Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (22)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = transcranial focused ultrasound stimulation

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
24 pages, 5445 KB  
Review
Transcranial Focused Ultrasound Stimulation for Alzheimer’s Disease—A Scoping Review
by Jon Crompton, Robyn Cuthell, Tom G. J. Steward, William W. Watts, Alanoud Alqahtani and Daniel J. Whitcomb
Brain Sci. 2026, 16(6), 570; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci16060570 - 28 May 2026
Viewed by 1818
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Alzheimer’s disease (AD) remains a significant global health challenge, characterised by a persistent resistance to traditional pharmacological interventions. While non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques like transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) show therapeutic promise, their limited depth [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Alzheimer’s disease (AD) remains a significant global health challenge, characterised by a persistent resistance to traditional pharmacological interventions. While non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques like transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) show therapeutic promise, their limited depth of penetration restricts their efficacy in targeting deep-brain AD pathology. Transcranial focused ultrasound stimulation (tFUS) has emerged as a novel, non-invasive neuromodulatory tool capable of precise deep-brain targeting. This scoping review aims to systematically map the current evidence base regarding the neuromodulatory application of tFUS in AD. Methods: Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, a scoping search was conducted across four major databases (Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and CENTRAL). Studies were included if they investigated focused ultrasound stimulation (FUS) as a neuromodulatory intervention for AD, excluding applications involving blood–brain-barrier disruption via microbubbles. Two independent reviewers performed screening and data extraction, with inter-rater reliability assessed via Cohen’s kappa. Results: Our analysis indicates that tFUS represents a safe and potent multi-modal intervention for AD that addresses both pathological protein aggregation and electrophysiological network failure. Its ability to modulate neuroplasticity and metabolic recovery suggests a promising therapeutic trajectory. Conclusions: Future research should prioritise the standardisation of acoustic protocols and the pursuit of longitudinal clinical cohorts to establish the long-term efficacy of this non-invasive technology. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Neurodegenerative Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

39 pages, 812 KB  
Systematic Review
Noninvasive Brain Stimulation Techniques and Their Efficacy in Treating Cognition and Memory in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer’s Disease—A Systematic Review
by Hector P. Valverde, Benjamin J. Clark, Jeremy Hogeveen and Vincent P. Clark
Brain Sci. 2026, 16(5), 527; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci16050527 - 15 May 2026
Viewed by 1776
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The growing aging population is susceptible to cognitive and memory impairment, most commonly due to Alzheimer’s disease, with no cures currently available. Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques may serve to improve cognition and delay catastrophic memory loss. Methods: A systematic review of [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: The growing aging population is susceptible to cognitive and memory impairment, most commonly due to Alzheimer’s disease, with no cures currently available. Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques may serve to improve cognition and delay catastrophic memory loss. Methods: A systematic review of NIBS research on cognitive impairment was carried out using PubMed, with additional backward citation searching. A total of 81 studies using NIBS were included. Conclusions: The reviewed studies show that NIBS holds promise in improving memory deficits in patients with cognitive impairment. While the longevity of benefits from transcranial electrical stimulation appears limited, its short-term effects may provide benefits when used consistently. Transcranial magnetic stimulation appears to provide longer-lasting benefits. Transcranial focused ultrasound stimulation may also provide further benefits through more precise targeting of deeper brain structures compared to other NIBS techniques. Together, these results suggest that NIBS shows promise for the treatment of symptoms related to cognitive and memory impairment, and may help to alleviate some of the growing issues associated with the increasing level of Alzheimer’s disease in an aging population. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Applications of Non-Invasive Stimulation for Therapeutics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 640 KB  
Review
Parameter-Determined Effects: Advances in Transcranial Focused Ultrasound for Modulating Neural Excitation and Inhibition
by Qin-Ling He, Yu Zhou, Yang Liu, Xiao-Qing Li, Shou-Kun Zhao, Qing Xie, Gang Feng and Ji-Xian Wang
Bioengineering 2026, 13(1), 20; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering13010020 - 25 Dec 2025
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 4388
Abstract
Transcranial focused ultrasound stimulation (tFUS), an emerging non-invasive neuromodulation technique, has garnered growing attention owing to its high spatial resolution and precise targeting capability for deep brain structures. A body of evidence demonstrates that tFUS can effectively modulate neural activity in specific brain [...] Read more.
Transcranial focused ultrasound stimulation (tFUS), an emerging non-invasive neuromodulation technique, has garnered growing attention owing to its high spatial resolution and precise targeting capability for deep brain structures. A body of evidence demonstrates that tFUS can effectively modulate neural activity in specific brain regions, inducing excitatory or inhibitory effects, and it is an important means to reshape neural functions. Ultrasound parameters are crucial in determining the transcranial ultrasound modulation effects. However, there is still controversy over which parameters can regulate neural excitability or inhibition, and there are significant differences in the parameters used in previous studies, which have limited the clinical application of transcranial ultrasound to some extent. Therefore, a systematic clarification of parameter–effect relationships is urgently needed to enable qualitative and quantitative understanding of ultrasound-induced neuromodulation, which is essential for achieving reliable and reproducible outcomes. This paper intends to review the effects of different tFUS parameters and their combinations on the excitability and inhibition of brain neural activities as well as the possible mechanisms. By integrating recent findings from both animal models and human clinical studies, we also discuss critical safety issues related to tFUS, aiming to provide a theoretical basis for future transcranial focused ultrasound modulation treatments for various neurological diseases such as stroke, Parkinson’s disease, dementia, epilepsy, pain disorders, and disorders of consciousness while providing reference value for selecting tFUS treatment regimens. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 1877 KB  
Systematic Review
Neuromodulatory Effects of Transcranial Pulse Stimulation (TPS) in Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by Selma Polte, Larissa Klingmann, Anna Seßmann, Svenja Schwichtenberg, Christoph S. Herrmann, Karsten Witt and Mandy Roheger
Neurol. Int. 2025, 17(11), 188; https://doi.org/10.3390/neurolint17110188 - 18 Nov 2025
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3972
Abstract
Background: Transcranial pulse stimulation (TPS) is an innovative non-invasive brain stimulation technique using ultrasonic waves. Despite its application in first clinical trials, so far, no systematic overview of its effects across different patient populations has been conducted. Objectives: This systematic review and meta-analysis [...] Read more.
Background: Transcranial pulse stimulation (TPS) is an innovative non-invasive brain stimulation technique using ultrasonic waves. Despite its application in first clinical trials, so far, no systematic overview of its effects across different patient populations has been conducted. Objectives: This systematic review and meta-analysis examines the effects of TPS on cognitive, motor, and mental health outcomes as well as on patient safety in neurological and psychiatric disorders. Methods: We conducted a literature search in MEDLINE, PsycINFO & PsycArticles, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, covering the period from January 2013 to December 2024. Two independent reviewers conducted the study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment. To evaluate the risk of bias, the RoB2 tool was used for randomized studies and the ROBINS-I tool for non-randomized studies. Results: A total of fifteen studies (five randomized controlled trials and ten non-blinded, single-arm trials) including both adolescent and adult and elderly patient populations (Alzheimer’s disease, mild cognitive impairment, Parkinson’s disease, major depressive disorder, autism spectrum disorder, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder) were included. Positive effects of TPS intervention on cognitive, motor, and mental health outcomes, as well as a high safety profile, were demonstrated in a majority of the studies and outcome parameters. However, limitations of the included studies persist due to small sample sizes, lack of control groups, retrospective analyses, and heterogeneity of study protocols and measurements. Conclusions: TPS is a safe and promising method for treating neurological and psychiatric disorders. To better assess the potential of this innovative technique, standardized protocol procedures and larger, sham-controlled trials are needed. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 2419 KB  
Article
A Frequency-Dependent and Nonlinear, Time-Explicit Five-Layer Human Head Numerical Model for Realistic Estimation of Focused Acoustic Transmission Through the Human Skull for Noninvasive High-Intensity and High-Frequency Transcranial Ultrasound Stimulation: An Application to Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders
by Shivam Sharma, Nuno A. T. C. Fernandes and Óscar Carvalho
Bioengineering 2025, 12(11), 1161; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12111161 - 26 Oct 2025
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2339
Abstract
Transcranial focused ultrasound is a promising noninvasive technique for neuromodulation in neurological and psychiatric disorders, but accurate prediction of acoustic transmission through the skull remains a major challenge. In this study, we present a five-layer numerical human head model that integrates frequency-dependent acoustic [...] Read more.
Transcranial focused ultrasound is a promising noninvasive technique for neuromodulation in neurological and psychiatric disorders, but accurate prediction of acoustic transmission through the skull remains a major challenge. In this study, we present a five-layer numerical human head model that integrates frequency-dependent acoustic parameters with nonlinear time-explicit dynamics to realistically capture ultrasound propagation. The model explicitly represents skin, trabecular bone, cortical bone, and brain, each assigned experimentally derived acoustic properties across a clinically relevant frequency range (0.5–5 MHz). Numerical simulations were performed in the frequency domain and time-explicit to quantify sound transmission loss and focal depth under high-intensity and high-frequency stimulation. The results show the effect of frequency, radius of curvature, and skull thickness on maximum pressure ratio, focal depth, and focus zone inside the brain tissue. Findings indicate that skull geometry, particularly radius of curvature and thickness, strongly influences the focal zone, with thinner skull regions allowing deeper penetration and reduced transmission loss. Comparison of the frequency-domain model with the time-explicit model demonstrated broadly similar trends; however, the frequency-domain approach consistently underestimated transmission loss and was unable to capture nonlinear effects such as frequency harmonics. These findings highlight the importance of nonlinear, time-explicit modeling for accurate transcranial ultrasound planning and suggest that the proposed framework provides a robust tool for optimizing stimulation parameters and identifying ideal target zones, supporting the development of safer and more effective neuromodulation strategies. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

29 pages, 1401 KB  
Review
Using Low-Intensity Focused Ultrasound to Treat Depression and Anxiety Disorders: A Review of Current Evidence
by Ao Du, Manli Huang, Zheng Wang, Hetong Zhou, Huilong Duan, Shaohua Hu and Yinfei Zheng
Brain Sci. 2025, 15(10), 1129; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15101129 - 21 Oct 2025
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 5663
Abstract
Background: Depression and anxiety disorders impact millions globally. In recent years, low-intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU), characterized by its high precision, deep penetration, and non-invasive nature, has garnered significant interest in neuroscience and clinical practice. To enhance understanding of its effects on mood, [...] Read more.
Background: Depression and anxiety disorders impact millions globally. In recent years, low-intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU), characterized by its high precision, deep penetration, and non-invasive nature, has garnered significant interest in neuroscience and clinical practice. To enhance understanding of its effects on mood, therapeutic availability in treatment of depression/anxiety disorders, and potential mechanisms, a systematic review of studies investigating the emotional impact of LIFU on depressive/anxious-like animal models, healthy volunteers, and patients with depression or anxiety disorders has been undertaken. Methods: Relevant papers published before 15 July 2025 were searched across four databases: Web of Science, PubMed, Science Direct, and Embase. A total of 28 papers which met the inclusion and exclusion criteria are included in this review. Results: Our findings indicate that LIFU reversed the depressive/anxious-like behaviors in the animal models and showed antidepressant/anti-anxiety effects among the state-of-art clinical studies. For example, immobility time in FST or TST is reduced in depressive animal models, and HRSD/BAI scales are improved in human studies. Key molecules such as BDNF/5-HT are found restored in animal models, and FC between key brain areas related to depression/anxiety is modulated after LIFU treatment. Notably, no brain tissue damage was observed in animal studies, and only mild adverse effects (such as dizziness and vomiting) were noted in a few human studies. Conclusions: The studies using LIFU to treat depression and anxiety remain in the preliminary stage. The mechanisms underlying LIFU’s mood effects—such as activation or inhibition of specific brain regions or neural circuits, anti-inflammatory effects, alterations in functional connectivity, synaptic plasticity, neurotransmitter levels, and BDNF—remain incompletely understood and warrant further investigation. Nevertheless, the LIFU technique holds promise for regulating both cortical and subcortical brain areas implicated in depression/anxiety disorders as a precise neuromodulation tool. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Noninvasive Neuromodulation Applications in Research and Clinics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 1028 KB  
Review
Focused Modulation of Brain Activity: A Narrative Review
by Aisha Zhantleuova, Altynay Karimova, Anna P. Andreou, Almira M. Kustubayeva, Rashid Giniatullin and Bazbek Davletov
Biomedicines 2025, 13(8), 1889; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13081889 - 3 Aug 2025
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 4118
Abstract
A wide range of strategies have been developed to modulate dysfunctional brain activities. This narrative review provides a comparative analysis of biophysical, genetic, and biological neuromodulation approaches with an emphasis on their known or unknown molecular targets and translational potential. The review incorporates [...] Read more.
A wide range of strategies have been developed to modulate dysfunctional brain activities. This narrative review provides a comparative analysis of biophysical, genetic, and biological neuromodulation approaches with an emphasis on their known or unknown molecular targets and translational potential. The review incorporates data from both preclinical and clinical studies covering deep brain stimulation, transcranial electrical and magnetic stimulation, focused ultrasound, chemogenetics, optogenetics, magnetogenetics, and toxin-based neuromodulation. Each method was assessed based on specificity, safety, reversibility, and mechanistic clarity. Biophysical methods are widely used in clinical practice but often rely on empirical outcomes due to undefined molecular targets. Genetic tools offer cell-type precision in experimental systems but face translational barriers related to delivery and safety. Biological agents, such as botulinum neurotoxins, provide long-lasting yet reversible inhibition via well-characterized molecular pathways. However, they require stereotaxic injections and remain invasive. To overcome individual limitations and improve targeting, delivery, and efficacy, there is a growing interest in the synthesis of multiple approaches. This review highlights a critical gap in the mechanistic understanding of commonly used methods. Addressing this gap by identifying molecular targets may help to improve therapeutic precision. This concise review could be valuable for researchers looking to enter the evolving field of the neuromodulation of brain function. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Feature Papers in Neuromodulation and Brain Stimulation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 3676 KB  
Article
Design and Structure of a Non-Coaxial Multi-Focal Composite Fresnel Acoustic Lens for Synergistic Ultrasound Stimulation of Multiple Brain Regions
by Ruiqi Wu, Fangfang Shi, Juan Tao, Jiajia Zhao, Jinying Zhang, Xianmei Wu and Jingjing Xu
Sensors 2025, 25(11), 3299; https://doi.org/10.3390/s25113299 - 24 May 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2189
Abstract
Transcranial focused ultrasound (TcFUS) neuromodulation is hindered by skull-induced acoustic limitations. To enable synergistic multi-region brain stimulation, we designed non-coaxial multi-focal composite Fresnel acoustic lenses, including an overlapping Fresnel lens (OFL) and an alternating-segmented Fresnel lens (ASFL). These lenses convert planar ultrasound into [...] Read more.
Transcranial focused ultrasound (TcFUS) neuromodulation is hindered by skull-induced acoustic limitations. To enable synergistic multi-region brain stimulation, we designed non-coaxial multi-focal composite Fresnel acoustic lenses, including an overlapping Fresnel lens (OFL) and an alternating-segmented Fresnel lens (ASFL). These lenses convert planar ultrasound into multiple foci. Based on Fresnel theory, acoustic fields were analyzed via simulations and experiments, validating the generation of four non-coaxial foci (10/30 mm focal lengths) from a 1 MHz planar wave using both OFL and ASFL. The influence of lens parameters on focal pressure distribution was investigated, and morphology was quantified using a linear least-squares method. Significant differences in focal morphology and intensity between OFL and ASFL provide crucial guidance for optimizing multi-target TcFUS strategies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Biomedical Sensors)
Show Figures

Figure 1

34 pages, 2164 KB  
Review
Non-Drug and Non-Invasive Therapeutic Options in Alzheimer’s Disease
by Alina Simona Șovrea, Adina Bianca Boșca, Eleonora Dronca, Anne-Marie Constantin, Andreea Crintea, Rada Suflețel, Roxana Adelina Ștefan, Paul Andrei Ștefan, Mădălin Mihai Onofrei, Christoph Tschall and Carmen-Bianca Crivii
Biomedicines 2025, 13(1), 84; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13010084 - 1 Jan 2025
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 29124
Abstract
Despite the massive efforts of modern medicine to stop the evolution of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), it affects an increasing number of people, changing individual lives and imposing itself as a burden on families and the health systems. Considering that the vast majority of [...] Read more.
Despite the massive efforts of modern medicine to stop the evolution of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), it affects an increasing number of people, changing individual lives and imposing itself as a burden on families and the health systems. Considering that the vast majority of conventional drug therapies did not lead to the expected results, this review will discuss the newly developing therapies as an alternative in the effort to stop or slow AD. Focused Ultrasound (FUS) and its derived Transcranial Pulse Stimulation (TPS) are non-invasive therapeutic approaches. Singly or as an applied technique to change the permeability of the blood–brain–barrier (BBB), FUS and TPS have demonstrated the benefits of use in treating AD in animal and human studies. Adipose-derived stem Cells (ADSCs), gene therapy, and many other alternative methods (diet, sleep pattern, physical exercise, nanoparticle delivery) are also new potential treatments since multimodal approaches represent the modern trend in this disorder research therapies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Neurobiology and Clinical Neuroscience)
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 1809 KB  
Review
Brain Stimulation Techniques in Research and Clinical Practice: A Comprehensive Review of Applications and Therapeutic Potential in Parkinson’s Disease
by Ata Jahangir Moshayedi, Tahmineh Mokhtari and Mehran Emadi Andani
Brain Sci. 2025, 15(1), 20; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15010020 - 27 Dec 2024
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 10148
Abstract
Parkinson’s Disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by a range of motor and non-motor symptoms (NMSs) that significantly impact patients’ quality of life. This review aims to synthesize the current literature on the application of brain stimulation techniques, including non-invasive methods [...] Read more.
Parkinson’s Disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by a range of motor and non-motor symptoms (NMSs) that significantly impact patients’ quality of life. This review aims to synthesize the current literature on the application of brain stimulation techniques, including non-invasive methods such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), transcranial electrical stimulation (tES), transcranial focused ultrasound stimulation (tFUS), and transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS), as well as invasive approaches like deep brain stimulation (DBS). We explore the efficacy and safety profiles of these techniques in alleviating both motor impairments, such as bradykinesia and rigidity, and non-motor symptoms, including cognitive decline, depression, and impulse control disorders. Current findings indicate that while non-invasive techniques present a favorable safety profile and are effective for milder symptoms, invasive methods like DBS provide significant relief for severe cases that are unresponsive to other treatments. Future research is needed to optimize stimulation parameters, establish robust clinical protocols, and expand the application of these technologies across various stages of PD. This review underscores the potential of brain stimulation as a vital therapeutic tool in managing PD, paving the way for enhanced treatment strategies and improved patient outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Noninvasive Neuromodulation Applications in Research and Clinics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 4868 KB  
Article
A Simulation Study of Low-Intensity Focused Ultrasound for Modulating Rotational Sense Through Acoustic Streaming in Semicircular Canal: A Pilot Study
by Sion Cha and Wooksung Kim
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(23), 11432; https://doi.org/10.3390/app142311432 - 9 Dec 2024
Viewed by 2210
Abstract
This study explores the feasibility of using low-intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU) to induce rotational sensations in the human semicircular canal (SCC) through the acoustic streaming effect. Existing vestibular stimulation methods, such as galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS), caloric vestibular stimulation (CVS), and magnetic vestibular [...] Read more.
This study explores the feasibility of using low-intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU) to induce rotational sensations in the human semicircular canal (SCC) through the acoustic streaming effect. Existing vestibular stimulation methods, such as galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS), caloric vestibular stimulation (CVS), and magnetic vestibular stimulation (MVS), face limitations in spatial and temporal resolution, with unclear mechanisms. This study investigates whether LIFU can overcome these limitations by modulating endolymph motion within SCC. A 3D finite element model was constructed to simulate the effects of LIFU-induced acoustic streaming on SCC (particularly the endolymph), with thermal effects evaluated to ensure safety. Fluid–structure interaction (FSI) was used to analyze the relationship between endolymph flow and cupula deformation. By adjusting the focal point of the ultrasound transducer, we were able to alter fluid flow pattern, which resulted in variations in cupula displacement. The results demonstrated that LIFU successfully induces fluid motion in SCC without exceeding thermal safety limits (<1 °C), suggesting its potential for controlling rotational sensations, with cupula displacement exceeding 1 μm. This novel approach enhances the understanding of LIFU’s thermal and neuromodulatory effects on the vestibular system, and thereby offers promising implications for future therapeutic applications. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 1071 KB  
Article
Preliminary Examination of the Effects of Focused Ultrasound on Living Skin and Temperature at the Skin–Transducer Interface
by Andrew A. E. D. Bishay, Andrew J. Swenson, Norman M. Spivak, Samantha Schafer, Brendan P. Bych, Spencer D. Gilles, Christopher Dorobczynski, Alexander S. Korb, Mark E. Schafer, Taylor P. Kuhn, Martin M. Monti and Alexander Bystritsky
Bioengineering 2024, 11(11), 1126; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering11111126 - 8 Nov 2024
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2885
Abstract
Transcranial Focused Ultrasound Stimulation (tFUS) is a new, rapidly growing field related to the study and treatment of brain circuits. Establishing safety cutoffs for focused ultrasound is crucial for non-ablative neurological ultrasound experiments. In addition to potential focal heating, there is concern about [...] Read more.
Transcranial Focused Ultrasound Stimulation (tFUS) is a new, rapidly growing field related to the study and treatment of brain circuits. Establishing safety cutoffs for focused ultrasound is crucial for non-ablative neurological ultrasound experiments. In addition to potential focal heating, there is concern about temperature elevation at the skin surface. Much work has been performed at or near the FDA guideline of ISPTA.3 = 720 mW/cm2, which technically only applies to diagnostic, not therapeutic, ultrasound. Furthermore, evidence of brain tissue damage on histology in the focal region has been shown not to occur until ISPTA.3 > 14 W/cm2. Therefore, this study was conducted across a range of intensities between these two values, evaluating both subjective and objective side effects. Subjective side effects encompassed any discomfort experienced during and after focused ultrasound stimulation, while objective side effects included clinical findings of skin irritation, such as erythema, edema, or burns. This study also examined how the skin temperature at the skin–transducer interface would change in order to assess whether there would be significant heating. The subjects did not experience any unpleasant sensation at the point of stimulation, including heat or pain, and no objective findings of skin irritation were observed following stimulation and the removal of the transducer. In addition, there was no intensity-dependent effect on temperature, and the maximal rise in temperature was 1.45 °C, suggesting that these parameters do not result in the heating of the skin at the interface in such a way that poses a risk to subjects when operating at or below the intensities tested in this experiment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Biomedical Engineering and Biomaterials)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 5435 KB  
Review
Transcranial Focused Ultrasound Neuromodulation in Psychiatry: Main Characteristics, Current Evidence, and Future Directions
by Ahmadreza Keihani, Claudio Sanguineti, Omeed Chaichian, Chloe A. Huston, Caitlin Moore, Cynthia Cheng, Sabine A. Janssen, Francesco L. Donati, Ahmad Mayeli, Khaled Moussawi, Mary L. Phillips and Fabio Ferrarelli
Brain Sci. 2024, 14(11), 1095; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci14111095 - 30 Oct 2024
Cited by 18 | Viewed by 14910
Abstract
Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques are designed to precisely and selectively target specific brain regions, thus enabling focused modulation of neural activity. Among NIBS technologies, low-intensity transcranial focused ultrasound (tFUS) has emerged as a promising new modality. The application of tFUS can safely [...] Read more.
Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques are designed to precisely and selectively target specific brain regions, thus enabling focused modulation of neural activity. Among NIBS technologies, low-intensity transcranial focused ultrasound (tFUS) has emerged as a promising new modality. The application of tFUS can safely and non-invasively stimulate deep brain structures with millimetric precision, offering distinct advantages in terms of accessibility to non-cortical regions over other NIBS methods. However, to date, several tFUS aspects still need to be characterized; furthermore, there are only a handful of studies that have utilized tFUS in psychiatric populations. This narrative review provides an up-to-date overview of key aspects of this NIBS technique, including the main components of a tFUS system, the neuronavigational tools used to precisely target deep brain regions, the simulations utilized to optimize the stimulation parameters and delivery of tFUS, and the experimental protocols employed to evaluate the efficacy of tFUS in psychiatric disorders. The main findings from studies in psychiatric populations are presented and discussed, and future directions are highlighted. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 18962 KB  
Article
Neuromodulatory Responses Elicited by Intermittent versus Continuous Transcranial Focused Ultrasound Stimulation of the Motor Cortex in Rats
by Tsung-Hsun Hsieh, Po-Chun Chu, Thi Xuan Dieu Nguyen, Chi-Wei Kuo, Pi-Kai Chang, Kai-Hsiang Stanley Chen and Hao-Li Liu
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(11), 5687; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25115687 - 23 May 2024
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 4287
Abstract
Transcranial focused ultrasound stimulation (tFUS) has emerged as a promising neuromodulation technique that delivers acoustic energy with high spatial resolution for inducing long-term potentiation (LTP)- or depression (LTD)-like plasticity. The variability in the primary effects of tFUS-induced plasticity could be due to different [...] Read more.
Transcranial focused ultrasound stimulation (tFUS) has emerged as a promising neuromodulation technique that delivers acoustic energy with high spatial resolution for inducing long-term potentiation (LTP)- or depression (LTD)-like plasticity. The variability in the primary effects of tFUS-induced plasticity could be due to different stimulation patterns, such as intermittent versus continuous, and is an aspect that requires further detailed exploration. In this study, we developed a platform to evaluate the neuromodulatory effects of intermittent and continuous tFUS on motor cortical plasticity before and after tFUS application. Three groups of rats were exposed to either intermittent, continuous, or sham tFUS. We analyzed the neuromodulatory effects on motor cortical excitability by examining changes in motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). We also investigated the effects of different stimulation patterns on excitatory and inhibitory neural biomarkers, examining c-Fos and glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD-65) expression using immunohistochemistry staining. Additionally, we evaluated the safety of tFUS by analyzing glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) expression. The current results indicated that intermittent tFUS produced a facilitation effect on motor excitability, while continuous tFUS significantly inhibited motor excitability. Furthermore, neither tFUS approach caused injury to the stimulation sites in rats. Immunohistochemistry staining revealed increased c-Fos and decreased GAD-65 expression following intermittent tFUS. Conversely, continuous tFUS downregulated c-Fos and upregulated GAD-65 expression. In conclusion, our findings demonstrate that both intermittent and continuous tFUS effectively modulate cortical excitability. The neuromodulatory effects may result from the activation or deactivation of cortical neurons following tFUS intervention. These effects are considered safe and well-tolerated, highlighting the potential for using different patterns of tFUS in future clinical neuromodulatory applications. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Biochemistry)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 1055 KB  
Review
Clinical Potential of Transcranial Focused Ultrasound for Neurorehabilitation in Pediatric Cancer Survivors
by Paul VanGilder, Justin Tanner, Kevin R. Krull and Ranganatha Sitaram
Brain Sci. 2024, 14(3), 218; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci14030218 - 27 Feb 2024
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 6158
Abstract
Cancer survivors are at a high risk for treatment-related late effects, particularly neurocognitive impairment in the attention and executive function domains. These can be compounded in pediatric populations still undergoing neural development, which has increased interest in survivorship studies and neurorehabilitation approaches to [...] Read more.
Cancer survivors are at a high risk for treatment-related late effects, particularly neurocognitive impairment in the attention and executive function domains. These can be compounded in pediatric populations still undergoing neural development, which has increased interest in survivorship studies and neurorehabilitation approaches to mitigate these effects. Cognitive training regimens have shown promise as a therapeutic intervention for improving cognitive function. Therapist-guided and computerized training programs with adaptive paradigms have been successfully implemented in pediatric populations, with positive outcomes on attention and working memory. Another interventional approach is neuromodulation to alter plasticity. Transcranial electrical stimulation can modulate cortical surface activity, and cranial nerve stimulation alters autonomic activity in afferent brainstem pathways. However, they are more systemic in nature and have diffuse spatial targeting. Transcranial focused ultrasound (tFUS) modulation overcomes these limitations with high spatial specificity and the ability to target deeper brain regions. In this review, we discuss the efficacy of tFUS for modulating specific brain regions and its potential utility to augment cognitive training programs as a complementary intervention. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Restorative Neurotherapeutic Technologies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop