Testimonials

The process of reviewing scientific papers is extremely important. While certainly not as significant as research and the preparation of papers, researchers must still pay due attention to peer review, and publishers must find a way to properly value it. My experience in this regard with MDPI publications is very positive.

Reviewer of Energies

Less

My experience reviewing for MDPI has been highly positive. The review process is well-structured and efficient, providing clear guidelines and evaluation criteria. The platform is user-friendly, and the editorial team is responsive and supportive. This facilitates a smooth and rewarding review experience, allowing me to contribute meaningfully to the scientific community.

Reviewer of Energies

Less

The reviewing system and process are more convenient for reviewers to review manuscripts and submit comments. Flexibility in submitting revisions is one of the merits of the reviewing process of MDPI.

Reviewer of Energies

Less

There was an extremely efficient and pleasant review process. Comments from the first reviewer were provided well before the revisions had to be made. MDPI also gave 7 days for major revisions, which was very good; it provides deadlines similar to other journals for minor revisions. After acceptance, it was published online within 3 to 5 days, which is quite amazing.

Article in Energies: The Degradation Prediction of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Performance Based on a Transformer Model

Less

I'll state it in short words: I like reviewing for MDPI because they care about me as a reviewer, offering a reward for my job and giving it value. They care that the review is appropriate, fast, and reliable. They recognise its importance and demonstrate it.

Reviewer of Energies

Less

I am glad to participate in the review process; I review interesting research papers and many of them are outstanding.

Reviewer of Energies

Less

I would like to commend the MDPI Energies editorial team for their professionalism, efficiency and understanding throughout the process of handling our article submission. All our queries and requests were handled promptly and professionally, and this greatly contributed to a very satisfactory publishing experience for us as the authors. I highly recommend the journal to any authors wishing to publish open access.

Article in Energies: Demand-Side Management as a Network Planning Tool: Review of Drivers, Benefits and Opportunities for South Africa

Less

The process for publishing in MDPI is clear, with a high-quality reviewing process and instructions easy to follow.

Article in Energies: A Polynomial Synthesis Approach to Design and Control an LCL-Filter-Based PWM Rectifier with Extended Functions Validated by SIL Simulations

Less

I started posting on MDPI about 5 years ago. I immediately saw the huge difference with other publishing houses–fast and clear deadlines, criteria for accepting manuscripts and a good professional team. In addition, there is a very good and stimulating system of vouchers and bonuses. For this reason, I no longer use other publishers for magazine publications. Very fast manuscript processing and review process. Maximum service and support from the technical team.

Article in Energies: Short-Term Hydro-Thermal-Solar Scheduling with CCGT Based on Self-Adaptive Genetic Algorithm

Less

Fast process with great and easy communication with the editorial team. We do not feel lost and abandoned like in other major publishers, where it takes so much effort and time to contact anyone.

Article in Energies: Forecasting East and West Coast Gasoline Prices with Tree-Based Machine Learning Algorithms

Less

The provided assistance by the responsible personnel of MDPI in the development of a Special Issue has been very efficient.

Special Issue in Energies: Development of Electrical Machines: Latest Studies and Future Prospects

Less

The reviewing process for all the five papers that I have reviewed was easy and all the steps were clearly explained on the platform.

Reviewer of Energies

Less

MDPI uses an excellent editorial system: easy to use and with good support.

Special Issue in Energies: Energy Transition: Decentralization, Electric Vehicles, and Local Energy Markets

Less

There is timely feedback and encouragement for the revision and improvement of the research articles.

Article in Energies: Issues, Challenges, and Future Perspectives of Perovskites for Energy Conversion Applications

Less

The publication process has clear and precise criteria, and the academic community participating gives very useful reviews that help to improve the presentation of research results. There is a clear and transparent review procedure, which is a kind of scientific discourse, and is extremely necessary in this environment for innovative ideas.

Article in Energies: Empowering Sustainable Energy Solutions through Real-Time Data, Visualization, and Fuzzy Logic

Less

I first knew of MDPI journals several years ago and their efficiency, rigor and support for reviewers and authors have been primordial and of the best quality.

Special Issue in Energies: Energy Water Food Nexus

Less

Very efficient and professional Editorial team. Thank you.

Reviewer of Energies

Less

I have had an extremely positive experience as a manuscript author and reviewer at MDPI. This refers to the exceptional professionalism of the editorial staff in terms of the expeditious process from submission to publication of the manuscript, selection of reviewers, and the monitoring of the flow of each work for potential publication in the journals.

Reviewer of Energies

Less

Enriching, encouraging and satisfying.

Reviewer of Energies

Less

Reviewing for MDPI is a great experience: the platform is easy to handle; if more time is needed to complete the review it is allowed; the editors are kind and try and arrange things. All is good!

Reviewer of Energies

Less