Search Results (49)

Vestibular migraine (VM) commonly causes recurrent vertigo, but diagnosing and managing it can be difficult due to symptom overlap with other vestibular and headache disorders. This review provides a comprehensive update on VM, beginning with the diagnostic criteria established by the International Headache Society and the Bárány Society, who have increased awareness of this condition. While the pathophysiology is not yet completely understood, there is evidence of a complex interaction between the nociceptive and vestibular systems. Treatment approaches are primarily empirical and lack robust, high-quality evidence. Often, antihistamines and benzodiazepines are used for quick symptom relief, while the efficacy of triptans is still uncertain. Preventive measures include lifestyle changes, vestibular rehabilitation, oral migraine prophylactics, Botulinum toxin type A, and, more recently, CGRP-targeted therapies. Due to diagnostic uncertainties and the absence of standardised treatment protocols, further research—particularly randomised controlled trials—is crucial for establishing evidence-based guidelines. Full article

Headache disorders are among the most prevalent and disabling neurological conditions worldwide, affecting more than three billion individuals and contributing to a substantial socioeconomic burden. Despite the availability of pharmacologic treatments such as triptans, NSAIDs, and CGRP monoclonal antibodies, a significant proportion of patients remain refractory or intolerant to these therapies. The sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG), a parasympathetic neural structure in the pterygopalatine fossa, is increasingly recognized as a critical node in the pathophysiology of primary headache disorders. SPG blocks—using local anesthetics, neurolytic agents, or electrical neuromodulation—offer a minimally invasive therapeutic approach by disrupting nociceptive transmission and autonomic activation. This narrative review synthesizes the anatomical and physiological rationale for SPG intervention, details various procedural techniques, evaluates clinical evidence across headache subtypes, and explores future research directions. Conditions covered include migraine, cluster headache, tension-type headache, trigeminal neuralgia, and persistent idiopathic facial pain. With expanding evidence and evolving technologies, SPG-targeted interventions have the potential to reshape the management of refractory headaches and facial pain syndromes. Full article

Background/Objectives: Lasmiditan is a newly developed drug for the acute treatment of migraine attacks, but factors associated with its efficacy remain unclear. This study aimed to confirm the efficacy of lasmiditan started at 50 mg under various dosing conditions and identify factors associated with its efficacy. Methods: There are four reasons for prescribing lasmiditan: as an add-on to triptan, if triptan is ineffective, if triptan produces side effects, and when triptan is contraindicated. Lasmiditan was administered at a dose of 50 mg. The efficacy of lasmiditan was defined as the disappearance of headache or a 50% or greater reduction in headache intensity within two hours after dosing. This study included 108 patients with migraines who took lasmiditan. Results: The results for efficacy and the side effects of lasmiditan were as follows: effective without side effects (22), effective with mild side effects (32), ineffective (14), and severe side effects (40). The efficacy rate of lasmiditan 50 mg was 50.0% (54/108). The following factors were found to be associated with lasmiditan’s efficacy: sex, migraine classification, calcium channel blockers, and anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibody (CGRP-mAb) treatment. The overall incidence of side effects was 66.7%, and the dropout rate was 37.0%. Somnolence was more prevalent in the effective group, and other side effects were more prevalent in patients who dropped out due to the side effects of lasmiditan. Conclusions: Lasmiditan is likely to be effective in males with severe migraine classification and receiving CGRP-mAb treatment. If mild somnolence is a side effect, the drug can be continued and may be effective. Full article

Introduction: The International Classification of Orofacial Pain (ICOP) recognizes orofacial migraine (OFM) and neurovascular orofacial pain (NVOP) as migraine-related entities affecting the facial and oral regions. The diagnostic features of OFM and NVOP indicate that there are many similarities between the two. However, we recently demonstrated that NVOP and OFM are two distinct diagnostic entities, confirming the ICOP classification. It was the aim of the present study to examine whether OFM and NVOP differ in response to pharmacotherapy. Materials and Methods: The cohort was made up of 40 patients attending a tertiary orofacial pain clinic. When implementing ICOP criteria, an OFM diagnosis was made in 23 and an NVOP diagnosis in 17. Results: No statistically significant differences between NVOP versus OFM were observed in the global response to standard abortive therapy such as triptans, or NSAIDs. Similarly, no statistically significant differences were found following prophylactic therapy that included beta-blockers, anti-epileptic drugs, and tricyclic antidepressants. Up to 80% of patients responded favorably with ≥50% pain reduction. Conclusions: NVOP and OFM differ in diagnostic characteristics, demonstrating unique features, and were confirmed as two diagnostic entities. However, NVOP and OFM did not differ in their response to abortive or prophylactic treatments. Study limitations include the lack of starting data precluding a more precise pharmacological analysis. The small sample size limits any far reaching conclusions. This is particularly true regarding individual drug efficacy. We were unable to analyze drug and dose responses separately due to data constraints. Full article

Background/Objectives: Migraine is a common neurological disorder with highly variable characteristics. While genome-wide association studies have identified genetic risk factors that implicate underlying pathways, the influence of genetic susceptibility on disease characteristics or treatment response is incompletely understood. We examined the relationships between a previously developed standardized integrative migraine polygenic genetic risk score (PRS) and migraine characteristics in a real-world, treated patient cohort. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used covariate-adjusted regression to comprehensively evaluate associations between the PRS and clinical characteristics in 1653 treated migraine cases with European ancestry at baseline and, in 800 cases, after one year. Cases were deeply phenotyped by neurologists during extensive interviews, using structured clinical documentation tools to record ~200 discrete data elements. Results: In treated patients, higher standardized PRS showed associations with two common migraine symptoms: photophobia (odds ratio [confidence interval]: 1.33 [1.13–1.56], p = 0.001) and stabbing pain (1.21 [1.08–1.36], p = 0.001]; both retained significance at Q = 0.05. Associations with phonophobia, nausea, emesis, and unilateral headache had similar effect sizes but did not survive correction for multiple tests. In this population, the PRS was not associated with other symptoms of migraine attacks, objective measures of migraine disability, frequency, severity, average duration, time-to-peak intensity of migraine attacks, chronification, emergency department visits, triptan responsiveness, or changes at follow-up. Conclusions: In treated patients, genetic risk was associated with common migraine symptoms but not with the severity of migraine characteristics or treatment outcomes. This suggests that in treated patients, other genetic and non-genetic factors influence migraine symptom severity and disease course more strongly than genetic susceptibility. Full article

Objectives: The present open-label multicenter pilot study sought to prospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of rimegepant in treating migraine attacks. Methods: The primary endpoint was pain freedom at two hours post-dose, while the co-primary efficacy endpoints included a reduction in the headache intensity and freedom from the most bothersome symptoms (MBS) associated with migraine at the same time point. To test the potential efficacy of rimegepant, patients were asked to record in a questionnaire all the relevant changes with each migraine attack treated with rimegepant at two hours post-dose vs. two hours before. The attending neurologists provided information on the basic demographics, medical anamnesis, and migraine history as well as the triptan use history. Results: A total of 54 patients (32 with episodic and 22 with chronic migraine) received rimegepant 75 mg at least once during a single migraine attack (overall, 140 dosage intakes). Pain freedom at 2 h was achieved in 45/140 (32.1%) intakes. Regarding the efficacy of the first rimegepant dose (n = 54), significant reductions in the headache intensity were observed between the pre- and 2 h post-treatment average VAS scores (−4.8 ± 2.8 mean; p < 0.001). Likewise, the same mean reductions in the average VAS scores occurred when the 2 h response to all 140 doses was analyzed (−5 ± 2.8; p < 0.001). Freedom from MBS at 2 h post-dose was achieved for photophobia in 43%, for phonophobia in 53%, and for nausea in 57%. The ability to fully return to everyday activities at 2 h post-dose was achieved in 83/140 instances (59%). We only recorded mild adverse events in 24/140 dosages. Conclusions: Our preliminary results demonstrate that rimegepant is effective, safe, and well tolerated in treating acute migraine attacks. Full article

Migraine has a high prevalence worldwide and is one of the main disabling neurological diseases in individuals under the age of 50. In general, treatment includes the use of oral analgesics or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for mild attacks, and, for moderate or severe attacks, triptans or 5-HT_1B/1D receptor agonists. However, the administration of antimigraine drugs in conventional oral pharmaceutical dosage forms is a challenge, since many molecules have difficulty crossing the blood-brain barrier (BBB) to reach the brain, which leads to bioavailability problems. Efforts have been made to find alternative delivery systems and/or routes for antimigraine drugs. In vivo studies have shown that it is possible to administer drugs directly into the brain via the intranasal (IN) or the nose-to-brain route, thus avoiding the need for the molecules to cross the BBB. In this field, the use of lipid nanoparticles, in particular solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) and nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC), has shown promising results, since they have several advantages for drugs administered via the IN route, including increased absorption and reduced enzymatic degradation, improving bioavailability. Furthermore, SLN and NLC are capable of co-encapsulating drugs, promoting their simultaneous delivery to the site of therapeutic action, which can be a promising approach for the acute migraine treatment. This review highlights the potential of using SLN and NLC to improve the treatment of acute migraine via the nose-to-brain route. First sections describe the pathophysiology and the currently available pharmacological treatment for acute migraine, followed by an outline of the mechanisms underlying the nose-to-brain route. Afterwards, the main features of SLN and NLC and the most recent in vivo studies investigating the use of these nanoparticles for the treatment of acute migraine are presented. Full article

Long-term frequent use of acute pain medication for the treatment of headaches has paradoxically been shown to increase the frequency of headaches. So-called medication-overuse headache (MOH) is particularly problematic in patients with migraine who overuse triptans and opioids. Prevention through education remains the most important management strategy. Once established, MOH can be difficult to treat. Although complete or near-complete withdrawal of acute pain medication for 8–12 weeks has been shown to benefit most patients, this can be hard to achieve. The use of OnabotulinumtoxinA and drugs that target the calcitonin gene-related peptide system for the prevention of migraines have been shown to benefit patients with MOH. Furthermore, the use of novel acute pain medication for migraines, including Gepants and Ditans, which do not cause MOH, are likely to improve patient outcomes. In this review article we examine the following: the burden of MOH; who develops MOH; the pathophysiological mechanisms; and the treatment strategies. Full article

This study aimed at the biotransformation of sumatriptan by Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus subtilis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica and the identification of the drug metabolites by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry. The drug was incubated with the organisms in tryptic soya broth at 37 °C. The broth was filtered and subjected to liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry. The metabolites identified by the use of mass spectral (+ve ion mode) fragmentation patterns were (3-methylphenyl)methanethiol (Bacillus subtilis), 1-(4-amino-3-ethylphenyl)-N-methylmethanesulfonamide (Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica) and 1-{4-amino-3-[(1E)-3-(dimethylamino)prop-1-en-1-yl]phenyl}methanesulfinamide (Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica, Bacillus subtilis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus). These metabolites exhibit high gastrointestinal absorption, no blood–brain barrier permeability (except (3-methylphenyl)methanethiol), a bioavailability score of 0.55 and no inhibitory effect on CYP2C19, CYP2C9, CYP2D6, CYP3A4 or cytochrome P450 1A2 (except (3-methylphenyl)methanethiol), as determined by SwissADME software ver. 2024. The metabolites appear to be more toxic than the parent drug, as suggested by their calculated median lethal dose values. All four organisms under investigation transformed sumatriptan to different chemical substances that were more toxic than the parent drug. Full article

This retrospective study assesses the efficacy and tolerability of anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (anti-CGRP) therapy in adolescents and young adults (ages 12–21) with migraine and chronic daily headaches unresponsive to standard treatments. Migraines in this demographic significantly impair school performance, self-esteem, psychological well-being, and cognitive health. These young patients are also particularly sensitive to the side effects of conventional medications, which are often prescribed off-label and come with high insurance denial rates. Medication overuse, including analgesics, triptans, and NSAIDs, is prevalent due to treatment failures. Elevated plasma CGRP levels observed during migraines suggest that anti-CGRP therapies, successful in adult populations, may also benefit this younger age group. Over a three-year period, patients at a specialized pediatric headache center were evaluated for the impact of anti-CGRP treatments, including monoclonal antibodies (erenumab, fremanezumab, and galcanezumab) and small-molecule CGRP receptor antagonists (ubrogepant, rimegepant, and atogepant), administered either alone or in combination with OnabotulinumtoxinA. Data were extracted from the hospital’s electronic medical records, and patient progress was consistently documented using a structured template for each clinic visit. Additional patient satisfaction data were collected via telephone follow-ups and patient message reviews. The study included 23 patients, primarily treated for chronic migraine (CM) (78.3%), with a smaller subset addressing episodic migraine (EM), new daily persistent headaches (NDPHs), and post-traumatic headaches (PTHs). Comprehensive demographic and clinical data, including age, treatment duration, history of preventive treatment failures, and comorbidities like psychiatric conditions and sleep disorders, were collected. Anti-CGRP therapies, particularly when combined with traditional treatments or OnabotulinumtoxinA, resulted in significant improvements: 91.3% of patients experienced reduced migraine duration and intensity, 82.6% reported improvements in other bothersome symptoms, and 73.9% saw an improved response to rescue medications. Additionally, 78.3% of patients reported a reduction in their use of rescue medications per week by more than 50%, and emergency room visits were reduced for 56.5% of patients. Significant reductions in headache days were observed in 82.6% of patients after one month and 87% after three months, with nearly 40% experiencing more than a 50% reduction in both periods. The greatest benefits were observed in patients treated for more than six months. Adverse effects were minimal, with 95.7% of patients reporting no side effects, and patient satisfaction was high, with 69.6% opting to continue treatment. Overall, this study highlights the substantial potential of anti-CGRP therapy in improving outcomes for adolescents and young adults with CM and EM, offering a promising approach for a demographic that faces considerable challenges with conventional treatment options. However, further research is needed to confirm these findings and expand clinical applications in this age group. Full article

To describe the need and effectiveness of acute and preventive medications in a series of 100 consecutive patients referred due to COVID-19-related headaches. Patients were aged 48.0 (standard deviation (SD): 12.4), 84% were female, and 56% had a prior history of headache. The most common headache phenotype was holocranial (63%), frontal (48%), pressing (75%), of moderate intensity (7 out of 10), and accompanied by photophobia (58%). Acute medication was required by 93%, with paracetamol (46%) being the most frequently used drug, followed by ibuprofen (44%). The drugs with the highest proportion of a 2 h pain-freedom response were dexketoprofen (58.8%), triptans (57.7%), and ibuprofen (54.3%). Preventive treatment was required by 75% of patients. The most frequently used drugs were amitriptyline (66%), anesthetic blockades (18%), and onabotulinumtoxinA (11%). The drugs with the highest 50% responder rate were amitriptyline (45.5%), mirtazapine (50%), and anesthetic blockades (38.9%). The highest 75% responder rate was experienced following onabotulinumtoxinA (18.2%). In conclusion, most patients required acute medication, with triptans and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs achieving the best responses. Three-quarters of patients required preventive medication. The most frequently used drug was amitriptyline, which obtained the best results. In some treatment-resistant patients, anesthetic blockades and onabotulinumtoxinA were also beneficial. Full article

The combined use of lasmiditan and triptan is unexplored in medical literature. This study aimed to investigate whether the intake of lasmiditan following triptan improves migraine pain. Following triptan intake, if headache relief was less than 50% at 1 h, patients took 50 mg of lasmiditan within 2 h of migraine onset. Patients recorded headache intensity and adverse events (AEs) caused by lasmiditan at 1, 2, and 4 h after the intake of an additional 50 mg of lasmiditan. A significant reduction in pain scale was observed post 50 mg lasmiditan intake (p < 0.001, t-test). Pain relief was reported for 32 migraine attacks (80%) at 1 h after additional lasmiditan intake. Although AEs were observed in 63% of the patients who took an additional lasmiditan, most were mild and resolved 1 h after lasmiditan intake. Our study revealed the significant headache relief provided by an additional lasmiditan for patients who did not achieve satisfactory results following initial triptan intake for treating migraine. The AEs associated with this treatment strategy were mild and lasted for a short time. This study suggested that the combination of triptan and lasmiditan is promising for the treatment of migraine and should be studied in a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Full article

Objective: The Greek Society of Migraine and Headache Patients conducted its third in-line population web-based survey in 2023 to ascertain if the burden of the disease and the patients’ satisfaction with conventional and novel migraine therapies are changing compared to our previous findings from 2018 and 2020. Methods: The sampling process was based on a random call to participants to reply to a specific migraine-focused self-administered questionnaire, including 83 questions in Greek, which was distributed nationwide through the online research software SurveyMonkey. Results: We eventually enrolled 2565 patients, the majority of which were females. Our findings clearly demonstrate that migraine is still a burdensome condition. The degree of its impact on all aspects of productivity depends on the monthly frequency of migraine and the response rates to acute and prophylactic treatments. A total of 1029 (42.4%) of the patients had visited the emergency room mainly for unresponsiveness to acute treatments or aura-related symptoms. Triptans seem to be partly effective as acute therapies. OnabotulinumtoxinA seems to be effective for almost half of chronic migraine patients (43.9%) to report adequate satisfaction with this treatment (27.8% were “fairly happy”, 10.6% were “very happy”, and 5.5% were “extremely happy”). Due to their high rates of preventative effectiveness, most respondents treated with anti-CGRP Mabs expressed their optimism concerning their future while living with their migraine (88.25%), as well as towards further improvements in their quality of life (82.8%) status, mostly with fremanezumab. Conclusions: The patients recognize the usefulness of anti-CGRP Mabs in migraine prevention and consequently seem to be more optimistic than before about living with migraine. Considering the market change that is anticipated with the use of gepants and ditans, larger longitudinal population-based studies are warranted to further explore if the new era of migraine therapeutics might further lessen the burden of the disease. Full article

Objective: To investigate whether the incidence of triggers, prodromal symptoms, hypersensitivity symptoms accompanying headache and responses to triptans were modified during a continuous 9-month fremanezumab therapy for migraine prophylaxis. Patients and methods: We studied 63 patients with high-frequency episodic migraine (HFEM). Enrolled patients received fremanezumab for nine consecutive months before defining the response rates and being stratified into treatment responders (≥50–74% reduction in monthly headache days (MHDs)), super responders (≥75%), partial non-responders (<50%) and super non-responders (<30%). Through headache diaries, patients provided data in order to document the impact of fremanezumab on the incidence of triggers, associated symptoms followed by headache and response to triptans (the use of the migraine treatment optimization questionnaire-4 (mTOQ-4)) during the 9-month treatment period. Results: Fremanezumab had early (after 3 monthly cycles) beneficial effects on the response to triptans in the majority of responders with relevant increases in mTOQ-4 scoring, but also in half of partial non-responders. A significant reduction in median days with migraine-associated symptoms was seen in responders after 6 months of therapy with fremanezumab, mostly for osmophobia, photophobia, phonophobia and nausea/vomiting, but partial non-responders also benefited. Likewise, the incidence of self-reported prodromal symptoms was significantly reduced in responders and was modestly diminished in partial non-responders. Triggers remained unaffected in both responders and non-responders. Conclusions: Fremanezumab given for at least 6–9 months may exert neuromodulatory effects in the migraine brain. These effects could result both in the inhibition of migraine chronification, but also in the diminishing of the magnitude of migraine-associated symptoms, mostly in responders and in partial non-responders. Full article

Objective: To investigate the prescription patterns for patients aged 6–17 years with headaches in the REZULT database. Methods: We cross-sectionally investigated (Study 1) the pattern of prescription and the proportion of triptan overprescription (≥30 tablets/90 d of triptans) among patients diagnosed with headaches in 2020. Next, we longitudinally studied patients (Study 2) for more than two years from the initial headache diagnosis (July 2010 to April 2022). The number of prescribed tablets was counted every 90 days. Results: In Study 1, headache diagnoses were assigned to 62,568 of 543,628 (11.51%) patients, and 1524 of 62,568 (2.44%) patients received acute medication. Single nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and triptans were prescribed to 620/624 (99.36%) and 5/624 (0.80%) of patients aged 6–11 years, respectively, and 827/900 (91.89%) and 91/900 (10.11%) of patients aged 12–17 years, respectively. Triptan overprescription was observed in 11/96 (11.46%) patients, and 5/11 (45.45%) of those patients received prophylactic medication. In Study 2, 80,756/845,470 (9.55%) patients aged 6–17 years were diagnosed with headaches that persisted for at least two years. Over two years, 44/80,756 (0.05%) patients were overprescribed triptans, and 3408/80,756 (4.22%) patients were prescribed prophylaxis on at least one occasion. Conclusions: Based on real-world data, the appropriate use of prophylactic treatment is still problematic. Overprescription of triptans was observed, although the number of patients was small. Full article