Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (10)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = horizontal bar rack

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
22 pages, 8098 KB  
Article
Removing Plastic Waste from Rivers: A Prototype-Scale Experimental Study on a Novel River-Cleaning Concept
by Yannic Fuchs, Susanne Scherbaum, Richard Huber, Nils Rüther and Arnd Hartlieb
Water 2024, 16(2), 248; https://doi.org/10.3390/w16020248 - 11 Jan 2024
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 9124
Abstract
Mismanaged plastic waste threatens the sustainable development goals of the United Nations in social, economic, and ecological dimensions. In the pollution process, fluvial systems are critical transport paths for mismanaged plastic waste, connecting land areas with oceans and acting as plastic reservoirs and [...] Read more.
Mismanaged plastic waste threatens the sustainable development goals of the United Nations in social, economic, and ecological dimensions. In the pollution process, fluvial systems are critical transport paths for mismanaged plastic waste, connecting land areas with oceans and acting as plastic reservoirs and accumulation zones. The complex fluid–plastic particle interaction leads to a strong distribution of transported particles over the entire river width and flow depth. Therefore, a holistic plastic removal approach must consider lateral and vertical river dimensions. This study investigates the conceptual design of a comprehensive river-cleaning system that enables the removal of both floating and suspended litter particles from watercourses withstanding flow variations. The innovative technical cleaning infrastructure is based on a self-cleaning system using rotating screen drum units. In 42 prototype-scale experiments using ten representative plastic particle types (both 3D items and fragments) of five different polymer types, we prove the self-cleaning concept of the infrastructure and define its parameters for the best cleaning performance. Its cleaning efficiency is strongly dependent on the polymer type and shape. The overall cleaning efficiency for 3D items amounts to 82%, whereas plastic fragments are removed less efficiently depending on hydraulic conditions. Adaptions to the prototype can enhance its efficiency. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

33 pages, 22772 KB  
Article
Evaluation of Hydraulics and Downstream Fish Migration at Run-of-River Hydropower Plants with Horizontal Bar Rack Bypass Systems by Using CFD
by Hannes Zöschg, Wolfgang Dobler, Markus Aufleger and Bernhard Zeiringer
Water 2023, 15(6), 1042; https://doi.org/10.3390/w15061042 - 9 Mar 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 3265
Abstract
Anthropogenic structures often block or delay the downstream migration of fish in rivers, thereby affecting their populations. A potential solution at run-of-river hydropower plants (HPPs) is the construction of a fish guidance structure in combination with a bypass system located at its downstream [...] Read more.
Anthropogenic structures often block or delay the downstream migration of fish in rivers, thereby affecting their populations. A potential solution at run-of-river hydropower plants (HPPs) is the construction of a fish guidance structure in combination with a bypass system located at its downstream end. Crucial to fish guidance efficiency and thus to fish behavior are the hydraulic flow conditions in front of the fish guidance structure and upstream of the bypass entrance, which have not thus far been investigated in depth. The present study aims to extend the knowledge about the flow conditions at these structures. Based on the results of 3D numerical simulations of two idealized block-type HPPs with horizontal bar rack bypass systems, the flow conditions were examined, and the fish guidance efficiency was predicted. Herein, a new method was used to represent the fish guidance structure in the numerical model. The results show that the approach flow to fish guidance structures at block-type HPPs varies significantly along their length, and areas with unfavorable flow conditions for downstream fish migration frequently occur according to common guidelines. Subsequently, eight variations were performed to investigate the effect of key components on the flow field, e.g., the bypass discharge. Finally, the results were compared with literature data and discussed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fish Passage at Hydropower Dams 2.0)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 10441 KB  
Article
Laboratory Research on Hydraulic Losses on SHP Inlet Channel Trash Racks
by Natalia Walczak, Zbigniew Walczak and Tomasz Tymiński
Energies 2022, 15(20), 7602; https://doi.org/10.3390/en15207602 - 14 Oct 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1985
Abstract
There is currently a growing trend towards renewable energy sources, which are characterised by a guaranteed power supply and low failure rate. Hydropower plants (small or large) are an example of such a source. They supply a total of 16% of the world’s [...] Read more.
There is currently a growing trend towards renewable energy sources, which are characterised by a guaranteed power supply and low failure rate. Hydropower plants (small or large) are an example of such a source. They supply a total of 16% of the world’s electricity. The advantages of a small hydropower plant include the relatively simple construction process and the lack of need for upstream water storage. SHPs are one of the most cost-effective and environmentally friendly energy technologies, which is why they are steadily increasing in popularity. One of the important components of SHPs are the trash racks in the inlet channels. Their main purpose is to catch debris and other elements carried downstream and to prevent these pollutants from reaching the turbine units. They can also protect migrating ichthyofauna such as larger fish. If trash racks are installed in the inlet channel, hydraulic losses are to be expected due to the reduction in the flow cross-section through the racks (bars) themselves and through the accumulation of debris and various types of trash on these racks. Energy losses on the trash racks affect the financial aspect of SHP investments. This paper presents the results of laboratory tests on trash racks for SHPs by taking into account the different shapes of the bars used, their number and spacing, and the angles of the trash racks to estimate the hydraulic losses on the trash racks. The measured values of hydraulic losses Δh on the trash racks varied according to the type of trash racks, the density of the bars in the cross-section, and the angle of the trash racks from the horizontal, reaching the highest values on the trash racks with angle bars (AB). They were almost eight times greater than those recorded on cylindrical-bar (CB) trash racks, although they involved different angles. It was shown that the discrepancy in the magnitude of losses on trash racks can be large, even for the same type of trash racks. It depends significantly on the design (shape and bar spacing) of the trash racks and the way the trash racks are installed. Depending on the inclination angle, the increase in energy losses reached 70% for angle bars, 60% for flat-bar trash racks, and almost 40% for cylindrical bars. The values of energy loss as well as the loss coefficient β varied non-linearly for the different bar types depending on the angle of inclination of the gratings, and the degree of this non-linearity depended on the type of bars and the blockage ratio of the section. The presented research results can be useful both during the design and the operation of an SHP. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Green Energy - Modern Digital Techniques)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 16013 KB  
Article
Field Investigation of Hydraulics and Fish Guidance Efficiency of a Horizontal Bar Rack-Bypass System
by Mohammadreza Maddahi, Roland Hagenbüchli, Ricardo Mendez, Claudia Zaugg, Robert Michael Boes and Ismail Albayrak
Water 2022, 14(5), 776; https://doi.org/10.3390/w14050776 - 1 Mar 2022
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 4193
Abstract
This paper investigates the hydraulics and fish guidance efficiency of a Horizontal Bar Rack-Bypass System (HBR-BS) installed at a hydropower plant with a design discharge of 33 m3/s. The HBR is placed at a horizontal rack angle of 38° to the [...] Read more.
This paper investigates the hydraulics and fish guidance efficiency of a Horizontal Bar Rack-Bypass System (HBR-BS) installed at a hydropower plant with a design discharge of 33 m3/s. The HBR is placed at a horizontal rack angle of 38° to the flow direction with clear bar spacing of 20 mm. The BS has a vertical-axis flap gate with two openings. The HBR-BS complies with most literature design criteria. Velocity measurements were conducted using a moving-vessel Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler (ADCP). The fish monitoring study was conducted using a stow net, video, and ARIS sonar recordings. The fish monitoring calculations imply guidance efficiency of 84%, even for fish with total body lengths below 10 cm. Furthermore, the hydraulic results show that the flow field is favorable in terms of fish guidance due to a good alignment of the rack and the BS, corroborating the fish monitoring results. The results indicate that the HBR-BS functions not only as a physical barrier but also as a mechanical behavioral barrier for some small fish that are capable of physically passing the HBR. The present results are compared and discussed with the laboratory and field results from different studies in the literature. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fish Passage at Hydropower Dams)
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 71450 KB  
Article
Protection and Guidance of Downstream Moving Fish with Electrified Horizontal Bar Rack Bypass Systems
by Julian Meister, Anita Moldenhauer-Roth, Claudia Beck, Oliver M. Selz, Armin Peter, Ismail Albayrak and Robert M. Boes
Water 2021, 13(19), 2786; https://doi.org/10.3390/w13192786 - 8 Oct 2021
Cited by 16 | Viewed by 3642
Abstract
Horizontal bar rack bypass systems (HBR-BS) are characterized by a horizontal bar rack (HBR) with narrow clear bar spacing of 10–20 mm and an adjacent bypass (BS) to efficiently protect and guide downstream moving fish at water intakes. The small bar spacing may [...] Read more.
Horizontal bar rack bypass systems (HBR-BS) are characterized by a horizontal bar rack (HBR) with narrow clear bar spacing of 10–20 mm and an adjacent bypass (BS) to efficiently protect and guide downstream moving fish at water intakes. The small bar spacing may lead to operational challenges, such as clogging and high head losses. This study investigated whether combining an HBR with a low-voltage electric field (e-HBR) allows one to increase the clear bar spacing while maintaining a high standard of fish protection and guidance efficiency. To this end, an HBR-BS with 20 mm bar spacing and an e-HBR-BS with 20 and 51 mm bar spacing were tested with spirlin (Alburnoides bipunctatus) and European eel (Anguilla anguilla) in a laboratory flume. The racks were electrified with 38 V pulsed direct current. The protection efficiency of the e-HBR with 51 mm was 96% for spirlin and 86% for eels, which are similar results to those of the HBR with 20 mm. Some eels passed through the e-HBR, but only when they were parallel to the rack. Fish injuries of variable severeness due to the electrification were observed. The results highlight the potential of hybrid barriers for the protection of downstream moving fish. However, fish injuries due to electricity may occur; and reporting applied voltage, electrode geometry, resulting electric field strength and the pulse pattern of the electrified rack setup is necessary to ensure comparability among studies and to avoid injuries. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fish Passage at Hydropower Dams)
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 7560 KB  
Article
Swimming Behavior of Downstream Moving Fish at Innovative Curved-Bar Rack Bypass Systems for Fish Protection at Water Intakes
by Claudia Beck, Ismail Albayrak, Julian Meister, Armin Peter, Oliver M. Selz, Claudia Leuch, David F. Vetsch and Robert M. Boes
Water 2020, 12(11), 3244; https://doi.org/10.3390/w12113244 - 19 Nov 2020
Cited by 29 | Viewed by 4310
Abstract
New types of fish guidance structures with vertical curved bars and a subsequent bypass system represent a promising technical solution for the protection and guidance of downstream moving fish at run-of-river hydropower plants and water intakes. These so-called “curved-bar rack bypass systems” (CBR-BSs) [...] Read more.
New types of fish guidance structures with vertical curved bars and a subsequent bypass system represent a promising technical solution for the protection and guidance of downstream moving fish at run-of-river hydropower plants and water intakes. These so-called “curved-bar rack bypass systems” (CBR-BSs) function as a mechanical behavioral barrier and are characterized by low hydraulic losses, a symmetrical downstream flow field and an overall high fish guidance efficiency in the laboratory for a wide array of European freshwater fish species. This paper presents the results of the hydraulic and live-fish laboratory tests of an optimized CBR-BS configuration with a bar spacing of 50 mm and 30° rack angle to the flow direction. The tests were conducted with six different fish species in an ethohydraulic laboratory flume at different approach flows (0.5 m/s, 0.7 m/s) and different bypass entrance velocities (0.6–1.0 m/s). A numerical model was used to simulate the flow fields in the CBR-BS in order to link the fish behavior to the hydrodynamic cues created by the CBR-BS. Lower approach flow velocities decreased the hydraulic cues of the CBR, which led to more rack passages. A 20% velocity increase towards the bypass entrance significantly increased the fish guidance efficiency compared to a 40% velocity increase. The tested CBR-BS resulted in overall higher interspecies fish protection and guidance efficiencies compared to the more commonly applied horizontal-bar rack with a narrow bar spacing of 20 mm. Recommendations for a sustainable and cost-effective application of CBR-BSs are given. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fish Passage at Hydropower Dams)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 17240 KB  
Article
Head Losses of Horizontal Bar Racks as Fish Guidance Structures
by Julian Meister, Helge Fuchs, Claudia Beck, Ismail Albayrak and Robert M. Boes
Water 2020, 12(2), 475; https://doi.org/10.3390/w12020475 - 11 Feb 2020
Cited by 25 | Viewed by 5257
Abstract
Horizontal bar racks have been used as trash racks at hydropower plants since the 1920s. With the installation of the first horizontal bar rack bypass system at a hydropower plant as a downstream fish passage facility in 2006, these racks rapidly gained importance [...] Read more.
Horizontal bar racks have been used as trash racks at hydropower plants since the 1920s. With the installation of the first horizontal bar rack bypass system at a hydropower plant as a downstream fish passage facility in 2006, these racks rapidly gained importance as fish protection measures. Since then, they have been installed at more than 100 small- to medium-sized hydropower plants in Europe. Despite the large number of installed racks, systematic investigations of the head losses and velocity fields were missing. On the basis of detailed hydraulic experimentation with a large number of rack parameters and including up-to-date foil-shaped bars, the layout of horizontal bar racks and their hydraulic performance were assessed in the current study. This paper reports the results of the rack head loss investigation, whereas the accompanying paper entitled Velocity Fields at Horizontal Bar Racks as Fish Guidance Structures focuses on the up- and downstream velocity fields. By applying foil-shaped bars instead of rectangular bars, the loss coefficient was reduced by more than 40%, depending on the rack configuration. Bottom and top overlays are used to increase the guidance efficiency for fish, sediments, and floating debris. However, the altered flow field results in increased head losses. A new set of equations is proposed to predict head losses for current horizontal bar racks, including overlays for various hydropower plant layouts. The predictions are compared to literature data. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fish in Hydropower Affected Rivers)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 35110 KB  
Article
Velocity Fields at Horizontal Bar Racks as Fish Guidance Structures
by Julian Meister, Helge Fuchs, Claudia Beck, Ismail Albayrak and Robert M. Boes
Water 2020, 12(1), 280; https://doi.org/10.3390/w12010280 - 18 Jan 2020
Cited by 22 | Viewed by 4347
Abstract
Horizontal bar racks used as fish protection measures at hydropower plants have rapidly gained importance in recent years. Despite the large number of installed racks in Europe, systematic investigations of the hydraulic losses and velocity fields were missing. To fill these research gaps, [...] Read more.
Horizontal bar racks used as fish protection measures at hydropower plants have rapidly gained importance in recent years. Despite the large number of installed racks in Europe, systematic investigations of the hydraulic losses and velocity fields were missing. To fill these research gaps, the hydraulic performance of horizontal bar racks was systematically investigated in a laboratory flume for a large number of rack parameters and different hydropower plant layouts. The results of the head loss assessment are published in a paper entitled Head Losses of Horizontal Bar Racks as Fish Guidance Structures, whereas the present paper focuses on the velocity fields. The measurements show that the bar shape, the horizontal approach flow angle, and the clear bar spacing have only a minor effect on the velocity fields. In contrast, bottom and top overlays might enhance the fish guidance efficiency for bottom and surface oriented fish, while the asymmetric downstream velocity field can reduce turbine efficiencies. The hydropower plant layout strongly affects the approach flow field to horizontal bar racks. For block-type hydropower plants, the installation of a dividing pier or partial opening of the spillways improves the flow field for better fish guidance. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fish in Hydropower Affected Rivers)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 13321 KB  
Article
Experimental Hydraulic Investigation of Angled Fish Protection Systems—Comparison of Circular Bars and Cables
by Heidi Böttcher, Roman Gabl and Markus Aufleger
Water 2019, 11(5), 1056; https://doi.org/10.3390/w11051056 - 21 May 2019
Cited by 16 | Viewed by 5240
Abstract
The requirements for fish protection at hydro power plants have led to a significant decrease of the bar spacing at trash racks as well as the need of an inclined or angled design to improve the guidance effect (fish-friendly trash racks). The flexible [...] Read more.
The requirements for fish protection at hydro power plants have led to a significant decrease of the bar spacing at trash racks as well as the need of an inclined or angled design to improve the guidance effect (fish-friendly trash racks). The flexible fish fence (FFF) is a new developed fish protection and guidance system, created by horizontally arranged steel cables instead of bars. The presented study investigated experimentally the head loss coefficient of an angled horizontal trash rack with circular bars (CBTR) and the FFF with identical cross sections in a flume (scale 1:2). Nine configurations of different bar and cable spacing (blockage ratio) and rack angles were studied for CBTR and FFF considering six different stationary flow conditions. The results demonstrate that head loss coefficient is independent from the studied Bar–Reynolds number range and increases with increasing blockage ratio and angle. At an angle of 30 degrees, a direct comparison between the two different rack options was conducted to investigate the effect of cable vibrations. At the lowest blockage ratio, head loss for both options are in similar very low ranges, while the head loss coefficient of the FFF increases significantly compared to the CBTR with an increase of blockage. Further, the results indicate a moderate overestimation with the predicted head loss by common head loss equations developed for inclined vertical trash racks. Thus, an adaption of the design equation is proposed to improve the estimation of head loss on both rack options. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environmental Hydraulics Research)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 6978 KB  
Article
Influence of Rack Slope and Approaching Conditions in Bottom Intake Systems
by Luis G. Castillo, Juan T. García and José M. Carrillo
Water 2017, 9(1), 65; https://doi.org/10.3390/w9010065 - 21 Jan 2017
Cited by 19 | Viewed by 7156
Abstract
The study analyzes the flow over bottom racks made of longitudinal T-shaped bars. A clear water flow is considered in a laboratory flume. Free surface profiles, wetted rack lengths, and discharge coefficients are measured, changing parameters such as longitudinal slope, void ratio, and [...] Read more.
The study analyzes the flow over bottom racks made of longitudinal T-shaped bars. A clear water flow is considered in a laboratory flume. Free surface profiles, wetted rack lengths, and discharge coefficients are measured, changing parameters such as longitudinal slope, void ratio, and approaching flow. The present work complements existing experimental studies, considering the influence of the approaching flow conditions. The velocity field measured with Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) technique and the pressure field with Pitot tubes are quantified. Numerical simulations (CFD) are used to complement laboratory data. The energy head along the rack is calculated and compared with the hypothesis of horizontal energy level with minimum energy at the beginning of the rack. A discharge coefficient adjustment that considers the slope, the void ratio, and the position along the rack is proposed and presented with the results of other works. Theoretical proposals to calculate the pressure field along the flow are compared with measurements in the laboratory. The relation between the static pressure head in the space of bars and the discharge coefficient is used as an alternative method to define the discharge. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Modeling of Water Systems)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop