Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (4)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = MICD

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
13 pages, 823 KB  
Article
A 5-Year Follow-Up of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Following External Beam Radiotherapy or Radical Prostatectomy in Localised Prostate Cancer
by Rowan V. David, Peter L. Stapleton, Arman A. Kahokehr, Jason Lee, David I. Watson, John Leung and Michael E. O’Callaghan
Soc. Int. Urol. J. 2025, 6(2), 35; https://doi.org/10.3390/siuj6020035 - 21 Apr 2025
Viewed by 1300
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Late toxicity following radiotherapy is common and compromises patient quality of life. However, the impact of toxicity on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) five years after prostate external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is poorly characterised. We describe PROMs using the Expanded Prostate Cancer [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Late toxicity following radiotherapy is common and compromises patient quality of life. However, the impact of toxicity on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) five years after prostate external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is poorly characterised. We describe PROMs using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC-26) five years post-EBRT compared against radical prostatectomy (RP). Methods: A prospective cohort of patients with localised prostate cancer treated from 2000 to 2020 captured by a state-level cancer registry was analysed. Multivariable mixed-effects linear modelling was performed to compare differences between EPIC-26 domains over time between ERBT and RP patients. The percentage of patients recording a decline in EPIC-26 domains compared with baseline which exceeded the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was calculated and compared between groups. Additionally, subgroup analysis was performed on patients treated using contemporary techniques. Results: There were 1720 patients (EBRT n = 1441 vs. RP n = 279) with evaluable EPIC-26 PROMS. Patients in the EBRT group had a higher median age (74 vs. 66, p < 0.001) and National comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) high-risk disease (61% vs. 24%, p < 0.001). Bowel domain scores were worse after EBRT compared to RP (beta −0.46, 95% CI −1.20–−0.28, p < 0.001), with a greater proportion of patients reporting a change in symptoms that exceeded the MICD at 12 months (22 vs. 11%, p = 0.009). Moderate/big bowel bother scores were significantly higher in the EBRT cohort at baseline and all follow-up periods compared to RP (beta −8.27, 95% CI −10.21–−6.34, p < 0.001). Pad use (i.e., ≥1) per day was significantly lower amongst the EBRT group (beta 16.56, 95% CI 14.35–18.76, p < 0.001). Despite contemporary techniques, EBRT was associated with worse bowel domain scores at 12 (75 vs. 80, p < 0.05) and 60 months (75 vs. 80, p < 0.05) compared to RP; however, EBRT was associated with less pad use at 12 (4% vs. 34%, p < 0.001), 24 (10% vs. 33%, p < 0.001) and 60 months (13% vs. 33%, p = 0.15) than RP. Conclusions: There are significant differences in PROMs after local curative treatment for prostate cancer which persist to five years post-treatment, despite contemporary techniques. Understanding the associated toxicity patterns helps inform shared decision-making during pre-treatment counselling. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 5219 KB  
Review
Alzheimer’s Amyloid Hypothesis and Antibody Therapy: Melting Glaciers?
by Poul F. Høilund-Carlsen, Abass Alavi, Rudolph J. Castellani, Rachael L. Neve, George Perry, Mona-Elisabeth Revheim and Jorge R. Barrio
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(7), 3892; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25073892 - 31 Mar 2024
Cited by 26 | Viewed by 5404
Abstract
The amyloid cascade hypothesis for Alzheimer’s disease is still alive, although heavily challenged. Effective anti-amyloid immunotherapy would confirm the hypothesis’ claim that the protein amyloid-beta is the cause of the disease. Two antibodies, aducanumab and lecanemab, have been approved by the U.S. Food [...] Read more.
The amyloid cascade hypothesis for Alzheimer’s disease is still alive, although heavily challenged. Effective anti-amyloid immunotherapy would confirm the hypothesis’ claim that the protein amyloid-beta is the cause of the disease. Two antibodies, aducanumab and lecanemab, have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, while a third, donanemab, is under review. The main argument for the FDA approvals is a presumed therapy-induced removal of cerebral amyloid deposits. Lecanemab and donanemab are also thought to cause some statistical delay in the determination of cognitive decline. However, clinical efficacy that is less than with conventional treatment, selection of amyloid-positive trial patients with non-specific amyloid-PET imaging, and uncertain therapy-induced removal of cerebral amyloids in clinical trials cast doubt on this anti-Alzheimer’s antibody therapy and hence on the amyloid hypothesis, calling for a more thorough investigation of the negative impact of this type of therapy on the brain. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 321 KB  
Article
Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID), Substantial Clinical Benefit (SCB), and Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) of the Shoulder Disability Questionnaire (SDQ) in Patients Undergoing Rotator Cuff Repair
by Umile Giuseppe Longo, Rocco Papalia, Sergio De Salvatore, Carlo Casciaro, Ilaria Piergentili, Benedetta Bandini, Alberto Lalli, Edoardo Franceschetti and Vincenzo Denaro
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(11), 5950; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20115950 - 25 May 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 3896
Abstract
The Shoulder Disability Questionnaire (SDQ) is a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) applied to evaluate shoulder surgery outcomes. The purpose of this study is to identify the accurate Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID), Substantial Clinical Benefit (SCB) and Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) values [...] Read more.
The Shoulder Disability Questionnaire (SDQ) is a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) applied to evaluate shoulder surgery outcomes. The purpose of this study is to identify the accurate Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID), Substantial Clinical Benefit (SCB) and Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) values for the SDQ score. A total of 35 patients (21 women and 16 men, mean age 76.6 ± 3.2 years) were followed up at 6 months postoperatively. To assess the patient’s health satisfaction and symptoms, anchor questions were used. The MCID and SCB values of the SDQ score for patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair from inception to final follow-up were 40.8 and 55.6, respectively. A change of 40.8 in the SDQ score at 6 months after surgery shows that patients achieved a minimum clinically important improvement in their state of health, and a 55.6 change in the SDQ score reflects a substantial clinically important improvement. The PASS cut-off of the SDQ score at 6 months postoperatively ranged from 22.5 to 25.8. If an SDQ score of 22.5 or more is attained after surgery, the health condition can be recognized as acceptable by the majority of patients. These cut-offs will help with understanding specific patient results and allow clinicians to personally assess patient improvement after rotator cuff repair. Full article
14 pages, 3535 KB  
Article
Synthesis of a Novel Catalyst MnO/CNTs for Microwave-Induced Degradation of Tetracycline
by Tianming Liu, Guobao Yuan, Guocheng Lv, Yuxin Li, Libing Liao, Siyao Qiu and Chenghua Sun
Catalysts 2019, 9(11), 911; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal9110911 - 30 Oct 2019
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 3651
Abstract
Microwave-induced catalytic degradation (MICD) has been considered as one of the most prospective approaches to remove organic contaminants from water. High-performance catalysts, ideally offering efficient degradation ability, are essential to this process. This work reports the fabrication of manganese oxide on carbon nanotubes [...] Read more.
Microwave-induced catalytic degradation (MICD) has been considered as one of the most prospective approaches to remove organic contaminants from water. High-performance catalysts, ideally offering efficient degradation ability, are essential to this process. This work reports the fabrication of manganese oxide on carbon nanotubes (MnO/CNTs) as an efficient catalyst under microwave irradiation (MI) to remove tetracycline (TC) from aqueous solution. The hybrid MnO/CNTs structure shows excellent performance in TC degradation. Combining experimental characterization and theoretical calculations, synergistic mechanisms are revealed: (i) Strong MnO/CNTs interaction stabilizes Mn(II) through interfacial bonding; (ii) high-spin states associated with low coordinated Mn(II) play a major role in MICD; and (iii) superoxide radicals (•O2) and hydroxyl radicals (•OH) induced by microwave input are identified as the major active species. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Catalytic Materials)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop