Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (3)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = coal boiler slag (CBS)

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
16 pages, 5725 KB  
Article
Utilization of Coal Combustion Residues as Supplementary Cementitious Materials for Sustainable Concrete
by Lidya E. Guteta, Daba S. Gedafa and Bruce Dockter
Sustainability 2025, 17(8), 3376; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17083376 - 10 Apr 2025
Viewed by 684
Abstract
Carbon dioxide emissions from cement production are a current environmental challenge. This research attempted to evaluate the pozzolanic reaction of residuals from coal-fired power plants, such as coal bottom ash (CBA) and coal boiler slag (CBS), as a supplementary cementitious material to lessen [...] Read more.
Carbon dioxide emissions from cement production are a current environmental challenge. This research attempted to evaluate the pozzolanic reaction of residuals from coal-fired power plants, such as coal bottom ash (CBA) and coal boiler slag (CBS), as a supplementary cementitious material to lessen the deleterious effect on the environment. The residues’ fineness modulus and specific gravity were determined using the No. 325 sieve and Le Chatelier flask, respectively. Chemical characterizations were conducted using X-ray diffraction (XRD) and X-ray fluorescence (XRF). The results indicated that the percent passing of both residues was greater than 66%, as the American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM) requires, and their specific gravity was comparable to that of cement. Subsequently, in concrete specimens, 20% of the weight of cement was replaced by CBA and CBS to determine the strength development of fresh and hardened characteristics compared with the control specimens. Experimental findings revealed that by the 90th day, concrete made with CBA achieved 98% of the compressive strength of the control concrete, while the concrete made with CBS reached 79% of the control concrete’s compressive strength. Moreover, CBA-based concrete achieved 97% of the flexural strength of the control concrete, while CBS-based concrete outperformed the control by 2% on the 90th day. A lower severity level of chloride ion penetration by both CBA- and CBS-based concrete was achieved in the rapid chloride penetration test, indicating the durability of the concrete. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 4198 KB  
Article
Determining Optimum Coal Bottom Ash/Slag Content for Sustainable Concrete Infrastructure
by Samrawit Menda, Sandip Poudel, Joe Useldinger-Hoefs, Bruce Dockter and Daba Gedafa
Sustainability 2025, 17(4), 1429; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17041429 - 10 Feb 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1030
Abstract
Concrete usage is increasing rapidly; subsequently, the industry’s carbon footprint is increasing and impacting the environment significantly. Large amounts of fine and coarse aggregate, including cement, are needed to fulfill the increased demand, leading to increased natural aggregate usage. Therefore, finding a fine [...] Read more.
Concrete usage is increasing rapidly; subsequently, the industry’s carbon footprint is increasing and impacting the environment significantly. Large amounts of fine and coarse aggregate, including cement, are needed to fulfill the increased demand, leading to increased natural aggregate usage. Therefore, finding a fine aggregate replacement in concrete is essential. Coal bottom ash (CBA) and coal boiler slag (CBS), byproducts of coal-burning power plants with pozzolanic properties, can replace fine aggregate in concrete to reduce global natural material depletion, health hazards, and technical and economic problems associated with power plants’ solid waste. This study was conducted to determine the optimum fine aggregate replacement amount of CBA and CBS in concrete while improving concrete performance. The optimum CBA and CBS content is 50%, which reduces fine aggregate usage in a concrete mix by 50% while maintaining equivalent or better concrete strength than the control. The optimum CBA content has a unit weight lower than the control for all mixes tested in this study, which makes the CBA mix lightweight concrete. The optimum CBA concrete has 15%, 43%, and 42% higher compressive strength than the control after 7 days, 28 days, and 56 days of curing, respectively. On the other hand, the optimum CBS concrete has 12%,16%, and 16% increased compressive strength than the control after 7, 28, and 56 days of curing, respectively. The compressive strength of optimum CBA concrete was higher than the optimum CBS, indicating that CBA concrete yields higher compressive strength than CBS, possibly due to the difference in physical properties, water absorption capacity, and bulk density. Nanoclay increased CBA concrete compressive strength at an early stage and increased the optimum content to 80% CBA. Therefore, using CBA and CBS can significantly reduce natural material usage and environmental harm by reducing CBA waste disposal and improving concrete performance. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 3884 KB  
Article
The Use of Ground Coal Bottom Ash/Slag as a Cement Replacement for Sustainable Concrete Infrastructure
by Sandip Poudel, Samrawit Menda, Joe Useldinger-Hoefs, Lidya E. Guteta, Bruce Dockter and Daba S. Gedafa
Materials 2024, 17(10), 2316; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17102316 - 14 May 2024
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 2306
Abstract
Cement production requires considerable energy and natural resources, severely impacting the environment due to harmful gas emissions. Coal bottom ash (CBA) and coal boiler slag (CBS), byproducts of coal-fired powerplants having pozzolanic properties, can be mechanically ground and replace cement in concrete, which [...] Read more.
Cement production requires considerable energy and natural resources, severely impacting the environment due to harmful gas emissions. Coal bottom ash (CBA) and coal boiler slag (CBS), byproducts of coal-fired powerplants having pozzolanic properties, can be mechanically ground and replace cement in concrete, which reduces waste in landfills, preserves natural resources, and reduces health hazards. This study was performed to determine the optimum cement replacement amount of ground CBA (GCBA) and ground CBS (GCBS) in concrete, which was 10% for GCBA and 5% for GCBS. GCBA-based concrete exhibited superior tensile strength, modulus of elasticity, and durability compared to the control. In the Rapid Chloride Penetration Test, 10% GCBA concrete resulted in 2026 coulombs at 56 days, compared to 3405 coulombs for the control, indicating more resistance to chloride penetration. Incorporating 2.5% nanoclay in GCBA-based concrete increased the optimum GCBA content by 5%, and the compressive strength of 15% GCBA concrete increased by 4 MPa. The mortar consisting of the finest GCBA(L1) having Blaine fineness of 3072 g/cm2 yielded the highest compressive strength (32.7 MPa). The study discovered that the compressive strength of GCBA and GCBS-based mortars increases with fineness, and meeting the recommended fineness limit in ASTM C618 enhances concrete or mortar properties. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Design, Application and Performance Improvement of Pavement Materials)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop