Search Results (6)

The rapid increase in construction and demolition waste (C&DW) has emerged as a significant environmental challenge, particularly due to the hazardous substances embodied within the fine residues destined into landfills. The disposal of C&DW in landfills has been widely recognized as a source of leachate, containing toxic contaminants, which pose significant environmental risks. A controlled column leaching experiment was conducted using samples with varying proportions of C&DW, gypsum, and organic content to assess their impact on leachate chemistry. The results indicate that higher C&DW content leads to increased concentrations of heavy metals, such as Pb, Hg, As, Cr, Ni, Cu, Zn, and Co, as well as other metals like Al and Fe, with peak contamination occurring within the first 13–15 weeks. Gypsum presence exacerbates heavy metal solubility by reducing pH, increasing sulfate levels, and promoting metal-sulfate complex formation. Despite remaining within regulatory thresholds, the cumulative concentration of toxic metals over time highlights potential environmental risks, particularly in landfill settings. This study underscores the need for improved C&DW management practices, enhanced waste segregation, and sustainable alternatives to gypsum to mitigate long-term ecological impacts. These findings contribute to a deeper understanding of C&DW leachate dynamics and inform policy recommendations for sustainable waste management in the construction sector. Full article

Heavy metal pollution in groundwater and the environment poses a serious threat to ecosystems and human health. In particular, heavy metal ions, such as copper (Cu), zinc (Zn) and manganese (Mn), in the leachate of metal mine tailings ponds have attracted much attention due to their high toxicity and bioaccumulation. In order to solve the problem of heavy metal pollution in groundwater caused by leachate from tailings pond of a polymetallic mine, carbon/hydroxyapatite (CHAP) prepared from animal bones was used as the medium material to systematically study its removal effect on heavy metal ions in water under static and dynamic conditions. The static experiment results showed that CHAP had excellent adsorption properties for copper, zinc, manganese and mixed ions, and the adsorption capacities were up to 80 mg/g, 67.86 mg/g and 49.29 mg/g, respectively. Dynamic experiments further confirmed the application potential of CHAP as a Permeable Reactive Barrier (PRB) medium material, which can effectively remove heavy metal ions from flowing water, having a long service life. This study provides a theoretical basis and experimental reference for the in situ remediation of heavy metal-contaminated groundwater and shows the application prospect of CHAP in the field of environmental remediation. Full article

The purpose of the study was to determine the mechanical and ecotoxicological properties of mortars with differently shaped recycled PET plastics as a partial natural aggregate replacement and assess its environmental impact. Different methods were used for determining mechanical properties, while ecotoxicity tests with two types of plants were performed for the assessment of the ecotoxicological potential of mortars. Results of strength tests revealed that PET in mortars increased 28-day compressive strength by up to 3% and decreased flexural strength by up to 14% compared to conventional mortar. Ultrasonic pulse velocity and dynamic modulus of elasticity were lower in PET mortars, while XRD and SEM-EDS showed fewer hydration products in PET mortars. Duckweed ecotoxicity test results revealed that frond growth inhibition values in PETS and conventional mortar leachate (100 g L⁻¹) were around 50%, while root growth inhibition values did not exceed 40%. Mustard seed germination test results revealed root growth inhibition values in both mortar leachates were lower than 20%. Ecotoxicity tests showed that conventional and PET mortar were non-toxic to duckweed in aquatic environments and non-toxic to mustard seeds in terrestrial environments. Characterization of mortar leachates showed a significant increase in chloride, Ca, Si, and Ba content as potential causes for growth inhibition of both plants. Plastic waste reduction due to the potential use of PET in mortars confirmed that plastic waste could be completely eliminated and the global consumption of primary natural resources for concrete production reduced up to 4%. Such an approach could increase mortar sustainability. Full article

Acid mine drainage originates from mining waste, tailings and overburden being exposed to air and water; it is also observed in abandoned mines, characterized by high acidity and increased concentrations of sulfate and heavy metals. It is considered a notorious pollutant, mostly affecting superficial and ground water quality. Until 1977, Lavrion mines have been the heart of dynamic Greek mining and extractive metallurgy. The present paper discusses the possibility of using low-cost eco-friendly materials, i.e., natural and synthetic zeolites for the in situ rehabilitation of Lavrion mine soil. Na-P1 synthetic zeolite prepared from Meliti fly ash and two natural zeolites from Samos tuffs mostly containing clinoptilolite and mordenite, respectively, were employed. The results indicated that all three aluminosilicates alleviated two basic soil parameters closely correlated with fertility, i.e., high acidity and low CEC. Regarding toxic metals leaching, Na-P1 synthetic zeolite proved more efficient, reducing heavy metal contents in the leachates by 38%, 72%, 61%, 67%, 77% and 33% for Pb, Cd, Zn, Cu, Mn and Fe, respectively. This was attributed to both the increased pH and CEC values of the Na-P1 zeolite. Between the Samos zeolites, the richest in mordenite exhibited the better performance. Full article

Arsenic is a poisonous element and its super mobility can pose a major threat to the environment and human beings. Disposed arsenic-bearing waste or minerals over time may release arsenic into the groundwater, soil and then the food chain. Consequently, safe landfill deposition should be carried out to minimize arsenic bleeding. Cement-based stabilization/solidification and glass vitrification are two important methods for arsenic immobilization. This work compares the stability and intrinsic leaching properties of sequestered arsenic by cement encapsulation and glass vitrification of smelter high-arsenic flue dust (60% As₂O₃) and confirms if they meet or exceed the requirement of landfill disposition over a range of environmentally relevant conditions. The toxicity characterization leaching procedure (TCLP, 1311), synthetic precipitation leaching procedure (SPLP, 1312) and Australian standard (Aus. 4439.3) in short-term (18 h) and mass transfer from monolithic material using a semi-dynamic leaching tank (1315) in longer-term (165 days) were employed to assess arsenic immobility characteristic in three arsenic-cement (2%, 8.4% and 14.4%) and arsenic-glass (11.7%) samples. Moreover, calcium release from different matrices has been taken into consideration as a contributor to arsenic bleeding. Based on the USEPA guidelines, samples can be acceptable for landfilling only if As release is <5 mg/L. Results obtained from short-term leaching were almost similar for both cement and glass materials. However, high calcium release was observed from the cement-encapsulated materials. The pH of leachates after the test was highly alkaline for encapsulated materials; however, in glass material it was near neutral or slightly acidic. Method 1315 tests made a huge difference between the two materials and confirmed that cement encapsulation is not the best method for landfilling arsenic waste due to the high arsenic and calcium release over time with alkaline pH. However, glass material has shown promising results, i.e., the insignificant release of arsenic over time with an acceptable change in pH value. Overall, arsenic sequestration in glass is a better option compared with the cement-based solidification process. Full article

Soil-available P for crop use is limited because of fixation reaction and loss of organic matter through erosion and surface runoff. These factors cause an imbalance between inputs and outputs of P nutrients in acid soils. Several approaches to improve P availability have been proposed, however, little is known about the effectiveness of amending humid mineral acid soils with charcoal and sago bark ash on P dynamics. Thus, pH buffering capacity and leaching studies were conducted to determine: (i) pH buffering capacity upon application of charcoal and sago bark ash and (ii) the influence of charcoal and sago bark ash on P leaching in acid soils. pH buffering capacity was calculated as the negative reciprocal of the slope of the linear regression (pH versus acid addition rate). A leaching study was carried out by spraying distilled water to each container with soil such that leachates through leaching were collected for analysis. The ascending order of the treatments based on their pH buffering capacity and regression coefficient (R²) were soil alone (0.25 mol H⁺ kg⁻¹ sample), soil with charcoal (0.26 mol H⁺ kg⁻¹ sample), soil with sago bark ash (0.28 mol H⁺ kg⁻¹ sample), charcoal alone (0.29 mol H⁺ kg⁻¹ sample), soil with charcoal and sago bark ash (0.29 mol H⁺ kg⁻¹ sample), and sago bark ash alone (0.34 mol H⁺ kg⁻¹ sample). Improvement in the soil pH buffering capacity was partly related to the inherent K, Ca, Mg, and Na contents of charcoal and sago bark ash. In the leaching study, it was noticed that as the rate of sago bark ash decreased, the pH of leachate decreased, suggesting that unlike charcoal the sago bark ash has significant impact on the alkalinity of leachate. Soil exchangeable acidity, Al³⁺, and H⁺ reduced significantly following co-application of charcoal and sago bark ash with ERP. This could be attributed to the neutralizing effects of sago bark ash and the high affinity of charcoal for Al and Fe ions. The amount of P leached from the soil with 100% charcoal was lower because charcoal has the ability to capture and hold P-rich water. The findings of this present study suggest that combined use of charcoal and sago bark ash have the potential to mitigate soil acidity and Al toxicity besides improving soil pH buffering capacity and minimizing P leaching. A field trial to consolidate the findings of this work is recommended. Full article