Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (18)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = transcription–replication collision

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
13 pages, 1794 KB  
Article
Ribosome-Associated Quality Control Mediated by Rqc2 Contributes to the Lytic Cycle and Stage Conversion of Toxoplasma gondii
by Yuxue Li, Keqin Huang, Honglin Jia, Xu Gao and Huanping Guo
Microorganisms 2025, 13(9), 2041; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13092041 - 31 Aug 2025
Viewed by 757
Abstract
The conversion from fast-growing tachyzoites to slow-growing bradyzoites is the key factor in establishing the chronic infection and long-term persistence of Toxoplasma gondii. Environmental stressors, such as amino acid starvation and alkaline medium, can trigger the transformation of tachyzoites into bradyzoites. Under [...] Read more.
The conversion from fast-growing tachyzoites to slow-growing bradyzoites is the key factor in establishing the chronic infection and long-term persistence of Toxoplasma gondii. Environmental stressors, such as amino acid starvation and alkaline medium, can trigger the transformation of tachyzoites into bradyzoites. Under such stress conditions, ribosomes slow down, potentially leading to stalling, and ribosomal collisions typically activate ribosome-associated quality control (RQC) pathways. In this study, we investigated the role of T. gondii ribosome quality control complex subunit 2 (TgRqc2), which contains both NFACT and coiled-coil domains, in the parasite’s survival and stage conversion. NFACT represents the “domain” found in the central players involved in RQC, human NEMF and its orthologs FbpA (known as RqcH), Caliban, and Tae2 (known as Rqc2). Phylogenetic analyses revealed that TgRqc2 formed a distinct clade with its orthologs in apicomplexan parasites. The deletion of TgRqc2 impaired T. gondii’s invasion and replication. The Rqc2-knockout strain showed defects in plaque formation and bradyzoite development. Our findings demonstrate that TgRqc2 is essential for T. gondii’s lytic cycle and the conversion of tachyzoites into bradyzoites. RNA-seq analysis further showed that the depletion of TgRqc2 significantly disrupted global transcriptional activity. However, the detailed molecular mechanisms involved remain to be elucidated. In conclusion, our results proved valuable insights that may aid in the development of therapeutic strategies to prevent chronic infection. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Microbiology and Immunology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

34 pages, 1773 KB  
Review
Participants in Transcription–Replication Conflict and Their Role in Formation and Resolution of R-Loops
by Anastasiia T. Davletgildeeva and Nikita A. Kuznetsov
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(14), 6951; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26146951 - 19 Jul 2025
Viewed by 2226
Abstract
The DNA of all living organisms is a common matrix for both replication and transcription processes. This sometimes leads to inevitable collisions between DNA replication and transcription machinery. There is plethora of evidence demonstrating that such collisions (or TRCs) are one of the [...] Read more.
The DNA of all living organisms is a common matrix for both replication and transcription processes. This sometimes leads to inevitable collisions between DNA replication and transcription machinery. There is plethora of evidence demonstrating that such collisions (or TRCs) are one of the most common and significant reasons for genomic instability. One of the key outcomes of TRCs is the accumulation of non-canonical DNA secondary structures, including R-loops. R-loops are three-stranded DNA–RNA hybrids with a displaced third single-stranded DNA fragment. Although R-loops are thought to play several functional roles in biological processes, an imbalance in their metabolism has been proven to have severe consequences. In this review, we attempt to summarize the current knowledge of the participants in the process of R-loop regulation in cells, with an emphasis on eukaryotic systems. We also touch upon the conditions favoring TRCs and the possible ways of dealing with these conflicts. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 19868 KB  
Article
Kinetic Features of Degradation of R-Loops by RNase H1 from Escherichia coli
by Aleksandra A. Kuznetsova, Iurii A. Kosarev, Nadezhda A. Timofeyeva, Darya S. Novopashina and Nikita A. Kuznetsov
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(22), 12263; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252212263 - 15 Nov 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1628
Abstract
R-loops can act as replication fork barriers, creating transcription–replication collisions and inducing replication stress by arresting DNA synthesis, thereby possibly causing aberrant processing and the formation of DNA strand breaks. RNase H1 (RH1) is one of the enzymes that participates in R-loop degradation [...] Read more.
R-loops can act as replication fork barriers, creating transcription–replication collisions and inducing replication stress by arresting DNA synthesis, thereby possibly causing aberrant processing and the formation of DNA strand breaks. RNase H1 (RH1) is one of the enzymes that participates in R-loop degradation by cleaving the RNA strand within a hybrid RNA–DNA duplex. In this study, the kinetic features of the interaction of RH1 from Escherichia coli with R-loops of various structures were investigated. It was found that the values of the dissociation constants Kd were minimal for complexes of RH1 with model R-loops containing a 10–11-nt RNA–DNA hybrid part, indicating effective binding. Analysis of the kinetics of RNA degradation in the R-loops by RH1 revealed that the rate-limiting step of the process was catalytic-complex formation. In the presence of RNA polymerase, the R-loops containing a ≤16-nt RNA–DNA hybrid part were efficiently protected from cleavage by RH1. In contrast, R-loops containing longer RNA–DNA hybrid parts, as a model of an abnormal transcription process, were not protected by RNA polymerase and were effectively digested by RH1. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Role of RNA Decay in Bacterial Gene Regulation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 1023 KB  
Perspective
Regulation of R-Loops in DNA Tumor Viruses
by Anaiya Crowner, Keely Smith and Marsha DeSmet
Pathogens 2024, 13(10), 863; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13100863 - 2 Oct 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2697
Abstract
R-loops are triple-stranded nucleic acid structures that occur when newly synthesized single-stranded RNA anneals to duplex DNA upon the collision of replication forks with transcription complexes. These RNA–DNA hybrids facilitate several transcriptional processes in the cell and have been described extensively in the [...] Read more.
R-loops are triple-stranded nucleic acid structures that occur when newly synthesized single-stranded RNA anneals to duplex DNA upon the collision of replication forks with transcription complexes. These RNA–DNA hybrids facilitate several transcriptional processes in the cell and have been described extensively in the literature. Recently, evidence has emerged that R-loops are key regulators of DNA tumor virus transcription and the replication of their lifecycle. Studies have demonstrated that R-loops on the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) genome must be resolved to maintain genome maintenance and avoid viral integration, a hallmark of HPV cancers. For Epstein–Barr virus (EBV), R-loops are formed at the oriLyt to establish lytic replication. Structural maintenance of chromosome proteins 5/6 (SMC5/6) bind to these viral R-loops to repress EBV lytic replication. Most viruses in the herpesvirales order, such as KSHV, contain R-loop-forming sequences. In this perspective, we will describe the current, although limited, literature demonstrating the importance of RNA–DNA hybrids to regulate DNA virus transcription. We will also detail potential new areas of R-loop research and how these viruses can be used as tools to study the growing field of R-loops. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Biology of Papillomaviruses)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 7748 KB  
Article
SIRT1 Prevents R-Loops during Chronological Aging by Modulating DNA Replication at rDNA Loci
by Bhushan L. Thakur, Nana A. Kusi, Sara Mosavarpour, Roger Zhu, Christophe E. Redon, Haiqing Fu, Anjali Dhall, Lorinc S. Pongor, Robin Sebastian, Fred E. Indig and Mirit I. Aladjem
Cells 2023, 12(22), 2630; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12222630 - 15 Nov 2023
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 3271
Abstract
In metazoans, the largest sirtuin, SIRT1, is a nuclear protein implicated in epigenetic modifications, circadian signaling, DNA recombination, replication, and repair. Our previous studies have demonstrated that SIRT1 binds replication origins and inhibits replication initiation from a group of potential initiation sites (dormant [...] Read more.
In metazoans, the largest sirtuin, SIRT1, is a nuclear protein implicated in epigenetic modifications, circadian signaling, DNA recombination, replication, and repair. Our previous studies have demonstrated that SIRT1 binds replication origins and inhibits replication initiation from a group of potential initiation sites (dormant origins). We studied the effects of aging and SIRT1 activity on replication origin usage and the incidence of transcription–replication collisions (creating R-loop structures) in adult human cells obtained at different time points during chronological aging and in cancer cells. In primary, untransformed cells, SIRT1 activity declined and the prevalence of R-loops rose with chronological aging. Both the reduction in SIRT1 activity and the increased abundance of R-loops were also observed during the passage of primary cells in culture. All cells, regardless of donor age or transformation status, reacted to the short-term, acute chemical inhibition of SIRT1 with the activation of excessive replication initiation events coincident with an increased prevalence of R-loops. However, cancer cells activated dormant replication origins, genome-wide, during long-term proliferation with mutated or depleted SIRT1, whereas, in primary cells, the aging-associated SIRT1-mediated activation of dormant origins was restricted to rDNA loci. These observations suggest that chronological aging and the associated decline in SIRT1 activity relax the regulatory networks that protect cells against excess replication and that the mechanisms protecting from replication–transcription collisions at the rDNA loci manifest as differentially enhanced sensitivities to SIRT1 decline and chronological aging. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 1523 KB  
Review
Pathophysiological Role and Diagnostic Potential of R-Loops in Cancer and Beyond
by Essak S. Khan and Sven Danckwardt
Genes 2022, 13(12), 2181; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13122181 - 22 Nov 2022
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 5365
Abstract
R-loops are DNA–RNA hybrids that play multifunctional roles in gene regulation, including replication, transcription, transcription–replication collision, epigenetics, and preserving the integrity of the genome. The aberrant formation and accumulation of unscheduled R-loops can disrupt gene expression and damage DNA, thereby causing genome instability. [...] Read more.
R-loops are DNA–RNA hybrids that play multifunctional roles in gene regulation, including replication, transcription, transcription–replication collision, epigenetics, and preserving the integrity of the genome. The aberrant formation and accumulation of unscheduled R-loops can disrupt gene expression and damage DNA, thereby causing genome instability. Recent links between unscheduled R-loop accumulation and the abundance of proteins that modulate R-loop biogenesis have been associated with numerous human diseases, including various cancers. Although R-loops are not necessarily causative for all disease entities described to date, they can perpetuate and even exacerbate the initially disease-eliciting pathophysiology, making them structures of interest for molecular diagnostics. In this review, we discuss the (patho) physiological role of R-loops in health and disease, their surprising diagnostic potential, and state-of-the-art techniques for their detection. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Reciprocal Links between RNA Metabolism and DNA Damage)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 1150 KB  
Review
Targeting Replication Stress Response Pathways to Enhance Genotoxic Chemo- and Radiotherapy
by Jac A. Nickoloff
Molecules 2022, 27(15), 4736; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27154736 - 25 Jul 2022
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 5571
Abstract
Proliferating cells regularly experience replication stress caused by spontaneous DNA damage that results from endogenous reactive oxygen species (ROS), DNA sequences that can assume secondary and tertiary structures, and collisions between opposing transcription and replication machineries. Cancer cells face additional replication stress, including [...] Read more.
Proliferating cells regularly experience replication stress caused by spontaneous DNA damage that results from endogenous reactive oxygen species (ROS), DNA sequences that can assume secondary and tertiary structures, and collisions between opposing transcription and replication machineries. Cancer cells face additional replication stress, including oncogenic stress that results from the dysregulation of fork progression and origin firing, and from DNA damage induced by radiotherapy and most cancer chemotherapeutic agents. Cells respond to such stress by activating a complex network of sensor, signaling and effector pathways that protect genome integrity. These responses include slowing or stopping active replication forks, protecting stalled replication forks from collapse, preventing late origin replication firing, stimulating DNA repair pathways that promote the repair and restart of stalled or collapsed replication forks, and activating dormant origins to rescue adjacent stressed forks. Currently, most cancer patients are treated with genotoxic chemotherapeutics and/or ionizing radiation, and cancer cells can gain resistance to the resulting replication stress by activating pro-survival replication stress pathways. Thus, there has been substantial effort to develop small molecule inhibitors of key replication stress proteins to enhance tumor cell killing by these agents. Replication stress targets include ATR, the master kinase that regulates both normal replication and replication stress responses; the downstream signaling kinase Chk1; nucleases that process stressed replication forks (MUS81, EEPD1, Metnase); the homologous recombination catalyst RAD51; and other factors including ATM, DNA-PKcs, and PARP1. This review provides an overview of replication stress response pathways and discusses recent pre-clinical studies and clinical trials aimed at improving cancer therapy by targeting replication stress response factors. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research and Development of DNA Repair Inhibitors)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

15 pages, 1463 KB  
Review
R-Loop-Associated Genomic Instability and Implication of WRN and WRNIP1
by Veronica Marabitti, Pasquale Valenzisi, Giorgia Lillo, Eva Malacaria, Valentina Palermo, Pietro Pichierri and Annapaola Franchitto
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(3), 1547; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23031547 - 28 Jan 2022
Cited by 20 | Viewed by 6901
Abstract
Maintenance of genome stability is crucial for cell survival and relies on accurate DNA replication. However, replication fork progression is under constant attack from different exogenous and endogenous factors that can give rise to replication stress, a source of genomic instability and a [...] Read more.
Maintenance of genome stability is crucial for cell survival and relies on accurate DNA replication. However, replication fork progression is under constant attack from different exogenous and endogenous factors that can give rise to replication stress, a source of genomic instability and a notable hallmark of pre-cancerous and cancerous cells. Notably, one of the major natural threats for DNA replication is transcription. Encounters or conflicts between replication and transcription are unavoidable, as they compete for the same DNA template, so that collisions occur quite frequently. The main harmful transcription-associated structures are R-loops. These are DNA structures consisting of a DNA–RNA hybrid and a displaced single-stranded DNA, which play important physiological roles. However, if their homeostasis is altered, they become a potent source of replication stress and genome instability giving rise to several human diseases, including cancer. To combat the deleterious consequences of pathological R-loop persistence, cells have evolved multiple mechanisms, and an ever growing number of replication fork protection factors have been implicated in preventing/removing these harmful structures; however, many others are perhaps still unknown. In this review, we report the current knowledge on how aberrant R-loops affect genome integrity and how they are handled, and we discuss our recent findings on the role played by two fork protection factors, the Werner syndrome protein (WRN) and the Werner helicase-interacting protein 1 (WRNIP1) in response to R-loop-induced genome instability. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1119 KB  
Review
Transcription–Replication Coordination
by Marco Saponaro
Life 2022, 12(1), 108; https://doi.org/10.3390/life12010108 - 13 Jan 2022
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 5030
Abstract
Transcription and replication are the two most essential processes that a cell does with its DNA: they allow cells to express the genomic content that is required for their functions and to create a perfect copy of this genomic information to pass on [...] Read more.
Transcription and replication are the two most essential processes that a cell does with its DNA: they allow cells to express the genomic content that is required for their functions and to create a perfect copy of this genomic information to pass on to the daughter cells. Nevertheless, these two processes are in a constant ambivalent relationship. When transcription and replication occupy the same regions, there is the possibility of conflicts between transcription and replication as transcription can impair DNA replication progression leading to increased DNA damage. Nevertheless, DNA replication origins are preferentially located in open chromatin next to actively transcribed regions, meaning that the possibility of conflicts is potentially an accepted incident for cells. Data in the literature point both towards the existence or not of coordination between these two processes to avoid the danger of collisions. Several reviews have been published on transcription–replication conflicts, but we focus here on the most recent findings that relate to how these two processes are coordinated in eukaryotes, considering advantages and disadvantages from coordination, how likely conflicts are at any given time, and which are their potential hotspots in the genome. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Transcription-Associated Genetic Instability)
Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 1185 KB  
Article
R-Loop Tracker: Web Access-Based Tool for R-Loop Detection and Analysis in Genomic DNA Sequences
by Václav Brázda, Jan Havlík, Jan Kolomazník, Oldřich Trenz and Jiří Šťastný
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(23), 12857; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222312857 - 27 Nov 2021
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 3987
Abstract
R-loops are common non-B nucleic acid structures formed by a three-stranded nucleic acid composed of an RNA–DNA hybrid and a displaced single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) loop. Because the aberrant R-loop formation leads to increased mutagenesis, hyper-recombination, rearrangements, and transcription-replication collisions, it is regarded as [...] Read more.
R-loops are common non-B nucleic acid structures formed by a three-stranded nucleic acid composed of an RNA–DNA hybrid and a displaced single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) loop. Because the aberrant R-loop formation leads to increased mutagenesis, hyper-recombination, rearrangements, and transcription-replication collisions, it is regarded as important in human diseases. Therefore, its prevalence and distribution in genomes are studied intensively. However, in silico tools for R-loop prediction are limited, and therefore, we have developed the R-loop tracker tool, which was implemented as a part of the DNA Analyser web server. This new tool is focused upon (1) prediction of R-loops in genomic DNA without length and sequence limitations; (2) integration of R-loop tracker results with other tools for nucleic acids analyses, including Genome Browser; (3) internal cross-evaluation of in silico results with experimental data, where available; (4) easy export and correlation analyses with other genome features and markers; and (5) enhanced visualization outputs. Our new R-loop tracker tool is freely accessible on the web pages of DNA Analyser tools, and its implementation on the web-based server allows effective analyses not only for DNA segments but also for full chromosomes and genomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bioinformatics of Unusual DNA and RNA Structures)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 601 KB  
Review
Transcription-Replication Collisions—A Series of Unfortunate Events
by Commodore St Germain, Hongchang Zhao and Jacqueline H. Barlow
Biomolecules 2021, 11(8), 1249; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11081249 - 21 Aug 2021
Cited by 17 | Viewed by 6283
Abstract
Transcription-replication interactions occur when DNA replication encounters genomic regions undergoing transcription. Both replication and transcription are essential for life and use the same DNA template making conflicts unavoidable. R-loops, DNA supercoiling, DNA secondary structure, and chromatin-binding proteins are all potential obstacles for processive [...] Read more.
Transcription-replication interactions occur when DNA replication encounters genomic regions undergoing transcription. Both replication and transcription are essential for life and use the same DNA template making conflicts unavoidable. R-loops, DNA supercoiling, DNA secondary structure, and chromatin-binding proteins are all potential obstacles for processive replication or transcription and pose an even more potent threat to genome integrity when these processes co-occur. It is critical to maintaining high fidelity and processivity of transcription and replication while navigating through a complex chromatin environment, highlighting the importance of defining cellular pathways regulating transcription-replication interaction formation, evasion, and resolution. Here we discuss how transcription influences replication fork stability, and the safeguards that have evolved to navigate transcription-replication interactions and maintain genome integrity in mammalian cells. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Genetics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 1427 KB  
Review
Consequences and Resolution of Transcription–Replication Conflicts
by Maxime Lalonde, Manuel Trauner, Marcel Werner and Stephan Hamperl
Life 2021, 11(7), 637; https://doi.org/10.3390/life11070637 - 30 Jun 2021
Cited by 23 | Viewed by 7154
Abstract
Transcription–replication conflicts occur when the two critical cellular machineries responsible for gene expression and genome duplication collide with each other on the same genomic location. Although both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells have evolved multiple mechanisms to coordinate these processes on individual chromosomes, it [...] Read more.
Transcription–replication conflicts occur when the two critical cellular machineries responsible for gene expression and genome duplication collide with each other on the same genomic location. Although both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells have evolved multiple mechanisms to coordinate these processes on individual chromosomes, it is now clear that conflicts can arise due to aberrant transcription regulation and premature proliferation, leading to DNA replication stress and genomic instability. As both are considered hallmarks of aging and human diseases such as cancer, understanding the cellular consequences of conflicts is of paramount importance. In this article, we summarize our current knowledge on where and when collisions occur and how these encounters affect the genome and chromatin landscape of cells. Finally, we conclude with the different cellular pathways and multiple mechanisms that cells have put in place at conflict sites to ensure the resolution of conflicts and accurate genome duplication. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Transcription-Associated Genetic Instability)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 746 KB  
Review
The rDNA Loci—Intersections of Replication, Transcription, and Repair Pathways
by Ivana Goffová and Jiří Fajkus
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22(3), 1302; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22031302 - 28 Jan 2021
Cited by 29 | Viewed by 6353
Abstract
Genes encoding ribosomal RNA (rDNA) are essential for cell survival and are particularly sensitive to factors leading to genomic instability. Their repetitive character makes them prone to inappropriate recombinational events arising from collision of transcriptional and replication machineries, resulting in unstable rDNA copy [...] Read more.
Genes encoding ribosomal RNA (rDNA) are essential for cell survival and are particularly sensitive to factors leading to genomic instability. Their repetitive character makes them prone to inappropriate recombinational events arising from collision of transcriptional and replication machineries, resulting in unstable rDNA copy numbers. In this review, we summarize current knowledge on the structure and organization of rDNA, its role in sensing changes in the genome, and its linkage to aging. We also review recent findings on the main factors involved in chromatin assembly and DNA repair in the maintenance of rDNA stability in the model plants Arabidopsis thaliana and the moss Physcomitrella patens, providing a view across the plant evolutionary tree. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Research in Ribosomal RNAs)
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 3288 KB  
Article
Impaired Replication Timing Promotes Tissue-Specific Expression of Common Fragile Sites
by Klizia Maccaroni, Elisa Balzano, Federica Mirimao, Simona Giunta and Franca Pelliccia
Genes 2020, 11(3), 326; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11030326 - 19 Mar 2020
Cited by 18 | Viewed by 4748
Abstract
Common fragile sites (CFSs) are particularly vulnerable regions of the genome that become visible as breaks, gaps, or constrictions on metaphase chromosomes when cells are under replicative stress. Impairment in DNA replication, late replication timing, enrichment of A/T nucleotides that tend to form [...] Read more.
Common fragile sites (CFSs) are particularly vulnerable regions of the genome that become visible as breaks, gaps, or constrictions on metaphase chromosomes when cells are under replicative stress. Impairment in DNA replication, late replication timing, enrichment of A/T nucleotides that tend to form secondary structures, the paucity of active or inducible replication origins, the generation of R-loops, and the collision between replication and transcription machineries on particularly long genes are some of the reported characteristics of CFSs that may contribute to their tissue-specific fragility. Here, we validated the induction of two CFSs previously found in the human fetal lung fibroblast line, Medical Research Council cell strain 5 (MRC-5), in another cell line derived from the same fetal tissue, Institute for Medical Research-90 cells (IMR-90). After induction of CFSs through aphidicolin, we confirmed the expression of the CFS 1p31.1 on chromosome 1 and CFS 3q13.3 on chromosome 3 in both fetal lines. Interestingly, these sites were found to not be fragile in lymphocytes, suggesting a role for epigenetic or transcriptional programs for this tissue specificity. Both these sites contained late-replicating genes NEGR1 (neuronal growth regulator 1) at 1p31.1 and LSAMP (limbic system-associated membrane protein) at 3q13.3, which are much longer, 0.880 and 1.4 Mb, respectively, than the average gene length. Given the established connection between long genes and CFS, we compiled information from the literature on all previously identified CFSs expressed in fibroblasts and lymphocytes in response to aphidicolin, including the size of the genes contained in each fragile region. Our comprehensive analysis confirmed that the genes found within CFSs are longer than the average human gene; interestingly, the two longest genes in the human genome are found within CFSs: Contactin Associated Protein 2 gene (CNTNAP2) in a lymphocytes’ CFS, and Duchenne muscular dystrophy gene (DMD) in a CFS expressed in both lymphocytes and fibroblasts. This indicates that the presence of very long genes is a unifying feature of all CFSs. We also obtained replication profiles of the 1p31.1 and 3q13.3 sites under both perturbed and unperturbed conditions using a combination of fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunofluorescence against bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) on interphase nuclei. Our analysis of the replication dynamics of these CFSs showed that, compared to lymphocytes where these regions are non-fragile, fibroblasts display incomplete replication of the fragile alleles, even in the absence of exogenous replication stress. Our data point to the existence of intrinsic features, in addition to the presence of long genes, which affect DNA replication of the CFSs in fibroblasts, thus promoting chromosomal instability in a tissue-specific manner. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Human Genomics and Genetic Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 2278 KB  
Review
Effects of Replication and Transcription on DNA Structure-Related Genetic Instability
by Guliang Wang and Karen M. Vasquez
Genes 2017, 8(1), 17; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes8010017 - 5 Jan 2017
Cited by 61 | Viewed by 13484
Abstract
Many repetitive sequences in the human genome can adopt conformations that differ from the canonical B-DNA double helix (i.e., non-B DNA), and can impact important biological processes such as DNA replication, transcription, recombination, telomere maintenance, viral integration, transposome activation, DNA damage and repair. [...] Read more.
Many repetitive sequences in the human genome can adopt conformations that differ from the canonical B-DNA double helix (i.e., non-B DNA), and can impact important biological processes such as DNA replication, transcription, recombination, telomere maintenance, viral integration, transposome activation, DNA damage and repair. Thus, non-B DNA-forming sequences have been implicated in genetic instability and disease development. In this article, we discuss the interactions of non-B DNA with the replication and/or transcription machinery, particularly in disease states (e.g., tumors) that can lead to an abnormal cellular environment, and how such interactions may alter DNA replication and transcription, leading to potential conflicts at non-B DNA regions, and eventually result in genetic stability and human disease. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Replication and Transcription Associated DNA Repair)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop