Search Results (15)

Objectives: Heart failure (HF) remains a significant public health issue, with heart transplantation (HT) being the gold standard treatment for end-stage HF. The increasing use of mechanical circulatory support, particularly left ventricular assist devices (LVADs), as a bridge to transplant (BTT), presents new perspectives for increasingly complex clinical scenarios. This study aimed to compare long-term clinical outcomes in patients in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) receiving an LVAD as BTT to those undergoing direct-to-transplant (DTT) without mechanical support, focusing on survival and post-transplant complications. Methods: A retrospective, single-center study included 105 patients who underwent HT from 2010. Patients were divided into two groups: BTT (n = 28) and DTT (n = 77). Primary endpoints included overall survival at 1 and 7 years post-HT. Secondary outcomes involved late complications, including organ rejection, renal failure, cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV), and cerebrovascular events. Results: At HT, the use of LVADs results in longer cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamping times in the BTT group; nevertheless, surgical complexity does not affect 30-day mortality. Survival at 1 year was 89.3% for BTT and 85.7% for DTT (p = 0.745), while at 7 years, it was 80.8% and 77.1%, respectively (p = 0.840). No significant differences were observed in the incidence of major complications, including permanent dialysis, organ rejection, and CAV. However, a higher incidence of cerebrovascular events was noted in the BTT group (10.7% vs. 2.6%). Conclusions: LVAD use as BTT does not negatively impact early post-transplant survival compared to DTT. At long-term follow-up, clinical outcomes remained similar across groups, supporting LVADs as a viable option for bridging patients to transplant. Full article

Background: Heart failure (HF) is a chronic condition that significantly affects morbidity and mortality. For patients with end-stage HF who are not candidates for heart transplantation, left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) provide mechanical circulatory support as a long-term solution, known as destination therapy (DT). Objective: This meta-analysis aims to synthesize evidence on the survival rates, complications, and quality-of-life improvements associated with LVADs used as destination therapy in patients with end-stage HF. Methods: A systematic search of databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus, was conducted to identify relevant studies. Studies were selected based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data from 12 studies were extracted and analyzed using a random-effects model. Survival rates, complications (e.g., infection and bleeding), and quality-of-life measures were the primary outcomes evaluated. Results: The analysis showed significant improvements in survival, with a pooled effect size of 0.848 (95% CI: 0.306–1.390, p = 0.002). Complication rates varied, with infections and bleeding being the most common adverse events. Quality of life also improved significantly post-LVAD implantation, with a standardized mean difference of 0.78 (95% CI: 0.65–0.91). Conclusions: LVADs as destination therapy provide a viable option for improving the survival and quality of life of end-stage HF patients, despite the associated risks of complications. Further research is needed to refine patient selection and management strategies to optimize outcomes. Full article

Heart transplantation (HT) is the gold standard therapy for advanced heart failure (ADHF), and LVADs as destination therapy are an option in non-HT candidates. Most patients with ADHF never receive HT or an LVAD, so alternative strategies are needed. Intermittent levosimendan can reduce HF hospitalizations in ADHF patients in the short term. It is uncertain whether the results of the comparison of inotropes with older-generation LVADs would have the same outcomes in the current era of ADHF patients treated with levosimendan, who are less sick but older. In this paper, we compare the use of two therapeutic strategies for end-stage HF in patients who are not candidates for HT: repetitive intermittent levosimendan vs. LVAD as destination therapy. To do so, we compare two multicenter cohorts of real-life patients from Spain: the LEVO-D registry and the REGALAD registry. In total, 715 patients coming from the two registries were found: 403 from LEVO-D and 312 from REGALAD. Non-adjusted median survival was shorter for LEVO-D patients, with the benefit for the LVADs seen only after the first year of therapy. The survival advantage for the LVAD cohort was also true after analysis of the matched cohort but, as in the non-matched analysis, the survival benefit was mainly shown after one year of follow-up. We conclude that in elderly ADHF non-HT candidates, LVAD therapy offers significantly better long-term outcomes when compared to intermittent levosimendan; thus, it should be considered in carefully selected candidates. On the other hand, in poor LVAD candidates or highly comorbid patients, intermittent inotropic support with levosimendan could be a reasonable alternative to LVAD, as 1-year outcomes are similar. Full article

Objectives: Patients in cardiogenic shock (CS) may be successfully bridged using intravascular micro-axial left ventricular assist devices (M-LVADs) for recovery or determination of definitive therapy. Methods: One hundred and seven CS patients implanted with M-LVADs from January 2020 to May 2024 were divided into four groups; group-1: 34 patients (transplant); group-2: 25 patients (LVAD); group-3: 42 patients (postcardiotomy CS (PCCS)); group-4: 6 patients (decision/recovery but excluded from analysis). Multivariable logistic regression and Multivariable Coxregression models identified predictors of early -hospital and late mortality, and Odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) with p < 0.05, respectively, were considered statistically significant. SPSS 29.0 and Python 3.11.1. were used for analyses. Results: Complications included device-malfunction (6%), gastrointestinal bleed (9%), long-term hemodialysis (21%), axillary hematoma requiring re-exploration (10%), heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (4%) requiring heparin therapy cessation/initiation of argatroban infusion, and non-fatal stroke (11%). Early hospital mortality included 13 patients: 2 in group-1, 1 in group-2, 10 in group-3 (p = 0.02). In the Logistic-Regression model, category of CS requiring an M-LVAD was significant (OR = 4.7, p = 0.05). Patients were followed for 4.5 years (mean follow-up was 23 ± 17 months), and 23 deaths occurred; group-1: 3 patients, group-2: 5 patients, and group-3: 15 patients (p = 0.019). At 4.5 years, actuarial survival was 90.7 ± 5.1% in group-1, 79.2 ± 8.3% in group-2, 62.8 ± 7.7% in group-3 (p = 0.01). In the Cox-Regression model, M-LVAD category (HR = 3.63, p = 0.04), and long-term postoperative dialysis (HR = 3.9, p = 0.002) emerged as predictors of long-term mortality. Conclusions: In cardiogenic shock, mid-term outcomes demonstrate good survival with M-LVADs as bridge to transplant/durable LVADs and reasonable survival with M-LVADs as a bridge to recovery following cardiotomy, accompanied by reduced ECMO usage, and early ambulation/rehabilitation. Full article

The management of advanced heart failure (HF) has long posed significant challenges due to its complex and chronic nature. Heart transplantation, while effective, is not always feasible due to the limited availability of donor organs. In this context, long term mechanical circulatory support and mainly left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have emerged as a vital intervention to fill this gap. LVAD superiority compared to medical therapy for some patients in advanced heart failure has been demonstrated either as a bridge to transplantation or as destination therapy. This literature review provides a comprehensive overview of the effectiveness, challenges, and advancements in the use of LVADs for treating advanced heart failure. It evaluates clinical outcomes associated with LVAD therapy, focusing on survival rates and quality of life improvements. The review synthesizes findings from recent studies, highlighting both the benefits and complications of LVAD implantation, such as infectious risk, thromboembolic events, hemorrhage and device malfunction. Additionally, it explores the latest technological and biomedical advancements in LVAD design, including innovations in biocompatibility, miniaturization, and power management. By examining current research, this review aims to elucidate how LVADs are transforming heart failure treatment and to offer insights into future directions for clinical practice and research. Full article

Heart transplantation remains the gold standard surgical treatment for advanced heart failure. Over time, medical therapies have achieved remarkable outcomes in terms of survival and quality of life, yet their results may be insufficient, even when maximized. The limited availability of organ donors and the selective criteria for heart transplant eligibility have led to a significant rise in the utilization of long-term mechanical circulatory support, including left ventricular assist devices. Patients receiving LVADs often present with multiple comorbidities, constituting a highly vulnerable population. Individuals living with LVADs may experience various long-term complications, such as bleeding, driveline infections, neurological events, and right ventricular dysfunction. Fortunately, the development of increasingly biocompatible LVAD devices in recent years has resulted in a notable reduction in these complications. This review aims to summarize the principal complications encountered by patients with LVADs throughout their treatment and the associated daily management strategies. Full article

Background: Donor shortage limits the utilization of heart transplantation, making it available for only a fraction of the patients on the transplant waiting list. Therefore, continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs) have evolved as a standard of care for end-stage heart failure. It is imperative therefore to investigate long-term survival in this population. Methods: This study assesses the impact of demographics, infections, comorbidities, types of cardiomyopathies, arrhythmias, and end-organ dysfunction on the long-term survival of LVAD recipients. The TriNetX database comprises de-identified patient information across healthcare organizations. The log-rank test assessed post-implant survival effects, while Cox regression was used in the univariate analysis to obtain the Hazard Ratio (HR). All analyses were conducted using the Python programming language and the lifelines library. Results: This study identified CMV, hepatitis A exposure, atrial fibrillation, paroxysmal ventricular tachycardia, ischemic cardiomyopathy, renal dysfunction, diabetes, COPD, mitral valve disease, and essential hypertension as risk factors that impact long-term survival. Interestingly, hypokalemia seems to have a protective effect and gender does not affect survival significantly. Conclusions: This is the first report of a detailed long-term survival assessment of the LVAD population using a decoded database. Full article

Long-term mechanical circulatory support by a left ventricular assist device (LVAD), with or without an additional temporary or long-term right ventricular (RV) support, is a life-saving therapy for advanced heart failure (HF) refractory to pharmacological treatment, as well as for both device and surgical optimization therapies. In patients with chronic non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM), timely prediction of HF’s transition into its end stage, necessitating life-saving heart transplantation or long-term VAD support (as a bridge-to-transplantation or destination therapy), remains particularly challenging, given the wide range of possible etiologies, pathophysiological features, and clinical presentations of NICM. Decision-making between the necessity of an LVAD or a biventricular assist device (BVAD) is crucial because both unnecessary use of a BVAD and irreversible right ventricular (RV) failure after LVAD implantation can seriously impair patient outcomes. The pre-operative or, at the latest, intraoperative prediction of RV function after LVAD implantation is reliably possible, but necessitates integrative evaluations of many different echocardiographic, hemodynamic, clinical, and laboratory parameters. VADs create favorable conditions for the reversal of structural and functional cardiac alterations not only in acute forms of HF, but also in chronic HF. Although full cardiac recovery is rather unusual in VAD recipients with pre-implant chronic HF, the search for myocardial reverse remodelling and functional improvement is worthwhile because, for sufficiently recovered patients, weaning from VADs has proved to be feasible and capable of providing survival benefits and better quality of life even if recovery remains incomplete. This review article aimed to provide an updated theoretical and practical background for those engaged in this highly demanding and still current topic due to the continuous technical progress in the optimization of long-term VADs, as well as due to the new challenges which have emerged in conjunction with the proof of a possible myocardial recovery during long-term ventricular support up to levels which allow successful device explantation. Full article

Advanced heart failure is a growing problem for which the best treatment is cardiac transplantation. However, the shortage of donors’ hearts made left ventricular assist devices as destination therapy (DT-LVAD) a highly recommended alternative: they improved mid-term prognosis as well as patients’ quality of life. Current intracorporeal pumps with a centrifugal continuous flow evolved in the last few years. Since 2003, when first LVAD was approved for long-term support, smaller device sizes with better survival and hemocompatibility profile were reached. The most important difficulty lies in the moment of the implant. Recent indications range from INTERMACS class 2 to 4, with close monitoring in intermediate cases. Moreover, a large multiparametric study is needed for considering the candidacy: basal situation, with a special interest in frailty, comorbidities, including renal and hepatic dysfunction, and medical background, considering every prior cardiac condition, must be evaluated. In addition, some clinical risk scores can be helpful to measure the possibility of right heart failure or morbi-mortality. With this review, we sought to summarize all the device improvements, with their updated clinical results, as well as to focus on all the patient selection criteria. Full article

Reduced oxygen consumption (VO₂), either due to insufficient oxygen delivery (DO₂), microcirculatory hypoperfusion and/or mitochondrial dysfunction, has an impact on the adverse short- and long-term survival of patients after cardiac surgery. However, it is still unclear whether VO₂ remains an efficient predictive marker in a population in which cardiac output (CO) and consequently DO₂ is determined by a left ventricular assist device (LVAD). We enrolled 93 consecutive patients who received an LVAD with a pulmonary artery catheter in place to monitor CO and venous oxygen saturation. VO₂ and DO₂ of in-hospital survivors and non-survivors were calculated over the first 4 days. Furthermore, we plotted receiver-operating curves (ROC) and performed a cox-regression analysis. VO₂ predicted in-hospital, 1- and 6-year survival with the highest area under the curve of 0.77 (95%CI: 0.6–0.9; p = 0.0004). A cut-off value of 210 mL/min VO₂ stratified patients regarding mortality with a sensitivity of 70% and a specificity of 81%. Reduced VO₂ was an independent predictor for in-hospital, 1- and 6-year mortality with a hazard ratio of 5.1 (p = 0.006), 3.2 (p = 0.003) and 1.9 (p = 0.0021). In non-survivors, VO₂ was significantly lower within the first 3 days (p = 0.010, p < 0.001, p < 0.001 and p = 0.015); DO₂ was reduced on days 2 and 3 (p = 0.007 and p = 0.003). In LVAD patients, impaired VO₂ impacts short- and long-term outcomes. Perioperative and intensive care medicine must, therefore, shift their focus from solely guaranteeing sufficient oxygen supply to restoring microcirculatory perfusion and mitochondrial functioning. Full article

The two main surgical options to treat end-stage heart failure are heart transplantation (HTx) or left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. In hemodynamically stable patients, the decision for HTx listing with or without LVADs is challenging. We analyzed the impact of both options on days alive and out of hospital (DAOH) and survival. This retrospective study screened all patients with HTx or LVAD implantation between 2010 and 2020. The main inclusion criterion was hemodynamic stability defined as independence of intravenous inotropic/vasoactive support at decision. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed. The primary endpoint was DAOH within one year after the decision. Secondary endpoints included survival, duration until HTx, and hospitalizations. In total, 187 patients received HTx and 227 patients underwent LVAD implantation. There were 21 bridge-to-transplant (BTT)-LVAD patients (implantation less than a month after HTx listing or listing after implantation) and 44 HTx-waiting patients included. PSM identified 17 matched pairs. Median DAOH at one year was not significantly different between the groups (BTT-LVAD: median 281, IQR 89; HTx waiting: median 329, IQR 74; p = 0.448). Secondary endpoints did not differ significantly. Our data suggest that BTT-LVAD implantation may not be favorable in terms of DAOH within one year for hemodynamically stable patients compared to waiting for HTx. Further investigations on quality of life and long-term outcomes are warranted. Full article

Survival after implant of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) continues to improve for patients with end-stage heart failure. Meanwhile, more patients are implanted with a destination therapy, rather than bridge-to-transplant, indication, meaning the population of patients living long-term on LVADs will continue to grow. Non-LVAD healthcare providers will encounter such patients in their scope of practice, and familiarity and comfort with the physiology and operation of these devices and common problems is essential. This review article describes the history, development, and operation of the modern LVAD. Common LVAD-related complications such as bleeding, infection, stroke, and right heart failure are reviewed and an approach to the patient with an LVAD is suggested. Nominal operating parameters and device response to various physiologic conditions, including hypo- and hypervolemia, hypertension, and device failure, are reviewed. Full article

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have been representing a cornerstone therapy for patients with end-stage heart failure during the last decades. However, their use induces several pathophysiological modifications which are partially responsible for the complications that typically characterize these patients, such as right ventricular failure, thromboembolic events, as well as bleedings. During the last years, biomarkers involved in the pathways of neurohormonal activation, myocardial injury, adverse remodeling, oxidative stress and systemic inflammation have raised attention. The search and analysis of potential biomarkers in LVAD patients could lead to the identification of a subset of patients with an increased risk of developing these adverse events. This could then promote a closer follow-up as well as therapeutic modifications. Furthermore, it might highlight some new therapeutic pharmacological targets that could lead to improved long-term survival. The aim of this review is to provide current evidence on the role of different biomarkers in patients with LVAD, in particular highlighting their possible implications in clinical practice. Full article

Background and Objectives: The understanding of high body mass index (BMI) and outcomes after Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD) implantation continues to evolve and the relationship has not been established yet. In this study, we investigated the effects of obesity (BMI > 30 kg/m²) on post–LVAD implantation outcomes. HeartWare LVAD and Heart Mate III LVAD were implanted. The primary outcome that was measured was mortality (in-hospital and on follow-up). The secondary outcomes that were measured were major adverse events. Materials and Methods: At our institution, the West German Heart and Vascular Center (Essen, Germany), from August 2010 to January 2020, a total of 210 patients received a long-term LVAD. Patients were stratified according to BMI ≥ 30 kg/m² representing the obesity threshold. The first group (n = 162) had an average BMI of 24.2 kg/m² (±2.9), and the second group (n = 48) had an average BMI of 33.9 kg/m² (±3.2). Baseline demographics were analysed alongside comorbidities per group. Results: Overall mortality was not significantly different between the obese group (51.1% n = 24) and the nonobese group (55.2%, n = 85) (p = 0.619). The difference between the mean duration of survival of patients who expired after hospital discharge was insignificant (2.1 years ± 1.6, group 1; 2.6 years ± 1.5, group 2; p = 0.29). In-hospital mortality was unvaried between the two groups: group 1: n = 34 (44% out of overall group 1 deaths); group 2: n = 11 (45.8% out of overall group 2 deaths) (p > 0.05). Postoperative complications were unvaried between the obese and the non-obese group (all with p > 0.05). However, a significant difference was found with regards to follow-up neurological complications (18.5% vs. 37.8%, p = 0.01) and LVAD thrombosis (14.7% vs. 33.3%, p = 0.01), as both were higher in the obese population. Conclusion: Obesity does not form a barrier for LVAD implantation in terms of mortality (in-hospital and on follow up). However, a significantly higher incidence of follow-up LVAD thrombosis and neurological complications has been found in the obese group of patients. Full article

Background and Objectives: Since the first use of ventricular assist devices (VADs) as bridge to recovery and bridge to cardiac transplantation in the early 1990s, significant technological advances have transformed VAD implantation into a routine destination therapy. With improved survival, many patients present for cardiac surgery for conditions not directly related to their permanent mechanical circulatory support. The aim of this study was to analyze the indications and outcomes of non-cardiac surgeries (NCSs) of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) patients in tertiary center. Material and Methods: We present a single-center experience after 151 LVAD implantations in 138 consecutive patients between 2012–2019 who had to undergo NCS during a follow-up period of 37 +/− 23.4 months on left ventricular assist device (LVAD). Results: A total of 105 procedures was performed in 63 LVAD recipients, resulting in peri-operative mortality of 3.8%. Twenty-five (39.7%) of patients underwent multiple surgeries. We found no significant difference in cumulative survival associated with the performed surgical interventions (p = 0.469). Conclusion: We demonstrated good overall clinical outcomes in LVAD patients undergoing NCS. With acceptable peri-operative mortality, NCS can be safely performed in LVAD patients on long-term support. Full article