Search Results (250)

Breast cancer (BC) is the most prevalent malignancy in women worldwide. Despite most cases being diagnosed in the early stages, patients typically require a multimodal treatment approach. This typically involves a combination of surgery, radiotherapy, systemic treatments (including chemotherapy or immunotherapy), targeted therapy, and endocrine therapy, depending on the disease subtype and the risk of recurrence. Moreover, patients with BC and germline mutations in the breast cancer genes 1 or 2 (BRCA1/BRCA2), (gBRCAm), who are typically young women, often require more aggressive therapeutic interventions. These mutations present unique characteristics that necessitate a distinct treatment approach, potentially influencing the side effect profiles of patients with BC. Regardless of the clear benefit observed with these treatments in terms of reduced recurrence and mortality rates, long-term, treatment-related adverse events occur that negatively affect the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of BC survivors. Thus, long-term adverse events need to be factored into the treatment decision algorithm of patients with early BC (eBC). Physical, functional, emotional, and psychosocial adverse events can occur and represent a significant concern and a challenge for clinicians, patients, and their families. This review article provides an overview of the various long-term adverse events that patients with eBC may experience, including their associated risk factors, as well as management and prevention strategies. We also explore the evidence of the long-term impact of treatment on the HRQoL of patients with gBRCAm. By providing a comprehensive overview of current evidence and recommendations regarding patients’ HRQoL, we aim to equip clinicians with scientific and clinical knowledge and provide guidance to optimize care and improve long-term outcomes. Full article

Background: Genetic insights from diverse populations are key to advancing cancer detection, treatment, and prevention. Unlike other Latin American countries, Colombia lacks a centralized registry for germline and somatic mutations in breast and ovarian cancer. This study describes the country’s first national variant registry, and the occurrence of recurrent mutations and potential founder effects in Colombia. Methods: To address this gap, we implemented the first capturing protocol using the REDCap system. In a group of 213 breast and/or ovarian cancer patients harboring genetic mutations, we collected genetic, clinical, and demographic data from 13 regional centers across Colombia. Statistical analyses assessed variant distribution and patient demographics. Results: Among 229 identified variants (105 germline, 124 somatic), most were classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic (72.4% germline, 87% somatic). BRCA1 and BRCA2 accounted for the majority of recurrent mutations. Germline recurrent variants (seen >3 times) were recorded for BRCA1 (77.7%; 21/27) and BRCA2 (22.3%; 6/27). Similarly, recurrent somatic variants were identified for BRCA1 (82.6%; 38/46) and BRCA2 (17.4%; 8/46). Notably, four recurrent variants were previously reported as founder mutations: BRCA1 c.1674del (14.3% germline and 23.7% somatic), BRCA1 c.3331_3334del (33.3% germline and 52.6% somatic), BRCA1 c.5123C>A (52.4% germline and 23.7% somatic), and BRCA2 c.2808_2811del (50% germline and 50% somatic). Most cases originated from the Andean region, highlighting regional disparities. Conclusions: This registry offers the first overview of genetic variants in Colombian breast and ovarian cancer patients. Recurrent and region-specific mutations highlight the need for population-focused data to guide targeted screening and personalized care strategies. Full article

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a highly aggressive subtype known for its rapid metastatic potential. Despite its severity, treatment options for TNBC remain limited. Olaparib, an FDA-approved PARP inhibitor, has been used to treat germline BRCA-mutated TNBC in both metastatic and high-risk early-stage settings. However, acquired resistance to PARP inhibitors and their limited applicability in non-BRCA TNBCs are now two major growing clinical problems. Activation of the IL-6/STAT3 signaling cascade has been implicated in therapeutic resistance. In this study, we evaluated the combined effects of the PARP inhibitor olaparib and the STAT3 inhibitor LLL12B in human TNBC cell lines with both BRCA mutations and wild-type BRCA status. Our results demonstrate that the PARP inhibitor olaparib can induce increased interleukin-6 (IL-6) in TNBC cells, with ELISA showing a 2- to 39-fold increase across five cell lines. MTT assays revealed that knocking down or inhibiting STAT3, a key downstream effector of the IL-6/GP130 pathway, sensitizes TNBC cells to olaparib. Treatment with either olaparib or LLL12B alone reduced TNBC cell viability, migration, and invasion. Notably, their combined administration produced a markedly enhanced inhibitory effect compared to individual treatments, regardless of BRCA mutation status. These findings highlight the potential of dual PARP and STAT3 inhibition as a novel targeted therapeutic strategy for both BRCA-mutant and BRCA-proficient TNBC. Full article

Background: The national guidelines, informed by evidence from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), define the criteria for genetic testing of BRCA1/2 and other genes associated with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (HBOC) and Lynch Syndrome (LS). When a germline pathogenic variant (PV) is identified in an index case, clinical recommendations advise informing at-risk relatives about the availability of predictive genetic testing, as early identification of carriers allows for timely implementation of preventive measures. Methods: This retrospective observational study examined data collected between 2017 and 2024 at the Medical Genetics Unit of the “Renato Dulbecco” University Hospital in Catanzaro, Italy. The analysis focused on trends in the identification of individuals carrying PVs in cancer predisposition genes (CPGs) and the subsequent uptake of cascade genetic testing (CGT) among their family members. Results: Over the study period, from 116 probands were performed 257 CGTs on 251 relatives. A notable reduction of approximately ten years in median age was observed, 39% were found to carry familial mutation and were referred to personalized cancer prevention programs. Among these, 62% accessed Oncological Genetic Counselling (CGO) within one year of the proband’s diagnosis, suggesting effective communication and outreach. Conclusions: The findings highlight the critical role of effective CGO and intrafamilial communication in hereditary cancer prevention. The identification of PVs, followed by timely CGTs and implementation of preventive strategies, significantly contributes to early cancer risk management. Periodic monitoring of CGT uptake and outcome trends, as demonstrated in this study, is essential to refine and optimize genetic services and public health strategies. Full article

Background/Objectives: Prostate cancer is the most common cancer among men globally and a leading cause of cancer-related death. Germline genetic evaluation is increasingly recognized as essential for men with high-risk features such as a strong family history or advanced disease. Methods: Comprehensive genetic risk assessment should integrate three components: family history (FH), rare pathogenic mutations (RPMs), and polygenic risk scores (PRS). RPMs in DNA repair genes (e.g., BRCA2, CHEK2, ATM) can inform screening, prognosis, and treatment strategies, particularly for metastatic or aggressive disease. PRS, derived from common genetic variants, provides a personalized and independent measure of prostate cancer risk and may guide decisions on screening intensity and timing. Results: Although PRS cannot yet differentiate between indolent and aggressive cancer, it has the potential to stratify men into low and high-risk categories more effectively than FH or RPMs alone. Knowledge of specific RPMs can influence treatment decisions in clinically advanced prostate cancer. Challenges in clinical implementation include limited provider awareness, underutilization of genetic counseling, and lack of diversity in genomic datasets, which can lead to misdiagnoses. Emerging technologies and digital tools are being developed to streamline genetic testing and counseling. Population-level strategies and tailored screening protocols based on genetic risk are under active investigation. Conclusions: While early evidence suggests high satisfaction with genetic testing among patients, further studies in diverse populations are needed. Integration of germline genetic information into prostate cancer management offers promising avenues for personalized screening, surveillance, and treatment, ultimately aiming to reduce morbidity and mortality. Full article

Background/Objectives: Cancer risk-reducing strategies in Ashkenazi women carrying founder variants have a cost-effective effect on reducing cancer morbidity and mortality. The British and US guidelines recommend BRCA1/2 (BRCA) screening among Ashkenazi Jewish people to identify high-risk individuals. BRCA status has not been investigated yet in the Jewish community of Rome. Methods: Patients were selected from the Family Cancer Clinic of the Umberto I University Hospital of Rome, and 38 unrelated families (28 of Roman Jewish and 10 of Libyan Jewish origin) were enrolled, comprising 44 subjects diagnosed with breast and/or ovarian cancer. Genetic counseling and germline BRCA testing were conducted. Haplotype analysis was performed. Results: Of the probands, 26.5% (9/34) from 7/28 unrelated families (25%) in the Jewish community of Rome harbored the known BRCA2 c.7007G>C, p. (Arg2336Pro) variant (rs28897743). Genetic analysis of the four unrelated carriers revealed a shared haplotype, indicating a potential founder effect. The length of the haplotype might confirm the Roman community to be the oldest among Jewish communities in Europe. Conclusions: This study indicates the BRCA2 c.7007G>C variant found in the Jewish community of Rome to be a founder variant. Finally, we underline a pressing need to address the increased risk of carrying BRCA mutations among individuals with Jewish heritage, and to enhance genetic counseling and screening efforts in ethnic minorities that are not otherwise routinely reached. Full article

Background: Niraparib is an oral poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitor with promising activity for patients with advanced breast cancer harboring germline BRCA1/2 mutations. Methods: LUZERN (NCT04240106) was a multicenter, open-label, Simon’s two-stage, phase II clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of niraparib with aromatase inhibitors (AIs) for patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer with either a germline BRCA1/2 mutation (cohort A) or germline BRCA1/2 wild-type and homologous recombination deficiency (exploratory cohort B). Eligible patients received ≤1 line of chemotherapy and 1–2 prior lines of endocrine therapy for advanced disease with secondary resistance to the last AI-based regimen. Patients received niraparib (300 mg or 200 mg) plus an AI. The primary endpoint was the clinical benefit rate (CBR) in cohort A. Results: Between June 2020 and November 2022, 14 patients were enrolled in cohort A (n = 6 for stage I, n = 8 for stage II) and no patients were enrolled in cohort B. One patient was excluded from the efficacy analysis due to no prior AI treatment. Nearly all patients (92.9%) previously received a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor, but no patients had received prior platinum-based chemotherapy. Median follow-up was 16.7 months (range: 13.2–18.2). The CBR was 46.2% (95% CI: 19.2–74.9), meeting the primary endpoint. Median progression-free survival was 5.5 months (95% CI: 1.9–8.5), and median overall survival was 18.1 months (95% CI: 9.7–NE). The safety profile was consistent with the known toxicity of both drugs. Conclusions: Niraparib combined with an AI has encouraging antitumor activity and a manageable safety profile in patients with AI-resistant HR-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer with germline BRCA1/2 mutations. Full article

The genotoxic drug doxorubicin (Dox) remains one of the most powerful chemotherapeutic options available for a wide range of cancers including breast, ovarian, and other cancers. However, emerging evidence links Dox treatment with chemotherapy-induced cognitive impairment, a condition that is popularly referred to as Dox-induced neurotoxicity or “chemobrain”, which limits the use of the drug. There are no specific treatments for Dox-induced neurotoxicity, only interventions to mitigate the neurotoxic effects of the drug. Accumulating evidence indicates that DNA damage, oxidative stress, dysregulation of autophagy and neurogenesis, inflammation, and apoptosis play central roles in Dox-induced neurotoxicity. Additionally, germline mutations in the tumour suppressor genes breast cancer susceptibility genes 1 and 2 (BRCA1 and BRCA2) increase the risk of breast, ovarian, and related cancers. BRCA1 and BRCA2 are distinct proteins that play crucial, unique roles in homologous recombination-mediated double-stranded break repair. Furthermore, BRCA1 and 2 mitigate oxidative stress in both neural cells and brain microvascular endothelial cells, which suggests that they have a critical role as regulators of pathways central to the development of Dox-induced neurotoxicity. Despite research on the effects of Dox on cognitive function, there is a gap in knowledge about the role of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in Dox-induced neurotoxicity. In this review, we discuss existing findings about the role of different mechanisms and the role of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in Dox-induced neurotoxicity, along with future perspectives. Full article

Purpose: To determine if the risk of clonal hematopoiesis (CH) would be higher among those with germline alterations in homologous recombination repair genes (gHRR) in the four BRCA-associated cancers (breast, ovarian, prostate, pancreas) compared to those without inherited predisposition (the sporadic group). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed deidentified data from 24,849 patient samples from the Tempus database with a primary diagnosis of breast, ovarian, prostate, and pancreatic cancers. Germline pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in BRCA1, BRCA2, ATM, PALB2, and CHEK2 were identified across all four cancer types. CH was determined based on the presence of pathogenic or likely pathogenic alterations in any one of 52 CH-associated genes with a variant allele fraction of at least 2% found in the normal match. Age-adjusted odds ratios were calculated for risk of CH across cancer types. Results: CH was identified in 14% of patients with BRCA-associated cancers. DNMT3A, PPM1D, and TET2 were the most common CH gene alterations. After adjusting for age at time of biopsy, having any germline alteration in the breast cancer cohort was associated with a 41% increased likelihood of CH (OR 1.41; 95% CI 1.07–1.84, p = 0.014). An increase in CH prevalence was not seen in the three other cancer types. Conclusions: When accounting for age at time of testing, pathogenic germline alterations in DNA repair genes were associated with an increased risk of CH only among patients with breast cancer, but not in those with ovarian, pancreatic, or prostate cancers. Full article

Background and Objectives: Despite the well-established role of the BRCA and mismatch repair (MMR) genes in DNA damage repair pathways, a substantial proportion of familial cancer cases still lack pathogenic variants in those genes. Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) panels have emerged as a powerful tool to identify hereditary cancer at-risk individuals and subsequently provide them with accurate management. Materials and Methods: Families harbouring PVs in RAD50, RAD51C, RAD51D, and BRIP1 were identified by analysing a cancer-predisposing genes panel using Ion S5 system technology. A retrospective cohort of 155 families tested only for the BRCAs of MMR genes were reanalysed, prompted by an increase in familial cases or new cancer diagnoses among index cases. Results: We identified 40 families through molecular reanalysis (33 with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (HBOC) and 7 with Lynch Syndrome (LS)), with positive test results among 155 families lacking BRCA or MMR mutations. The most frequently mutated genes after ATM and CHEK2 were BRIP1, RAD51D, and RAD51C with 16, 13, and 9 positive families, respectively. The phenotype–genotype correlations not only revealed ovarian and HER-negative breast cancer predispositions but also other cancer types, particularly lung and gastric, and individuals with a second or third distinct cancer episode. Conclusions: Broader ranges of malignancies, including gastric, lung, and bladder, have been identified among BRIP1, RAD51D, and RAD51C positive families. The results generated using NGS provide a comprehensive genetic landscape in each patient that could explain the diversity of phenotypes shown in PV families that, combined with non-genetic factors, might enable accurate surveillance and personalized treatments. NGS reanalysis doubled our diagnostic yield and was a good strategy to identify hereditary cancer families that would otherwise be overlooked. Full article

Patients with a BRCA1 germline mutation often represent a challenge for medical healthcare, since they develop malignancies that tend to be more aggressive and which need to be addressed in multidisciplinary teams with more individualized therapies. We report a case of a 37-year-old woman with a BRCA1 mutation who was diagnosed and treated for high-grade papillary serous carcinoma of the fallopian tube. Eight years later, her regular check-up imaging revealed a latero-aortic lymphadenopathy and a right breast tumor. She underwent a fine needle breast biopsy which was positive for invasive non-specific type carcinoma with negative estrogen, progesterone and Her2 receptors in immunohistochemistry tests. The patient underwent debulking surgery for metastatic lymphadenopathy, followed by chemotherapy with Carboplatin and Paclitaxel, and a modified right mastectomy with axillary lymphadenectomy. She subsequently initiated therapy with the PARP inhibitor Olaparib. No evidence of tumor recurrence was detected during the six-month postoperative follow-up period. The primary goal of this paper is to emphasize the complexity and challenges of managing patients with BRCA1 mutations who develop synchronous malignancies. This case report aims to highlight the increasing role of precision medicine and the importance of personalized, multidisciplinary therapeutic strategies, which include surgery, chemotherapy, and targeted therapies. Full article

Cancers that arise from germline mutations of breast cancer associated gene 1 (BRCA1), which is a crucial player in homologous recombination (HR) DNA repair, are vulnerable to DNA-damaging agents such as platinum and PARP inhibitors (PARPis). Increasing evidence suggests that BRCA1 is an essential driver of all phases of the cell cycle, thereby maintaining orderly steps during cell cycle progression. Specifically, loss of BRCA1 activity causes the S-phase, G₂/M, spindle checkpoints, and centrosome duplication to be dysregulated, thereby blocking cell proliferation and inducing apoptosis. In vertebrates, loss of HR genes such as BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 is lethal, since HR is a prerequisite for genome integrity. Thus, cancer cells utilize alternative DNA repair pathways such as non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) to cope with the loss of BRCA1 function. In this review, we attempt to update and discuss how these novel components are crucial for regulating DNA damage repair (DDR) in BRCA1-deficient cancers. Full article

Background: Several pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA) biomarkers beyond the traditional carbohydrate antigen (CA)19-9 have been identified but are lacking large-scale prospective validation. This prospective cohort study evaluated the prognostic impact of potential PA biomarkers. Methods: We enrolled 238 of 288 patients with histologically proven PA. We assessed candidate biomarkers, including CA19-9, germline BRCA1/2, and ATM mutations, as well as mutant KRAS circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in blood samples. Additionally, we evaluated the expression of SLC29A1 (hENT1), DCK, CES2, and GATA6. We examined the association of candidate biomarkers with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: We analyzed biomarker efficacy in 200 (median age 65 years; 55% male) of the enrolled patients who received chemotherapy. A high mutant KRAS ctDNA concentration (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.508 and 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.052–2.161 for PFS; HR: 1.796 and 95% CI: 1.203–2.681 for OS) and high CA19-9 level (HR: 1.647 and 95% CI: 1.177–2.306 for PFS; HR: 1.803 and 95% CI: 1.248–2.605 for OS) were associated with poor prognosis. High GATA6 RNA expression was linked to longer PFS (HR: 0.336 and 95% CI: 0.195–0.582) and OS (HR: 0.304 and 95% CI: 0.165–0.560). Conclusions: Plasma mutant KRAS ctDNA concentrations and GATA6 expression could serve as significant prognostic biomarkers in patients with PA, potentially guiding therapeutic decisions and prognostication. Full article

Ovarian cancer (OC) is a highly heterogeneous malignancy, often characterized by complex genomic alterations that drive tumor progression and therapy resistance. In this paper, we report a novel de novo BRCA2 germline variant NM_000059.3:c.(8693_8695delinsGT) associated with early-onset OC that featured two regions with differential MMR (Mismatch Repair) gene expression. To date, only six cases of de novo BRCA2 variants have been reported, none of which were associated with early-onset high-grade serous OC. The immunohistochemical analysis of MMR genes revealed two distinct tumor areas, separated by a clear topographic boundary, with the heterogeneous expression of MLH1 and PMS2 proteins. Seventy-five percent of the tumor tissue showed positivity, while the remaining 25% exhibited a complete absence of expression, underscoring the spatial variability in MMR gene expression within the tumor. Integrated comparative spatial genomic profiling identified several tumor features associated with the genetic variant as regions of loss of heterozygosity (LOH) that involved BRCA2 and MLH1 genes, along with a significantly higher mutational tumor burden in the tumor area that lacked MLH1 and PMS2 expression, indicating its further molecular evolution. The following variants were acquired: c.6572C>T in NOTCH2, c.1852C>T in BCL6, c.191A>T in INHBA, c.749C>T in CUX1, c.898C>A in FANCG, and c.1712G>C in KDM6A. Integrated comparative spatial proteomic profiles revealed defects in the DNA repair pathways, as well as significant alterations in the extracellular matrix (ECM). The differential expression of proteins involved in DNA repair, particularly those associated with MMR and Base Excision Repair (BER), highlights the critical role of defective repair mechanisms in driving genomic instability. Furthermore, ECM components, such as collagen isoforms, Fibrillin-1, EMILIN-1, Prolargin, and Lumican, were found to be highly expressed in the MLH1/PMS2-deficient tumor area, suggesting a connection between DNA repair deficiencies, ECM remodeling, and tumor progression. Thus, the identification of the BRCA2 variant sheds light on the poorly understood interplay between DNA repair deficiencies and ECM remodeling in OC, providing new insights into their dual role in shaping tumor evolution and suggesting potential targets for novel therapeutic strategies. Full article

Background/Objectives: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is the most common non-invasive form of breast cancer. It is not clear to what extent DCIS is a part of the hereditary breast/ovarian cancer syndrome caused by BRCA1/2 mutations. Therefore, we investigated the association of BRCA1/2 mutations in patients with DCIS and assessed their impact on survival. Methods: We studied 564 Polish women with DCIS for six alleles in BRCA1 (c.181T>G, c.5266dupC, c.4035delA, c.3700_3704del5, c.68_69del and c.5251C>T) and four in BRCA2 (c.658_659del, c.3847_3848del, c.5946del and c.7913_7917del). To investigate the association of BRCA1/2 founder mutations with DCIS risk, we tested 4702 controls as a reference. To analyze survival, mutation carriers were followed for an average of 110 months. Results: A BRCA1 mutation was present in seven (1.24%) cases and in twenty-two (0.47%) controls (OR = 3.27, 95%CI 1.36 to 7.87, p = 0.01). A BRCA2 mutation was present in eight (1.42%) cases versus six (0.13%) controls (OR = 11.3, 95%CI 3.9 to 32.6, p < 0.0001). Three of the fifteen cases with BRCA1/2 mutations developed invasive ipsilateral or contralateral breast cancer, on average 6 years from the diagnosis of DCIS. There were no deaths reported among the 15 mutation carriers with DCIS. Conclusions: DCIS is a part of the hereditary breast/ovarian cancer syndrome caused by BRCA1/2 mutations. Women with DCIS should receive genetic counseling and testing for BRCA1/2 mutations. BRCA1/2 mutations may predispose women to a better DCIS prognosis, but further studies are needed. Full article