Search Results (29)

Registered dietitian nutritionists (RDNs) have an opportunity to play a central role in improving nutritional outcomes among Mexican American young adult college students by helping them make culturally relevant adaptations to their eating patterns. Previous research has suggested limited representation of Mexican Americans among RDNs; therefore, the cultural competence of RDNs as perceived by Mexican Americans is uncertain. The purpose of this study was to evaluate how young adult college-age Mexican Americans (defined as 18–30 years old) perceive the cultural competence of RDNs. A sample of Mexican American (n = 93) and non-Mexican American (n = 120) young adult college students completed a 19-item online survey, with researchers using a subset of 4 survey items related to perceived cultural competence of RDNs in the present study. Descriptive statistics, Fisher’s exact tests with adjusted standardized residuals, and ordinal regression models were used. Fisher’s exact tests indicated that Mexican American young adult college students, compared to non-Mexican American young adult college students, reported less agreement that RDNs were knowledgeable about a traditional Mexican diet, that RDNs would take time to know students’ food preferences, and that RDNs would take personal preferences into account during nutrition counseling (p < 0.05). These associations, however, became insignificant in adjusted regression models. Rather, results indicated that other variables, such as age and lack of prior experience with an RDN, were associated with poorer perceptions. Full article

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being integrated into healthcare, with applications ranging from predictive analytics to clinical decision support. In clinical nutrition, AI tools offer opportunities to improve workflow efficiency, enhance dietary assessment, and personalize nutrition care. Despite growing interest, little is known about registered dietitian nutritionists’ (RDNs) perceptions of AI in clinical practice. The aim of the present study was to assess RDNs’ attitudes toward AI use within a large healthcare system, along with their perceived barriers in this regard. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was developed through expert review and distributed electronically via REDCap to RDNs across Mayo Clinic’s academic campuses and affiliated health system sites. The 23-item survey included Likert-scale items addressing AI’s potential utilization within clinical care, perceived benefits and risks, and readiness for adoption. Responses were summarized using descriptive statistics. Factor analysis identified underlying constructs related to AI attitudes. Differences stratified by age and years of experience were evaluated using ANOVA. Results: Of the 185 RDNs invited, 64 (35%) responded. Two factors emerged: optimism regarding AI usage (Cronbach’s α = 0.94) and skepticism about implementation (α = 0.76). The overall mean ± SD score for optimism was 0.1 ± 0.6 (neutral), while skepticism averaged 1.0 ± 0.6 (moderate). Skepticism differed by years of experience (p = 0.012), with the lowest levels observed among RDNs with ≥21 years of practice. No significant differences were observed across age groups. Discussion: RDNs demonstrated neutral attitudes toward AI use but expressed concerns about accuracy, training, and implementation challenges. Addressing these concerns through education and structured implementation strategies may facilitate successful adoption of AI in dietetic practice. Full article

Background: Social media has emerged as a powerful communication tool for healthcare professionals, including nutritionists and dietitians, particularly since the COVID-19 pandemic. Evidence suggests that their online presence can enhance nutritional literacy and play a crucial role in countering misinformation. Objective: This systematic review aims to investigate how and why Registered Nutritionists and Dietitians (RNDs) use social media in their professional practice, focusing on benefits, challenges, and impact. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted between 1 January 2019 and 28 February 2024, in PubMed, Scopus, Scholar, and SciELO databases using terms such as ‘nutritionist’, ‘dietitian’, and ‘social media’. Quality was assessed using the MMAT tool. This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. The included studies were analysed with respect to their content, professional practices, and patterns of social media use. Results: Of the 359 articles identified through the systematic search, 10 cross-sectional studies conducted using questionnaires were included in this review. Sample sizes ranged from 10 to 2542 participants across nine countries. Instagram and Twitter were the most frequently used platforms among RDNs, primarily for sharing evidence-based nutritional information, counselling content, and professional promotion. Reported usage ranged from 37.5% to 100%, with a marked increase during the COVID-19 pandemic, especially among younger professionals. Key enablers included enhanced communication, professional visibility, and cost-effective outreach, while main challenges involved limited digital literacy and difficulties replicating face-to-face counselling online. Although ethical concerns were reported, many RNDs maintained compliance with professional standards, particularly in regions with strict marketing regulations. Conclusions: This systematic review provides evidence that social media is a valuable tool for RNDs, particularly in the context of food and/or nutritional education. RNDs would benefit from training in content creation, knowledge dissemination and ethical digital communication. However, clearer guidelines from professional organisations are also recommended. Full article

Introduction: Recent guidelines developed by the European Association for the Study of Obesity (EASO) and the European Federation of the Associations of Dietitians (EFAD) focused on the dietetic management of obesity in adults. The present study aimed to explore the perspectives of healthcare professionals regarding these guidelines. Methods: In total, 85 registered dietitians/nutritionists from Greece, the Netherlands, the Republic of Ireland, and the United Kingdom completed an online survey, and 10 were interviewed, in February–March 2023. Demographic data were also collected. Results: Awareness of the EASO-EFAD guidelines among registered dietitians/nutritionists was moderate (57.6%), but only 20% had read them in full. Dietitians with higher education and relevant experience were more likely to have read the guidelines. Less than half reported that key evidence-based recommendations, such as individualized medical nutrition therapy and intensive behavioral interventions, are already included in national guidance. Recommendations like portfolio or DASH diets, partial meal replacements, and calorie restriction were less commonly part of national guidance/usual practice. A small percentage of participants described their adoption of several nutritional approaches novel to them. These included the portfolio dietary pattern, partial meal replacements, and intermittent fasting or continuous calorie restriction. For some Irish dietitians, prioritizing weight as the main outcome conflicted with their emphasis on overall health and individualized nutrition therapy. Other barriers of recommendation implementation included exclusive availability in English, rapid changes in obesity management, staffing shortages, limited multidisciplinary collaboration, and inconsistent knowledge among healthcare providers. Conclusions: The present study identified gaps in the adoption of the EASO-EFAD guidelines into dietetic/clinical practice. EFAD will develop strategies to disseminate these guidelines at different levels of stakeholders (national/local authorities, dietitians/nutritionists, and patients). Full article

Background/Objectives: The field of dietary supplements is changing and evolving quickly. Registered Dietitian Nutritionists are recognized as experts in nutrition and familiarity with the usage of dietary supplements is expected. However, education on the use of dietary supplements is not equal across accredited dietetic education programs, which can lead to disparities in dietitians’ feelings of preparedness, attitudes, and consequently experience of comfort regarding dietary supplements. The purpose of this study was to create the D-SCOPE Questionnaire (Dietitians’ Survey of Comfort, Opinions, and Preparedness in Education in Supplements) and validate it. This questionnaire assesses Registered Dietitian Nutritionists’ feelings of preparedness, comfort with use, and general attitudes in the field of dietary supplements. Methods: Face and content validity was established with dietitian, nutritionist, and statistician input. For recruitment, 2000 national randomly selected emails were obtained from the Commission on Dietetic Registration. Registered Dietitian Nutritionists (n = 248) responded to the survey email request. Descriptive statistics (reported as means ± standard deviation), principal axis factoring (exploratory factor analysis) with a direct oblimin rotation and Cronbach’s a reliability analysis were used for validation techniques. Results: Five factors were created, which explained about 63% of the variance in the questionnaire. The questionnaire was generally reliable, but the factor structure could change with a non-US population. Conclusions: As a unit, the D-SCOPE Questionnaire shows validity and reliability in assessing Registered Dietitian Nutritionists’ perceptions of preparedness and attitudes in the area related to dietary supplements. Full article

A total of 38% of Americans do not meet the Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) for calcium including those at risk for osteoporosis. To increase the percentage of patients at risk for osteoporosis who achieve goal calcium RDA intake, a collaborative specialty pharmacy-registered dietitian-nutritionist (RDN) quality improvement program was developed. Patients aged 18 to 90 years old receiving osteoporosis therapy (denosumab, teriparatide, zoledronic acid) or medications that increase bone loss (elagolix, oral prednisone) were provided with a structured assessment and educational intervention. Daily calcium intake included patient self-reported dietary intake plus supplement use. Written and verbal education on increasing dietary intake based on patient preferences was provided with 5 calcium-rich food-source store coupons. Recommendations for supplement selection (citrate vs. carbonate) and/or medication-related problem resolution were provided. Follow-up occurred at 3–6 months. Fifty patients enrolled [94% female, mean age 66.6 years (SD 15.3)] were taking denosumab (36), teriparatide (1), zoledronic acid (1), elagolix (7) and prednisone (5). The mean baseline daily dietary calcium intake was 500 mg (SD 247) with none achieving goal intake with diet alone. Average calcium supplement use in 22 (44%) patients was 686 mg daily (SD 284). At baseline, 17 (34%) met goal daily calcium intake compared to 30 (60%) at post intervention follow-up (p = 0.009). Over half of the store coupons were redeemed. A specialty pharmacy-RDN customized intervention program provides a model for aiding patients to modify calcium intake. Full article

Objective: This study aimed to identify components of a trauma-informed, culturally sensitive eating-disorder-specific nutrition-focused physical examination (ED-NFPE) tool. Method: The modified Delphi methodology was used to develop a consensus on the clinical relevance of nine evidence-informed ED-specific nutrition examination domains and 46 components within those domains. Purposive sampling was used to recruit a panel of registered dietitian nutritionist (RDN) experts in the ED field. The panelists responded to survey statements on a five-point Likert scale. The panelists also provided qualitative feedback on domain and component additions, exclusions, modifications, and trauma-informed culturally sensitive examination practice techniques. Results: Twenty-two RDN expert panelists completed Round One of the study, and eighteen panelists completed Round Two (82% retention). Twenty-one were female. Fifteen panelists had ten or more years of experience in ED dietetics. Fifty percent held an advanced practice credential from the International Association of Eating Disorders Professionals (IAEDP). After the two survey rounds, the nine ED-NFPE domains and 46 of the 48 components achieved a consensus for clinical relevance. The panelists proposed two new examination components and provided qualitative feedback for trauma-informed culturally sensitive practice techniques in all nine domains. Conclusions: This modified Delphi study design was chosen to reach a consensus on developing an ED-NFPE tool, as there are few current evidence-based guidelines for nutrition examinations in ED care. An NFPE tool specifically designed to detect the nutrition-related findings of individuals with EDs would strengthen the overall nutrition assessment. RDNs at every level of care and with all degrees of experience could use an ED-NFPE to inform patient treatment goals. Full article

Background/Objectives: Registered dietitian nutritionists (RDNs) are allied healthcare professionals who can help people with multiple sclerosis (MS) incorporate healthy eating, but little is known about their involvement in MS care. Thus, the objective of this survey was to investigate the perceptions and utilization of RDNs in MS care among multidisciplinary MS providers in the United States and Canada. Methods: An online survey was disseminated via the Consortium of MS Centers email listserv and MS-specific scientific conferences. The survey queried practitioner type, RDN referrals, the perceived benefits of RDNs in MS care, and the proportion of their patients who follow ‘MS diets’ or have nutrition-related issues. Reasons for or against RDN referral and beneficial resources were also queried. Results: Of the 60 completed surveys, respondents were primarily neurologists (n = 27, 45.0%). Most (n = 43, 71.7%) indicated that half or more of their patients inquire about diet, but n = 32 (53.3%) indicated that very few follow an ‘MS diet’ and n = 47 (78.3%) indicated that very few decline disease-modifying therapies to follow an ‘MS diet’. Most (n = 45, 77.6%) respondents indicated referring their patients to a RDN with lack of nutrition knowledge/general healthy eating advice (n = 34, 73.9%) and overweight/obesity (n = 31, 67.4%) as being the most common reasons for referral. RDNs were reported as being helpful or extremely helpful by n = 38 (84.4%) of respondents who reported referring to RDNs. Most (n = 46, 79.3%) indicated that their patients would benefit from having an RDN with MS-specialized training as a member of staff. Conclusions: MS care providers support the need for RDNs with specialized training in MS care. Full article

Background/Objectives: Low- and no-calorie sweeteners (LNCSs) provide sweetness in food applications that are suggested to support consumers’ reduced consumption of caloric sweeteners and added sugar intake. Consumers seek guidance and advice on using LNCSs from healthcare providers, including dietitians and nutritionists. However, prior research suggests there may be inconsistent guidance on the use of LNCSs. The main goal is to assess dietitians’ and nutritionists’ perceptions and knowledge of LNCSs. We also evaluate the impact of educational intervention on the perceptions and knowledge of low- and no-calorie sweeteners (LNCSs) among healthcare professionals. Methods: Participants completed an online questionnaire on their perceptions of LNCSs before and after viewing a webinar given by a member of the FDA on the safety and approval process of LNCSs. A total of 187 participants completed the pre-questionnaire, and 58 participants completed the post-questionnaire. Results: The LNCSs most familiar to participants was aspartame, followed by stevia, with thaumatin, advantame, and neotame being the least familiar sweeteners. While all sweeteners were FDA-approved, there were differences in perceived safety and suitability for dietary use. Following the intervention, there was a significant improvement in the participant’s knowledge, understanding, and confidence in the safety and approval process of LNCSs and reduced negative perceptions of LNCSs on health. Conclusions: With nutritionists and dietitians being the primary sources of nutritional guidance, consumers may seek their recommendations regarding using LNCSs. However, this study revealed differences in suitability across FDA-approved LNCSs and a lack of confidence regarding the safety and approval process. Education programs regarding the safety and approval process of LNCSs increase confidence in advising patients and clients on the use of LNCSs. Full article

Lactation support from health professionals is a crucial social determinant of health. Registered dietitians (RDs) and registered nurses (RNs) can play an important role in supporting breastfeeding, yet most have minimal formal lactation education and training. This study seeks to explore the correlates of professional breastfeeding perceived role, perceived influence, and confidence in providing lactation support among RDs and RNs. Using a cross-sectional design, a convenience sample of 111 credentialed providers completed an online survey assessing their breastfeeding-related training, experiences, knowledge, attitudes, and practices. We also examined perceptions of social support, intentions for future breastfeeding, professional roles, and confidence in lactation support. We tested for relationships between variables using chi-square, Fisher’s exact, and Mann–Whitney U tests and identified which correlates were associated with the dependent variables using bivariate logistic regression. Respondents who were breastfed as infants were 3.4 times more likely to agree that it is their responsibility to highlight health problems associated with infant formula when giving breastfeeding advice (p = 0.009). Those agreeing that people around them support breastfeeding were 8.0 times more likely to believe they can influence a woman’s breastfeeding decision and duration (p = 0.05). Respondents working in maternal/child/family health were 14.3 times more likely to feel confident in their ability to provide lactation counseling, guidance, and recommendations (p = 0.03). Educational institutions and employers should provide all RDs and RNs with opportunities for personal reflection and lactation training while strengthening breastfeeding social norms. Full article

Tools to briefly assess diet among US Spanish-speaking adults are needed to identify individuals at risk for cardiometabolic disease (CMD) related to diet. Two registered dietitian nutritionists (RDNs) recruited bilingual medical students to translate the validated Diet Risk Score (DRS) into Spanish (DRS-S). Participants were recruited from a federally qualified health center. Students administered the DRS-S and one 24-h recall (Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour (ASA24^®) Dietary Assessment Tool) on one day; a second recall was administered within 1 week. Recalls were scored using the Healthy Eating Index (HEI)-2015, a measure of adherence to the Dietary Guidelines for Americans. Spearman correlations, weighted kappa, and ANOVA were conducted using SAS 9.4 to assess the relative validity of the DRS-S. Thirty-one Spanish-speaking adults (female: n = 17, 53%; mean age: 58 (42–69)) completed assessments. The mean DRS-S was 9 (SD = 4.2) (max: 27; higher score = higher risk) and the mean HEI-2015 score was 65.7 (SD = 9.7) (max: 100; higher score = lower risk), with significant agreement between measures (r: −0.45 (p = 0.01)), weighted kappa: −0.3 (p = 0.03). The DRS-S can be used in resource-constrained settings to assess diet for intervention and referral to RDNs. The DRS-S should be tested in clinical care to assess the impact of dietary changes to reduce CMD risk. Full article

Although evidence-based nutrition care is recommended for patients with cancer, current nutrition care practices provided by nutritionists and dietitians in Southeast Asian countries are not clearly reported. The aim of this scoping review was to describe nutritionists’ and dietitians’ current oncology nutrition care practice within Southeast Asia by identifying access to dietetic services, tools or strategies used in providing care, and barriers and enablers to implementing nutrition care practices. Five databases (Ovid MEDLINE, Global Health, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Proquest) were searched through structured search strategies, in addition to strategic searching of grey literature. A total of 4261 sources of evidence were retrieved. After full-text screening, 18 studies from Southeast Asian countries met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review. The provision and reporting of nutrition care practices provided by nutritionists and dietitians were limited. Access to dietetic services, including nutritional screening tools and reason to be referred, were varied within studies. Barriers and enablers to nutrition care provision were unique and related to each country’s specific resources and guidelines. In summary, there was varied reporting of nutrition care practices provided to patients with cancer in Southeast Asia and a lack of clarity on the actual standardized processes. Future research is warranted to further explore the barriers and enablers to providing nutrition care by local nutritionists and dietitians in Southeast Asia. Full article

Sport-related concussion incidence has increased in many team-based sports, such as rugby, Gaelic (camogie, hurling, football), and hockey. Concussion disrupts athletes’ brain function, causing an “energy crisis” that requires energy and nutrient support to restore function and heal. Performance dietitians and nutritionists play a role in supporting athletes’ post-injury nutritional demands. This study aimed to investigate Irish performance dietitians’ and nutritionists’ knowledge and implementation of nutritional strategies to manage and support athletes’ recovery following concussion. In-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted with seventeen (n = 17) Irish performance dietitians and nutritionists recruited from the Sport and Exercise Nutrition register and other sporting body networks across Ireland. Participants practised or had practised with amateur and/or professional athletes within the last ten years. All interviews and their transcripts were thematically analysed to extract relevant insights. These data provided valuable insights revealing performance dietitians and nutritionists: (1) their awareness of concussion events and (2) their use of nutritional supports for concussion management. Furthermore, the research highlighted their implementation of ‘novel nutritional protocols’ specifically designed to support and manage athletes’ concussion recovery. There was a clear contrast between participants who had an awareness and knowledge of the importance of nutrition for brain recovery after sport-related concussion(s) and those who did not. Participants presenting with a practical understanding mentioned re-emphasising certain foods and supplements they were already recommending to athletes in the event of a concussion. Performance dietitians and nutritionists were keeping up to date with nutrition research on concussions, but limited evidence has prevented them from implementing protocols in practice. Meanwhile, participants mentioned trialling/recommending nutritional protocols, such as carbohydrate reloading, reducing omega-6 intake, and acutely supplementing creatine, omega-3 fish oils high in Docosahexaenoic acid, and probiotics to support brain healing. Performance dietitians’ and nutritionists’ use of nutrition protocols with athletes following concussion was linked to their knowledge and the limited scientific evidence available. Nutrition implementation, therefore, may be overlooked or implemented with uncertainty, which could negatively affect athletes’ recovery following sports-related concussions. Full article

The relationship between what and how individuals eat and their overall and long-term health is non-controversial. However, for decades, food and nutrition discussions have often been highly medicalized. Given the significant impact of poor nutrition on health, broader discussions about food should be integrated into routine patient history taking. We advocate for an expansion of the current, standard approach to patient history taking in order to include questions regarding patients’ ‘foodlife’ (total relationship to food) as a screening and baseline assessment tool for referrals. We propose that healthcare providers: (1) routinely engage with patients about their relationship to food, and (2) recognize that such dialogues extend beyond nutrition and lifestyle questions. Mirroring other recent revisions to medical history taking—such as exploring biopsychosocial risks—questions about food relationships and motivators of eating may be essential for optimal patient assessment and referrals. We draw on the novel tools of ‘foodlife’ ethnography (developed by co-author ethnographer J.J.L., and further refined in collaboration with the co-authors who contributed their clinical experiences as a former primary care physician (D.M.E.), registered dietitian (J.W.M.), and diabetologist (H.Z.)) to model a set of baseline questions for inclusion in routine clinical settings. Importantly, this broader cultural approach seeks to augment and enhance current food intake discussions used by registered dietitian nutritionists, endocrinologists, internists, and medical primary care providers for better baseline assessments and referrals. By bringing the significance of food into the domain of routine medical interviewing practices by a range of health professionals, we theorize that this approach can set a strong foundation of trust between patients and healthcare professionals, underscoring food’s vital role in patient-centered care. Full article

The impostor phenomenon (IP) (also known as impostor syndrome) describes high-achieving individuals who, despite their objective successes, fail to internalize their accomplishments and have persistent self-doubt and fear of being exposed as a fraud or impostor. This study aimed to assess the prevalence and predictors of IP within a sample of nutrition and dietetics students and practitioners. An online cross-sectional survey was conducted and utilized a non-random, convenience sampling approach. A total of 1015 students, dietetic interns, and currently practicing and retired registered dietitian nutritionists and nutrition and dietetic technicians registered provided complete responses. IP was assessed with the Clance Impostor Phenomenon Scale (CIPS). Self-reported job satisfaction and well-being were assessed using validated scales. Average CIPS score was 66.0 ± 16.3 (range 22–99), and higher scores indicate more frequent or severe IP experiences. Frequent or intense IP was reported by 64% of survey respondents (n = 655). Older age, greater educational attainment and professional level, and membership in Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics groups were associated with lower IP scores. Greater social media use was associated with higher IP scores. Job satisfaction and overall well-being were inversely correlated with IP (p < 0.001). Findings suggest that IP experiences were common among a majority of nutrition and dietetics students and practitioners surveyed. Additional research and development of preventative strategies and interventions is needed. Full article