Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (22)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = very low sulfur fuel oil

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
28 pages, 2211 KB  
Article
Dynamic Total Cost of Ownership Assessment of Methanol Dual-Fuel Container Ships in the Ningbo–Zhoushan–Valencia Green Shipping Corridor
by Kun Bo, Linlin Cai and Dong Zhang
Sustainability 2026, 18(15), 7905; https://doi.org/10.3390/su18157905 - 4 Aug 2026
Viewed by 576
Abstract
Green methanol is widely regarded as a technically feasible low-carbon marine fuel for sustainable shipping in the medium term, but its economic viability remains constrained by fuel price and supply-scale uncertainty. This study develops a dynamic total cost of ownership (TCO) model for [...] Read more.
Green methanol is widely regarded as a technically feasible low-carbon marine fuel for sustainable shipping in the medium term, but its economic viability remains constrained by fuel price and supply-scale uncertainty. This study develops a dynamic total cost of ownership (TCO) model for a methanol dual-fuel container ship with a nominal capacity of 15,000 twenty-foot equivalent units (TEUs) operating on the Ningbo–Zhoushan–Valencia green shipping corridor. The model integrates capital expenditure, operating expenditure, fuel costs, European Union Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) carbon costs, FuelEU Maritime compliance costs, and green premium revenue. It evaluates a 15-year baseline, 25- and 30-year extensions, speed scenarios, probabilistic parameter uncertainty, and purchase-versus-charter thresholds. Under baseline assumptions (carbon price of 73.5 EUR/tCO2 and green methanol price of 1500 USD/t), the 15-year present-value cost of the green methanol case is 134.4% higher than that of the very low sulfur fuel oil (VLSFO) case. Annual costs may cross in 2045, 2040, and 2037 under baseline, optimistic, and accelerated decarbonization scenarios, respectively, but cumulative discounted cost advantage is not achieved within 30 years. Across 5000 Monte Carlo simulations, the probability of cumulative methanol cost advantage is 0% at 15, 25, and 30 years; methanol price and its decline rate remain the dominant uncertainty drivers. Slower speeds reduce the absolute cost gap but do not reverse the fuel ranking. These results show that carbon pricing or green premium revenue alone cannot close the corridor-level cost gap under the tested conditions. They also provide corridor-level evidence for methanol procurement, bunkering-capacity planning, and coordination among ship operators, ports, fuel suppliers, and cargo owners. Shipowners and port planners can update the framework as fuel prices, policy parameters, and bunkering conditions change. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 3033 KB  
Article
Operational Strategy Optimization of LNG Dual-Fuel Ships Considering Emission Regulations and Carbon Tax
by Qin Wang, Sinuo Liu and Wenzhen He
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2026, 14(7), 615; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse14070615 - 26 Mar 2026
Viewed by 1157
Abstract
The liner shipping industry is thriving in the low-carbon transition, and optimizing operational strategies for liquefied natural gas (LNG) dual-fuel ships has become a research hotspot. This research examines the impacts of the carbon tax, emission control area (ECA) policies, fuel price discounts [...] Read more.
The liner shipping industry is thriving in the low-carbon transition, and optimizing operational strategies for liquefied natural gas (LNG) dual-fuel ships has become a research hotspot. This research examines the impacts of the carbon tax, emission control area (ECA) policies, fuel price discounts and methane slip rate on fuel management strategies. Firstly, to reduce liner operating costs and adhere to ECA policies, this study develops a basic optimization model. Further, the model is extended to take into account the impact of fuel price discounts. Secondly, by linearizing multiple nonlinear terms, the operational strategies are obtained. Thirdly, taking a real vessel sailing between the Far East and Northwest Europe as a case study, this study identifies the ports for LNG and very low sulfur fuel oil (VLSFO) bunkering, determines the bunkering amounts and calculates the planned speeds. Furthermore, sensitivity analyses are conducted on fuel price difference, carbon tax rate and methane slip rate. Results show that fuel price difference, carbon tax rate, methane slip rate and fuel price discount exert a significant impact on ship operational decisions. To ensure the effectiveness of maritime decarbonization regulations, authorities should monitor ship engines with high methane slip rates. This study offers important references for shipping enterprises to meet ship emission policies and simultaneously cut operational costs. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

29 pages, 2883 KB  
Article
Heavy Fuel Oil Quality Dependence on Blend Composition, Hydrocracker Conversion, and Petroleum Basket
by Sotir Sotirov, Evdokia Sotirova, Rosen Dinkov, Dicho Stratiev, Ivelina Shiskova, Iliyan Kolev, Georgi Argirov, Georgi Georgiev, Vesselina Bureva, Krassimir Atanassov, Radoslava Nikolova, Anife Veli, Svetoslav Nenov, Denis Dichev Stratiev and Svetlin Vasilev
Fuels 2025, 6(2), 43; https://doi.org/10.3390/fuels6020043 - 4 Jun 2025
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 4916
Abstract
The production of very-low-sulfur residual fuel oil is a great challenge for modern petroleum refining because of the instability issues caused by blending incompatible relatively high-sulfur residual oils and ultra-low-sulfur light distillates. Another obstacle in the production of very-low-sulfur residual fuel oil using [...] Read more.
The production of very-low-sulfur residual fuel oil is a great challenge for modern petroleum refining because of the instability issues caused by blending incompatible relatively high-sulfur residual oils and ultra-low-sulfur light distillates. Another obstacle in the production of very-low-sulfur residual fuel oil using hydroprocessing technology is the contradiction of hydrodesulfurization with hydrodemetallization, as well as the hydrodeasphaltization functions of the catalytic system used. Therefore, the production of very-low-sulfur residual fuel oil by employing hydroprocessing could be achieved by finding an appropriate residual oil to be hydroprocessed and optimal operating conditions and by controlling catalyst system condition management. In the current study, data on the characteristics of 120 samples of heavy fuel oils produced regularly over a period of 10 years from a high-complexity refinery utilizing H–oil vacuum residue hydrocrackers in its processing scheme, the crude oils refined during their production, the recipes of the heavy fuel oils, and the level of H–oil vacuum residue conversion have been analyzed by using intercriteria and regression analyses. Artificial neural network models were developed to predict the characteristics of hydrocracked vacuum residues, the main component for the production of heavy fuel oil. It was found that stable very-low-sulfur residual fuel oil can be manufactured from crude oils whose sulfur content is no higher than 0.9 wt.% by using ebullated bed hydrocracking technology. The diluents used to reduce residue viscosity were highly aromatic FCC gas oils, and the hydrodemetallization rate was higher than 93%. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

28 pages, 7537 KB  
Article
Optimal Alternative Fuel Selection for Dual-Fuel Ships Under FuelEU Maritime Regulations: Environmental and Economic Assessment
by Cong Wang, Zhongxiu Peng, Jianming Yang, Niyu Zhang, Ke Li and Xuesong Li
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2025, 13(6), 1105; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13061105 - 30 May 2025
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 4518
Abstract
To address greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the maritime sector, the European Union (EU) has introduced the FuelEU Maritime regulation to incentivize ships to adopt diversified compliance pathways and energy solutions. This study aims to determine the optimal alternative fuel configurations for dual-fuel [...] Read more.
To address greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the maritime sector, the European Union (EU) has introduced the FuelEU Maritime regulation to incentivize ships to adopt diversified compliance pathways and energy solutions. This study aims to determine the optimal alternative fuel configurations for dual-fuel ships of different types under environmental, economic, and regulatory constraints. An integrated environmental and cost assessment model from a well-to-wake (WtW) perspective to systematically evaluate the environmental benefits and economic feasibility of fossil-based, bio-based, and renewable electricity-based alternative fuels applied in dual-fuel ships. By incorporating the PROMETHEE II method within a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) framework, together with the CRITIC objective weighting method, the study enables a robust ranking of alternative fuel configurations across three key dimensions: environmental performance, cost feasibility, and regulatory compliance. The results indicate that, regardless of ship type, the very low sulfur fuel oil (VLSFO) + marine gas oil (MGO) and VLSFO + methanol (MEOH) combinations fail to meet the GHG intensity targets for 2025–2050. Only the VLSFO + electrolytic liquid hydrogen (E-LH2) and VLSFO + electrolytic ammonia (E-NH3) configurations are compliant. Although e-fuels incur the highest annual costs, the EU compliance penalty associated with fossil fuels increases exponentially. In contrast, e-fuels retain long-term cost advantages, ultimately driving a sector-wide transition toward e-fuel-dominated energy structures by 2050. Their superior environmental performance and regulatory compatibility emerge as the core drivers of the maritime energy transition. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable and Efficient Maritime Operations)
Show Figures

Figure 1

35 pages, 1408 KB  
Article
Feasibility and Cost-Benefit Analysis of Methanol as a Sustainable Alternative Fuel for Ships
by Pei-Chi Wu and Cherng-Yuan Lin
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2025, 13(5), 973; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13050973 - 17 May 2025
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 10283
Abstract
The amendment to MARPOL Annex VI, which limits the sulfur content in marine fuels to a maximum of 0.5 wt.%, came into effect in January 2020. This includes reducing sulfur oxide (SOX) emissions and establishing nitrogen oxide (NOX) emission [...] Read more.
The amendment to MARPOL Annex VI, which limits the sulfur content in marine fuels to a maximum of 0.5 wt.%, came into effect in January 2020. This includes reducing sulfur oxide (SOX) emissions and establishing nitrogen oxide (NOX) emission standards (Tiers I, II, and III) based on the ship’s engine type and construction date. Furthermore, the regulations require oil tankers to control volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions and prohibit the installation of new equipment containing ozone-depleting substances. After a four-year exploration phase, global shipping companies still lack consistent evaluation criteria for the selection and use of alternative fuels, resulting in divergence across the industry. According to the latest data, methanol can reduce NOX, SOX, and particulate matter (PM) emissions by approximately 80%, 99%, and 95%, respectively, compared to traditional heavy fuel oil. Furthermore, green methanol has the potential for near-zero greenhouse gas emissions and can meet the stringent standards of Emission Control Areas. Therefore, this study adopts a cost-benefit analysis method to evaluate the feasibility and implementation benefits of two promising strategies: methanol dual fuel and very low-sulfur fuel oil (VLSFO). A 6600-TEU container ship was selected as a representative case, and the evaluation was conducted by replacing an older ship with a newly built one. The reductions in total pollutants and CO2-equivalent emissions of the container ship, as well as the cost-effectiveness of each specific strategy, were calculated. This study found that, in the first five years of operation, the total incremental cost of Vessel A, which uses 100% VLSFO, will be significantly lower than that of Vessel B, which uses a blend of 30% e-methanol + 70% VLSFO as fuel. Furthermore, compared to a scenario without any improvement strategies, the total incremental cost for Vessels A and B will increase by 69.90% and 178.15%, respectively, over five years. Vessel B effectively reduced the total greenhouse gas emission equivalent (CO2e) of CO2, CH4, and N2O by 24.72% over five years, while Vessel A reduced the CO2e amount by 12.18%. Furthermore, the cost-benefit ratio (CBR) based on total pollutant emission reduction is higher for Vessel A than for Vessel B within five years of operation. However, in terms of the cost-effectiveness of CO2e emission reduction, the CBR of Vessel A becomes lower than Vessel B after 4.7 years of operation. Therefore, Vessel A’s strategy should be considered a short-term option for reducing CO2e within 4.7 years, whereas the strategy of Vessel B is more suitable as a long-term solution for more than 4.7 years. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Marine Environmental Science)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 2683 KB  
Article
Transition to the New Green Maritime Era—Developing Hybrid Ecological Fuels Using Methanol and Biodiesel—An Experimental Procedure
by Dimitrios Parris, Konstantinos Spinthiropoulos, Konstantinos Panitsidis and Constantinos Tsanaktsidis
Eng 2024, 5(3), 1863-1884; https://doi.org/10.3390/eng5030100 - 14 Aug 2024
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2933
Abstract
The conventional utilization of fossil fuels precipitates uncontrolled carbon dioxide and sulfur oxides emissions, thereby engendering pronounced atmospheric pollution and global health ramifications. Within the maritime domain, concerted global initiatives aspire to mitigate emissions by 2050, centering on the adaptation of engines, alteration [...] Read more.
The conventional utilization of fossil fuels precipitates uncontrolled carbon dioxide and sulfur oxides emissions, thereby engendering pronounced atmospheric pollution and global health ramifications. Within the maritime domain, concerted global initiatives aspire to mitigate emissions by 2050, centering on the adaptation of engines, alteration of fuel compositions, and amelioration of exhaust gas treatment protocols. This investigation pioneers experimentation with marine gas oil augmented by methanol, a practice conventionally encumbered by prohibitively expensive additives. Successful amalgamation of methanol, animal-derived biodiesel, and marine gas oil (MGO) is empirically demonstrated under meticulously controlled thermal conditions, creating a homogeneous blend with virtually zero sulfur content and reduced carbon content, featuring characteristics akin to conventional marine gas oil but with no use of expensive emulsifiers. This new blend is suitable for employment in maritime engines utilizing Delaval technology, yet with significantly lower energy requirements compared to those necessitated using conventional very low sulfur fuel oil (VLSFO) with a maximum sulfur content of 0.5% w/w. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Green Engineering for Sustainable Development 2024)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 2103 KB  
Article
New Exploration of Emission Abatement Solution for Newbuilding Bulk Carriers
by Shunquan Huang and Yuyang Li
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2024, 12(6), 973; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12060973 - 10 Jun 2024
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2578
Abstract
With the implementation of the International Maritime Organization’s (IMO) sulfur cap 2020, shipowners have had to choose suitable sulfur oxide emission abatement solutions to respond to this policy. The use of Very Low Sulfur Fuel Oil (VLSFO) and the installation of scrubbers are [...] Read more.
With the implementation of the International Maritime Organization’s (IMO) sulfur cap 2020, shipowners have had to choose suitable sulfur oxide emission abatement solutions to respond to this policy. The use of Very Low Sulfur Fuel Oil (VLSFO) and the installation of scrubbers are the main response solutions for bulk carriers today. In recent years, the epidemic has gradually improved, and the options facing shipowners may change. Based on the Clarkson Shipping Intelligence Network, this paper collects data related to newbuilding bulk carriers after the implementation of this policy, considers several factors affecting shipowners’ decision, and adopts a machine learning approach for the first time to build a model and make predictions on emission abatement solutions to provide some reference for shipowners to choose a more suitable solution. The results of the study show that the Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model is more suitable for the problem studied in this paper, and the highest prediction accuracy of about 84.25% with an Area Under the Curve (AUC) value of 0.9019 is achieved using this model with hyperparameter adjustment based on a stratified sampling divided data set. The model makes good predictions for newbuilding bulk carriers. In addition, the deadweight tonnage and annual distance traveled of a ship have a greater degree of influence on the choice of its option, which can be given priority in the decision making. In contrast to traditional cost–benefit analyses, this study incorporates economic and non-economic factors and uses machine learning methods for effective classification, which have the advantage of being fast, comparable, and highly accurate. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 4696 KB  
Article
Technical–Economic Analysis for Ammonia Ocean Transportation Using an Ammonia-Fueled Carrier
by Youngkyun Seo, Jiyoung An, Eunyoung Park, Jintae Kim, Meangik Cho, Seongjong Han and Jinkwang Lee
Sustainability 2024, 16(2), 827; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020827 - 18 Jan 2024
Cited by 33 | Viewed by 12797
Abstract
This study performed a technical–economic analysis for ship-based ammonia transportation to investigate the feasibility of international ammonia transportation. Ammonia is considered to be a vital hydrogen carrier, so the international trade in ammonia by ship will considerably increase in the future. This study [...] Read more.
This study performed a technical–economic analysis for ship-based ammonia transportation to investigate the feasibility of international ammonia transportation. Ammonia is considered to be a vital hydrogen carrier, so the international trade in ammonia by ship will considerably increase in the future. This study proposed three scenarios for transporting ammonia from the USA, Saudi Arabia, and Australia to South Korea and employed an 84,000 m3 class ammonia carrier. Not only traditional very low sulfur fuel oil (VLSFO)/marine diesel oil (MDO) but also LNG and ammonia fuels were considered as propulsion and power generation fuels in the carrier. A life-cycle cost (LCC) model consisting of capital expenditure (CAPEX) and operational expenditure (OPEX) was employed for the cost estimation. The results showed that the transportation costs depend on the distance. The unit transportation cost from the USA to South Korea was approximately three times higher than that of Australia to South Korea. Ammonia fuel yielded the highest costs among the fuels investigated (VLSFO/MGO, LNG, and ammonia). When using ammonia fuel, the unit transportation cost was approximately twice that when using VLSFO/MDO. The fuel costs occupied the largest portion of the LCC. The unit transportation costs from Australia to South Korea were 23.6 USD/ton-NH3 for the LVSFO/MDO fuel case, 31.6 USD/ton-NH3 for the LNG fuel case, and 42.9 USD/ton-NH3 for the ammonia fuel case. This study also conducted a sensitivity analysis to investigate the influence of assumptions, including assumed parameters. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 364 KB  
Article
Generalized Net Model of Heavy Oil Products’ Manufacturing in Petroleum Refinery
by Danail Stratiev, Angel Dimitriev, Dicho Stratiev and Krassimir Atanassov
Mathematics 2023, 11(23), 4753; https://doi.org/10.3390/math11234753 - 24 Nov 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2017
Abstract
Generalized nets (GNs) are a suitable tool for the modeling of parallel processes. Through them, it is possible to describe the functioning and results of the performance of complex real processes running in time. In a series of articles, we consistently describe the [...] Read more.
Generalized nets (GNs) are a suitable tool for the modeling of parallel processes. Through them, it is possible to describe the functioning and results of the performance of complex real processes running in time. In a series of articles, we consistently describe the main processes involved in the production of petroleum products taking place in an oil refinery. The GN models can be used to track the actual processes in the oil refinery in order to monitor them, make decisions in case of changes in the environment, optimize some of the process components, and plan future actions. This study models the heavy oil production process in a refinery using the toolkit of GNs. Five processing units producing ten heavy-oil-refined products in an amount of 106.5 t/h from 443 t/h atmospheric residue feed, their blending, pipelines, and a tank farm devoted to storage of finished products consisting of three grades of fuel oil (very low sulfur fuel oil (0.5%S) —3.4 t/h; low sulfur fuel oil (1.0%S) —4.2 t/h; and high sulfur fuel oil (2.5%S) —66.9 t/h), and two grades of road pavement bitumen (bitumen 50/70 —30 t/h and bitumen 70/100 —2 t/h) are modeled in a GN medium. This study completes the process of modeling petroleum product production in an oil refinery using GNs. In this way, it becomes possible to construct a highly hierarchical model that incorporates the models already created for the production of individual petroleum products into a single entity, which allows for a comprehensive analysis of the refinery’s operations and decision making concerning the influence of various factors such as disruptions in the feedstock supply, the occurrence of unplanned shutdowns, optimization of the production process, etc. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Intuitionistic Fuzziness and Parallelism: Theory and Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 1332 KB  
Article
Assessing the Environmental Impact of Eight Alternative Fuels in International Shipping: A Comparison of Marginal vs. Average Emissions
by Gustav Krantz, Christian Moretti, Miguel Brandão, Mikael Hedenqvist and Fritjof Nilsson
Environments 2023, 10(9), 155; https://doi.org/10.3390/environments10090155 - 6 Sep 2023
Cited by 28 | Viewed by 9125
Abstract
Global warming and other environmental concerns drive the search for alternative fuels in international shipping. A life-cycle analysis (LCA) can be utilized to assess the environmental impact of different fuels, thereby enabling the identification of the most sustainable alternative among the candidate fuels. [...] Read more.
Global warming and other environmental concerns drive the search for alternative fuels in international shipping. A life-cycle analysis (LCA) can be utilized to assess the environmental impact of different fuels, thereby enabling the identification of the most sustainable alternative among the candidate fuels. However, most LCA studies do not consider marginal emissions, which are important when predicting the effects of large-scale fuel transitions. The research purpose of this study was to assess the marginal emissions of several currently available marine fuels to facilitate the identification of the most promising marine fuel. Thus, marginal and average emissions for eight marine fuels (high-sulfur fuel oil, very-low-sulfur fuel oil, marine gas oil, liquified natural gas, biomethane, biomethanol, fossil methanol, and hydro-treated vegetable oil) were compared in terms of their environmental impact. Non-intuitively, the results indicate that biofuels exhibit equally or higher marginal greenhouse gas emissions than conventionally used fuel oils (162–270 versus 148–174 kg CO2/MJ propulsion), despite their significantly lower average emissions (19–73 vs. 169–175 kg CO2/MJ). This discrepancy is attributed to the current limited availability of climate-efficient biofuels. Consequently, a large-scale shift to biofuels cannot presently yield substantial reductions in the shipping industry’s climate impact. Additional measures, such as optimized trading routes, more energy-efficient ships, and research on more climate-friendly biofuels and electro-fuels, are thus required to significantly reduce the climate footprint of shipping. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Trends and Innovations in Environmental Impact Assessment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 1062 KB  
Article
New Prospects of Waste Involvement in Marine Fuel Oil: Evolution of Composition and Requirements for Fuel with Sulfur Content up to 0.5%
by Dmitriy V. Nelyubov, Marat I. Fakhrutdinov, Alena A. Sarkisyan, Evgeniy A. Sharin, Mikhail A. Ershov, Ulyana A. Makhova, Alisa E. Makhmudova, Nikita A. Klimov, Marina Y. Rogova, Vsevolod D. Savelenko, Vladimir M. Kapustin, Marina M. Lobashova and Ekaterina O. Tikhomirova
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2023, 11(7), 1460; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11071460 - 22 Jul 2023
Cited by 16 | Viewed by 4774
Abstract
Research was carried out on the possibility of involving oil refining wastes and petrochemical by-products in marine fuel oil. It was shown that the properties of the studied products (VAT distillation residue of butyl alcohols, heavy pyrolysis tar, desalted phenol production tar, waste [...] Read more.
Research was carried out on the possibility of involving oil refining wastes and petrochemical by-products in marine fuel oil. It was shown that the properties of the studied products (VAT distillation residue of butyl alcohols, heavy pyrolysis tar, desalted phenol production tar, waste motor oil mixture) mainly differ from primary and secondary oil refining products used in this fuel with increased toxicity (hazard classes 2 and 3). A clear disadvantage of waste motor oils is an increased content of metals, particularly zinc, calcium and phosphorus, which leads to high ash content. Recommended concentrations for introducing components into marine fuels are given. The influences of the composition and sulfur content on operational properties and quality indexes of VLSFO were also studied. It is shown that the use of products of deep hydrotreatment of vacuum-distillate fractions of oil processing can worsen its protective (anticorrosive) properties and colloidal stability; therefore, a reduction of sulfur content below 0.1% in this fuel is inexpedient without the use of additives. The requirements for VLSFO quality indicators have been developed. Application of VLSFO corresponding to the developed requirements will provide an increase in performance of ship power plants and the stability of VLSFO quality, which will contribute to cost reduction of ship owners when using it. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Marine Renewable Energy and the Transition to a Low Carbon Future)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 4286 KB  
Article
Biodiesel as Dispersant to Improve the Stability of Asphaltene in Marine Very-Low-Sulfur Fuel Oil
by Daping Zhou, Haijun Wei, Zhiwen Tan, Shuye Xue, Ye Qiu and Shen Wu
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2023, 11(2), 315; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11020315 - 2 Feb 2023
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 4554
Abstract
Since the implementation of the sulfur cap legislation in 2020, marine very-low-sulfur fuel oil, often known as VLSFO, has become a crucial source of fuel for the contemporary shipping industry. However, both the production and utilization processes of VLSFO are plagued by the [...] Read more.
Since the implementation of the sulfur cap legislation in 2020, marine very-low-sulfur fuel oil, often known as VLSFO, has become a crucial source of fuel for the contemporary shipping industry. However, both the production and utilization processes of VLSFO are plagued by the poor miscibility of the cutter fraction and the residual fraction, which can result in the precipitation of asphaltene. In this study, biodiesel was chosen as a cutter fraction to improve the stability and compatibility of asphaltene in VLSFO because of its environmental benefit and strong solubility. The average chemical structure of asphaltene derived from the marine low-sulfur fuel oil sample was analyzed using element analysis, FTIR, 1HNMR, and time-flight spectroscopy. The composition of biodiesel was analyzed using GC-MS. It was found that the asphaltene had a feature of a short side chain, low H/C ratio, high aromaticity, and a high proportion of heteroatoms. Both laboratory experiments and molecular dynamic simulations were applied to investigate the dispersion effect and mechanism compared with other dispersants. The dispersion effect of biodiesel was studied using measurements of the initial precipitation point (IPP), dispersion improvement rate, and morphology of asphaltene in the model oil. Experimental results revealed that biodiesel was fully compatible with heavy fuel oil and that it can postpone the IPP from 46% to 54% and increase the dispersion improvement rate to 35%. Molecular dynamics (MDs) simulation results show that biodiesel can form strong interactions with the fused aromatics structures and heteroatoms in the asphaltene; such interactions can increase the solubility of asphaltene and acts as a “connection bridge” to promote the dispersion effect of asphaltene molecules. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Marine Fuels and Green Energy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

39 pages, 14922 KB  
Article
Technological Potential Analysis and Vacant Technology Forecasting in Properties and Composition of Low-Sulfur Marine Fuel Oil (VLSFO and ULSFO) Bunkered in Key World Ports
by Mikhail A. Ershov, Vsevolod D. Savelenko, Alisa E. Makhmudova, Ekaterina S. Rekhletskaya, Ulyana A. Makhova, Vladimir M. Kapustin, Daria Y. Mukhina and Tamer M. M. Abdellatief
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10(12), 1828; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10121828 - 28 Nov 2022
Cited by 43 | Viewed by 8720
Abstract
Analysis of the very-low-sulfur fuel oil (VLSFO) and ultra-low-sulfur fuel oil (ULSFO) bunkered in key ports in Asia, the Middle East, North America, Western Europe, and Russia is presented. The characteristics of said fuels, including density, sulfur content, kinematic viscosity, aluminum and silicon [...] Read more.
Analysis of the very-low-sulfur fuel oil (VLSFO) and ultra-low-sulfur fuel oil (ULSFO) bunkered in key ports in Asia, the Middle East, North America, Western Europe, and Russia is presented. The characteristics of said fuels, including density, sulfur content, kinematic viscosity, aluminum and silicon content, vanadium and nickel content, as well as pour point are investigated. Furthermore, the main trends and correlations are also discussed. Based on the graphical and mathematical analysis of the properties, the composition of the fuels is predicted. The key fuel components in Asian ports, the most important of which is Singapore, are hydrodesulfurized atmospheric residues (AR) (50–70%) and catalytic cracker heavy cycle oil (HCO) (15–35%) with the addition of other components, which is explained by the presence of a number of large oil refining centers in the area. In the Middle East ports, the most used VLSFO compositions are based on available resources of low-sulfur components, namely hydrodesulfurized AR, the production facilities of which were recently built in the region. In European ports, due to the relatively low sulfur content in processed oils, straight-run AR is widely used as a component of low-sulfur marine fuels. In addition, fuels in Western European ports contain on average significantly more hydrotreated vacuum gas oil (21%) than in the rest of the world (4–5%). Finally, a mixture of hydrotreated (80–90%) and straight-run fuel oil (10–15%) with a sulfur content of no more than 2.0–2.5% is used as the base low-sulfur component of marine fuels in the ports of Singapore and the Middle East. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Marine Fuels and Green Energy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 821 KB  
Article
Verification of Fuel Consumption and Carbon Dioxide Emissions under Sulfur Restriction Policy during Oceanographic Navigation
by Hsueh-Chen Shen, Fu-Ming Tzu, Chitsan Lin, Chin-Ko Yeh, Wen-Yen Huang, Han-Pin Pu and Shun-Hsyung Chang
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(19), 9857; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12199857 - 30 Sep 2022
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 6771
Abstract
The paper presents a comparison of the fuel oil (FO) consumption and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions of a container ship’s 8000 twenty-foot equivalent unit (TEU) during oceanographic navigation. The evaluation has two types of FOs: a 3.4% heavy fuel oil with [...] Read more.
The paper presents a comparison of the fuel oil (FO) consumption and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions of a container ship’s 8000 twenty-foot equivalent unit (TEU) during oceanographic navigation. The evaluation has two types of FOs: a 3.4% heavy fuel oil with desulfurization (HFOWD) and a 0.5% very-low-sulfur fuel oil (VLSFO), based on the sulfur cap policy of the International Maritime Organization (IMO). The results show the average FO consumption at 130 tons/day of HFOWD and 141 tons/day of VLSFO, which means shifting to VLSFO increases fuel consumption 8.4% more than the HFOWD. The average CO2 emissions are 429 tons/day of the HFOWD and 471 tons/day of the VLSFO, indicating an 9.5% increase in CO2 emissions when the IMO adopts the low-sulfur fuel policy. Moreover, the VLSFO blending of various chemicals further deteriorates and wears out the main engine of the ship. IMO’s low-sulfur fuel policy significantly reduced the emission of sulfur oxides (SOX) and particulate matter emissions. Still, we should not ignore the fact that adopting VLSFO may cause more CO2 emissions. Therefore, while switching to low-sulfur fuels, the maritime industry should improve the related energy efficiency to reduce fuel consumption and CO2 emissions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Physics and Mechanics of New Materials and Their Applications 2021)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 2094 KB  
Article
Analysis of Characteristic Changes of Blended Very Low Sulfur Fuel Oil on Ultrasonic Frequency for Marine Fuel
by Hae-ji Ju and Soo-kyung Jeon
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10(9), 1254; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10091254 - 5 Sep 2022
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 4877
Abstract
The demand for very low sulfur fuel oil (VLSFO) with a sulfur content of less than 0.5% has increased since the IMO2020 regulations were published. However, most VLSFOs for marine fuel are produced by blending two fuel oils with different sulfur contents, which [...] Read more.
The demand for very low sulfur fuel oil (VLSFO) with a sulfur content of less than 0.5% has increased since the IMO2020 regulations were published. However, most VLSFOs for marine fuel are produced by blending two fuel oils with different sulfur contents, which causes some problems, such as sludge formation. This study investigates the effect of ultrasonic irradiation frequency (25 and 72 kHz), ultrasonic irradiation time (0, 12, and 24 h), and the blending ratio (marine gas oil (MGO) and bunker-A (B-A) with weight ratios of 25:75, 50:50, and 75:25 on the characteristics of blended VLSFO. After 12 h of irradiation time and a frequency of 25 kHz, the amount of carbon residue decreases with increasing MGO content; it decreases by 33% for 75% MGO. However, at 72 kHz, the carbon residue increases with increasing MGO content, implying that the change in carbon residue depends on the ultrasonic frequency. After 24 h, the carbon residue does not decrease in any scenario; however, it does increase in some cases due to asphaltene reaggregation caused by excessive ultrasonic irritation. The sulfur content decreases by approximately 4% for the 100% B-A condition. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Marine Fuels and Green Energy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop