A Review of Scientific Reports. Nutrients 2024, 16, 1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Petrariu, O.A.; Barbu, I.C.; Niculescu, A.G.; Constantin, M.; Grigore, G.A.; Cristian, R.E.; Mihaescu, G.; Vrancianu, C.O. Role of probiotics in managing various human diseases, from oral pathology to cancer and gastrointestinal diseases. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 14, 1296447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Nasr, M.A.; Aldous, A.; Daniels, J.; Joy, C.; Capozzi, E.; Yang, M.; Moriarty, P.; Emmanuel-Baker, V.; Malcolm, S.; Green, S.J.; et al. Effect of progestin-based contraceptives on HIV-associated vaginal immune biomarkers and microbiome in adolescent girls. PLoS ONE 2024, 19, e0306237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Barrientos-Durán, A.; Fuentes-López, A.; de Salazar, A.; Plaza-Díaz, J.; García, F. Reviewing the Composition of Vaginal Microbiota: Inclusion of Nutrition and Probiotic Factors in the Maintenance of Eubiosis. Nutrients 2020, 12, 419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Roberts, S.A.; Brabin, L.; Diallo, S.; Gies, S.; Nelson, A.; Stewart, C.; Swinkels, D.W.; Geurts-Moespot, A.J.; Kazienga, A.; Ouedraogo, S.; et al. Mucosal lactoferrin response to genital tract infections is associated with iron and nutritional biomarkers in young Burkinabé women. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2019, 73, 1464–1472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Kaur, H.; Merchant, M.; Haque, M.M.; Mande, S.S. Crosstalk between female gonadal hormones and vaginal microbiota across various phases of women’s gynecological lifecycle. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Chee, W.J.Y.; Chew, S.Y.; Than, L.T.L. Vaginal microbiota and the potential of Lactobacillus derivatives in maintaining vaginal health. Microb. Cell Factories 2020, 19, 203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Bardos, J.; Fiorentino, D.; Longman, R.E.; Paidas, M. Immunological Role of the Maternal Uterine Microbiome in Pregnancy: Pregnancies Pathologies and Alterated Microbiota. Front. Immunol. 2020, 10, 2823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Saadaoui, M.; Singh, P.; Ortashi, O.; Al Khodor, S. Role of the vaginal microbiome in miscarriage: Exploring the relationship. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2023, 13, 1232825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Oliver, A.; LaMere, B.; Weihe, C.; Wandro, S.; Lindsay, K.L.; Wadhwa, P.D.; Mills, D.A.; Pride, D.T.; Fiehn, O.; Northen, T.; et al. Cervicovaginal Microbiome Composition Is Associated with Metabolic Profiles in Healthy Pregnancy. mBio 2020, 11, e01851-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Jordan, M.M.; Amabebe, E.; Khanipov, K.; Taylor, B.D. Scoping Review of Microbiota Dysbiosis and Risk of Preeclampsia. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2024, 92, e70003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Shardell, M.; Gravitt, P.E.; Burke, A.E.; Ravel, J.; Brotman, R.M. Association of Vaginal Microbiota With Signs and Symptoms of the Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause Across Reproductive Stages. J. Gerontol. Ser. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2021, 76, 1542–1550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Gliniewicz, K.; Schneider, G.M.; Ridenhour, B.J.; Williams, C.J.; Song, Y.; Farage, M.A.; Miller, K.; Forney, L.J. Comparison of the Vaginal Microbiomes of Premenopausal and Postmenopausal Women. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. de Oliveira, N.S.; de Lima, A.B.F.; de Brito, J.C.R.; Sarmento, A.C.A.; Gonçalves, A.K.S.; Eleutério, J., Jr. Postmenopausal Vaginal Microbiome and Microbiota. Front. Reprod. Health 2022, 3, 780931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Głowienka-Stodolak, M.; Bagińska-Drabiuk, K.; Szubert, S.; Hennig, E.E.; Horala, A.; Dąbrowska, M.; Micek, M.; Ciebiera, M.; Zeber-Lubecka, N. Human Papillomavirus Infections and the Role Played by Cervical and Cervico-Vaginal Microbiota—Evidence from Next-Generation Sequencing Studies. Cancers 2024, 16, 399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Lan, Y.; Jin, B.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, Y.; Luo, Z.; Su, C.; Li, J.; Ma, L.; Zhou, J. Vaginal microbiota, menopause, and the use of menopausal hormone therapy: A cross-sectional, pilot study in Chinese women. Menopause 2024, 31, 1014–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Gandhi, K.; Gutierrez, P.; Garza, J.; Arispe, R.; Galloway, M.; Ventolini, G. Lactobacillus species and inflammatory cytokine profile in the vaginal milieu of pre-menopausal and post-menopausal women. GREM—Gynecol. Reprod. Endocrinol. Metab. 2020, 1, 180–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Yoshikata, R.; Yamaguchi, M.; Mase, Y.; Tatsuzuki, A.; Myint, K.Z.Y.; Ohta, H. Age-Related changes, influencing factors, and crosstalk between vaginal and gut microbiota: A Cross-Sectional Comparative Study of pre- and postmenopausal women. J. Women’s Health 2022, 31, 1763–1772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Egawa, N.; Egawa, K.; Griffin, H.; Doorbar, J. Human papillomaviruses; epithelial tropisms, and the development of neoplasia. Viruses 2015, 7, 3863–3890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Sung, H.; Ferlay, J.; Siegel, R.L.; Laversanne, M.; Soerjomataram, I.; Jemal, A.; Bray, F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021, 71, 209–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. De Martel, C.; Georges, D.; Bray, F.; Ferlay, J.; Clifford, G.M. Global burden of cancer attributable to infections in 2018: A worldwide incidence analysis. Lancet Glob. Health 2020, 8, e180–e190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Arbyn, M.; Weiderpass, E.; Bruni, L.; de Sanjosé, S.; Saraiya, M.; Ferlay, J.; Bray, F. Estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in 2018: A worldwide analysis. Lancet Glob. Health 2020, 8, e191–e203, Erratum in: Lancet Glob Health. 2022, 10, e41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Zhao, M.; Wu, Q.; Hao, Y.; Hu, J.; Gao, Y.; Zhou, S.; Han, L. Global, regional, and national burden of cervical cancer for 195 countries and territories, 2007–2017: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. BMC Women’s Health 2021, 21, 419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Kyrgiou, M.; Mitra, A.; Moscicki, A. Does the vaginal microbiota play a role in the development of cervical cancer? Transl. Res. 2017, 179, 168–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Zhou, Z.; Long, H.; Cheng, Y.; Luo, H.; Wen, D.; Gao, L. From microbiome to inflammation: The key drivers of cervical cancer. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 767931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Mitra, A.; MacIntyre, D.A.; Marchesi, J.R.; Lee, Y.S.; Bennett, P.R.; Kyrgiou, M. The vaginal microbiota, human papillomavirus infection and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: What do we know and where are we going next? Microbiome 2016, 4, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Aswathy, S.; Reshma, J.; Avani, D. Epidemiology of cervical cancer with special focus on India. Int. J. Women’s Health 2015, 7, 405–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Caruso, S.; Bruno, M.T.; Cianci, S.; Di Pasqua, S.; Minona, P.; Cianci, A. Sexual behavior of women with diagnosed HPV. J. Sex Marital. Ther. 2019, 45, 569–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Erickson, B.K.; Alvarez, R.D.; Huh, W.K. Human papillomavirus: What every provider should know. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2014, 208, 169–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Audirac-Chalifour, A.; Torres-Poveda, K.; Bahena-Román, M.; Téllez-Sosa, J.; Martínez-Barnetche, J.; Cortina-Ceballos, B.; López-Estrada, G.; Delgado-Romero, K.; Burguete-García, A.I.; Cantú, D.; et al. Cervical microbiome and cytokine profile at various stages of cervical cancer: A pilot study. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0153274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Pino, A.; Rapisarda, A.M.C.; Vitale, S.G.; Cianci, S.; Caggia, C.; Randazzo, C.L.; Cianci, A. A clinical pilot study on the effect of the probiotic Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus TOM 22.8 strain in women with vaginal dysbiosis. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 2592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Frąszczak, K.; Barczyński, B.; Kondracka, A. Does lactobacillus exert a protective effect on the development of cervical and endometrial cancer in women? Cancers 2022, 14, 4909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Tachedjian, G.; Aldunate, M.; Bradshaw, C.S.; Cone, R.A. The role of lactic acid production by probiotic Lactobacillus species in vaginal health. Res. Microbiol. 2017, 168, 782–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Holm, J.B.; Carter, K.A.; Ravel, J.; Brotman, R.M. Lactobacillus iners and Genital Health: Molecular Clues to an Enigmatic Vaginal Species. Curr. Infect. Dis. Rep. 2023, 25, 67–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Beghini, J.; Linhares, I.; Giraldo, P.; Ledger, W.; Witkin, S. Differential expression of lactic acid isomers, extracellular matrix metalloproteinase inducer, and matrix metalloproteinase-8 in vaginal fluid from women with vaginal disorders. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2014, 122, 1580–1585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Ojala, T.; Kankainen, M.; Castro, J.; Cerca, N.; Edelman, S.; Westerlund-Wikström, B.; Paulin, L.; Holm, L.; Auvinen, P. Comparative genomics of Lactobacillus crispatus suggests novel mechanisms for the competitive exclusion of Gardnerella vaginalis. BMC Genom. 2014, 15, 1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Leizer, J.; Nasioudis, D.; Forney, L.J.; Schneider, G.M.; Gliniewicz, K.; Boester, A.; Witkin, S.S. Properties of Epithelial Cells and Vaginal Secretions in Pregnant Women When Lactobacillus crispatus or Lactobacillus iners Dominate the Vaginal Microbiome. Reprod. Sci. 2017, 25, 854–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Nasioudis, D.; Witkin, S.S. Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin and innate immune responses to bacterial infections. Med. Microbiol. Immunol. 2015, 204, 471–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Abtin, A.; Eckhart, L.; Gläser, R.; Gmeiner, R.; Mildner, M.; Tschachler, E. The antimicrobial heterodimer S100A8/S100A9 (Calprotectin) is upregulated by bacterial flagellin in human epidermal keratinocytes. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2010, 130, 2423–2430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Turley, E.A.; Noble, P.W.; Bourguignon, L.Y. Signaling properties of hyaluronan receptors. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 4589–4592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Vaneechoutte, M. Lactobacillus iners, the unusual suspect. Res. Microbiol. 2017, 168, 826–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Kwak, W.; Han, Y.; Seol, D.; Kim, H.; Ahn, H.; Jeong, M.; Kang, J.; Kim, H.; Kim, T.H. Complete Genome of Lactobacillus iners KY Using Flongle Provides Insight Into the Genetic Background of Optimal Adaption to Vaginal Econiche. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Norenhag, J.; Du, J.; Olovsson, M.; Verstraelen, H.; Engstrand, L.; Brusselaers, N. The vaginal microbiota, human papillomavirus and cervical dysplasia: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2019, 127, 171–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Aggarwal, I.M.; Ng, Q.J.; Koo, S.; Tan, M.; Wang, J.; Chin, F.H.X.; Qi, M.; Ho, W.Y.; Ng, Z.Y.; Tan, E.C. Lactobacillus iners is the predominant species in the vaginal microbiome of women with high-risk HPV-infection: Experience from a tertiary referral colposcopy centre in Singapore. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 2023, A119–A120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Zheng, N.; Guo, R.; Wang, J.; Zhou, W.; Ling, Z. Contribution of Lactobacillus iners to Vaginal Health and Diseases: A Systematic Review. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2021, 11, 792787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Borgdorff, H.; Gautam, R.; Armstrong, S.D.; Xia, D.; Ndayisaba, G.F.; Van Teijlingen, N.H.; Geijtenbeek, T.B.H.; Wastling, J.M.; Van De Wijgert, J.H.H.M. Cervicovaginal microbiome dysbiosis is associated with proteome changes related to alterations of the cervicovaginal mucosal barrier. Mucosal Immunol. 2015, 9, 621–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Bi, Q.; Zhu, J.; Qu, S.; Chen, J.; Zhang, L.; Mu, X. Cervicovaginal microbiota dysbiosis correlates with HPV persistent infection. Microb. Pathog. 2021, 152, 104617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Wan, B.; Wei, L.J.; Tan, T.M.; Qin, L.; Wang, H. Inhibitory effect and mechanism of Lactobacillus crispatus on cervical precancerous cells Ect1/E6E7 and screening of early warning factors. Infect. Agents Cancer 2023, 18, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Motevaseli, E.; Shirzad, M.; Akrami, S.M.; Mousavi, A.; Mirsalehian, A.; Modarressi, M.H. Normal and tumour cervical cells respond differently to vaginal lactobacilli, independent of pH and lactate. J. Med. Microbiol. 2013, 62, 1065–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Wang, K.D.; Xu, D.J.; Wang, B.Y.; Yan, D.H.; Lv, Z.; Su, J.R. Inhibitory Effect of Vaginal Lactobacillus Supernatants on Cervical Cancer Cells. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins 2018, 10, 236–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Buchta, V. Vaginal microbiome. Ceska Gynekol. 2018, 83, 371–379. (In English) [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  121. Nicolò, S. Interplay Among Microbial Communities, Epithelial Cells, and Immune System in Vaginal Mucosa of Women with High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Infection. 2022. Available online: https://hdl.handle.net/2158/1275958 (accessed on 1 September 2024).
  122. Nicolò, S.; Antonelli, A.; Tanturli, M.; Baccani, I.; Bonaiuto, C.; Castronovo, G.; Rossolini, G.M.; Mattiuz, G.; Torcia, M.G. Bacterial Species from Vaginal Microbiota Differently Affect the Production of the E6 and E7 Oncoproteins and of p53 and p-Rb Oncosuppressors in HPV16-Infected Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 7173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Brotman, R.M.; Shardell, M.D.; Gajer, P.; Tracy, J.K.; Zenilman, J.M.; Ravel, J.; Gravitt, P.E. Interplay between the temporal dynamics of the vaginal microbiota and human papillomavirus detection. J. Infect. Dis. 2014, 210, 1723–1733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Gao, Q.; Fan, T.; Luo, S.; Zheng, J.; Zhang, L.; Cao, L.; Zhang, Z.; Li, L.; Huang, Z.; Zhang, H.; et al. Lactobacillus gasseri LGV03 isolated from the cervico-vagina of HPV-cleared women modulates epithelial innate immune responses and suppresses the growth of HPV-positive human cervical cancer cells. Transl. Oncol. 2023, 35, 101714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Gao, W.; Weng, J.; Gao, Y.; Chen, X. Comparison of the vaginal microbiota diversity of women with and without human papillomavirus infection: A cross-sectional study. BMC Infect. Dis. 2013, 13, 271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Xiao, B.; Niu, X.; Han, N.; Wang, B.; Du, P.; Na, R.; Chen, C.; Liao, Q. Predictive value of the composition of the vaginal microbiota in bacterial vaginosis, a dynamic study to identify recurrence-related flora. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 26674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Mortaki, D.; Gkegkes, I.D.; Psomiadou, V.; Blontzos, N.; Prodromidou, A.; Lefkopoulos, F.; Nicolaidou, E. Vaginal microbiota and human papillomavirus: A systematic review. J. Turk. -Ger. Gynecol. Assoc. 2019, 21, 193–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Rodriguez-Cerdeira, C.; Sanchez-Blanco, E.; Alba, A. Evaluation of Association between Vaginal Infections and High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Types in Female Sex Workers in Spain. ISRN Obstet. Gynecol. 2012, 2012, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Ghaniabadi, R.; Hashemi, S.; Bajgiran, M.S.; Javadi, S.; Mohammadzadeh, N.; Masjedian, F. Distribution of Lactobacillus species in Iranian women with both human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and bacterial vaginosis (BV). Meta Gene 2020, 26, 100791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Atassi, F.; Pho Viet Ahn, D.L.; Lievin-Le, M.o.a.l.V. Diverse Expression of Antimicrobial Activities Against Bacterial Vaginosis and Urinary Tract Infection Pathogens by Cervicovaginal Microbiota Strains of Lactobacillus gasseri and Lactobacillus crispatus. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 2900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  131. Zhang, Y.; Xu, X.; Yu, L.; Shi, X.; Min, M.; Xiong, L.; Pan, J.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, P.; Wu, G.; et al. Vaginal microbiota changes caused by HPV infection in Chinese women. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 814668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Zhong, L.; Zheng, J.; Lin, L.; Cong, Q.; Qiao, L. Perspective on human papillomavirus infection treatment by vaginal microbiota. Deleted J. 2023, 1, e20220020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Nunn, K.L.; Wang, Y.; Harit, D.; Humphrys, M.S.; Ma, B.; Cone, R.; Ravel, J.; Lai, S.K. Enhanced Trapping of HIV-1 by Human Cervicovaginal Mucus Is Associated with Lactobacillus crispatus-Dominant Microbiota. mBio 2015, 6, e01084-15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Reimers, L.L.; Mehta, S.D.; Massad, L.S.; Burk, R.D.; Xie, X.; Ravel, J.; Cohen, M.H.; Palefsky, J.M.; Weber, K.M.; Xue, X.; et al. The cervicovaginal microbiota and its associations with human papillomavirus detection in HIV-Infected and HIV-Uninfected women. J. Infect. Dis. 2016, 214, 1361–1369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Ghanavati, R.; Asadollahi, P.; Shapourabadi, M.B.; Razavi, S.; Talebi, M.; Rohani, M. Inhibitory effects of Lactobacilli cocktail on HT-29 colon carcinoma cells growth and modulation of the Notch and Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathways. Microb. Pathog. 2020, 139, 103829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Hyun, C.J. The Research for Association Between Vaginal Microbiome and High-Risk Human Papillomavirus in Young Korean Women. 2024. Available online: https://s-space.snu.ac.kr/handle/10371/210377 (accessed on 10 October 2024).
  137. Irina, P.; Alena, V.; Arsene, M.M.J.; Milana, D.; Alla, P.; Lyudmila, K.; Boris, E. Comparison of Vaginal microbiota in HPV-negative and HPV-positive pregnant women using a culture-based approach. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2024, 110, 116419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Fang, B.; Li, Q.; Wan, Z.; OuYang, Z.; Zhang, Q. Exploring the association between cervical microbiota and HR-HPV infection based on 16S RRNA gene and metagenomic sequencing. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 922554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Hu, S.; Hao, Y.; Zhang, X.; Yang, Y.; Liu, M.; Wang, N.; Zhang, T.; He, H. Lacticaseibacillus casei LH23 Suppressed HPV Gene Expression and Inhibited Cervical Cancer Cells. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2021, 15, 443–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Mosleh, I.S.; Karami, F.; Salahshourifar, I.; Ebrahimi, M.T.; Marvibaigi, M. Investigating the effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus paracasei supernatant on cervical cancer cells. Deleted J. 2023, 27, 426–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Chao, X.; Sun, T.; Wang, S.; Fan, Q.; Shi, H.; Zhu, L.; Lang, J. Correlation between the diversity of vaginal microbiota and the risk of high-risk human papillomavirus infection. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 2019, 29, 28–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Chen, K.L.; Madak-Erdogan, Z. Estrogen and microbiota crosstalk: Should we pay attention? Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2016, 27, 752–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Chen, Y.; Qiu, X.; Wang, W.; Li, D.; Wu, A.; Hong, Z.; Di, W.; Qiu, L. Human papillomavirus infection and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia progression are associated with increased vaginal microbiome diversity in a Chinese cohort. BMC Infect. Dis. 2020, 20, 629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Campisciano, G.; Gheit, T.; De Seta, F.; Cason, C.; Zanotta, N.; Delbue, S.; Ricci, G.; Ferrante, P.; Tommasino, M.; Comar, M. Oncogenic Virome Benefits from the Different Vaginal Microbiome-Immune Axes. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. McKee, K.S.; Carter, K.A.; Bassis, C.; Young, V.B.; Reed, B.; Harper, D.M.; Iv, M.T.R.; Bell, J.D. The vaginal microbiota, high-risk human papillomavirus infection, and cervical cytology: Results from a population-based study. Gynecol. Pelvic Med. 2020, 3, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Lin, W.; Zhang, Q.; Chen, Y.; Dong, B.; Xue, H.; Lei, H.; Lu, Y.; Wei, X.; Sun, P. Changes of the vaginal microbiota in HPV infection and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: A cross-sectional analysis. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 2812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Kang, G.; Jung, D.; Lee, Y.H.; Jeon, S.Y.; Han, H.S.; Chong, G.O.; Shin, J. Potential Association between Vaginal Microbiota and Cervical Carcinogenesis in Korean Women: A Cohort Study. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Yang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Wei, X.; Zhu, J.; Wang, X.; Xie, X.; Lu, W. The alterations of vaginal microbiome in HPV16 infection as identified by shotgun metagenomic sequencing. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Lebeau, A.; Bruyere, D.; Roncarati, P.; Peixoto, P.; Hervouet, E.; Cobraiville, G.; Taminiau, B.; Masson, M.; Gallego, C.; Mazzucchelli, G.; et al. HPV infection alters vaginal microbiome through down-regulating host mucosal innate peptides used by Lactobacilli as amino acid sources. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Farahmandi, F.; Parhizgar, P.; Tape, P.M.K.; Bizhannia, F.; Rohani, F.S.; Bizhanzadeh, M.; Alhosseini, Z.S.M.; Hosseinzade, M.; Farsi, Y.; Nasiri, M.J. Implications and Mechanisms of antiviral effects of lactic acid Bacteria: A Systematic review. Int. J. Microbiol. 2023, 2023, 9298363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Lithgow, K.V.; Buchholz, V.C.H.; Ku, E.; Konschuh, S.; D’Aubeterre, A.; Sycuro, L.K. Protease activities of vaginal Porphyromonas species disrupt coagulation and extracellular matrix in the cervicovaginal niche. Npj Biofilms Microbiomes 2022, 8, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Hearps, A.; Tyssen, D.; Srbinovski, D.; Bayigga, L.; Diaz, D.J.D.; Aldunate, M.; Cone, R.; Gugasyan, R.; Anderson, D.; Tachedjian, G. Vaginal lactic acid elicits an anti-inflammatory response from human cervicovaginal epithelial cells and inhibits production of pro-inflammatory mediators associated with HIV acquisition. Mucosal Immunol. 2017, 10, 1480–1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Barros, M.R.; De Melo, C.M.L.; Barros, M.L.C.M.G.; De Cássia Pereira De Lima, R.; De Freitas, A.C.; Venuti, A. Activities of stromal and immune cells in HPV-related cancers. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2018, 37, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Jones, D.; Williams, P. Immunological properties of the cervix and its microbiome. J. Infect. Dis. 2022, 226, 1121–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. De Tomasi, J.B.; Opata, M.M.; Mowa, C.N. Immunity in the Cervix: Interphase between Immune and Cervical Epithelial Cells. J. Immunol. Res. 2019, 2019, 7693183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  156. Rodriguezgarcia, M. Mucosal Immunity in the Human Female Reproductive Tract. N.p., 2015. Mucosal Immunol. 2015, 2097–2124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Wang, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhu, M.; Ge, L.; Liu, X.; Su, K.; Chen, Z.; Zhao, W. The Interplay Between Cervicovaginal Microbial Dysbiosis and Cervicovaginal Immunity. Front Immunol. 2022, 13, 857299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  158. Mitchell, C.; Marrazzo, J. Bacterial vaginosis and the cervicovaginal immune response. Am. J. Reprod Immunol. 2014, 71, 555–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  159. Singh, D.; Vignat, J.; Lorenzoni, V.; Eslahi, M.; Ginsburg, O.; Lauby-Secretan, B.; Arbyn, M.; Basu, P.; Bray, F.; Vaccarella, S. Global estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in 2020: A baseline analysis of the WHO Global Cervical Cancer Elimination Initiative. Lancet Glob. Health 2023, 11, e197–e206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Don, K.R.; Padma, K.R.; Chandana, B.V.S.; Anjum, M.R.; Mohan, S. Influence of Vaginal Microbiota on Sexual and Reproductive Health: A Mini Review. Entomol. Appl. Sci. Lett. 2023, 10, 11–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Villa, P.; Cipolla, C.; D’Ippolito, S.; Amar, I.D.; Shachor, M.; Ingravalle, F.; Scaldaferri, F.; Puca, P.; Di Simone, N.; Scambia, G. The interplay between immune system and microbiota in gynecological diseases: A narrative review. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2020, 24, 5676–5690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Ntuli, L.; Mtshali, A.; Mzobe, G.; Liebenberg, L.J.; Ngcapu, S. Role of Immunity and Vaginal Microbiome in Clearance and Persistence of Human Papillomavirus Infection. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 927131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Caselli, E.; D’Accolti, M.; Santi, E.; Soffritti, I.; Conzadori, S.; Mazzacane, S.; Greco, P.; Contini, C.; Bonaccorsi, G. Vaginal Microbiota and Cytokine Microenvironment in HPV Clearance/Persistence in Women Surgically Treated for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia: An Observational Prospective Study. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 540900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Smith, S.B.; Ravel, J. The vaginal microbiota, host defence and reproductive physiology. J. Physiol. 2017, 595, 451–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Leclaire, S.; Bandekar, M.; Rowe, M.; Ritari, J.; Jokiniemi, A.; Partanen, J.; Allinen, P.; Kuusipalo, L.; Kekäläinen, J. Female reproductive tract microbiota varies with MHC profile. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2024, 291, 20241334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Taddei, C.R.; Cortez, R.V.; Mattar, R.; Torloni, M.R.; Daher, S. Microbiome in normal and pathological pregnancies: A literature overview. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2018, 80, e12993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Mall, A.S.; Habte, H.; Mthembu, Y.; Peacocke, J.; De Beer, C. Mucus and Mucins: Do they have a role in the inhibition of the human immunodeficiency virus? Virol. J. 2017, 14, 192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Taherali, F.; Varum, F.; Basit, A.W. A slippery slope: On the origin, role and physiology of mucus. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2017, 124, 16–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Al-Nasiry, S.; Ambrosino, E.; Schlaepfer, M.; Morré, S.A.; Wieten, L.; Voncken, J.W.; Spinelli, M.; Mueller, M.; Kramer, B.W. The interplay between reproductive tract microbiota and immunological system in human reproduction. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Doerflinger, S.Y.; Throop, A.L.; Herbst-Kralovetz, M.M. Bacteria in the vaginal microbiome alter the innate immune response and barrier properties of the human vaginal epithelia in a Species-Specific manner. J. Infect. Dis. 2014, 209, 1989–1999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Pandit, H.; Gopal, S.; Sonawani, A.; Yadav, A.K.; Qaseem, A.S.; Warke, H.; Patil, A.; Gajbhiye, R.; Kulkarni, V.; Al-Mozaini, M.A.; et al. Surfactant Protein D Inhibits HIV-1 Infection of Target Cells via Interference with gp120-CD4 Interaction and Modulates Pro-Inflammatory Cytokine Production. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e102395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Wang, Y.; Kannan, A.; Nunn, K.L.; Murphy, M.A.; Subramani, D.B.; Moench, T.; Cone, R.; Lai, S.K. IgG in cervicovaginal mucus traps HSV and prevents vaginal Herpes infections. Mucosal Immunol. 2014, 7, 1036–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Cai, H.; Yan, L.; Liu, N.; Xu, M.; Cai, H. IFI16 promotes cervical cancer progression by upregulating PD-L1 in immunomicroenvironment through STING-TBK1-NF-kB pathway. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2020, 123, 109790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Scott, M.L.; Woodby, B.L.; Ulicny, J.; Raikhy, G.; Orr, A.W.; Songock, W.K.; Bodily, J.M. Human papillomavirus 16 E5 inhibits interferon signaling and supports episomal viral maintenance. J. Virol. 2020, 94, e01582-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. De Matos, L.G.; Cândido, E.B.; Vidigal, P.V.; Bordoni, P.H.; Lamaita, R.M.; Carneiro, M.M.; Da Silva-Filho, A.L. Association between Toll-like Receptor and Tumor Necrosis Factor Immunological Pathways in Uterine Cervical Neoplasms. Tumori J. 2016, 103, 81–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Yang, X.; Cheng, Y.; Li, C. The role of TLRs in cervical cancer with HPV infection: A review. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2017, 2, 17055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Cheng, Z.; Dai, T.; He, X.; Zhang, Z.; Xie, F.; Wang, S.; Zhang, L.; Zhou, F. The interactions between cGAS-STING pathway and pathogens. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2020, 5, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Castanheira, C.P.; Sallas, M.L.; Nunes, R.a.L.; Lorenzi, N.P.C.; Termini, L. Microbiome and cervical cancer. Pathobiology 2020, 88, 187–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Langers, I.; Renoux, V.; Reschner, A.; Touzé, A.; Coursaget, P.; Boniver, J.; Koch, J.; Delvenne, P.; Jacobs, N. Natural killer and dendritic cells collaborate in the immune response induced by the vaccine against uterine cervical cancer. Eur. J. Immunol. 2014, 44, 3585–3595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Belkaid, Y.; Hand, T.W. Role of the microbiota in immunity and inflammation. Cell 2014, 157, 121–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  181. Duluc, D.; Banchereau, R.; Gannevat, J.; Thompson-Snipes, L.; Blanck, J.; Zurawski, S.; Zurawski, G.; Hong, S.; Rossello-Urgell, J.; Pascual, V.; et al. Transcriptional fingerprints of antigen-presenting cell subsets in the human vaginal mucosa and skin reflect tissue-specific immune microenvironments. Genome Med. 2014, 6, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  182. Shannon, B.; Yi, T.; Perusini, S.; Gajer, P.; Ma, B.; Humphrys, M.; Thomas-Pavanel, J.; Chieza, L.; Janakiram, P.; Saunders, M.; et al. Association of HPV infection and clearance with cervicovaginal immunology and the vaginal microbiota. Mucosal Immunol. 2017, 10, 1310–1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Xue, J.; Wang, Y.; Chen, C.; Zhu, X.; Zhu, H.; Hu, Y. Effects of Th17 cells and IL-17 in the progression of cervical carcinogenesis with high-risk human papillomavirus infection. Cancer Med. 2017, 7, 297–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Gosmann, C.; Mattarollo, S.R.; Bridge, J.A.; Frazer, I.H.; Blumenthal, A. IL-17 suppresses immune effector functions in human Papillomavirus-Associated epithelial hyperplasia. J. Immunol. 2014, 193, 2248–2257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. Passmore, J.S.; Williamson, A. Host Immune Responses Associated with Clearance or Persistence of Human Papillomavirus Infections. Curr. Obstet. Gynecol. Rep. 2016, 5, 177–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Thurman, A.R.; Kimble, T.; Herold, B.; Mesquita, P.M.; Fichorova, R.N.; Dawood, H.Y.; Fashemi, T.; Chandra, N.; Rabe, L.; Cunningham, T.D.; et al. Bacterial vaginosis and subclinical markers of genital tract inflammation and mucosal immunity. AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses 2015, 31, 1139–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Leo, P.J.; Madeleine, M.M.; Wang, S.; Schwartz, S.M.; Newell, F.; Pettersson-Kymmer, U.; Hemminki, K.; Hallmans, G.; Tiews, S.; Steinberg, W.; et al. Correction: Defining the genetic susceptibility to cervical neoplasia—A genome-wide association study. PLoS Genet. 2018, 14, e1007257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  188. Zhou, C.; Tuong, Z.K.; Frazer, I.H. Papillomavirus immune evasion strategies target the infected cell and the local immune system. Front. Oncol. 2019, 9, 682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Literature search.
Figure 1. Literature search.
Jcm 14 01521 g001
Figure 2. Association of cervicovaginal microbiota with HPV infection persistence. CIN—cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; CST—community state type.
Figure 2. Association of cervicovaginal microbiota with HPV infection persistence. CIN—cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; CST—community state type.
Jcm 14 01521 g002
Table 1. Female cervicovaginal microbiome composition depending on the age.
Table 1. Female cervicovaginal microbiome composition depending on the age.
Age GroupPredominant Microbial GeneraDescription of ChangesReferences
Infancy and childhoodStaphylococcus, Streptococcus, Enterobacteriaceae, CorynebacteriumLeads to the dominance of a wide range of aerobes and facultative anaerobes.[66,67,68,69,70,71]
AdolescentTransition towards Lactobacillus spp. dominance, including L. crispatus, L. iners; presence of Streptococcus, Staphylococcus, CorynebacteriumThe vaginal pH of a young girl changes from birth until pre-puberty to become neutral or slightly alkaline, followed by a low abundance of lactobacilli.[66,68,72]
Reproductive periodPredominance of Lactobacillus spp. (L. crispatus, L. iners, L. gasseri, L. jensenii); presence of Gardnerella, Prevotella, AtopobiumDepending on the phases of the menstrual cycle, the overall increase in estrogen level leads to the dominance of Lactobacilli spp. and lower vaginal pH.[73,74,75,76]
PregnancyIncreased abundance of Lactobacillus spp., Bifidobacteriaceae, particularly L. crispatus; reduced microbial diversityBoth estrogen and progesterone contribute to the increased dominance of lactobacilli during pregnancy, which stimulates glycogen accumulation in the vaginal epithelial cells favoring Lactobacilli spp. colonization.[77,78,79,80]
MenopauseDecreased Lactobacillus spp.; increased prevalence of Gardnerella, Atopobium, Prevotella, Mobiluncus, Streptococcus, StaphylococcusHormonal changes during menopause lead to a decrease in Lactobacillus dominance, resulting in increased microbial diversity. A higher vaginal pH increases the risks of infections.[68,73,81,82,83]
Table 2. Cervicovaginal microbiome species association with HPV infection [40,41,47,48,141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148].
Table 2. Cervicovaginal microbiome species association with HPV infection [40,41,47,48,141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148].
AuthorCountryStudy TypeSample SizeParticipants’ Age (Years)Test Technique UsedFindings Reference
Campisciano et al., 2019ItalyCohort study90 women20–40 Species-specific multiplex genotyping assayLactobacillus crispatus increased in CST I while Prevotella timonensis and Sneathia sanguinegens increased in CST IV. An efficient viral clearance was observed only in women from CST I, dominated by Lactobacillus crispatus.[144]
Chao et al., 2019ChinaCohort study151 women 20–65Sequencing barcoded 16S rDNA gene fragments (V4) on Illumina HiSeq2500Bacteroides plebeius, Acinetobacter lwoffii, and Prevotella buccae were found significantly more frequently in HPV-positive women.[141]
Onywera et al., 2019South AfricaRetrospective cross-sectional study62 womenAverage 34.5Bacterial 16S rRNA geneLactobacillus, Gardnerella, Prevotella, and Sneathia were the most predominant genera in the phyla Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, Bacteriodetes, and Fusobacteria, respectively.[40,41]
Chen et al., 2020ChinaCohort study229 women25–69Deep sequencing barcoded 16s rRNA ThinPrep cytology test, colposcopy examinationThe highest microbial diversity was observed in cervical cancer patients when compared to other CIN/lesion-statused groups. HPV contributed to the reduction in the abundance of species of Prevotella, Bacillus, Anaerococcus,
Sneathia, Megasphaera, Streptococcus, and Anaerococcus.
[143]
McKee et al., 2020Appalachia, United StatesPopulation study308 women21–39 Illumina MiSeq sequencing of 16S rRNA gene ampliconsWomen who were determined to have abnormal cervical cytology or high-risk HPV possessed increased relative abundance of G. vaginalis and reduced relative abundance of L. gasseri.[145]
Yang et al., 2020ChinaExploratory and validation cohort study2251 women25–50Metagenome sequencing and HPV genotyping Lactobacillus, followed by the Gardnerella genus, was highly dominant in both HPV-16-infected women and healthy groups. [148]
Kang et al., 2021South KoreaCohort study23 women, 4 groups:
healthy individuals, patients with CIN 2, 3, and ICC
Average 47.4 Amplicon sequencing was performed using the Ion Torrent PGMGardnerella and Prevotella were abundant in the CIN group and only one genus was abundant in the healthy control group (Lactobacillus). Gardnerella and Streptococcus were the only microorganisms that differed significantly between each group.[147]
Lin et al., 2022ChinaPopulation-based cohort study448 women 20–74 Sequencing the region of the bacterial 16S V4 rRNA gene The proportion of Gardnerella and Prevotella were markedly increased in HPV (+) patients. Gardnerella and Prevotella are the most high-risk combination for the development of HPV (+) in women.[146]
Liu et al., 2024ChinaProspective observational cohort study802 women Age was not reported High-throughput 16S rRNA sequencing technologyInfected group exhibited a lower abundance of Lactobacillus and a significantly higher abundance of Pseudomonas, Bifidobacterium, Limosilactobacillus, Peptostreptococcus, Gardnerella, Prevotella, and Dialister.[48]
CST—community state type; ICC—invasive cervical cancer; rRNA—ribosomal RNA; rDNA—ribosomal DNA.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alizhan, D.; Ukybassova, T.; Bapayeva, G.; Aimagambetova, G.; Kongrtay, K.; Kamzayeva, N.; Terzic, M. Cervicovaginal Microbiome: Physiology, Age-Related Changes, and Protective Role Against Human Papillomavirus Infection. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 1521. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14051521

AMA Style

Alizhan D, Ukybassova T, Bapayeva G, Aimagambetova G, Kongrtay K, Kamzayeva N, Terzic M. Cervicovaginal Microbiome: Physiology, Age-Related Changes, and Protective Role Against Human Papillomavirus Infection. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2025; 14(5):1521. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14051521

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alizhan, Diana, Talshyn Ukybassova, Gauri Bapayeva, Gulzhanat Aimagambetova, Kuralay Kongrtay, Nazira Kamzayeva, and Milan Terzic. 2025. "Cervicovaginal Microbiome: Physiology, Age-Related Changes, and Protective Role Against Human Papillomavirus Infection" Journal of Clinical Medicine 14, no. 5: 1521. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14051521

APA Style

Alizhan, D., Ukybassova, T., Bapayeva, G., Aimagambetova, G., Kongrtay, K., Kamzayeva, N., & Terzic, M. (2025). Cervicovaginal Microbiome: Physiology, Age-Related Changes, and Protective Role Against Human Papillomavirus Infection. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(5), 1521. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14051521

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop