Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (1,260)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = COVID-19 mRNA vaccine

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
40 pages, 1275 KiB  
Review
Do Long COVID and COVID Vaccine Side Effects Share Pathophysiological Picture and Biochemical Pathways?
by Jean-François Lesgards, Dominique Cerdan and Christian Perronne
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(16), 7879; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26167879 - 15 Aug 2025
Abstract
COVID affects around 400 million individuals today with a strong economic impact on the global economy. The list of long COVID symptoms is extremely broad because it is derived from neurological, cardiovascular, respiratory, immune, and renal dysfunctions and damages. We review here these [...] Read more.
COVID affects around 400 million individuals today with a strong economic impact on the global economy. The list of long COVID symptoms is extremely broad because it is derived from neurological, cardiovascular, respiratory, immune, and renal dysfunctions and damages. We review here these pathophysiological manifestations and the predictors of this multi-organ pathology like the persistence of the virus, altered endothelial function, unrepaired tissue damage, immune dysregulation, and gut dysbiosis. We also discuss the similarities between long COVID and vaccine side effects together with possible common immuno-inflammatory pathways. Since the spike protein is present in SARS-CoV-2 (and its variants) but also produced by the COVID vaccines, its toxicity may also apply to all mRNA or adenoviral DNA vaccines as they are based on the production of a very similar spike protein to the virus. After COVID infection or vaccination, the spike protein can last for months in the body and may interact with ACE2 receptors and mannan-binding lectin (MBL)/mannan-binding lectin serine protease 2 (MASP-2), which are present almost everywhere in the organism. As a result, the spike protein may be able to trigger inflammation in a lot of organs and systems similar to COVID infection. We suggest that three immuno-inflammatory pathways are particularly key and responsible for long COVID and COVID vaccine side effects, as it has been shown for COVID, which may explain in large part their strong similarities: the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS), the kininogen–kinin–kallikrein system (KKS), and the lectin complement pathway. We propose that therapeutic studies should focus on these pathways to propose better cures for both long COVID as well as for COVID vaccine side effects. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Research and Insights into COVID-19: Third Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 856 KiB  
Review
Rural–Urban Disparities in COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake and Associated Mortality and Cardiovascular Disease Outcomes in the United States
by Bailey Smith, Fahad Farakh, Asma Hanif, Javed H Tunio and Shumaila Nida Javed Tunio
Vaccines 2025, 13(8), 861; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13080861 - 14 Aug 2025
Abstract
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic magnified long-standing health disparities in the United States, particularly among rural, disadvantaged populations. These communities experience greater barriers to healthcare access, a higher prevalence of chronic illness, and increased vaccine hesitancy factors that collectively contribute to poorer health outcomes. [...] Read more.
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic magnified long-standing health disparities in the United States, particularly among rural, disadvantaged populations. These communities experience greater barriers to healthcare access, a higher prevalence of chronic illness, and increased vaccine hesitancy factors that collectively contribute to poorer health outcomes. Methods: This narrative review examines rural–urban disparities in COVID-19 vaccine uptake and their impact on mortality, with a focus on cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes. We synthesized the peer-reviewed literature, CDC data, and U.S. Census reports to assess factors contributing to vaccine hesitancy, vaccination coverage, COVID-19-related mortality, and CVD mortality trends. Results: Rural residents were less likely to initiate COVID-19 vaccination, showed greater vaccine hesitancy, and experienced higher rates of both COVID-19 and CVD mortality. These disparities were further driven by safety concerns surrounding mRNA technology, misinformation, infrastructural barriers, and sociodemographic factors including political affiliation, education, poverty, and religion. Notably, pre-existing CVD increased vulnerability to severe COVID-19 outcomes in rural communities. Conclusions: Expanding vaccination efforts and improving healthcare infrastructure are essential for addressing these widening health inequities. Future public health strategies should prioritize culturally tailored interventions and rural-specific outreach to reduce vaccine hesitancy and improve mortality outcomes in underserved populations. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 3253 KiB  
Review
Multisystem Endothelial Inflammation: A Key Driver of Adverse Events Following mRNA-Containing COVID-19 Vaccines
by János Szebeni and Akos Koller
Vaccines 2025, 13(8), 855; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13080855 - 12 Aug 2025
Viewed by 480
Abstract
mRNA-LNP-based COVID-19 vaccines, namely Pfizer-BioNTech’s Comirnaty and Moderna’s Spikevax, were successfully deployed to help control the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, and their updated formulations continue to be recommended, albeit only for high-risk populations. One widely discussed aspect of these vaccines is their uniquely broad spectrum [...] Read more.
mRNA-LNP-based COVID-19 vaccines, namely Pfizer-BioNTech’s Comirnaty and Moderna’s Spikevax, were successfully deployed to help control the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, and their updated formulations continue to be recommended, albeit only for high-risk populations. One widely discussed aspect of these vaccines is their uniquely broad spectrum and increased incidence of adverse events (AEs), collectively referred to as post-vaccination syndrome (PVS). Although the reported PVS rate is low, the high number of administered doses among healthy individuals has resulted in a substantial number of reported vaccine-related injuries. A prominent manifestation of PVS is multisystem inflammation, hypothesized to result from the systemic transfection of organ cells with genetic instructions for a toxin, the spike protein, delivered with lipid nanoparticles (LNPs). In this narrative review, we focus on endothelial cells in the microcirculatory networks of various organs as primary sites of transfection with mRNA-LNP and consequent PVS. We outline the anatomical variations in the microcirculation contributing to the individual variability of symptoms and examine the molecular and cellular responses to vaccine nanoparticle exposure at the endothelial cell level with a focus on the pathways of a sustained cascade of toxic and autoimmune processes. A deeper understanding of the mechanisms underlying mRNA-LNP-induced AEs and PVS at the organ and cellular levels is critical for improving the safety of future vaccines and other therapeutic applications of this groundbreaking technology. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 763 KiB  
Systematic Review
Humoral and Cellular Immune Responses Against SARS-CoV-2 Following COVID-19 Vaccination in Older Adults: A Systematic Review
by Ruth Angélica Rojas-De la Cruz, Janeth M. Flores-Córdova, Cielo Cinthya Calderon-Hernandez, Nelson Luis Cahuapaza-Gutierrez, Nino Arturo Ccallalli-Ruiz and Fernando M. Runzer-Colmenares
Vaccines 2025, 13(8), 852; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13080852 - 12 Aug 2025
Viewed by 621
Abstract
Background: Evidence on the humoral and cellular immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 following COVID-19 vaccination in older adults is warranted. Aims: To synthesize and analyze the current evidence on humoral and cellular immune responses to both standard and booster COVID-19 vaccination in individuals aged [...] Read more.
Background: Evidence on the humoral and cellular immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 following COVID-19 vaccination in older adults is warranted. Aims: To synthesize and analyze the current evidence on humoral and cellular immune responses to both standard and booster COVID-19 vaccination in individuals aged 60 years and older. Methods: Clinical trials and observational studies were included. Reviews, case series, letters to the editor, and similar publications were excluded. A selective literature search was conducted in the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and Web of Science. The risk of bias and methodological quality of the included studies were assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) and the Risk of Bias 2.0 (RoB 2) tool. Statistical analysis was conducted using Stata version 18 and Review Manager version 5.4.1. Results: Thirteen studies were included: eleven observational studies and two randomized clinical trials, evaluating humoral and cellular immune responses in 782 older adults. Messenger RNA vaccines were the most administered, particularly Pfizer-BioNTech (76.9%) and Moderna mRNA-1273 (23%). In most cases, immune responses were assessed after the second dose and booster doses. Most studies (61.5%) reported increased IgG titers specific to the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein, while 23.1% reported a decrease. Regarding cellular immunity, 46.2% of the studies reported low interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) levels post-vaccination, whereas 38.5% showed increases. These findings highlight the need for tailored vaccination strategies to address emerging variants, particularly in vulnerable populations such as older adults. Conclusions: In older adults receiving COVID-19 vaccination, humoral immunity tends to increase, whereas cellular responses are frequently diminished, reflecting age-related immunosenescence that may limit the durability and breadth of protection following vaccination in older adults. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Understanding Immune Responses to COVID-19 Vaccines)
Show Figures

Figure A1

16 pages, 875 KiB  
Article
Profile of Selected MicroRNAs as Markers of Sex-Specific Anti-S/RBD Response to COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine in Health Care Workers
by Simona Anticoli, Maria Dorrucci, Elisabetta Iessi, Salvatore Zaffina, Rita Carsetti, Nicoletta Vonesch, Paola Tomao and Anna Ruggieri
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(15), 7636; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26157636 - 7 Aug 2025
Viewed by 563
Abstract
Sex-based immunological differences significantly influence the outcome of vaccination, yet the molecular mediators underpinning these differences remain largely elusive. MicroRNAs (miRNAs), key post-transcriptional regulators of gene expression, have emerged as critical modulators of innate and adaptive immune responses. In this study, we investigated [...] Read more.
Sex-based immunological differences significantly influence the outcome of vaccination, yet the molecular mediators underpinning these differences remain largely elusive. MicroRNAs (miRNAs), key post-transcriptional regulators of gene expression, have emerged as critical modulators of innate and adaptive immune responses. In this study, we investigated the expression profile of selected circulating miRNAs as potential biomarkers of sex-specific humoral responses to the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in a cohort of health care workers. Plasma samples were collected longitudinally at a defined time point (average 71 days) post-vaccination and analyzed using RT-qPCR to quantify a panel of immune-relevant miRNAs. Anti-spike (anti-S) IgG titers were measured by chemiluminescent immunoassays. Our results revealed sex-dependent differences in miRNA expression dynamics, with miR-221-3p and miR-148a-3p significantly overexpressed in vaccinated female HCWs and miR-155-5p overexpressed in vaccinated males. MiR-148a-3p showed a significant association with anti-S/RBD (RBD: receptor binding domain) IgG levels in a sex-specific manner. Bioinformatic analysis for miRNA targets indicated distinct regulatory networks and pathways involved in innate and adaptive immune responses, potentially underlying the differential immune activation observed between males and females. These findings support the utility of circulating miRNAs as minimally invasive biomarkers for monitoring and predicting sex-specific vaccine-induced immune responses and provide mechanistic insights that may inform tailored vaccination strategies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Research on Immune Response to Virus Infection and Vaccines)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 249 KiB  
Review
Update on Thromboembolic Events After Vaccination Against COVID-19
by Theocharis Anastasiou, Elias Sanidas, Thekla Lytra, Georgios Mimikos, Helen Gogas and Marina Mantzourani
Vaccines 2025, 13(8), 833; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13080833 - 5 Aug 2025
Viewed by 818
Abstract
The association between COVID-19 vaccination and thromboembolic events has garnered significant research attention, particularly with the advent of vaccines based on adenoviral vectors, including AstraZeneca’s and Johnson & Johnson’s vaccines. This review underscores the uncommon occurrence of venous thromboembolism (VTE), arterial thromboembolism (ATE), [...] Read more.
The association between COVID-19 vaccination and thromboembolic events has garnered significant research attention, particularly with the advent of vaccines based on adenoviral vectors, including AstraZeneca’s and Johnson & Johnson’s vaccines. This review underscores the uncommon occurrence of venous thromboembolism (VTE), arterial thromboembolism (ATE), and vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) following COVID-19 vaccination. Although these complications are extremely rare compared to the heightened risk of thrombosis from COVID-19 infection, elements like age, biological sex, type of vaccine and underlying health conditions may contribute to their development. In addition, rare renal complications such as acute kidney injury and thrombotic microangiopathy have been documented, broadening the spectrum of potential vaccine-associated thrombotic manifestations. Current guidelines emphasize early detection, individualized risk assessment, and use of anticoagulation therapy to mitigate risks. Despite these events, the overwhelming majority of evidence supports the continued use of COVID-19 vaccines, given their proven efficacy in reducing severe illness and mortality. In addition, recent comparative data confirm that mRNA-based vaccines are associated with a significantly lower risk of serious thrombotic events compared to adenoviral vector platforms. Ongoing research is essential to further refine preventive and therapeutic strategies, particularly for at-risk populations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section COVID-19 Vaccines and Vaccination)
16 pages, 2036 KiB  
Article
Adjuvanted Protein Vaccines Boost RNA-Based Vaccines for Broader and More Potent Immune Responses
by Jiho Kim, Jenn Davis, Bryan Berube, Malcolm Duthie, Sean A. Gray and Darrick Carter
Vaccines 2025, 13(8), 797; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13080797 - 28 Jul 2025
Viewed by 557
Abstract
Background/Objectives: mRNA vaccines introduced during the COVID-19 pandemic were a significant step forward in the rapid development and deployment of vaccines in a global pandemic context. These vaccines showed good protective efficacy, but—due to limited breadth of the immune response—they required frequent [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: mRNA vaccines introduced during the COVID-19 pandemic were a significant step forward in the rapid development and deployment of vaccines in a global pandemic context. These vaccines showed good protective efficacy, but—due to limited breadth of the immune response—they required frequent boosters with manufactured spike sequences that often lagged behind the circulating strains. In order to enhance the breadth, durability, and magnitude of immune responses, we studied the effect of combining priming with an RNA vaccine technology with boosting with protein/adjuvant using a TLR4-agonist based adjuvant. Methods: Specifically, four proprietary adjuvants (EmT4TM, LiT4QTM, MiT4TM, and AlT4TM) were investigated in combination with multiple modes of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination (protein, peptide, RNA) for their effectiveness in boosting antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in murine models. Results: Results showed significant improvement in immune response strength and breadth—especially against more distant SARS-CoV-2 variants such as Omicron—when adjuvants were used in combination with boosters following an RNA vaccine prime. Conclusions: The use of novel TLR4 adjuvants in combination with protein or RNA vaccinations presents a promising strategy for improving the efficacy of vaccines in the event of future pandemics, by leveraging rapid response using an RNA vaccine prime and following up with protein/adjuvant-based vaccines to enhance the breadth of immunity. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Adjuvants and Delivery Systems for Vaccines)
Show Figures

Figure 1

6 pages, 1774 KiB  
Perspective
Case Series: Reactivation of Herpetic Keratitis After COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination During Herpetic Prophylaxis
by Michael Tsatsos, Efthymia Prousali, Athanasios Karamitsos and Nikolaos Ziakas
Vision 2025, 9(3), 63; https://doi.org/10.3390/vision9030063 - 28 Jul 2025
Viewed by 369
Abstract
This report presents two cases of herpes simplex keratitis recurrence after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination in patients on herpetic prophylaxis due to recurrent herpetic keratitis. A 58-year-old man with a history of a previous penetrating keratoplasty presented with blurred vision and evidence of corneal [...] Read more.
This report presents two cases of herpes simplex keratitis recurrence after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination in patients on herpetic prophylaxis due to recurrent herpetic keratitis. A 58-year-old man with a history of a previous penetrating keratoplasty presented with blurred vision and evidence of corneal endothelitis 48 h after the first dose of the m-RNA vaccination, and a 24-year-old male student came with a dendritic ulcer 72 h post first vaccination dose. The original prophylactic treatment of 400 mg of acyclovir twice daily was increased to five times per day for a week for both patients. The grafted patient additionally received an increase in Dexamethasone 0.1% from twice daily to four times a day. Improvement was noted within two days and documented at the weekly review, during which both patients returned to their prophylactic antiviral regime without further recurrence. At the time of their second dose of vaccination, both patients followed the same regime with an increase in treatment as per the first dose of vaccination without recurrence. Our findings suggest that patients with recurrent herpetic disease receiving prophylactic treatment need close monitoring when experiencing even subtle symptoms of recurrence and may benefit from an increase in their dose to therapeutic levels during the first days after the COVID-19 mRNA vaccination. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 542 KiB  
Review
Challenges to the Effectiveness and Immunogenicity of COVID-19 Vaccines: A Narrative Review with a Systematic Approach
by Alexander A. Soldatov, Nickolay A. Kryuchkov, Dmitry V. Gorenkov, Zhanna I. Avdeeva, Oxana A. Svitich and Sergey Soshnikov
Vaccines 2025, 13(8), 789; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13080789 - 24 Jul 2025
Viewed by 1329
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the rapid development and distribution of various vaccine platforms, resulting in a significant reduction in disease severity, hospitalizations, and mortality. However, persistent challenges remain concerning the durability and breadth of vaccine-induced protection, especially in the face of emerging SARS-CoV-2 [...] Read more.
The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the rapid development and distribution of various vaccine platforms, resulting in a significant reduction in disease severity, hospitalizations, and mortality. However, persistent challenges remain concerning the durability and breadth of vaccine-induced protection, especially in the face of emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants. This review aimed to evaluate the factors influencing the immunogenicity and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines to inform future vaccine advancement strategies. A narrative review with systematic approach was conducted following PRISMA guidelines for narrative review. Literature was sourced from databases including PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science for studies published between December 2019 and May 2025. Encompassed studies assessed vaccine efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety across various populations and vaccine platforms. Data were collected qualitatively, with quantitative data from reviews highlighted where available. We have uncovered a decline in vaccine efficacy over time and weakened protection against novel variants such as Delta and Omicron. Booster doses, specifically heterologous regimens, improved immunogenicity and increased protection. Vaccine-induced neutralizing antibody titers have been found to correlate with clinical protection, although the long-term correlates of immunity remain poorly defined. The induction of IgG4 antibodies after repeated mRNA vaccinations raised concerns about potential modulation of the immune response. COVID-19 vaccines have contributed significantly to pandemic control; however, their efficacy is limited by the evolution of the virus and declining immunity. Forthcoming vaccine strategies should focus on broad-spectrum, variant-adapted formulations and defining robust comparisons of protection. Recognizing the immunological basis of vaccine response, including the role of specific antibody subclasses, is fundamental for optimizing long-term protection. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section COVID-19 Vaccines and Vaccination)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 479 KiB  
Article
Association of TMEM173/STING1 Gene Variants with Severe COVID-19 Among Fully Vaccinated vs. Non-Vaccinated Individuals
by Daniel Vázquez-Coto, Marta García-Clemente, Guillermo M. Albaiceta, Laura Amado, Lorena M. Vega-Prado, Claudia García-Lago, Rebeca Lorca, Juan Gómez and Eliecer Coto
Life 2025, 15(8), 1171; https://doi.org/10.3390/life15081171 - 23 Jul 2025
Viewed by 371
Abstract
Background. The STING protein is activated by the second messenger cGAMP to promote the innate immune response against infections. Beyond this role, a chronically overactive STING signaling has been described in several disorders. Patients with severe COVID-19 exhibit a hyper-inflammatory response (the cytokine [...] Read more.
Background. The STING protein is activated by the second messenger cGAMP to promote the innate immune response against infections. Beyond this role, a chronically overactive STING signaling has been described in several disorders. Patients with severe COVID-19 exhibit a hyper-inflammatory response (the cytokine storm) that is in part mediated by the cGAS-STING pathway. Several STING inhibitors may protect from severe COVID-19 by down-regulating several inflammatory cytokines. This pathway has been implicated in the establishment of an optimal antiviral vaccine response. STING agonists as adjuvants improved the IgG titers against the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein vaccines. Methods. We investigated the association between two common functional STING1/TMEM173 polymorphisms (rs78233829 C>G/p.Gly230Ala and rs1131769C>T/p.His232Arg) and severe COVID-19 requiring hospitalization. A total of 801 non-vaccinated and 105 fully vaccinated (mRNA vaccine) patients, as well as 300 population controls, were genotyped. Frequencies between the groups were statistically compared. Results. There were no differences for the STING1 variant frequencies between non-vaccinated patients and controls. Vaccinated patients showed a significantly higher frequency of rs78233829 C (230Gly) compared to non-vaccinated patients (CC vs. CG + GG; p = 0.003; OR = 2.13; 1.29–3.50). The two STING1 variants were in strong linkage disequilibrium, with the rs78233829 C haplotypes being significantly more common in the vaccinated (p = 0.02; OR = 1.66; 95%CI = 1.01–2.55). We also studied the LTZFL1 rs67959919 G/A polymorphism that was significantly associated with severe COVID-19 (p < 0.001; OR = 1.83; 95%CI = 1.28–2.63). However, there were no differences between the non-vaccinated and vaccinated patients for this polymorphism. Conclusions. We report a significant association between common functional STING1 polymorphisms and the risk of developing severe COVID-19 among fully vaccinated patients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Genetics and Genomics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 680 KiB  
Review
Adaptation of the Vaccine Prophylaxis Strategy to Variants of the SARS-CoV-2 Virus
by Sofia M. Gulova, Uliana S. Veselkina and Irina V. Astrakhantseva
Vaccines 2025, 13(7), 761; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13070761 - 17 Jul 2025
Viewed by 673
Abstract
The emergence of a novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus closely related to SARS-CoV and officially known as Betacoronavirus pandemicum precipitated a substantial surge in vaccine development that culminated during the global COVID-19 pandemic. At present, there are dozens of [...] Read more.
The emergence of a novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus closely related to SARS-CoV and officially known as Betacoronavirus pandemicum precipitated a substantial surge in vaccine development that culminated during the global COVID-19 pandemic. At present, there are dozens of vaccines for the prevention of SARS-CoV-2 being utilized across the globe. However, only 10 of these vaccines have been authorized by the World Health Organization (WHO). These include mRNA-based, viral vector, subunit and whole-virion inactivated vaccines. At the current end of the pandemic, there has been a decline in the global vaccination rate, both for the general population and for those most at risk of severe illness from the virus. This suggests that the effectiveness of the vaccines may be waning. The decline occurs alongside a decrease in testing and sequencing for SARS-CoV-2. Furthermore, the process of tracking viruses becomes increasingly complex, thereby providing a selective advantage for SARS-CoV-2 and allowing it to evolve stealthily. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of viral evolution and vaccine development. We also discuss ways to overcome viral variability and test universal vaccines for all SARS-CoV-2 variants. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1020 KiB  
Communication
XBB.1.5 COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines Induce Inadequate Mucosal Immunity in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease
by Simon Woelfel, Joel Dütschler, Daniel Junker, Marius König, Georg Leinenkugel, Claudia Krieger, Samuel Truniger, Annett Franke, Seraina Koller, Katline Metzger-Peter, Nicola Frei, STAR SIGN Study Investigators, Werner C. Albrich, Matthias Friedrich, Jan Hendrik Niess, Nicole Schneiderhan-Marra, Alex Dulovic, Wolfgang Korte, Justus J. Bürgi and Stephan Brand
Vaccines 2025, 13(7), 759; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13070759 - 16 Jul 2025
Viewed by 628
Abstract
Background: Mucosal immunity plays a pivotal role in preventing infections with SARS-CoV-2. While COVID-19 mRNA vaccines induce robust systemic immune responses in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), little is known about their efficacy in the mucosal immune compartment. In this sub-investigation of [...] Read more.
Background: Mucosal immunity plays a pivotal role in preventing infections with SARS-CoV-2. While COVID-19 mRNA vaccines induce robust systemic immune responses in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), little is known about their efficacy in the mucosal immune compartment. In this sub-investigation of the ongoing STAR-SIGN study, we present the first analysis of mucosal immunity elicited by XBB.1.5 mRNA vaccines in immunocompromised patients with IBD. Methods: IgG and IgA antibodies targeting the receptor-binding domain of the SARS-CoV-2 JN.1 variant were quantified longitudinally in the saliva of IBD patients using the multiplex immunoassay MultiCoV-Ab. Antibody levels were quantified before and 2–4 weeks after vaccination with XBB.1.5 mRNA vaccines. All patients previously received three doses with original COVID-19 vaccines. Results: Mucosal IgG antibodies were readily induced by XBB.1.5 mRNA vaccines (p = 0.0013 comparing pre- and post-vaccination levels). However, mucosal IgA levels were comparable before and after vaccination (p = 0.8233). Consequently, mucosal IgG and IgA antibody levels correlated only moderately before and after immunization (pre-vaccination: r = 0.5294; p = 0.0239; post-vaccination: r = 0.4863; p = 0.0407). Contrary to a previous report in healthy individuals, vaccination did not induce serum IgA in patients with IBD (p = 0.5841 comparing pre- and post-vaccination levels). These data suggest that COVID-19 mRNA vaccines fail to elicit mucosal IgA in patients with IBD. Conclusions: Since mucosal IgA plays a pivotal role in infection control, the lack of IgA induction indicates that patients lack sufficient protection against SARS-CoV-2 infections which warrants the development of mucosal COVID-19 vaccines. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 334 KiB  
Protocol
Clinical Course, Outcomes, and Risk Factors of Myocarditis and Pericarditis Following Administration of mRNA-1273 Vaccination: A Protocol for a Federated Real-World Evidence Vaccine Safety Study Using Data from Five European Data Sources
by Laura C. Zwiers, Diederick E. Grobbee, Rob Schneijdenberg, Corine Baljé, Samantha St. Laurent, Daina B. Esposito, Lei Zhu, Veronica V. Urdaneta, Magalie Emilebacker, Daniel Weibel, Felipe Villalobos, Carlo Alberto Bissacco, Arantxa Urchueguía Fornes, Juan José Carreras-Martínez, Anteneh A. Desalegn, Angela Lupattelli, Lei Wang, Jannik Wheler, Vera Ehrenstein, Denise Morris, Catherine Fry, Marjolein Jansen, Brianna M. Goodale and David S. Y. Ongadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Vaccines 2025, 13(7), 755; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13070755 - 16 Jul 2025
Viewed by 1071
Abstract
Background: Myocarditis and pericarditis are recognised risks following COVID-19 vaccination, including the mRNA-1273 vaccine. Most cases occur shortly following the second dose of this vaccine, and incidence is highest among young males. However, little is known about risk factors beyond age and [...] Read more.
Background: Myocarditis and pericarditis are recognised risks following COVID-19 vaccination, including the mRNA-1273 vaccine. Most cases occur shortly following the second dose of this vaccine, and incidence is highest among young males. However, little is known about risk factors beyond age and sex and about the longer-term clinical course. This study aims to identify possible risk factors for myocarditis and pericarditis following mRNA-1273 vaccination, to characterise the clinical course of myocarditis and pericarditis, both associated with mRNA-1273 vaccination and not associated with vaccination, and to identify risk factors for severe outcomes (i.e., cardiac or thromboembolic complications, severe hospital outcomes, all-cause hospital readmission, and death). Methods: This study is being conducted within the Vaccine Monitoring Collaboration for Europe (VAC4EU) association using routinely collected healthcare data from five data sources from four European countries (Denmark, Norway, Spain, and the United Kingdom). The study is being performed using a common data model, and all analyses are performed separately in each data source in a federated manner following a common protocol. A case–cohort analysis set is identified within each data source for identifying potential risk factors for myocarditis and pericarditis following mRNA-1273 vaccination using logistic regression analysis. The clinical course of myocarditis and pericarditis is being assessed using a cohort study design and describes all cases (i.e., cases associated with mRNA-1273 and unexposed cases). Cox regression analysis is applied to assess the associations between risk factors and several follow-up outcomes. Conclusions: This protocol describes the study methodology of an international collaborative initiative with the aim of assessing the risk factors and clinical course of myocarditis and pericarditis following mRNA-1273 vaccination using a federated network of five European data sources. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Vaccine Advancement, Efficacy and Safety)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 747 KiB  
Article
Nuclear Factor Erythroid 2-Related Factor 2 and SARS-CoV-2 Infection Risk in COVID-19-Vaccinated Hospital Nurses
by Stefano Rizza, Luca Coppeta, Gianluigi Ferrazza, Alessandro Nucera, Maria Postorino, Andrea Quatrana, Cristiana Ferrari, Rossella Menghini, Susanna Longo, Andrea Magrini and Massimo Federici
Vaccines 2025, 13(7), 739; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13070739 - 9 Jul 2025
Viewed by 410
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused sickness and death among many health care workers. However, the apparent resistance of health care workers to SARS-CoV-2 infection despite their high-risk work environment remains unclear. To investigate if inflammation and circadian disruption contribute to resistance [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused sickness and death among many health care workers. However, the apparent resistance of health care workers to SARS-CoV-2 infection despite their high-risk work environment remains unclear. To investigate if inflammation and circadian disruption contribute to resistance or diminished susceptibility to the SARS-CoV-2 virus, we retrospectively evaluated a cohort of volunteer hospital nurses (VHNs). Methods: A total of 246 apparently healthy VHNs (mean age 37.4 ± 5.9 years) who had received the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine were asked to report their sleep quality, according to the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, and number of SARS-CoV-2 infections during the observational study period (from the end of December 2020 to April 2025). The expression of inflammation-associated mediators and circadian transcription factors in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, as well as sleep quality, were examined. Results: Our findings revealed no anthropometric, biochemical, or inflammation-associated parameters but demonstrated significantly greater levels of NFE2L2, also known as nuclear factor erythroid-derived 2-like 2 (NFR2), gene expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells among VHNs who had never been infected with SARS-CoV-2 (n = 97) than in VHNs with only one (n = 119) or with two or more (n = 35) prior SARS-CoV-2 infections (p < 0.01). This result was confirmed through one-to-one propensity score matching (p < 0.01). Moreover, NRF2 gene expression was not associated with the number of COVID-19 vaccinations (p = 0.598). Finally, NRF2 gene expression was higher among participants who reported better sleep quality (p < 0.01). Conclusions: Our findings suggest possible interactions among NRF2 gene expression, protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection, and the modulation of COVID-19 vaccination efficacy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue SARS-CoV-2 Pathogenesis, Vaccines and Therapeutics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

45 pages, 2714 KiB  
Review
mRNA Vaccine Development in the Fight Against Zoonotic Viral Diseases
by Brandon E. K. Tan, Seng Kong Tham and Chit Laa Poh
Viruses 2025, 17(7), 960; https://doi.org/10.3390/v17070960 - 8 Jul 2025
Viewed by 1161
Abstract
Zoonotic diseases are transmitted from animals to humans, and they impose a significant global burden by impacting both animal and human health. It can lead to substantial economic losses and cause millions of human deaths. The emergence and re-emergence of zoonotic diseases are [...] Read more.
Zoonotic diseases are transmitted from animals to humans, and they impose a significant global burden by impacting both animal and human health. It can lead to substantial economic losses and cause millions of human deaths. The emergence and re-emergence of zoonotic diseases are heavily influenced by both anthropogenic and natural drivers such as climate change, rapid urbanization, and widespread travel. Over time, the unprecedented rise of new and re-emerging zoonotic diseases has prompted the need for rapid and effective vaccine development. Following the success of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, mRNA-based platforms hold great promise due to their rapid design, swift development and ability to elicit robust immune responses, thereby highlighting their potential in combating emerging and pre-pandemic zoonotic viruses. In recent years, several mRNA vaccines targeting emerging and re-emerging zoonotic viral diseases, such as rabies, Nipah, Zika, and influenza, have advanced to clinical trials, demonstrating promising immunogenicity. This review explores recent advances, challenges, and future directions in developing mRNA vaccines against emerging and re-emerging zoonotic viral diseases. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop