Search Results (64)

Anti-PD-1 therapies have transformed cancer treatment by restoring antitumor T cell activity. Despite their broad clinical use, variability in treatment response and immune-related adverse events underscore the need for therapeutic optimization. This article provides an integrative overview of the pharmacokinetics (PKs) of anti-PD-1 antibodies—such as nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and cemiplimab—and examines pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) relationships, highlighting the impact of clearance variability on drug exposure, efficacy, and safety. Baseline clearance and its reduction during therapy, together with interindividual variability, emerge as important dynamic biomarkers with potential applicability across different cancer types for guiding individualized dosing strategies. The review also discusses established biomarkers for anti-PD-1 therapies, including tumor PD-L1 expression and immune cell signatures, and their relevance for patient stratification. The evidence supports a shift from traditional weight-based dosing toward adaptive dosing and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), especially in long-term responders and cost-containment contexts. Notably, the inclusion of clearance-based biomarkers—such as baseline clearance and its reduction—into therapeutic models represents a key step toward individualized, dynamic immunotherapy. In conclusion, optimizing anti-PD-1 therapy through PK-PD insights and biomarker integration holds promise for improving outcomes and reducing toxicity. Future research should focus on validating PK-based approaches and developing robust algorithms (machine learning models incorporating clearance, tumor burden, and other validated biomarkers) for tailored cancer treatment. Full article

Skin cancer is the most common cancer worldwide. The incidence of skin cancer has been increasing worldwide. Nearly 75% of all skin cancers are basal cell carcinomas (BCC), cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) represents approximately 20%, and those remaining are melanomas (4%) or other rare tumors (1%). Given the high cure rates and the ability to histologically confirm tumor clearance, surgical therapy is the gold standard for the treatment of skin cancer. Conventional surgery is the most employed technique for the removal of non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSCs). Mohs Micrographic Surgery (MMS) is the most precise surgical method for the treatment of non-melanoma skin cancer, allowing for 100% margin evaluation, being the gold-standard method for surgical treatment of non-melanoma skin cancer. Whenever it is possible to obtain wide margins (4 to 6 mm), cure rates vary from 70% to 99%. Imiquimod, a synthetic imidazoquinolinone amine, is a topical immune response modifier approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of external anogenital warts, actinic keratosis (AK), and superficial basal cell carcinoma (sBCC). The efficacy of imiquimod is primarily attributed to its ability to modulate both innate and adaptive immune responses, as well as its direct effects on cancer cells. Imiquimod exerts its immunomodulatory effects by activating Toll-like receptors 7 and 8 (TLR7/8) on various immune cells, including dendritic cells, macrophages, and natural killer (NK) cells. Upon binding to these receptors, imiquimod triggers the MyD88-dependent signaling pathway, leading to the activation of nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) and interferon regulatory factors (IRFs). This cascade leads to the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including interferon-alpha (IFN-α), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-12 (IL-12), and interleukin-6 (IL-6). These cytokines enhance local inflammation, recruit additional immune cells to the tumor site, and stimulate antigen presentation, thereby promoting an anti-tumor immune response. Radiation therapy (RTh) may be employed as a primary treatment to BCC. It may also be employed as an adjuvant treatment to surgery for SCC and aggressive subtypes of BCC. RTh triggers both direct and indirect DNA damage on cancer cells and generates reactive oxygen species (ROS) within cells. ROS trigger oxidative damage to DNA, proteins, and lipids, exacerbating the cellular stress and contributing to tumor cell death. Recently, immunotherapy emerged as a revolutionary treatment for all stages of SCC. Cemiplimab is a human programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)-blocking antibody that triggers a response to over 50% of patients with locally advanced and metastatic SCC. A randomized clinical trial (RCT) published in 2022 revealed that cemiplimab was highly effective in the neoadjuvant treatment of large SCCs. The drug promoted a significant tumor size decrease, enabling organ-sparing operations and a much better cosmetic effect. A few months ago, a RCT of cemiplimab on adjuvant therapy for locally aggressive SCC was published. Interestingly, cemiplimab was administered to patients with local or regional cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma after surgical resection and postoperative radiotherapy, at high risk for recurrence owing to nodal features, revealed that cemiplimab led to much lower risks both of locoregional recurrence and distant recurrence. Full article

Skin cancer is the most common cancer form worldwide, and it is primarily divided into melanoma and non-melanoma types, with non-melanoma being the most prevalent condition. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) accounts for 50% of primary skin cancers and is characterized by uncontrolled keratinocyte proliferation. cSCC’s current standard treatment is surgical resection and chemotherapy. Unfortunately, these methods often lead to disfigurement, functional morbiditly, and compromised function. In contrast to immunotherapy, emerging scenarios have shown promising results, especially in neoadjuvant settings. Cemiplimab (Libtayo^®; Regeneron, Tarrytown, NY, USA), a PD-1 monoclonal antibody, has shown efficacy in treating advanced or metastatic cSCC, and its use as a neoadjuvant therapy has been recently explored. This review aims to evaluate Cemiplimab in the neoadjuvant setting for cSCC treatment. The Methodology followed PRISMA guidelines, this review analyzed studies on Cemiplimab as a neoadjuvant therapy for cSCC that were sourced from PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus. Only controlled trials, cohort studies, case series, and systematic reviews were included. From 341 records, 21 studies were included, and six clinical trials provided key data about neoadjuvant Cemiplimab’s response rates, efficacy, adverse effects, and safety considerations. The targeted data revealed a neoadjuvant Cemiplimab mean pathologic response rate of 72%, with a 62% objective response rate. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) affect 66% of patients, though most cases are not severe. The most common include fatigue, maculopapular rash, and diarrhea. The studies showed high rates of complete pathological responses (cPRs) and major pathological responses (mPRs), suggesting a strong therapeutic potential. Neoadjuvant Cemiplimab for cSCC therapy shows high response rates, low recurrence, improved survival, and manageable side effects. The current literature indicates that Cemiplimab may also be effective when used in immunosuppressed patients. Despite more research still being needed to confirm its long-term benefits and the effects of the drug’s use outside of clinical trials, there is strong evidence to consider neoadjuvant Cemiplimab as a promising and efficient treatment. Full article

Background: Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Advances in screening, diagnosis, and management have transformed clinical practice, particularly with the integration of immunotherapy and target therapies. Methods: A systematic literature search was carried out for the period between October 2016 to September 2024. Phase II and III randomized trials evaluating ICI monotherapy, ICI–chemotherapy combinations, and dual ICI regimens in patients with advanced NSCLC were included. Outcomes of interest included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and treatment-related adverse events (AEs). Results: PD-1-targeted therapies demonstrated superior OS compared to PD-L1-based regimens, with cemiplimab monotherapyranking highest for OS benefit (posterior probability: 90%), followed by sintilimab plus platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) and pemetrexed—PBC. PFS atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and PBC, and camrelizumab plus PBC were the most effective regimens. ICI–chemotherapy combinations achieved higher ORRs but were associated with greater toxicity. The most favorable safety profiles were observed with cemiplimab, nivolumab, and avelumab monotherapy, while atezolizumab plus PBC and sugemalimab plus PBC carried the highest toxicity burdens. Conclusions: In PD-L1-unselected advanced NSCLC, PD-1 blockade—particularly cemiplimab monotherapy—and rationally designed ICI–chemotherapy combinations represent the most efficacious treatment strategies. Balancing efficacy with safety remains critical, especially in the absence of predictive biomarkers. These findings support a patient-tailored approach to immunotherapy and highlight the need for further biomarker-driven and real-world investigations to optimize treatment selection. Full article

Background/Objectives: Tumor-immune system interactions shape the progression of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC). Serum biomarkers for risk stratification remain limited. Complement factor H (CFH) regulates the alternative complement pathway. It has been linked to immunosuppression and cSCC development in tissue-based studies. We investigated whether serum CFH is associated with tumor aggressiveness and may help predict immunotherapy outcomes in advanced cSCC. Methods: In this retrospective, single-center study, pre-treatment serum CFH levels were measured in 104 cSCC patients (62 high-risk and 42 advanced) using ELISA. Associations with clinical characteristics, disease stage, and response to cemiplimab were analyzed. Subgroup comparisons considered immune status and inflammatory comorbidities. Results: Advanced cSCC patients had significantly higher CFH levels than high-risk patients (OR 0.13, p = 0.026), independent of tumor diameter or invasion depth. Among advanced cSCC cases, lower baseline CFH was associated with more prolonged progression-free survival (median 19.8 vs. 3.07 months, p = 0.029; HR 0.29, p = 0.014), independent of covariates including immunosuppression. CFH levels during therapy did not predict treatment response. ROC analysis showed moderate discriminatory ability with CFH alone (AUC 0.625), which improved when combined with clinical variables in a multivariable risk model (AUC 0.767). Conclusions: Serum CFH is an independent predictor of cemiplimab response and reflects biological aggressiveness in cSCC beyond conventional high-risk features. These findings support the use of CFH in clinical risk models and warrant external validation in multicenter cohorts. Full article

Background: Increasing evidence suggests that the immunogenicity of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines might influence the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Current studies have not considered the impact of additional vaccinations, which are now recommended as a preventive strategy against SARS-CoV-2 infection for cancer patients receiving active treatments. Consequently, we leveraged the prospective monitoring from the Vax-On-Third study to explore whether periodic mRNA vaccine boosters administered around the start of ICIs could influence the rates of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and survival outcomes in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Our study included patients with a histological diagnosis of metastatic NSCLC and available PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS), who had undergone at least two cycles of upfront treatment with pembrolizumab, cemiplimab, or their combination with platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients who received any additional mRNA-based vaccine doses within 60 days before to 30 days after starting ICIs accounted for the exposed cohort. Those who declined further boosters formed the reference cohort. We analyzed differences in irAE frequencies, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) using univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: Between 27 November 2021 and 31 March 2024, we enrolled 226 eligible patients. The exposed cohort consisted of 112 patients who had received either a third or fourth dose of tozinameran or a bivalent booster. Based on PD-L1 expression levels, 93 (41%) and 133 (59%) patients received single-agent ICIs (PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50%) or combination regimens (PD-L1 TPS < 50%), respectively. Propensity-score matching using comprehensive criteria resulted in two cohorts of 102 patients each, with an optimal balance of prognostic factors. A thorough analysis of any grade irAEs showed no significant differences between the cohorts. A longitudinal survival assessment with a median follow-up of 22.8 (95% CI 19.2–26.0) months showed no difference between the cohorts. The median PFS for the reference and exposed cohorts was 7.5 (95% CI 5.9–9.1) and 8.2 (95% CI 6.2–10.2) months, respectively (p = 0.408; HR 0.88 [95% CI 0.66–1.18]). The median OS for the reference and exposed cohorts was 10.5 (95% CI 7.9–13.0) and 13.8 (95% CI 12.0–15.5) months, respectively (p = 0.170; HR 0.81 [95% CI 0.59–1.09]). Multivariate analysis confirmed that receiving additional mRNA vaccine boosters did not significantly affect the risk of disease progression or mortality. Univariate analysis within the subgroup of patients with high PD-L1 TPS who received single-agent ICIs showed a significant OS advantage for patients in the exposed cohort (9.7 [95% CI 8.1–11.2] vs. 18.6 [95% CI 13.5–23.6] months; p = 0.034; HR 0.59 [95% CI 0.36–0.96]). Conclusion: After optimally balancing prognostic factors, regular mRNA vaccine boosters at the onset of ICIs did not impact the safety and survival of patients with advanced NSCLC. The improved outcome observed in patients with high PD-L1 expression levels aligns with previous findings and warrants further investigation. Full article

The aim of this study was to develop a baseline [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT model to predict immunotherapy response in advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) and noninvasively determine tumor grade, thereby enhancing early patient stratification. We retrospectively analyzed 59 patients with histologically confirmed advanced cSCC submitted to immunotherapy with cemiplimab. All underwent [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT at baseline and after approximately 12 weeks. Clinical response was assessed through PET findings integrated with clinical and dermatological evaluation, and patients were classified as responders (complete/partial metabolic response or stable disease) or non-responders (progression or toxicity-related discontinuation). Tumors were also classified as low to intermediate (G1–G2) or poorly differentiated (G3). Machine learning models (Random Forest and Extreme Gradient Boosting) were trained to predict treatment response and tumor grade. Clinical benefit was observed in 46/59 patients (77.9%), while 13 (22.1%) were non-responders. Histology showed 64.4% (n = 38) G1–G2 and 35.6% (n = 21) G3 tumors. The PET-based model best predicted clinical benefit (AUC = 0.96, accuracy = 91% cross-validation; AUC = 0.88, accuracy = 82% internal validation). For tumor grade prediction, the CT-based model achieved a higher AUC of 0.80 (accuracy 73%), whereas the PET-based model reached an AUC of 0.78 but demonstrated a slightly higher accuracy of 77%. Radiomic analysis of baseline [¹⁸F]FDG PET enables the discriminative prediction of immunotherapy response and tumor grade in advanced cSCC, with PET-based models outperforming CT-based ones. Full article

Background/Objectives: Systemic therapy with hedgehog pathway inhibitors (HHIs) and anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) antibodies represent the first- and second-line treatment options for advanced basal cell carcinoma (aBCC), respectively. A shift in the treatment paradigms toward the neoadjuvant approach is gaining increasing interest in aBCC management, whereby prior systemic therapy followed by surgery is likely to yield more favorable outcomes. The aim of this narrative review is to summarize the current evidence on systemic treatment options and the neoadjuvant approach for aBCC management. Methods: We performed a non-systematic review of the literature based on PubMed as search engine. Results: The pivotal phase II trials ERIVANCE and BOLT investigated the efficacy and safety profile of vismodegib and sonidegib, respectively, with reported objective response rates (ORRs) of 60.3% and 56% in laBCC patients, respectively. The pivotal phase II trial NCT03132636 investigated the efficacy and safety profile of cemiplimab in patients who progressed or were intolerant to prior HHI therapy, with an ORR of 32.1% in laBCC patients. Real-life studies confirmed the effectiveness and safety profile of HHI and anti-PD-1 immunotherapy. Several phase I/II clinical trials are currently investigating HHIs and immune-checkpoint inhibitors in the neoadjuvant setting followed by surgery for aBCC patients, with the aim of providing more favorable treatment outcomes, especially when upfront surgery would result in functional and/or aesthetic sequelae. Conclusions: Advanced BCC treatment is challenging, and the neoadjuvant approach followed by surgery is expected to reduce surgical complexity, increase tissue preservation, and improve patients’ satisfaction. Full article

Background: A previous published Phase 2 trial using 2–4 doses of neoadjuvant cemiplimab in stage II–IV resectable cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) demonstrated that a complete pathological (pCR) rate of 51% and major pathological response (mPR) rate of 13% could be achieved with durable disease control. Methods: In this open-label, single-institution phase II trial (NCT05878288), patients with stage II–IV resectable CSCC received up to four doses of neoadjuvant cemiplimab prior to surgery. The primary endpoint of the study was to perform comprehensive molecular profiling. The focus of this report are the secondary clinical endpoints of pCR rate, mPR (defined as <10% viable tumour) rate, overall response rate (ORR) using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) 1.1, immune-modified RECIST (imRECIST) and Immune PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumours (iPERCIST), disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), safety, and to describe changes in planned surgery. Results: Eleven patients were enrolled, with all proceeding with surgery. An ORR and pCR rate of 73% (8/11; 95% CI 0.39–0.93) was achieved, whilst 3/11 patients progressed on treatment. On pre-operative imaging, all 8/11 pCR patients demonstrated a partial response (RECIST 1.1), whilst 6/8 achieved a complete metabolic response and 2/8 a partial metabolic response (iPERCIST). Median follow-up was 10.2 (IQR 6.7–16.4) months. DFS was 91% (95% CI 0.57–1) and OS was 100% (95% CI 0.68–1), with one non-responder patient who developed recurrent locoregional and distant metastatic disease. There were no unexpected safety signals. Pathological features of response to neoadjuvant immunotherapy most commonly were granulomatous inflammation with keratin, fibrosis and inflammation. No cases with a dense inflammatory infiltrate were observed. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy did not impact the intra-operative planning and execution of surgery, but in the eight pCR cases, it reduced the extent of required surgery, whilst in the three non-responder cases, surgery was more extensive than originally planned. Conclusions: The DISCERN trial confirms that an excellent complete response rate can be achieved with four doses of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in stage II–IV CSCC. Proposed refinements to the pathological assessment of response and metabolic response criteria in CSCC for the neoadjuvant context are provided. Full article

Background and Clinical Significance: The current study aims to show the diagnostic challenge of mandibular exposed necrotic bone in a patient with locally aggressive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the lower lip and carrying risk factors for osteoradionecrosis and medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws. Case Presentation: In March 2023, an 80-year-old ex-farmer male patient complaining of feeding difficulty showed a 3 cm area of exposed bone in the left region of the mandible. In July 2020, the patient underwent an incisional biopsy of a lower labial cutaneous keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma, which developed within actinic cheilitis. The cancer was unresectable due to the extent of the local invasion; thus, the patient underwent radiotherapy. In February 2022, the cancer reached the left mandibular canal by completely infiltrating the homolateral canal of the mental nerve. Therefore, the oncologist prescribed cemiplimab and denosumab as palliative immunotherapy. The differential diagnosis included osteoradionecrosis, stage-III medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws, and intraoral localization of the cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. The oral surgeon performed a sequestrectomy under local anesthesia and antibiotic prophylaxis; a histological examination confirmed the hypothesis of medication-related osteonecrosis. The patient currently undergoes follow-up visits monthly; the combination of photobiomodulation therapy and cycles of antibiotics keeps the necrotic lesion steady, and the oncological therapy prevents the growth of the cutaneous squamous cell cancer. Conclusions: The current case supports the need for histological examination to resolve the diagnostic challenge of mandibular exposed necrotic bone and to differentiate among osteoradionecrosis, stage-III medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws, and intraoral localization of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Full article

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) is one of the most common non-melanoma skin cancers, and particularly challenging to treat in advanced or metastatic stages. Traditional therapies, including chemotherapy and radiation, often result in limited efficacy and severe side effects. Cosibelimab, a fully human monoclonal antibody targeting PD-L1, has emerged as a promising immunotherapy for advanced CSCC. In this review, we evaluate the therapeutic potential of cosibelimab by analyzing its mechanism of action, clinical trial data, and its role compared to other PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, such as pembrolizumab and cemiplimab. We synthesized the available preclinical and clinical data on cosibelimab, focusing on published Phase I and II trial results involving 76 patients. Objective response rates (ORRs), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety profiles were compared between cosibelimab, pembrolizumab, and cemiplimab. Mechanistic insights into cosibelimab’s dual action, including PD-L1 blockade and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), were also explored. Phase II trials demonstrated an ORR of 47.5%, with a median PFS of 12.9 months in advanced CSCC patients. Cosibelimab demonstrated a favorable safety profile, with predominantly mild to moderate adverse events. Comparative analysis with pembrolizumab and cemiplimab showed similar efficacy, although long-term survival data for cosibelimab is still emerging. Given its efficacy and safety, cosibelimab holds promise not only as a monotherapy but also for future exploration in combination regimens and broader oncologic indications. Future trials are required to validate its long-term outcomes, including overall survival, and to explore its use in combination therapies and neoadjuvant/adjuvant settings. Full article

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is a common cancer with increasing incidence and 5% of patients develop incurable disease, often resistant to chemotherapy. The anti-PD-1 therapy cemiplimab has shown high efficacy in clinical trials. This retrospective study evaluated the real-world effectiveness of cemiplimab in incurable cSCC and examined factors influencing response and toxicity. Data from 86 patients across three UK healthcare providers were analysed. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were not reached, with 38% showing durable responses beyond 12 months. The overall response rate was 60.8% (95% CI 49–71), and the clinical benefit rate was 74.3% (95% CI 63–83). A head and neck primary site was associated with improved PFS (p = 0.008) and OS (p = 0.023), while concurrent immunosuppression was associated with worse PFS (p < 0.001). These findings align with clinical trials, suggesting cemiplimab is effective and safe in the recurrent/metastatic setting. Full article

Background: The immune checkpoint inhibitor cemiplimab has significant clinical activity in unresectable and metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas. There are limited real-world data available to assess the outcome of cemiplimab treatment in patients in a community practice setting. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of treatment outcomes following cemiplimab treatment (350 mg IV every 3 weeks) of squamous cell skin cancer. An exploratory analysis was performed to evaluate patient subsets, including patients with locally advanced disease, regional or distant metastases, and “too numerous to count” primaries. Another small group of patients who did not respond to the initial four doses of cemiplimab were evaluated following added radiotherapy. Results: Of the 36 patients treated, 22 (61.1%) achieved complete remission, 10 (27.8%) experienced a partial response, 3 (8.3%) had stable disease, and 1 (2.8%) developed progressive disease. The median progression-free survival for the entire cohort was over 33 months. Overall, cemiplimab was well-tolerated, with no hospitalizations due to treatment-related toxicity. Conclusions: Cemiplimab produced complete remissions in over 60% of patients with locally advanced and metastatic squamous cell skin cancers, allowing elective treatment discontinuation. Addition of radiotherapy in cemiplimab-refractory patients appeared to increase tumor responsiveness. In contrast, patients with TNTC primary tumors frequently develop new primary skin cancers. Thus, improved treatment options for this patient subset are still needed. Full article

Telomerase and telomeres are crucial in cancer cell immortalization, making them key targets for anticancer therapies. Currently, 6-thio-dG (THIO) combined with the anti-PD-1 inhibitor Cemiplimab is under phase II clinical investigation (NCT05208944) in NSCLC patients resistant to prior immunotherapies. This study presents the design, synthesis, and evaluation of novel bimodular conjugate molecules combining telomere-targeting nucleoside analogs and phosphatidyl diglyceride groups. Among them, dihexanoyl-phosphatidyl-THIO (diC6-THIO) showed high anticancer activity with sub-µM EC50 values in vitro across various cancer cell lines. In mouse colorectal cancer models, diC6-THIO demonstrated strong anticancer effects alone and in combination with PD1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Administration of this compound resulted in the efficient formation of Telomere dysfunction Induced Foci (TIFs) in vitro, indicating an on-target, telomerase-mediated telomere-modifying mechanism of action for the molecule. Systemic treatment also activated CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells while reducing regulatory T cells, indicating immune system enhancement. Notably, diC6-THIO exhibits an improved solubility profile while maintaining comparable anticancer properties, further supporting its potential as a promising therapeutic candidate. These findings highlight diC6-THIO as a promising telomere-targeting prodrug with dual effects on telomere modification and immune activation. Full article